入学过渡期高中新生大五人格与主观社会地位变化轨迹的关系：基于潜变量增长模型的分析

doi:10.12139/j.1672-0628.2022.05.017

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为了考察入学过渡期高中新生主观社会地位（subjective social status, SSS）的变化轨迹及人格在其中的作用，本研究对546名高一新生进行了历时4个月的4次追踪测试。基于潜变量增长模型的分析结果显示：（1）SSS呈阶段化线性增长，且个体间差异显著；（2）人格中的外倾性、宜人性、责任心和开放性均能显著预测SSS的初始水平；（3）外倾性、宜人性和神经质对SSS的第一阶段变化速度有显著预测作用。结果表明，SSS会在新生入学后1个月内初步形成，且人格与其变化轨迹有关。

关键词: 高中新生, 入学过渡期, 大五人格, 主观社会地位, 潜变量增长模型

Abstract: The current study aimed to investigate the developmental trajectory of subjective social status (SSS) and the role of personality dimension of high school freshmen in their transition period. A total of 546 high school freshmen participated in four tests with one-month intervals throughout the first semester of high school. The results of latent growth models showed that: 1) The growth trajectory of SSS of high school freshmen was piecewise linear with significant individual differences. 2) Extraversion, agreeableness, conscientiousness and openness significantly predicted the initial level of SSS. 3) Extraversion, agreeableness and neuroticism significantly predicted the rate of decline in the first stage of SSS. These results suggest that the SSS of high school freshmen is initially reformed within the first month of enrollment, during which personality plays a unique role.

Key words: high school freshman, transition to high school, Big Five personality, subjective social status, latent growth model

中图分类号:

B849

程刚, 邹燕, 余玮, 丁芳媛, 贾云丞. 入学过渡期高中新生大五人格与主观社会地位变化轨迹的关系：基于潜变量增长模型的分析[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(5): 692-699.

CHENG Gang, ZOU Yan, YU Wei, DING Fangyuan, JIA Yuncheng. The Relationship Between the Big Five Personality and the Trajectory of High School Freshmen’s Subjective Social Status During the School Transition Period: A Latent Growth Curve Model[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2022, 20(5): 692-699.

参考文献

程刚, 陈艳红, 关雨生, 张大均. (2015). 大学生主观社会地位的指标构成及特点. 西南大学学报(自然科学版), 37(6), 156–162
程刚, 张大均, 肖友琴, 关雨生, 陈艳红. (2016). 大学新生主观社会地位与抑郁的变化轨迹: 一项多元潜变量增长模型分析. 心理发展与教育, 32(6), 753–760
梁钰苓, 邹泓, 孙鹏, 张文娟. (2013). 青少年人格五因素对其学校人际关系质量的影响. 中国特殊教育, (1), 68–72
聂衍刚, 林崇德, 郑雪, 丁莉, 彭以松. (2008). 青少年社会适应行为与大五人格的关系. 心理科学, 31(4), 774–779
曲可佳, 邹泓, 余益兵. (2010). 青少年孤独感与人格五因素的关系: 人际关系能力的中介作用. 心理学探新, 30(6), 75–80
张卓. (2020) “00后”大学生积极应对方式、人格特质与领悟社会支持的关系. 中国健康心理学杂志, 28(8), 1235–1238.
周颖萍. (2004). 浅析大五人格特质和社会群体地位的关系. 山东教育学院学报, 19(6), 41–43
Anderson, C., John, O. P., Keltner, D., & Kring, A. M. (2001). Who attains social status? Effects of personality and physical attractiveness in social groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(1), 116–132, doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.81.1.116.
Anglim, J., & O’Connor, P. (2019). Measurement and research using the Big Five, HEXACO, and narrow traits: A primer for researchers and practitioners. Australian Journal of Psychology, 71(1), 16–25, doi: 10.1111/ajpy.12202.
Arnett, J. J., Žukauskienė, R, & Sugimura, K. (2014). The new life stage of emerging adulthood at ages 18–29 years: Implications for mental health. The Lancet Psychiatry, 1(7), 569–576, doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(14)00080-7.
Benner, A. D., Boyle, A. E., & Bakhtiari, F. (2017). Understanding students’ transition to high school: Demographic variation and the role of supportive relationships. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 46(10), 2129–2142, doi: 10.1007/s10964-017-0716-2.
Bucciol, A., Cavasso, B., & Zarri, L. (2015). Social status and personality traits. Journal of Economic Psychology, 51, 245–260, doi: 10.1016/j.joep.2015.10.002.
Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Normal personality assessment in clinical practice: The NEO Personality Inventory. Psychological Assessment, 4(1), 5–13, doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.4.1.5.
Cundiff, J. M., & Matthews, K. A. (2017). Is subjective social status a unique correlate of physical health? A meta-analysis. Health Psychology, 36(12), 1109–1125, doi: 10.1037/hea0000534.
Curran, P. J., West, S. G., & Finch, J. F. (1996). The robustness of test statistics to nonnormality and specification error in confirmatory factor analysis. Psychological Methods, 1(1), 16–29, doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.1.1.16.
Du, T. V., Yardley, A. E., & Thomas, K. M. (2021). Mapping big five personality traits within and across domains of interpersonal functioning. Assessment, 28(5), 1358–1375, doi: 10.1177/1073191120913952.
Elder, G. H., Jr. (1998). The life course as developmental theory. Child Development, 69(1), 1–12, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.1998.tb06128.x.
Enz, K. F., & Talarico, J. M. (2016). Forks in the road: Memories of turning points and transitions. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 30(2), 188–195, doi: 10.1002/acp.3176.
Field, R. D., Tobin, R. M., & Reese-Weber, M. (2014). Agreeableness, social self-efficacy, and conflict resolution strategies. Journal of Individual Differences, 35(2), 95–102, doi: 10.1027/1614-0001/a000131.
Harris, K., English, T., Harms, P. D., Gross, J. J., & Jackson, J. J. (2017). Why are extraverts more satisfied? Personality, social experiences, and subjective well-being in college. European Journal of Personality, 31(2), 170–186, doi: 10.1002/per.2101.
Jeung, W. (2013). Exploring the changing effects of individual differences on social status of influence (Unpublished doctorial dissertation). University of Nebraska-Lincoln.
John, O. P., & Srivastava, S. (1999). The Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In L. A. Pervin & O. P. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 102–138). New York: Guilford Press.
Judge, T. A., van Vianen, A. E. M., & De Pater, I. E. (2004). Emotional stability, core self-evaluations, and job outcomes: A review of the evidence and an agenda for future research. Human Performance, 17(3), 325–346, doi: 10.1207/s15327043hup1703_4.
Liu, G. Z., Zhang, D. J., Pan, Y. G., Hu, T. Q., He, N., Chen, W. F., & Wang, Z. (2017). Self-concept clarity and subjective social status as mediators between psychological suzhi and social anxiety in Chinese adolescents. Personality and Individual Differences, 108, 40–44, doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2016.11.067.
Makover, H., Adrian, M., Wilks, C., Read, K., Stoep, A. V., & McCauley, E. (2019). Indicated prevention for depression at the transition to high school: Outcomes for depression and anxiety. Prevention Science, 20(4), 499–509, doi: 10.1007/s11121-019-01005-5.
Marsh, H. W., Seaton, M., Trautwein, U., Lüdtke, O., Hau, K. T., O’Mara, A. J., & Craven, R. G. (2008). The Big-fish-little-pond-effect stands up to critical scrutiny: Implications for theory, methodology, and future research. Educational Psychology Review, 20(3), 319–350, doi: 10.1007/s10648-008-9075-6.
McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (2004). A contemplated revision of the NEO Five-Factor Inventory. Personality and Individual Differences, 36(3), 587–596, doi: 10.1016/S0191-8869(03)00118-1.
Ohannessian, C. M., Milan, S., & Vannucci, A. (2017). Gender differences in anxiety trajectories from middle to late adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 46(4), 826–839, doi: 10.1007/s10964-016-0619-7.
Russell, M. A., & Odgers, C. L. (2020). Adolescents’ subjective social status predicts day-to-day mental health and future substance use. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 30(S2), 532–544, doi: 10.1111/jora.12496.
Song, J., Gaspard, H., Nagengast, B., & Trautwein, U. (2020). The Conscientiousness×Interest Compensation (CONIC) model: Generalizability across domains, outcomes, and predictors. Journal of Educational Psychology, 112(2), 271–287, doi: 10.1037/edu0000379.
Tehrani, H. D., & Yamini, S. (2020). Personality traits and conflict resolution styles: A meta-analysis. Personality and Individual Differences, 157, 109794, doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2019.109794.
van Der Linden, D., Scholte, R. H. J., Cillessen, A. H. N., Nijenhuis, J. T., & Segers, E. (2010). Classroom ratings of likeability and popularity are related to the Big Five and the general factor of personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 44(5), 669–672, doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2010.08.007.
Wu, L. L., Xiao, Y. Q., Chen, Y. H., & Cheng, G. (2021). Family socioeconomic status, subjective social status, and achievement motivation among Chinese college freshmen: A latent growth modeling approach. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 38(7), 2141–2161, doi: 10.1177/02654075211008244.
Ye, J. M., Huang, D. W., Li, Y. L., Liu, L., & Shi, M. W. (2022). Subjective social status of high school freshmen in the transitional period: The impact of extraversion. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 17(2), 971–983, doi: 10.1007/s11482-021-09945-3.
Yu, W., Cheng, G., Huang, J. J., Ding, F. Y., & Jia, Y. C. (2022). Trajectory of first-year students’ depressive mood after the transition to high school: The role of personality dimensions. School Psychology International, 43(1), 38–54, doi: 10.1177/01430343211049113.

[1]	姚文玉, 张雯, 刘影, 张思敏, 丁雪辰, 徐刚敏. 儿童抑郁水平与学业成绩的发展轨迹：基于平行潜变量增长模型[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(2): 223-229.
[2]	曾练平, 田丹丹, 黄亚夫, 赵守盈. 中小学教师人格类型及其对工作家庭平衡与工作绩效关系的调节作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(2): 280-286.
[3]	李昌竹, 郑士春, 陆梭, 张雨青, 刘正奎. 心率变异性与人格的神经质之间关系研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(2): 275-280.
[4]	缪佩君, 谢姗姗, 陈则飞, 连榕. 幼儿教师心理弹性与职业倦怠的关系：大五人格的中介效应[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2018, 16(4): 512-517.
[5]	程刚, 张大均. 家庭社会经济地位对大学新生抑郁情绪的影响：有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2018, 16(2): 247-252.
[6]	刘丹, 张建新, 张明妍. 纪检干部腐败容忍度与其组织忠诚的关系[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2018, 16(1): 130-138.
[7]	冯永辉, 彭运石. 青少年压力与吸烟行为的关系：人格与性别的调节作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2017, 15(5): 697-701.
[8]	周浩, 龙立荣. 组织员工的工作疏离感: 人格特质与工作特征的交互效应^*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2017, 15(3): 385-391.
[9]	赵雅文, 高岩研, 刘拓, 杨海波, 闫国利. 人格特质对微信用户朋友圈点赞行为动机影响的研究*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2017, 15(2): 270-275.
[10]	胡雯, 杨静, 王有智, 王丽. 人格特质测验的情境差异––兼谈职业应聘情境中心理测验作假的识别与控制[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2015, 13(6): 817-822.
[11]	陈志霞，李启明. 不同年龄群体大五人格与幸福感关系^*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2014, 12(5): 633-638.
[12]	李洪玉,王蕊. 情绪智力在大五人格与学业满意度之间的中介效应[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2009, 7(3): 176-182.