返回抑制对空间Stroop效应的影响

心理与行为研究 ›› 2009, Vol. 7 ›› Issue (4): 265-268.

返回抑制对空间Stroop效应的影响

付佳,张明

东北师范大学心理学系,长春 130024

收稿日期:2009-03-22 出版日期:2009-12-20 发布日期:2015-01-21
通讯作者: 张明,男,东北师范大学心理学系教授,博士生导师。Email: zhangm@nenu.edu.cn。
作者简介:付佳,女,东北师范大学心理学系博士生。
基金资助:
本研究得到国家自然科学基金30770717项目的资助

INHIBITION OF RETURN AND SPATIAL STROOP EFFECT

Fu Jia,Zhang Ming

Department of Psychology, Northeast Normal University, Jilin Changchun 130024

Received:2009-03-22 Online:2009-12-20 Published:2015-01-21

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 联合空间cue-target范式和空间Stroop任务,考察了空间注意在解决空间Stroop效应中所起的作用。结果表明：（1）与空间Stroop刺激出现在非线索化位置相比,出现在线索化位置上时,被试对位置和空间维度不一致试验的反应更快,且空间Stroop的量显著减少;（2）返回抑制影响空间Stroop效应量的大小,返回抑制对非空间Stroop效应量的调节和对空间Stroop效应量的调节有所不同,无论一致条件,还是不一致条件下,对空间Stroop反应的反应速度要快于非空间Stroop。

关键词: 空间注意, 返回抑制, 空间Stroop效应

Abstract: The present study joined cue-target paradigm with spatial stroop task to investigate the role of spatial attention in spatial stroop task. The results showed that:(1)when spatial stroop stimuli were presented at a cued location, subjects showed a faster response on trials where its location and spatial dimensions are inconsistent, and there was a substantial reduction in the amount of spatial stroop;(2)IOR influenced the amount of spatial stroop. It has different effects in modulating spatial versus non-spatial stroop. Whether in congruent or incongtuent conditions, responses to spatial stroop task are faster than that to non-spatial stroop task.

Key words: spatial attention, inhibition of return, spatial stroop effect

中图分类号:

B842.3

付佳,张明. 返回抑制对空间Stroop效应的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2009, 7(4): 265-268.

Fu Jia,Zhang Ming. INHIBITION OF RETURN AND SPATIAL STROOP EFFECT[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2009, 7(4): 265-268.

参考文献

[1] Cheal M L, Chastain G. Timing of facilitatory and inhibitory effects of visual attention. Visual Cognition, 2002, 9(8): 969-1002
[2] Lupiáñez J, Klein R M, Bartolomeo P. Inhibition of return: Twenty years after. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 2006, 23(7): 1003-1014
[3] Posner M I, Cohen Y. Components of visual orienting// Bouma H, Bouwhuis D. Attention and Performance Vol. X. Erlbaum, 1984
[4] Taylor T L, Klein R M. On the causes and effects of inhibition of return. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 1998, 5: 625-643
[5] Vivas A B, Fuentes L J. Stroop interference is affected in inhibition of return. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 2001, 8(2): 315-323
[6] Fuentes L J, Vivas A B, Humphreys G W. Inhibitory tagging of stimulus properties in inhibition of return: Effects on semantic priming and flanker interference. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1999, 52A, 149-164
[7] Chen Q, Wei P, Zhou X. Distinct neural correlates for resolving stroop conflict at inhibited and non inhibited locations in inhibition of return. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 2006, 18(11): 1937-1946
[8] Zhou X, Chen Q. Neural correlates of spatial and non-spatial inhibition of return in attentional orienting. Neuropsychologia, 2008, 46(11): 2766-2775
[9] Giesbrecht B, Woldorff M G, Song A W, et al. Neural mechanisms of top-down control during spatial and feature attention. Neuroimage, 2003, 19: 496-512
[10] Funes M J, Lupiáñez J, Milliken B. Separate mechanisms recruited by exogenous and endogenous spatial cues: Evidence from a spatial stroop paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2007, 33(2): 348-362
[11] Kahneman D, Treisman A, Gibbs B J. The reviewing of object files: Object specific integration of information. Cognitive Psychology, 1992, 24: 175-219
[12] Klein R M. Inhibition of return. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2000, 4, 138-147
[13] Fuentes L J. Inhibitory processing in the attentional networks// Posner M I. Cognitive Neuroscience of Attention, New York: Guilford Press, 2004