词汇加工中视觉干扰效应及影响因素

doi:10.12139/j.1672-0628.2024.02.006

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

采用词汇判断任务，以中文词语、面孔图片和韩文非词为实验材料，通过三个实验考察了词汇加工中视觉干扰效应及影响因素。结果发现：(1)视野内的干扰材料会减慢目标词汇加工的速度；(2)词汇加工的干扰效应受到干扰材料和目标材料类别一致性的调节，同类别材料会引起更强的干扰效应。结果说明，词汇加工中视觉干扰效应可能反映了同类别的干扰刺激和目标刺激在类别特异性加工脑区内的资源竞争。

关键词: 词汇加工, 词汇判断任务, 视觉干扰效应, 类别特异性加工

Abstract:

This study conducted three experiments, in which Chinese words, facial images, and Korean nonwords were used as materials. By using a lexical decision task, this study aimed to explore the visual interference effect during word processing and its influential factors. The results showed that: 1) The interference materials in the visual field slowed down the reading speed of target word processing. 2) The visual interference effect was regulated by the category consistency between the interference materials and the target materials, in which the materials belonging to the same category produced a stronger interference effect. These results suggest that the visual interference effect during word processing might be accounted by the potential competition for neural resources in the category-specific brain area.

Key words: word processing, lexical decision task, visual interference effect, category-specific processing

顾啦啦, 孙悦, 梅磊磊. 词汇加工中视觉干扰效应及影响因素[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2024, 22(2): 189-196.

Lala GU, Yue SUN, Leilei MEI. Visual Interference Effect During Word Processing and Its Influential Factors[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2024, 22(2): 189-196.

图/表 9

图1 实验1材料示例及任务流程图

表1 实验1三种实验条件下的平均反应时和正确率

条件	反应时(ms)	正确率(%)
无干扰	612(66)	96.4(3.4)
3词语	619(78)	96.3(3.1)
6词语	623(67)	95.4(4.0)

图2 实验1三种实验条件下词汇判断任务的反应时(A)及正确率(B) 注：*p<0.05，**p<0.01，***p<0.001，以下同。

图3 实验2三种实验材料示例

表2 实验2三种实验条件下的平均反应时和正确率

条件	反应时(ms)	正确率(%)
6面孔	637(97)	95.8(3.3)
3面孔3词语	650(93)	95.3(4.3)
6词语	649(95)	95.3(4.2)

图4 实验2三种实验条件下词汇判断任务的反应时(A)及正确率(B)

图5 实验3三种实验材料示例

表3 实验3三种实验条件下的平均反应时和正确率

条件	反应时(ms)	正确率(%)
6韩词	636(84)	97.8(2.1)
3韩词3中词	646(86)	97.2(2.4)
6中词	644(91)	97.4(2.7)

图6 实验3三种实验条件下词汇判断任务的反应时(A)及正确率(B)

参考文献 0

	龚栩, 黄宇霞, 王妍, 罗跃嘉. 中国面孔表情图片系统的修订. 中国心理卫生杂志, 2011, 25 (1): 40- 46. DOI
	华巧云. (2018). 相似性、邻近性和工作记忆负载对视觉工作记忆表征的影响(硕士学位论文). 山东师范大学, 济南.
	黄发杰, 孟迎芳, 邵丹妮. 提取干扰对知觉和概念启动的影响. 心理科学, 2020, 43 (6): 1289- 1295.
	黄子立, 丁玉珑, 曲折. 特征注意的全局性调制作用——增强还是抑制. 心理科学进展, 2020, 28 (4): 566- 578.
	王瑞明, 莫雷, 冷英. 我国文本阅读研究的回顾与展望. 内蒙古师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2009, 22 (2): 72- 76.
	张蕾, 鲁成柔, 林军凤, 梅磊磊. 学习材料组块方式对相似词长时记忆的影响. 心理学报, 2019, 51 (3): 280- 292.
	周琳, 王权红, 苗俊杰, 熊荣敏. 词汇判断下的声旁家族促进: 语音总激活的作用. 心理学进展, 2021, 11 (5): 1316- 1326.
	朱翠银. (2018). 儿童汉字工作记忆发展(硕士学位论文). 浙江师范大学, 金华.
	Bays, P. M., & Husain, M. Dynamic shifts of limited working memory resources in human vision. Science, 2008, 321 (5890): 851- 854. DOI
	Caffarra, S., Karipidis, I. I., Yablonski, M., & Yeatman, J. D. Anatomy and physiology of word-selective visual cortex: From visual features to lexical processing. Brain Structure and Function, 2021, 226 (9): 3051- 3065. DOI
	Cai, Q., & Brysbaert, M. SUBTLEX-CH: Chinese word and character frequencies based on film subtitles. PLoS One, 2010, 5 (6): e10729. DOI
	Chen, L., Perfetti, C., Leng, Y., & Li, Y. Word superiority effect for native Chinese readers and low-proficiency Chinese learners. Applied Psycholinguistics, 2018, 39 (6): 1097- 1115. DOI
	Chen, Z. Q., Luo, B. Y., Xu, M. W., Shang, D. S., & Liang, H. Visual word form processing in the right hemisphere: Evidence from neuropsychological investigations in two Chinese patients with a splenium lesion. Aphasiology, 2013, 27 (10): 1200- 1213. DOI
	Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.
	Dehaene, S., Cohen, L., Sigman, M., & Vinckier, F. The neural code for written words: A proposal. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2005, 9 (7): 335- 341. DOI
	Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A. G. Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 2009, 41 (4): 1149- 1160. DOI
	Fougnie, D., & Marois, R. Distinct capacity limits for attention and working memory. Psychological Science, 2006, 17 (6): 526- 534. DOI
	Hirotani, M., Frazier, L., & Rayner, K. Punctuation and intonation effects on clause and sentence wrap-up: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Memory and Language, 2006, 54 (3): 425- 443. DOI
	Jha, A. P., Fabian, S. A., & Aguirre, G. K. (2004). The role of prefrontal cortex in resolving distractor interference. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 4(4), 517–527.
	Kemper, S., Crow, A., & Kemtes, K. Eye-fixation patterns of high-and low-span young and older adults: Down the garden path and back again. Psychology and Aging, 2004, 19 (1): 157- 170. DOI
	Li, S., Li, L., Wang, J. X., McGowan, V. A., & Paterson, K. B. Effects of word length on eye guidance differ for young and older Chinese readers. Psychology and Aging, 2018, 33 (4): 685- 692. DOI
	Luck, S. J., & Vogel, E. K. The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions. Nature, 1997, 390 (6657): 279- 281. DOI
	Luo, C. H., Chen, W., & Zhang, Y. The inversion effect for Chinese characters is modulated by radical organization. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 2017, 46 (3): 791- 803. DOI
	Ma, Y. N., & Han, S. H. Functional dissociation of the left and right fusiform gyrus in self-face recognition. Human Brain Mapping, 2012, 33 (10): 2255- 2267. DOI
	Mate, J., & Baqués, J. Short article: Visual similarity at encoding and retrieval in an item recognition task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 2009, 62 (7): 1277- 1284. DOI
	Rossion, B., & Jacques, C. Does physical interstimulus variance account for early electrophysiological face sensitive responses in the human brain? Ten lessons on the N170. Neuroimage, 2008, 39 (4): 1959- 1979. DOI
	Spronk, M., Vogel, E. K., & Jonkman, L. M. No behavioral or ERP evidence for a developmental lag in visual working memory capacity or filtering in adolescents and adults with ADHD. PLoS One, 2013, 8 (5): e62673. DOI
	Woolnough, O., Donos, C., Rollo, P. S., Forseth, K. J., Lakretz, Y., Crone, N. E., … Tandon, N. Spatiotemporal dynamics of orthographic and lexical processing in the ventral visual pathway. Nature Human Behaviour, 2021, 5 (3): 389- 398.
	Zhang, Q., Li, S. X., Wang, X. S., & Che, X. W. The effects of direction similarity in visual working memory: Behavioural and event-related potential studies. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 2016, 69 (9): 1812- 1830. DOI

[1]	赵赛男, 李琳, 张俐娟, 王敬欣. 汉语阅读中高限制性语境对不可预测词加工的影响：眼动研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(6): 736-742.
[2]	刘志方, 曾台燊, 柴林, 陈朝阳, 仝文. 失聪学生阅读中的词汇加工特点：消失文本证据[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(5): 592-598.
[3]	俞锦旺, 孟珠, 秦钊, 邓志洲, 赵绍晨, 闫国利. 中文词汇加工过程中的无关言语效应[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(5): 611-617.
[4]	赵冰洁, 王永胜, 陈茗静, 李馨, 闫国利, 白学军. 双字词整词加工与词素加工在眼跳目标选择中的作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2018, 16(6): 721-734.
[5]	蔡超群；孟迎芳. 双语词汇理解切换中非目标语言加工[J]. , 2013, 11(1): 55-60.
[6]	武宁宁, 舒华. Gating范式：探讨听觉词汇加工的途径[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2003, 1(2): 105-109.