儿童学习时间分配决策能力发展的研究进展

心理与行为研究 ›› 2004, Vol. 2 ›› Issue (2): 443-446.

儿童学习时间分配决策能力发展的研究进展

刘希平^1,2,3,方格¹

1 中国科学院心理健康重点实验室,北京 100101;
2 天津师范大学教育科学学院,天津300073;
3 中国科学院研究生院,北京 100101

收稿日期:2004-04-29 出版日期:2004-06-20 发布日期:2015-01-21
作者简介:刘希平,女,天津师范大学教育科学学院副教授,中国科学院心理健康重点实验室博士生。方格,女,中国科学院心理健康重点实验室研究员,博士生导师。
基金资助:
本文得到国家自然科学基金30370490项目、天津市教育科学“十五”规划重点课题CESO16项目和规划课题PEO81项目资金资助

REVIEW ON DEVELOPMENT OF CHILDREN'S ABILITY ON DECISION MAKING OF ALLOCATION OF LEARNING TIME

Liu Xiping^1,2,3,Fang Ge¹

1 The Key Lab of Mental Health, CAS, Beijing 100101;
2 The College of Educational Science, Tianjin Normal University, Tianjin 300073;
3 Graduate School of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100000

Received:2004-04-29 Online:2004-06-20 Published:2015-01-21

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 学习时间分配的研究进行了将近40年,而对儿童学习时间分配的发展研究也走过了近40年的历史。从最初的他控步调的学习到后来的自控步调的学习,从关注学习材料的难度这一外部线索到关注学习者内部的活动机制,从讨论学习时间分配活动本身到探讨影响学习时间分配发展的各种因素,对于学习时间分配发展的研究始终在不断深入。文章从上述视角,对学习时间分配的新近研究进行了总结。并对今后的研究趋势进行了展望。

关键词: 元记忆, 学习时间分配, 他控步调的学习, 自控步调的学习

Abstract: The studies on allocation of learning time have been lasted for about 40 years. The same is on development of children's allocation of learning time. We are knowing more and more about it by investigating both experimenter-paced study and self-paced one, by focusing on the difficulty of materials only and then the mechanism, and by discussing itself and then those factors that may effect the development of allocation of learning time. However, there is no review on it in China. The current work has a summary from all aspects above. And the prospective view has been evaluated.

Key words: metamemory, allocation of learning time, experimenter-paced study, self-paced study

中图分类号:

B842.1

刘希平,方格. 儿童学习时间分配决策能力发展的研究进展[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2004, 2(2): 443-446.

Liu Xiping,Fang Ge. REVIEW ON DEVELOPMENT OF CHILDREN'S ABILITY ON DECISION MAKING OF ALLOCATION OF LEARNING TIME[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2004, 2(2): 443-446.

参考文献

1 Dufresne A & Kobasigawa A. Developmental difference in children's spontaneous allocation of study time. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 1988, 149: 87~92
2 Dufresne A, Kobasigawa A. Children's spontaneous allocation of study time: differential and sufficient aspects. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1989, 47: 274~296
3 Kobasigawa A & Metcalf-Haggert A. Spontaneous allocation of study time by first- and third-grade children in a simple memory task. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 1993, 154(2): 223~235
4 Nelson Thoma O, Leonesio R Jacob. Allocation of self-paced study time and the "labor-in-vain effect." Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 1988, 14(4): 676~686
5 Dunlosky J & Connor L T. Age differences in the allocation of study time account for age differences in memory performance. Memory & Cognition, 1997, 25: 269~700
6 Dunlosky J & Hertzog C. Older and younger adults use a founctionally identical algorithm to select items for restudy during multitrial learning. Journal of Gerontogy: Psychological Sciences. 1997, 52(4): 178~186
7 Dunlosky J & Thiede K W. What makes people study more? An evaluation of factors that affect self-paced study. Acta Psychologica, 1998, 98: 37~56
8 Mazzoni Giuliana, Cornoldi Cesare. Strategies in study time allocation: why is study time sometimes not effective? Journal of Experimental Psychology:General. 1993, 122(1): 47~60
9 Mazzoni Giuliana, Cornoldi Cesare, Marchitelli Giampiera. Do memorability ratings affect study time allocation? Memory and-Cognition, 1990, 18(2): 196~204
10 Nelson T O & Narens L. Metamemory: A theoretical framework and new findings. In: Bower G H (Ed). The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 1990, 26: 125~173
11 Nelson T O & Leonesio R J. Allocation of self-paced study time and the "labor-in-vain effect". Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 1998, 14: 676~686
12 Thiede K W & Dunlosky J. Toward a general model of self-regulated study: an analysis of selection of the items for study and self-paced study time. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 1999, 25: 1024~1037
13 Son Lisa K, Metcalfe Janet. Metacognitive and control strategies in study time allocation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2000, 26(1): 204~221
14 Metcalfe Janet. Is study time allocated selectively to a region of proximal learning? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 2002, 131(3): 349~363
15 Koriat A, Sheffer L & Ma'ayan H. Comparing objective and subjective learning curves: judgments of learning exhibit increased underconfidence with practice. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 2002, 131(2): 147~162
16 Dunlosky J, Kubat Silman A K & Hertzog C. Training monitoring skills improves older adults' self-paced associative learning. Unpublished manuscript, 2002

[1]	姜英杰,于洋,严燕. 价值-项目间隔和项目呈现时间对价值导向元记忆的影响^*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2016, 14(6): 749-754.
[2]	谢瑞波,路璐,李伟健. 学习时间分配的基于议程调节模型^*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2016, 14(2): 283-288.
[3]	曹晓华，王本驰，家晓余，李锋盈. 惩罚对学习时间分配中决策与绩效的影响^*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2014, 12(4): 462-468.
[4]	周楚,刘晓明,路海东. 学习困难儿童元记忆能力的实验研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2003, 1(3): 190-193.