认知负荷和控制性注意对工作记忆广度任务成绩的影响

心理与行为研究 ›› 2008, Vol. 6 ›› Issue (2): 112-116.

认知负荷和控制性注意对工作记忆广度任务成绩的影响

刘丽,李晖

天津商业大学心理学系,天津 300134

收稿日期:2007-07-03 出版日期:2008-06-20 发布日期:2015-01-21
作者简介:刘丽,女,天津商业大学心理学系助教,Email: liuli9879@yahoo.com.cn。李晖,女,天津商业大学心理学系教授。

THE EFFECTS OF COGNITIVE LOAD AND CONTROLLED-ATTENTION ON WORKING MEMORY SPAN TASKS

Liu Li,Li Hui

Department of Psychology, Tianjin Commerce University, Tianjin 300134

Received:2007-07-03 Online:2008-06-20 Published:2015-01-21

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 通过stroop干扰实验严格筛选被试,考察了控制性注意能力不同的被试在加工部分认知负荷不同的工作记忆广度任务中的成绩。结果表明：任务复杂性和加工速度对工作记忆广度任务成绩有重要影响,任务越复杂或加工速度越快,被试的工作记忆广度任务成绩越低;在复杂的和加工速度快的工作记忆广度任务中,控制性注意能力高的被试成绩要好于控制性注意能力低的被试,但在简单的和加工速度慢的任务中两者成绩没有显著差异。

关键词: 认知负荷, 任务复杂性, 加工速度, 控制性注意, 工作记忆广度

Abstract: In this article, we chose subjects strictly by experiment of stroop-interference and investigated the performance of high and low controlled-attention capacity subjects in working memory span tasks that cognitive loads of processing are different. The results showed tasks complexity and processing speed have effects on performance of working memory span tasks, the more complex the task and faster the processing speed, the lower the performance. In more complex and faster tasks, the performance of high subjects were higher than the low, but these effects were not significant in more simple and slower tasks.

Key words: cognitive load, tasks complexity, processing speed, controlled-attention, working memory span

中图分类号:

刘丽,李晖. 认知负荷和控制性注意对工作记忆广度任务成绩的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2008, 6(2): 112-116.

Liu Li,Li Hui. THE EFFECTS OF COGNITIVE LOAD AND CONTROLLED-ATTENTION ON WORKING MEMORY SPAN TASKS[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2008, 6(2): 112-116.

参考文献

[1] Towse J N, Hitch G J, Hutton U. On the interpretation of working memory spans in adults. Memory and Cognition, 2000, 28(3): 341~348
[2] Rohrer D, Pashler H. Concurrent task effects on memory retrieval. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 2003, 10(1): 96~103
[3] 李力红, 刘丽, 车文博. 工作记忆广度个体差异模型述评. 心理科学, 2005, 28(6): 1421~1423
[4] Miyake A, Friedman N P, Emerson M J. The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex frontal lobe task: A latent variable analysis. Cognitive Psychology, 2000, 41(1): 49~100
[5] Barrouillet P, Camos V. Developmental of increase in working memory span: Resource sharing or temporal decay? Journal of Memory and Language, 2001, 45(1): 1~20
[6] Towse J N, Hitch G J, Hutton U. On the nature of the ralationship between processing activity and item retention in children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 2002, 82(2): 156~184
[7] Danelles M, Scott J. Working memory capacity and strategy use. Memory and Cognition, 2001, 29(1): 10~17
[8] Brian M E. Working memory and focal attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2001, 27(3): 817~835
[9] Logan G D. Working memory, task switching, and executive control in the task span procedure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 2004, 133(2): 218~236
[10] Baddeley A D, Logie R H. The multiple-component model. In: Miyake A, Shah P (Eds). Models of working memory: Mechanisms of active maintenance and executive control. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1999
[11] Christoff K. Complexity and working memory resources: Task characteristics necessitating the executive control of attention. Perspectives on Cognitive Science, 1999, 5: 1~9
[12] Daneman M, Hannon B. Using working memory theory to investigate the construct validity of multiple-choice reading comprehension test such as SAT. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 2001, 130(2): 208~222

[1]	赵婷婷, 杨晓梦, 张洋, 王燕青, 谢和平, 王福兴. 多媒体学习中线索原则是否存在经验逆转效应？——来自两项元分析的证据[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(1): 22-29.
[2]	孙崇勇, 刘丽丽, 高春阳. 翻转教学法对高中生认知负荷及学习成绩的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(3): 369-375.
[3]	干加裙, 张曼曼, 胡锦慧, 郭云飞, 陈幼贞. 执行意向影响事件性前瞻记忆的加工机制[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(1): 53-59.
[4]	龚少英, 韩雨丝, 王祯, 徐升, 刘小先. 基于计算机的反馈复杂性和先前知识对学习的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2019, 17(6): 765-772.
[5]	张冬梅, 路海东. 文本学习中运用先行组织者策略的知识反转效应[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2019, 17(1): 83-90.
[6]	张锦坤, 刘晓倩, 杨丽娴. 背景图相关度与知觉流畅性对意义材料学习的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2018, 16(6): 757-762.
[7]	孔海燕, 孙雨, 宋广文. 心智游移、工作记忆对初中生阅读理解的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2018, 16(3): 362-370,377.
[8]	干加裙, 郭盈秀, 郭云飞, 张哲, 陈幼贞. 执行意向在不同认知负荷下对前瞻记忆的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2017, 15(6): 743-749.
[9]	龚少英, 张盼盼, 上官晨雨. 学习者控制和任务难度对多媒体学习的影响^*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2017, 15(3): 335-342.
[10]	于斌，刘惠军，乐国安. 工作记忆广度与自我损耗的关系[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2016, 14(5): 577-583.
[11]	孙崇勇. 英语多媒体学习中言语关联手势对认知负荷的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2016, 14(5): 633-639.
[12]	于斌, 乐国安, 刘惠军. 工作记忆广度与爱荷华赌博任务的关系[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2013, 11(6): 721-727.
[13]	刘丽. 加工时间和加工速度对工作记忆广度的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2013, 11(3): 333-339.
[14]	陈英和；赵业粉. 智力和元认知技能在发现学习中的作用：任务复杂性的影响[J]. , 2011, 9(2): 81-87.
[15]	施建农,恽梅,翟京华,李新兵. 7~12岁儿童视觉搜索能力的发展[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2004, 2(1): 337-341.