注视喜欢效应中的采择机制

doi:10.12139/j.1672-0628.2023.02.006

心理与行为研究 ›› 2023, Vol. 21 ›› Issue (2): 185-192.DOI: 10.12139/j.1672-0628.2023.02.006

注视喜欢效应中的采择机制

周菘¹, 冷漫¹, 蒋涛², 孙艺涵³, 管庆丽¹, 李士一⁴

1. 福建师范大学心理学院, 福州 350117;
2. 外交学院区域与国别比较外交研究中心, 北京 100037;
3. 天津师范大学国际教育交流学院, 天津 300387;
4. 教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地天津师范大学心理与行为研究院, 天津师范大学心理学部, 学生心理发展与学习天津市高校社会科学实验室, 天津 300387

收稿日期:2022-07-08 出版日期:2023-03-20 发布日期:2023-03-20
通讯作者: 李士一,E-mail:elevenny@163.com
基金资助:
福建省自然科学基金项目(2022J05045)

Perspective Taking in Gaze-Liking-Effect

ZHOU Song¹, LENG Man¹, JIANG Tao², SUN Yihan³, GUAN Qingli¹, LI Shiyi⁴

1. School of Psychology, Fujian Normal University, Fujian 350117;
2. Research Center for Regional and National Comparative Diplomacy, China Foreign Affairs University, Beijing 100037;
3. College of International Education and Exchange, Tianjin Normal University, Tianjin 300387;
4. Key Research Base of Humanities and Social Sciences of the Ministry of Education, Academy of Psychology and Behavior, Faculty of Psychology, Tianjin Social Science Laboratory of Students' Mental Development and Learning, Tianjin Normal University, Tianjin 300387

Received:2022-07-08 Online:2023-03-20 Published:2023-03-20

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为探究视觉观点采择在注视喜欢效应产生过程中的作用，对点观点采择范式进行改编，通过操纵字母位置来改变其对于虚拟人的可见性，要求被试对虚拟人可见或不可见字母的喜爱程度做出评价。结果发现，被试对虚拟人可见字母的喜爱程度显著高于不可见字母，且这种喜欢效应的产生不是由他人的注意力引导或目标物的位置决定的，而是由于人们对他人的视觉观点信息进行了加工，从而引发了对他人可见字母的喜欢效应。结果表明，视觉观点采择在喜欢效应的产生机制中起着重要作用。

关键词: 注视喜欢效应, 视觉观点采择, 社会认知

Abstract: Gaze plays an important role in transmitting information in social interactions. People are cued by the direction of others’ attention and respond faster to the target object looking toward rather than away from it. Current evidence suggests that eye gaze also led to changes in people’s affective evaluation of objects. Compared with objects that are looked away, people usually have a higher degree of liking for objects that are looked at by others, which is called the gaze-liking-effect. However, it is still unclear how visual perspective taking influence the processing mechanism of the gaze-liking-effect. Therefore, we adapted the classical dots perspective task, and manipulated the position of letters to change their visibility to the agent. Subsequently, participants were asked to provide ratings related to their preferences for different letters. The results of the three experiments showed that participants preferred the visible letters of the agent to the invisible letters. More importantly, we observed that the gaze-liking-effect was not due to the attentional cues or positional distance of the target stimulus. Instead, our findings suggest that this effect is mediated by the ability to infer others’ visual perspectives, implying a social and cognitive basis for the gaze-liking-effect. In conclusion, visual perspective taking plays an important role in the generation of the gaze-liking-effect.

Key words: gaze-liking-effect, visual perspective taking, social cognition

中图分类号:

B842

周菘, 冷漫, 蒋涛, 孙艺涵, 管庆丽, 李士一. 注视喜欢效应中的采择机制[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2023, 21(2): 185-192.

ZHOU Song, LENG Man, JIANG Tao, SUN Yihan, GUAN Qingli, LI Shiyi. Perspective Taking in Gaze-Liking-Effect[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2023, 21(2): 185-192.

参考文献

李丹惠, 杜建刚, 李晓楠. (2022). 注视线索对消费者的影响机制. 心理科学进展, 30(11), 2607–2618
杨继平, 王兴超, 杨力. (2014). 观点采择对大学生网络偏差行为的影响: 道德推脱的中介作用. 心理科学, 37(3), 633–638
于祎雯, 纪皓月, 王莉, 蒋毅. (2020). 眼睛注视线索对物体认知加工的影响及其机制. 生物化学与生物物理进展, 47(11), 1145–1161
Baron-Cohen, S. (1995). Mindblindness: An essay on autism and theory of mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Bayliss, A. P., Frischen, A., Fenske, M. J., & Tipper, S. P. (2007). Affective evaluations of objects are influenced by observed gaze direction and emotional expression. Cognition, 104(3), 644–653.
Bayliss, A. P., Paul, M. A., Cannon, P. R., & Tipper, S. P. (2006). Gaze cuing and affective judgments of objects: I like what you look at. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13(6), 1061–1066.
Bayliss, A. P., Schuch, S., & Tipper, S. P. (2010). Gaze cueing elicited by emotional faces is influenced by affective context. Visual Cognition, 18(8), 1214–1232.
Callejas, A., Shulman, G. L., & Corbetta, M. (2014). Dorsal and ventral attention systems underlie social and symbolic cueing. Journal of cognitive neuroscience, 26(1), 63–80.
Canadas, E., & Schmid Mast, M. (2017). Drawn towards what others seem to like: Implicit preference for objects and people looked at with a Duchenne smile. Motivation and Emotion, 41(5), 628–635.
Capozzi, F., Bayliss, A. P., Elena, M. R., & Becchio, C. (2015). One is not enough: Group size modulates social gaze-induced object desirability effects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 22(3), 850–855.
Capozzi, F., & Ristic, J. (2020). Attention AND mentalizing? Reframing a debate on social orienting of attention. Visual Cognition, 28(2), 97–105.
Colombatto, C., Chen, Y. C., & Scholl, B. J. (2020). Gaze deflection reveals how gaze cueing is tuned to extract the mind behind the eyes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 117(33), 19825–19829.
Cooney, S., Dignam, H., & Brady, N. (2015). Heads first: Visual aftereffects reveal hierarchical integration of cues to social attention. PLoS One, 10(9), e0135742.
Corneille, O., Mauduit, S., Holland, R. W., & Strick, M. (2009). Liking products by the head of a dog: Perceived orientation of attention induces valence acquisition. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(1), 234–237.
Dalmaso, M., Castelli, L., & Galfano, G. (2020). Social modulators of gaze-mediated orienting of attention: A review. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 27(5), 833–855.
Driver, J., IV, Davis, G., Ricciardelli, P., Kidd, P., Maxwell, E., & Baron-Cohen, S. (1999). Gaze perception triggers reflexive visuospatial orienting. Visual Cognition, 6(5), 509–540.
Emery, N. J. (2000). The eyes have it: The neuroethology, function and evolution of social gaze. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 24(6), 581–604.
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A. G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 1149–1160.
Freundlieb, M., Kovács, Á. M., & Sebanz, N. (2018). Reading your mind while you are reading—Evidence for spontaneous visuospatial perspective taking during a semantic categorization task. Psychological Science, 29(4), 614–622.
Frischen, A., Bayliss, A. P., & Tipper, S. P. (2007). Gaze cueing of attention: Visual attention, social cognition, and individual differences. Psychological Bulletin, 133(4), 694–724.
Grynszpan, O., Martin, J. C., & Fossati, P. (2017). Gaze leading is associated with liking. Acta Psychologica, 173, 66–72.
Hadjidimitrakis, K., Breveglieri, R., Placenti, G., Bosco, A., Sabatini, S. P., & Fattori, P. (2011). Fix your eyes in the space you could reach: Neurons in the macaque medial parietal cortex prefer gaze positions in peripersonal space. PLoS One, 6(8), e23335.
Kaisler, R. E., & Leder, H. (2016). Trusting the looks of others: Gaze effects of faces in social settings. Perception, 45(8), 875–892.
Landes, T. L., Kashima, Y., & Howe, P. D. L. (2016). Investigating the effect of gaze cues and emotional expressions on the affective evaluations of unfamiliar faces. PLoS ONE, 11(9), e0162695.
Manera, V., Elena, M. R., Bayliss, A. P., & Becchio, C. (2014). When seeing is more than looking: Intentional gaze modulates object desirability. Emotion, 14(4), 824–832.
Manssuer, L. R., Pawling, R., Hayes, A. E., & Tipper, S. P. (2016). The role of emotion in learning trustworthiness from eye-gaze: Evidence from facial electromyography. Cognitive Neuroscience, 7(1–4), 82–102.
Martin, R., Kusev, P., & van Schaik, P. (2021). Autonomous vehicles: How perspective-taking accessibility alters moral judgments and consumer purchasing behavior. Cognition, 212, 104666.
McKay, K. T., Grainger, S. A., Coundouris, S. P., Skorich, D. P., Phillips, L. H., & Henry, J. D. (2021). Visual attentional orienting by eye gaze: A meta-analytic review of the gaze-cueing effect. Psychological Bulletin, 147(12), 1269–1289.
Mitsuda, T., & Masaki, S. (2018). Subliminal gaze cues increase preference levels for items in the gaze direction. Cognition and Emotion, 32(5), 1146–1151.
Mitsuda, T., Otani, M., & Sugimoto, S. (2019). Gender and individual differences in cueing effects: Visuospatial attention and object likability. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 81(6), 1890–1900.
Moors, P., Germeys, F., Pomianowska, I., & Verfaillie, K. (2015). Perceiving where another person is looking: The integration of head and body information in estimating another person’s gaze. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 909.
Moors, P., Verfaillie, K., Daems, T., Pomianowska, I., & Germeys, F. (2016). The effect of head orientation on perceived gaze direction: Revisiting Gibson and Pick (1963) and Cline (1967). Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1191.
Samson, D., Apperly, I. A., Braithwaite, J. J., Andrews, B. J., & Bodley Scott, S. E. (2010). Seeing it their way: Evidence for rapid and involuntary computation of what other people see. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36(5), 1255–1266.
Samuel, S., Hagspiel, K., Eacott, M. J., & Cole, G. G. (2021). Visual perspective-taking and image-like representations: We don’t see it. Cognition, 210, 104607.
Shimojo, S., Simion, C., Shimojo, E., & Scheier, C. (2003). Gaze bias both reflects and influences preference. Nature Neuroscience, 6(12), 1317–1322.
Tipples, J. (2002). Eye gaze is not unique: Automatic orienting in response to uninformative arrows. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9(2), 314–318.
Tipples, J., Dodd, M., Grubaugh, J., & Kingstone, A. (2019). Verbal descriptions of cue direction affect object desirability. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 471.
Tipples, J., & Pecchinenda, A. (2019). A closer look at the size of the gaze-liking effect: A preregistered replication. Cognition and Emotion, 33(3), 623–629.
Ulloa, J. L., Marchetti, C., Taffou, M., & George, N. (2015). Only your eyes tell me what you like: Exploring the liking effect induced by other’s gaze. Cognition and Emotion, 29(3), 460–470.
van der Weiden, A., Veling, H., & Aarts, H. (2010). When observing gaze shifts of others enhances object desirability. Emotion, 10(6), 939–943.
Vestner, T., Gray, K. L. H., & Cook, R. (2022). Sensitivity to orientation is not unique to social attention cueing. Scientific Reports, 12(1), 5059.
Zhao, X., & Malle, B. F. (2022). Spontaneous perspective taking toward robots: The unique impact of humanlike appearance. Cognition, 224, 105076.

[1]	姚崇, 赵可欣, 周晨琛, 崔萌筱, 王党, 游旭群. 公费教育政策满意度对师范生教师职业认同的影响—社会认知因素的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(2): 241-247.
[2]	刘立立, 缴润凯. 高中生生涯学习经验问卷的编制及信效度检验[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2018, 16(2): 238-246.
[3]	王荣,桑标,李亚真. 4-8年级儿童同伴关系中的内隐认知偏差[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2016, 14(3): 338-345.
[4]	宋娟，张振，黄亮，王益文. 基础认知与社会认知中内隐过程及其脑机制^*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2014, 12(4): 572-580.
[5]	云祥，李小平. 权力感的无意识启动:方法研究^*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2014, 12(3): 315-320.
[6]	归纳推论—演绎推论的不对称性在中国文化背景下的表现. 归纳推论—演绎推论的不对称性在中国文化背景下的表现[J]. , 2009, 7(1): 56-60.
[7]	朱滢,隋洁. 社会认知神经科学——一个很有前途的交叉学科[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2004, 2(2): 401-404.

注视喜欢效应中的采择机制

Perspective Taking in Gaze-Liking-Effect

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 7

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价