人工语法范式下内隐学习的脑机制及其教育启示

心理与行为研究 ›› 2008, Vol. 6 ›› Issue (2): 150-154.

人工语法范式下内隐学习的脑机制及其教育启示

潘玲,闫国利

天津师范大学心理与行为研究院,天津 300074

收稿日期:2008-01-12 出版日期:2008-06-20 发布日期:2015-01-21
通讯作者: 闫国利,男,天津师范大学心理与行为研究院教授,博士生导师。Email: psy-ygl@mail.tjnu.edu.cn。
作者简介:潘玲,女,天津师范大学心理与行为研究院博士生。
基金资助:
本研究得到国家社科基金”十一五“规划（教育学科）国家重点课题ABA060004项目、高等学校全国优秀博士论文作者专项资金200708项目和天津市教育科学“十一五”规划ZZG179课题的资助

THE BRAIN MECHANISM OF IMPLICIT LEARNING BY ARTIFICIAL GRAMMAR PARADIGM AND ITS IMPLICATIONS FOR EDUCATION

Pan Ling,Yan Guoli

Academy of Psychology and Behavior in Tianjin Normal University, Tianjin 300074

Received:2008-01-12 Online:2008-06-20 Published:2015-01-21

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 人工语法范式是研究内隐学习实验的重要范式。利用脑成像技术的研究发现：人工语法范式下内隐学习发生时,额叶、枕叶、顶叶以及基底神经节与内隐学习有密切关系。该结果对当前教育教学产生一定启示,即教师要多给学生创造知识迁移的机会;培养学生的动手实践活动;重视学习过程中内隐学习与外显学习的先后顺序和有序结合。

关键词: 人工语法, 内隐学习, 脑机制, 教育启示

Abstract: Artificial grammar is an important experimental paradigm to study implicit learning. The neuroimaging techniques were used to investigate the neural activity mechanism of implicit learning by this paradigm. The results showed that the frontal lobe, occipital lobe, parietal lobe, as well as the basal ganglia involved in the implicit learning, which had some implications for the current education and teaching. That is, teachers must offer students the opportunity for knowledge transfer, pay attention to the practice activities, and the order and integration sequentially of the implicit and explicit learning.

Key words: artificial grammar, implicit learning, brain mechanism, education enlightenment

中图分类号:

B842.3

潘玲,闫国利. 人工语法范式下内隐学习的脑机制及其教育启示[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2008, 6(2): 150-154.

Pan Ling,Yan Guoli. THE BRAIN MECHANISM OF IMPLICIT LEARNING BY ARTIFICIAL GRAMMAR PARADIGM AND ITS IMPLICATIONS FOR EDUCATION[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2008, 6(2): 150-154.

参考文献

[1] Perruchetm O, Pacteau C. Synthetic grammar learning：Implicit rule abstraction or explicit fragmentary knowledge? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 1990, 119(3): 264~275
[2] 陆峥. 人工语法内隐学习的新探新. 华东师范大学硕士论文, 2004
[3] 郭秀艳, 杨治良. 内隐学习研究的核心方法——人工语法范式. 应用心理学, 2001, 7(3): 45~50
[4] Reber A S. Implicit learning of artificial grammars. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1967, 6(2): 317~327
[5] Dulany D E, Carlson R A, Dewey G I. A case of syntactical learning and judgment: How conscious and how abstract? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 1984, 113(4): 541~555
[6] Dunn J. Implicit memory and amnesia. In: Kirsner K, Maybery C,et al. Implicit and Explicit Mental Processes. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1998, 99~118
[7] Seger C A, Prabhakaran V, Poldrack R A, et al. Neural activity differs between explicit and implicit learning of artificial grammar strings: An fMRI study. Psychobiology, 2000, 28(3): 283~292
[8] Indefrey P, Hagoort P, Herzog H, et al. Syntactic processing in left prefrontal cortex is independent of lexical meaning. NeuroImage, 2001, 14(3): 546~555
[9] Christian F, Peter H, Guillen F, et al. Neural correlates of artificial syntactic structure classification. NeuroImage, 2006, 32(2): 956~967
[10] Petersson K M. On the relevance of the neurobiological analogue of the finite-state architecture. Neurocomputing, 2005, 65~66, 825~832
[11] Fletcher P, Büchel C, Josephs O, et al. Learning-related neuronal responses in prefrontal cortex studied with functional neuroimaging. Cerebral Cortex, 1999, 9(2): 168~178
[12] Stuss D T, Levine B, Alexander M P, et a1. Wisconsin Card Sorting Test performance in patients with focal frontal and posterior brain damage: Effects of lesion location and test structure on separable cognitive processes. Neuropsychological, 2000, 38(4): 388~402
[13] 郭秀艳. 内隐学习. 上海: 华东师范大学出版社, 2003
[14] Opitz B, Friederici A D. Interactions of the hippocampal system and the prefrontal cortex in learning language-like rules. NeuroImage, 2003, 19(4): 1730~1737
[15] Forkstam C, Peterson K M. Syntactic classification of acquired structural regularities. Italy: XXVII Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 2005
[16] Skosnik P D, Mirza F, Gitelman D R, et al. Neural correlates of artificial grammar learning. NeuroImage, 2002, 17(3): 1306~1314
[17] Seger C A, Cincotta C M. Striatal activity in concept learning. Cognitive, Affective, and Behavioral Neuroscience, 2002, 2(2): 149~161
[18] Dienes Z, Berry D. Mapping across domains without feedback: A neural network model of transfer of implicit knowledge. Cognitive Science, 1999, 23(1): 53~82
[19] Manza L, Reber A S. Representing artificial grammars: Transfer across stimulus forms and modalities. In: Berry D. How Implicit is Implicit Learning? Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997, 73~106
[20] Smith J, Siegert R J, McDowall J, et al. Preserved implicit learning on both the serial reaction time task and artificial grammar in patients with Parkinson′s disease. Brain Cognition, 2001, 45(3): 378~391
[21] Witt K, Nühsman A, Deuschl G. Intact artificial grammar learning in patients with cerebellar degeneration and advanced Parkinson′s disease. Neuropsychology, 2002, 40(9): 1534~1540
[22] 付秋芳, 刘永芳. 内隐学习潜在机制研究的某些新进展. 心理科学进展, 2003, 11(4): 405~410
[23] Matthew D, Grace Y, Joan C, et al. An event-related fMRI study of artificial grammar learning in a balanced chunk strength design. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 2004, 16(3): 427~438
[24] Heuer H, Spijkers W, Kiesswetter E, et al. Effects of sleep loss, time of day, and extended mental work on implicit and explicit learning of sequences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 1998, 4(2): 139~162
[25] 杨治良. 记忆心理学. 上海: 华东师范大学出版社, 1994
[26] Ullman M. Contributions of memory circuits to language: The declarative/procedural model. Cognition, 2004, 92(1-2): 231~270