不同效价敬畏促进青少年合作行为：顺应需要和安静自我的作用

doi:10.12139/j.1672-0628.2026.03.010

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

本研究基于敬畏的安静自我假说及自我变革效应，通过两项实验考察不同效价敬畏对青少年合作行为的影响及顺应需要、安静自我的作用。结果发现：积极、消极敬畏均能促进青少年合作行为(实验1)；积极、消极敬畏均能通过顺应需要、安静自我的链式中介作用促进合作行为，但仅积极敬畏能通过安静自我的单独中介作用促进合作行为(实验2)。研究结果有助于敬畏亲社会效应的广泛推论，揭示不同效价敬畏促进合作行为的机制异同。

关键词: 合作行为, 敬畏, 效价, 顺应需要, 安静自我

Abstract:

Drawing on the quiet ego hypothesis and the self-transcendence effect of awe, the present study examined the effects of awe with different valences on adolescents’ cooperative behavior, as well as the roles of the need for accommodation and the quiet ego, using two experiments. The results indicated that both positive and negative awe significantly promoted adolescents’ cooperative behavior (Experiment 1). Furthermore, both positive and negative awe promoted cooperative behavior through the chain mediation of the need for accommodation and the quiet ego, whereas only positive awe facilitated cooperative behavior through the mediation of the quiet ego (Experiment 2). These findings provide further evidence for the prosocial effects of awe and elucidate the similarities and differences in the underlying mechanisms by which awe of different valences promotes cooperative behavior.

Key words: cooperative behavior, awe, valence, need for accommodation, quiet ego

中图分类号:

B844

吴琴, 韩宪国, 崔丽莹, 贺雯. 不同效价敬畏促进青少年合作行为：顺应需要和安静自我的作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2026, 24(3): 359-366.

Qin WU, Xianguo HAN, Liying CUI, Wen HE. The Promotion of Adolescent Cooperative Behavior by Awe with Different Valences: The Roles of Need for Accommodation and Quiet Ego[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2026, 24(3): 359-366.

图/表 7

参考文献 0

	崔丽莹, 卜炜玮, 高权丽, 吴琴, 黄瑶, 韩宪国, 罗俊龙. 歧视知觉对初中生的合作倾向与行为的影响. 心理学报, 2022, 54 (3): 259- 269.
	董蕊, 彭凯平, 喻丰. 积极情绪之敬畏. 心理科学进展, 2013, 21 (11): 1996- 2005.
	李涛, 李永红, 宋慧, 高冉, 冯菲. 焦虑中的安全行为及其影响. 心理科学进展, 2022, 30 (9): 2067- 2077.
	林荣茂, 余巧华, 胡添祥, 张九妹, 叶玉珊, 连榕. 敬畏感与亲社会行为关系的三水平和结构方程模型元分析. 心理学报, 2025, 57 (4): 631- 651.
	刘国华. 安静自我量表(QES)中文版适用性初探. 中国健康心理学杂志, 2018, 26 (7): 1091- 1093.
	王笑笑, 王伊萌, 汪凤炎. 敬畏与智慧推理: 正负效价的分离机制. 心理与行为研究, 2025, 23 (1): 17- 24. DOI
	熊承清, 许佳颖, 马丹阳, 刘永芳. 囚徒困境博弈中对手面部表情对合作行为的影响及其作用机制. 心理学报, 2021, 53 (8): 919- 932.
	张丽, 潘霈霖, 牛梓瑜, 马敏. 安静自我: 基于平衡和成长视角的理解. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40 (2): 288- 297.
	赵小红, 童薇, 陈桃林, 吴冬梅, 张蕾, 陈正举, … 唐小蓉. 敬畏的心理模型及其认知神经机制. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29 (3): 520- 530.
	赵越, 胡小勇, 马佳馨. 敬畏的亲社会效应: 小我与真我的作用. 心理科学进展, 2023, 31 (11): 2171- 2182. DOI
	Balliet, D., Wu, J. H., & De Dreu, C. K. W. Ingroup favoritism in cooperation: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 2014, 140 (6): 1556- 1581. DOI
	Bauer, J. J., & Wayment, H. A. (2008). The psychology of the quiet ego. In H. A. Wayment & J. J. Bauer (Eds.), Transcending self-interest: Psychological explorations of the quiet ego. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
	Bauer, J. J., & Weatherbie, K. J. The quiet ego and human flourishing. Journal of Happiness Studies, 2023, 24 (8): 2499- 2530. DOI
	Block, J. Assimilation, accommodation, and the dynamics of personality development. Child Development, 1982, 53 (2): 281- 295. DOI
	Bosch, J. A., de Geus, E. J. C., Carroll, D., Goedhart, A. D., Anane, L. A., Veldhuizen van Zanten, J. J., … Edwards, K. M. A general enhancement of autonomic and cortisol responses during social evaluative threat. Psychosomatic Medicine, 2009, 71 (8): 877- 885. DOI
	Chaudhury, S. H., Garg, N., & Jiang, Z. The curious case of threat-awe: A theoretical and empirical reconceptualization. Emotion, 2022, 22 (7): 1653- 1669. DOI
	Danvers, A. F., & Shiota, M. N. Going off script: Effects of awe on memory for script-typical and -irrelevant narrative detail. Emotion, 2017, 17 (6): 938- 952. DOI
	Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A. G., & Buchner, A. G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 2007, 39 (2): 175- 191. DOI
	Frankenberger, K. D. Adolescent egocentrism: A comparison among adolescents and adults. Journal of Adolescence, 2000, 23 (3): 343- 354. DOI
	Fritsche, I., Jonas, E., Ablasser, C., Beyer, M., Kuban, J., Manger, A. M., & Schultz, M. The power of we: Evidence for group-based control. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2013, 49 (1): 19- 32. DOI
	Gordon, A. M., Stellar, J. E., Anderson, C. L., McNeil, G. D., Loew, D., & Keltner, D. The dark side of the sublime: Distinguishing a threat-based variant of awe. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2017, 113 (2): 310- 328. DOI
	Keltner, D., & Haidt, J. Approaching awe, a moral, spiritual, and aesthetic emotion. Cognition and Emotion, 2003, 17 (2): 297- 314. DOI
	Lilgendahl, J. P., Helson, R., & John, O. P. Does ego development increase during midlife? The effects of openness and accommodative processing of difficult events. Journal of Personality, 2013, 81 (4): 403- 416. DOI
	Liu, C. J., & Hao, F. Changes in cooperative behaviour and belief in finitely repeated social dilemmas. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 2015, 18 (3): 246- 251. DOI
	Liu, G. Y., Isbell, L. M., & Leidner, B. How does the quiet ego relate to happiness? A path model investigation of the relations between the quiet ego, self-concept clarity, and well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 2022, 23 (3): 1007- 1020. DOI
	McAdams, D. P. The psychological self as actor, agent, and author. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2013, 8 (3): 272- 295. DOI
	Perlin, J. D., & Li, L. Why does awe have prosocial effects? New perspectives on awe and the small self. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2020, 15 (2): 291- 308. DOI
	Piff, P. K., Dietze, P., Feinberg, M., Stancato, D. M., & Keltner, D. Awe, the small self, and prosocial behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2015, 108 (6): 883- 899.
	Reischer, H. N., Roth, L. J., Villarreal, J. A., & McAdams, D. P. Self-transcendence and life stories of humanistic growth among late-midlife adults. Journal of Personality, 2021, 89 (2): 305- 324. DOI
	Rogawski, M., Simonsmeier, B. A., & Buecker, S. The quiet ego: A meta-analytical review. Journal of Happiness Studies, 2025, 26 (7): 112. DOI
	Seo, M., Yang, S. Y., & Laurent, S. M. No one is an island: Awe encourages global citizenship identification. Emotion, 2023, 23 (3): 601- 612. DOI
	Septianto, F., Seo, Y., & Paramita, W. The role of implicit theories in motivating donations in response to threat-based awe. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 2022, 41 (1): 72- 88. DOI
	Shiota, M. N., Keltner, D., & John, O. P. Positive emotion dispositions differentially associated with Big Five personality and attachment style. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 2006, 1 (2): 61- 71. DOI
	Shiota, M. N., Keltner, D., & Mossman, A. The nature of awe: Elicitors, appraisals, and effects on self-concept. Cognition and Emotion, 2007, 21 (5): 944- 963. DOI
	Stellar, J. E. Awe helps us remember why it is important to forget the self. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 2021, 1501 (1): 81- 84. DOI
	Stellar, J. E., Gordon, A., Anderson, C. L., Piff, P. K., McNeil, G. D., & Keltner, D. Awe and humility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2018, 114 (2): 258- 269.
	Tomasello, M. (2019). Becoming human: A theory of ontogeny. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.
	Tyson, C., Hornsey, M. J., & Barlow, F. K. What does it mean to feel small? Three dimensions of the small self. Self and Identity, 2022, 21 (4): 387- 405. DOI
	Valdesolo, P., & Graham, J. Awe, uncertainty, and agency detection. Psychological Science, 2014, 25 (1): 170- 178. DOI
	Wang, M. Z., Qu, X. Q., Guo, C. L., & Wang, J. Awe elicited by natural disasters and willingness to help people in afflicted areas: A meditational model. Current Psychology, 2023, 42 (24): 20883- 20889. DOI
	Wayment, H. A., & Bauer, J. J. The quiet ego: Motives for self-other balance and growth in relation to well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 2018, 19 (3): 881- 896. DOI
	Wayment, H. A., Bauer, J. J., & Sylaska, K. The Quiet Ego Scale: Measuring the compassionate self-identity. Journal of Happiness Studies, 2015, 16 (4): 999- 1033. DOI
	Wu, Q., Cui, L. Y., Han, X. G., Wu, Y. X., & He, W. Facilitative effect of awe on cooperation: The role of the small-self and self-other inclusion. PsyCh Journal, 2024, 13 (4): 552- 565. DOI
	Zhang, J. L., Chang, B. R., & Fang, J. D. Awe influences prosocial behavior and subjective well-being through the quiet ego. Journal of Happiness Studies, 2025, 26 (1): 2. DOI

	积极敬畏组 (n=58)	消极敬畏组 (n=53)	中性情绪组 (n=56)	F
生气	1.28±0.93	2.34±1.73	1.27±0.88	13.61^***
难过	1.59±1.17	3.91±1.89	1.21±0.78	63.41^***
开心	3.98±2.49	1.87±1.56	3.84±2.25	16.45^***
害怕	1.76±1.63	3.66±2.32	1.18±0.72	32.64^***
敬畏	4.40±2.34	3.94±1.91	1.75±1.55	29.20^***
公共物品投资额	61.45±30.55	68.09±22.97	47.29±28.73	6.34^**

	积极敬畏组 (n=58)	消极敬畏组 (n=53)	中性情绪组 (n=56)	F
生气	1.28±0.93	2.34±1.73	1.27±0.88	13.61^***
难过	1.59±1.17	3.91±1.89	1.21±0.78	63.41^***
开心	3.98±2.49	1.87±1.56	3.84±2.25	16.45^***
害怕	1.76±1.63	3.66±2.32	1.18±0.72	32.64^***
敬畏	4.40±2.34	3.94±1.91	1.75±1.55	29.20^***
公共物品投资额	61.45±30.55	68.09±22.97	47.29±28.73	6.34^**

	积极敬畏组 (n=131)	消极敬畏组 (n=114)	中性情绪组 (n=113)	F
生气	1.16±0.71	2.20±1.49	1.36±1.12	28.12^***
难过	1.81±1.52	3.35±2.01	1.43±1.19	45.98^***
开心	4.29±2.17	1.68±1.40	3.30±2.15	55.24^***
害怕	1.57±1.32	3.52±2.12	1.42±1.20	62.95^***
敬畏	4.69±2.25	4.09±1.95	2.00±1.75	58.33^***
顺应需要	5.19±1.57	5.07±1.52	4.03±1.83	17.21^***
安静自我	3.67±0.49	3.42±0.49	3.39±0.55	11.94^***
公共物品投资额	64.32±26.14	62.99±23.59	48.78±28.53	13.07^***

	积极敬畏组 (n=131)	消极敬畏组 (n=114)	中性情绪组 (n=113)	F
生气	1.16±0.71	2.20±1.49	1.36±1.12	28.12^***
难过	1.81±1.52	3.35±2.01	1.43±1.19	45.98^***
开心	4.29±2.17	1.68±1.40	3.30±2.15	55.24^***
害怕	1.57±1.32	3.52±2.12	1.42±1.20	62.95^***
敬畏	4.69±2.25	4.09±1.95	2.00±1.75	58.33^***
顺应需要	5.19±1.57	5.07±1.52	4.03±1.83	17.21^***
安静自我	3.67±0.49	3.42±0.49	3.39±0.55	11.94^***
公共物品投资额	64.32±26.14	62.99±23.59	48.78±28.53	13.07^***

结果变量	预测变量	β	SE	t	95% CI
安静自我
	性别	0.05	0.10	0.54	[–0.14, 0.25]
	年龄	–0.19	0.05	–3.84^***	[–0.29, –0.09]
	他人合作预期	0.16	0.05	3.20^**	[0.06, 0.26]
	积极敬畏 (vs. 中性情绪)	0.53	0.12	4.37^***	[0.29, 0.77]
	消极敬畏 (vs. 中性情绪)	0.07	0.13	0.56	[–0.17, 0.32]
公共物品投资额
	性别	–0.05	0.09	–0.55	[–0.21, 0.12]
	年龄	–0.01	0.04	–0.17	[–0.09, 0.08]
	他人合作预期	0.52	0.04	11.96^***	[0.43, 0.60]
	安静自我	0.14	0.05	3.13^**	[0.05, 0.23]
	积极敬畏 (vs. 中性情绪)	0.42	0.11	4.01^***	[0.22, 0.63]
	消极敬畏 (vs. 中性情绪)	0.42	0.11	3.97^***	[0.21, 0.63]