净脏启动对道德判断的影响：有调节的中介效应

doi:10.12139/j.1672-0628.2023.02.007

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为探讨净脏启动对道德判断的影响以及道德自我意象的中介作用和负性道德情绪与道德敏感性的调节作用，采用净脏身体启动、负性道德情绪问卷、道德自我意象量表、道德敏感性问卷和道德两难故事判断对449名大学生进行调查。结果发现：(1)净脏启动直接影响道德判断；(2)净脏启动通过道德自我意象的中介作用间接影响道德判断；(3)道德自我意象的中介作用受负性道德情绪和道德敏感性的调节，对于高负性道德情绪和高道德敏感性的个体而言，中介作用更强。研究结果有助于揭示道德判断的内在形成机制，并为道德判断进行干预提供了参考依据。

关键词: 净脏启动, 道德判断, 道德自我意象, 负性道德情绪, 道德敏感性

Abstract: This study aimed to explore the influence of clean-dirty priming on moral judgment, as well as the mediating effect of moral self-image and the moderating effect of negative moral emotion and moral sensitivity. A total of 449 college students were investigated with clean-dirty priming, negative moral emotion, moral self-image, moral sensitivity questionnaire and moral dilemma story judgment. The results showed that: 1) clean-dirty priming directly affected moral judgment; 2) clean-dirty priming indirectly affected moral judgment through the intermediary role of moral self-image; 3) the mediating effect of clean-dirty priming on moral judgment through moral self-image was regulated by negative moral emotion and moral sensitivity. To be specific, for individuals with high negative moral emotion and high moral sensitivity, such mediating effect was stronger. The results reveal the internal mechanism of clean-dirty priming on moral judgments, and provide a reference for the intervention of moral judgments.

Key words: clean-dirty priming, moral judgment, moral self-image, negative moral emotion, moral sensivity

中图分类号:

B842

丁凤琴, 马小红. 净脏启动对道德判断的影响：有调节的中介效应[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2023, 21(2): 193-199.

DING Fengqin, MA Xiaohong. The Influence of Clean Dirty Priming on Moral Judgment: Moderated Mediation Effect[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2023, 21(2): 193-199.

参考文献

丁凤琴, 孙逸舒. (2020). 具身视角下道德概念净脏隐喻的特征、影响因素与未来展望. 心理科学, 43(6), 1327–1332
丁凤琴, 王喜梅, 刘钊. (2017). 道德概念净脏隐喻及其对道德判断的影响. 心理发展与教育, 33(6), 666–674
郭瑞. (2014). 清洁启动对道德判断的影响 (硕士学位论文). 湖南师范大学, 长沙.
唐芳贵, 岑国桢. (2011). 德性自我意象、道德情绪与行为自我管理: 对大学生的一项交叉滞后研究. 心理科学, 34(2), 371–375
伍秋萍, 冯聪, 陈斌斌. (2011). 具身框架下的社会认知研究述评. 心理科学进展, 19(3), 336–345
徐平, 迟毓凯. (2007). 道德判断的社会直觉模型述评. 心理科学, 30(2), 403–405
阎书昌. (2011). 身体洁净与道德. 心理科学进展, 19(8), 1242–1248
杨素真, 黄雪梅. (2019). 道德敏感性与道德判断——农村留守儿童与非留守儿童的比较研究. 教育观察, 8(5), 15–16
张静, 陈巍. (2021). 对话心智与身体: 具身认知的内感受研究转向. 心理科学, 44(1), 30–36
郑信军, 岑国桢. (2008). 大学生倾向性道德敏感的结构研究. 心理科学, 31(5), 1026–1030
Barsalou, L. W. (2008). Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 617–645.
Baumert, A., Gollwitzer, M., Staubach, M., & Schmitt, M. (2011). Justice sensitivity and the processing of justice-related information. European Journal of Personality, 25(5), 386–397.
Bolin, J. H. (2014). Andrew F. Hayes (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: The Guilford Press. Journal of Educational Measurement, 51(3), 335–337.
Cornelissen, G., Bashshur, M. R., Rode, J., & Le Menestrel, M. (2013). Rules or consequences? The role of ethical mind-sets in moral dynamics. Psychological Science, 24(4), 482–488.
Cornelissen, G., Pandelaere, M., Warlop, L., & Dewitte, S. (2008). Positive cueing: Promoting sustainable consumer behavior by cueing common environmental behaviors as environmental. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 25(1), 46–55.
Cramwinckel, F. M., De Cremer, D., & Van Dijke, M. (2013). Dirty hands make dirty leaders?! The effects of touching dirty objects on rewarding unethical subordinates as a function of a leader’s self-interest. Journal of Business Ethics, 115(1), 93–100.
Dijksterhuis, A., & Bargh, J. A. (2001). The perception-behavior expressway: Automatic effects of social perception on social behavior. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 33, 1–40.
Hong, J. W., & Sun, Y. C. (2012). Warm it up with love: The effect of ephysical coldness on liking of romance movies. Journal of Consumer Research, 39(2), 293–306.
Janoff-Bulman, R., Sheikh, S., & Hepp, S. (2009). Proscriptive versus prescriptive morality: Two faces of moral regulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(3), 521–537.
Jordan, J., Leliveld, M. C., & Tenbrunsel, A. E. (2015). The Moral Self-Image Scale: Measuring and understanding the malleability of the moral self. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1878.
Jordan, J., Mullen, E., & Murnighan, J. K. (2011). Striving for the moral self: The effects of recalling past moral actions on future moral behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37(5), 701–713.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Landy, J. F., & Goodwin, G. P. (2015). Does incidental disgust amplify moral judgment? A meta-analytic review of experimental evidence. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10(4), 518–536.
Lee, S. W. S., & Schwarz, N. (2010). Dirty hands and dirty mouths: Embodiment of the moral-purity metaphor is specific to the motor modality involved in moral transgression. Psychological Science, 21(10), 1423–1425.
Lobel, T. E., Cohen, A., Kalay Shahin, L., Malov, S., Golan, Y., & Busnach, S. (2015). Being clean and acting dirty: The paradoxical effect of self-cleansing. Ethics & Behavior, 25(4), 307–313.
Ma, Y. N., & Han, S. H. (2010). Why we respond faster to the self than to others? An implicit positive association theory of self-advantage during implicit face recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36(3), 619–633.
Rest, J. R. (1982). A psychologist looks at the teaching of ethics. The Hastings Center Report, 12(1), 29–36.
Schnall, S., Benton, J., & Harvey, S. (2008). With a clean conscience: Cleanliness reduces the severity of moral judgments. Psychological Science, 19(12), 1219–1222.
Schnall, S., Haidt, J., Clore, G. L., & Jordan, A. H. (2008). Disgust as embodied moral judgment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34(8), 1096–1109.
Stafford, L. D., Fleischman, D. S., Le Her, N., & Hummel, T. (2018). Exploring the emotion of disgust: Differences in smelling and feeling. Chemosensors, 6(1), 9.
Tang, H. H., Lu, X. P., Su, R., Liang, Z. L., Mai, X., & Liu, C. (2017). Washing away your sins in the brain: Physical cleaning and priming of cleaning recruit different brain networks after moral threat. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 12(7), 1149–1158.
West, C., & Zhong, C. B. (2015). Moral cleansing. Current Opinion in Psychology, 6, 221–225.
Williams, L. E., & Bargh, J. A. (2008). Experiencing physical warmth promotes interpersonal warmth. Science, 322(5901), 606–607.
Yan, Z. X., Ding, D. Q., & Yan, L. S. (2011). To wash your body, or purify your soul: Physical cleansing would strengthen the sense of high moral character. Psychology, 2(9), 992–997.
Yang, Q., Wu, X. C., Zhou, X. Y., Mead, N. L., Vohs, K. D., & Baumeister, R. F. (2013). Diverging effects of clean versus dirty money on attitudes, values, and interpersonal behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104(3), 473–489.
Zhong, C. B., & Liljenquist, K. (2006). Washing away your sins: Threatened morality and physical cleansing. Science, 313(5792), 1451–1452.
Zhong, C. B., Strejcek, B., & Sivanathan, N. (2010). A clean self can render harsh moral judgment. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46(5), 859–862.