方言和外语学习对词汇通达能力的影响

心理与行为研究 ›› 2013, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (3): 318-324.

方言和外语学习对词汇通达能力的影响

范小月^{1, 2}, 王瑞明¹

1 华南师范大学心理应用研究中心,广州 510631;
2 北京大学心理学系,北京 100871

收稿日期:2012-03-31 出版日期:2013-05-20 发布日期:2015-02-15
通讯作者: 王瑞明,男,华南师范大学心理学教授,博士。E-mail:wruiming@163.com。
作者简介:范小月,女,北京大学心理学系硕士生。
基金资助:
本研究得到国家社会科学基金项目（11CYY023）、全国教育科学“十一五”规划项目（EBA100361）和国家基础科学人才培养基金（J1030729、J1210024）的资助

Effect of Diglossia and Trilingual on Lexical Access

Fan Xiaoyue^{1, 2}, Wang Ruiming¹

1 Center for Studies of Psychological Application, Guangzhou 510631;
2 Department of Psychology, Peking University, Beijing 100871

Received:2012-03-31 Online:2013-05-20 Published:2015-02-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 使用图片命名任务和TOT（舌尖现象）任务考察方言和外语学习对词汇通达能力的影响。实验结果发现,在图片命名任务和TOT任务中,单语者的表现均好于粤语-普通话双言者和粤语-普通话-英语三语者,粤语-普通话双言者和粤语-普通话-英语三语者的表现没有显著差异。该结果说明,与外语学习一样,方言也会影响个体的词汇通达能力,但方言和外语学习对词汇通达能力的影响依赖于他们的使用频率。

关键词: 方言学习, 外语学习, 词汇通达能力

Abstract: Picture naming task and TOT(tip of tongue)task were conducted to examine the effect of diglossia and trilingual on lexical access. The result showed that(1)Cantonese-Mandarin diglossia speakers and Cantonese-Mandarin-English trilinguals outperformed monolinguals in picture naming task and TOT task.(2)Cantonese-Mandarin diglossia speakers and Cantonese-Mandarin-English trilinguals performed equivalently in picture naming TOT task. The result suggests the effect of diglossia on lexical access, and the effect of bilingualism on lexical access depends on using frequency.

Key words: diglossia, trilingual, lexical access

中图分类号:

B842.5

范小月, 王瑞明. 方言和外语学习对词汇通达能力的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2013, 11(3): 318-324.

Fan Xiaoyue, Wang Ruiming. Effect of Diglossia and Trilingual on Lexical Access[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2013, 11(3): 318-324.

参考文献

1 苏金智.(2002). 中国语言文字使用情况调查中的双语双方言问题. 语言文字应用, (1), 49-54.
2 陈恩泉.(1996). 简论双语和双方言. 语文研究, (2), 33-39.
3 张积家, 张凤玲.(2010). 双语和双言对图片和分类的不对称影响. 心理学报, 42(4), 452-466.
4 Bialystok, E.(1986). Factors in the growth of linguistic awareness. Child Development, 57(2), 498-510.
5 Brown, A. S.(1991). A review of the tip of the tongue phenomenon. Psychological Bulletin, 109(2), 204-223.
6 Bialystok, E., Craik, F. I. M., & Luk, G.(2008). Cognitive control and lexical access in younger and older bilinguals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34(4), 859-873.
7 Brown, R., & McNeill, D.(1966). The “tip of the tongue” phenomenon. The Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 5(4), 325-337.
8 Burke, D. M., MacKay, D. G., Worthley, J. S., & Wade, E.(1991). On the tip of the tongue: What causes word finding failures in young and older adults? Journal of Memory and Language, 30(5), 542-579.
9 Colome, A.(2001). Lexical activation in bilinguals-speech production: Language-specific or language-independent? Journal of Memory and Language, 45(4), 721-736.
10 Costa, A., Caramazza, A., & Sebastian-Galles, N.(2000). The cognate facilitation effect: Implications for models of lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 26(5), 1283-1296.
11 Cohen, G., & Faulkner, D.(1986). Memory for proper names: Age differences in retrieval. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 4(2), 187-197.
12 Costa, A., Hernandez, M., & Sebastian-Galles, N.(2008). Bilingualism aids conflict resolution: Evidence from the ANT task. Cognition, 106(1), 59-86.
13 Ferguson, C. A.(1959). Diglossia. Word, 15(3), 325-340.
14 Gollan, T. H., & Acenas, L. A.(2004). What is a TOT? Cognate and translation effects on tip-of-the-tongue states in Spanish-English and Tagalog-English bilinguals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30(1), 246-269.
15 Gollan, T. H., Montoya, R., Cera, C., & Sandoval, T.(2008). More use almost always means a smaller frequency effect: Aging, bilingualism, and the weaker links hypothesis. Journal of Memory and Language, 58(3), 787-814.
16 Gollan, T. H., Montoya, R. I., Fennema-Notestine, C., & Morris, S. K.(2005). Bilingualism affects picture naming but not picture classification. Memory & Cognition, 33(7), 1220-1234.
17 Gollan, T. H., Montoya, R. I., & Werner, G.(2002). Semantic and letter fluency in Spanish-English bilinguals. Neuropsychology, 16(4), 562-576.
18 Gollan, T. H., & Silverberg, N. B.(2001). Tip-of-the-tongue states in Hebrew-English bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 4(1), 63-83.
19 Harley, T. A., & Bown, H. E.(1998). What cause a tip-of-the-tongue states? Evidence for lexical neighbourhood effects in speech production. British Journal of Psychology, 89(1), 151-174.
20 Ivanova, I., & Costa, A.(2008). Does bilingualism hamper lexical access in speech production? Acta Psychologica, 127(2), 277-288.
21 Kohn, S. E., Wingfield, A., Menn, L., Goodglass, H., Gleason, J. B., & Hyde, M.(1987). Lexical retrieval: The tip-of the tongue phenomenon. Applied Psycholinguistics, 8(3), 245-266.
22 Oller, D. K., & Eilers, R. E.(2002). Language and literacy in bilingual children. Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters.
23 Oller, D. K., Pearson, B. Z., & Cobo-Lewis, A. B.(2007). Profile effects in early bilingual language and literacy. Applied Psycholinguistics, 28(2), 191-230.
24 Pyers, J. E., Gollan, T. H., & Emmorey, K.(2009). Bimodal bilinguals reveal the source of tip-of-the-tongue states. Cognition, 112(2), 323-329.
25 Roberts, P. M., Garcia, L. J., Desrochers, A., & Hernandez, D.(2002). English performance of proficient bilingual adults on the Boston Naming Test. Aphasiology, 16(4-6), 635-645.
26 Reason, J. T., & Lucas, D.(1984). Using cognitive diaries to investigate naturally occurring memory blocks. In J. E. Harris & P. E. Morris(Eds.), Everyday memory, actions absentmindedness(pp. 53-69). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
27 Schwartz, B. L.(1999). Sparkling at the end of the tongue: The etiology of the tip-of-the-tongue phenomenology. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 6(3), 379-393.
28 Vitevitch, M. S. & Sommers, M. S.(2003). The facilitative influence of phonological similarity and neighborhood frequency in speech production in younger and older adults. Memory & Cognition, 31(4), 491-504.

[1]	康廷虎, 王旎撰, 高吴平. 记叙文阅读中主人公转换对情境模型更新的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(1): 1-7.
[2]	倪亚琨, 赵君哲, 李巧灵, 郭腾飞, 王明辉. 高低拖延者的跨期选择差异：基于ERP的研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2019, 17(6): 831-839.
[3]	王婷, 王丹, 张积家. 双语与双言影响心理理论内隐系统与外显系统的分离[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2019, 17(4): 442-451.
[4]	刘志方, 陈朝阳, 仝文, 苏衡. 阅读中词汇识别依赖词内字序编码的阶段性特点：眼动证据[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2019, 17(3): 304-310.
[5]	陈宝国, 张媛玥, 马腾飞. 高限制性句子语境条件下词汇接触次数和二语熟练度对词汇习得的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2019, 17(2): 153-159.
[6]	孙尔鸿, 张启睿, 张积家. 书法字体与汉字颜色在成语重要性加工中的作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2019, 17(2): 160-169.
[7]	郝海平, 范宁. 反应模式对时间空间一致性效应的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2019, 17(2): 178-184.
[8]	潘颖, 邓小平, 林正军, 刘岩. 中国学生英语语音意识与英语阅读成绩关系的元分析[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2019, 17(2): 229-239.
[9]	赵帅, 鹿士义, 陈婧, 逯芝璇, 匡柳兴, 邓彧君, 付宸. 母语为韩语的汉语学习者加工“V+N1+的+N2”歧义结构的眼动研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2019, 17(1): 15-23.
[10]	于秒, 丁潼飞. 汉语词汇识别的声调时长效应[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2019, 17(1): 24-30.
[11]	赵冰洁, 王永胜, 陈茗静, 李馨, 闫国利, 白学军. 双字词整词加工与词素加工在眼跳目标选择中的作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2018, 16(6): 721-734.
[12]	赵黎明, 廉园, 李卫君. 口语句子产生中词汇选择的计划单元：来自大中小学生的比较研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2018, 16(6): 735-743.
[13]	季雨竹, 张逸玮, 毕鸿燕. 汉语发展性阅读障碍儿童的视觉大细胞-背侧通路功能[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2018, 16(5): 577-582.
[14]	张曼莉, 孟祥芝, 郑小蓓. 中文阅读障碍儿童的时间加工缺陷:来自知觉学习干预研究的证据[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2018, 16(5): 583-593,623.
[15]	白学军, 张明哲, 孟红霞, 谭珂, 王雯. 词边界信息对发展性阅读障碍儿童朗读和默读影响的眼动研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2018, 16(5): 594-602.