知识型员工共享领导对团队绩效的影响：团队学习能力的中介效应

心理与行为研究 ›› 2013, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (3): 374-379.

知识型员工共享领导对团队绩效的影响：团队学习能力的中介效应

赵鹏娟, 赵国祥

贵州师范大学教育科学学院,贵阳 550001;河南大学心理与行为研究所,开封 475001

收稿日期:2012-09-21 出版日期:2013-05-20 发布日期:2015-02-15
通讯作者: 赵国祥,男,河南大学心理与行为研究所教授,博士生导师。E-mail:zhaogx@henu.edu.cn。
作者简介:赵鹏娟,女,贵州师范大学教育科学学院教师,硕士生。

The Influence of Knowledge Employees Shared Leadership on Team Performance: Mediating Effect of Team Learning Capacity

Zhao Pengjuan, Zhao Guoxiang

school of Educational Science, Guizhou Normal University, Guiyang 550001; Institute of Psychology & Behavior, Henan University, Kaifeng 475001

Received:2012-09-21 Online:2013-05-20 Published:2015-02-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 对27个单位,92个团队共687名知识型员工调查,目的是基于团队学习能力视角探讨知识型员工共享领导对团队绩效的影响。首先用HLM6.08将收集到的数据从个体层面上升到团队层面,然后采用共享领导二阶模型初步得出团队学习能力在共享领导与团队绩效之间起中介作用,最后借助LISEREL8.70统计软件从共享领导各维度探讨团队学习能力的中介效应。结果表明共享领导与团队绩效之间具有显著地正相关关系,且共享领导通过团队学习能力的中介效应影响团队绩效。

关键词: 知识型员工, 共享领导, 团队学习能力, 团队绩效

Abstract: Knowledge employees shared leadership is a dynamic leadership theory. Knowledge employees(such as teachers, medical persons and researchers)according to their specialty, experience or knowledge skills play a role of leaders and lead the team to realize high efficiency target. This study we try to discuss how the knowledge employee shared leadership affects team performance based on team learning capability. There are 687 knowledge employee samples that come from schools, hospitals or enterprises forming 92 teams. We use structural equation model, path analysis and many other kinds of statistical analysis technology by SPSS16.0, HLM6.08 and LISEREL8.70 to test hypothesis. The specific process as follows: Firstly, we make every data from personal level to collective level by HLM6.08. Then, use shared leadership second order model forecast shared leadership through team learning ability influence team performance(p<0.01). Thirdly, team spirit, team cooperation, shared responsibility and team expect four dimensions of shared leadership are associated with team performance, team learning capability still as mediation(p<0.01). The main innovation of this study is that knowledge employees shared leadership through team learning ability mediation affect team performance.

Key words: knowledge employee, shared leadership, team learning capability, team performance

赵鹏娟, 赵国祥. 知识型员工共享领导对团队绩效的影响：团队学习能力的中介效应[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2013, 11(3): 374-379.

Zhao Pengjuan, Zhao Guoxiang. The Influence of Knowledge Employees Shared Leadership on Team Performance: Mediating Effect of Team Learning Capacity[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2013, 11(3): 374-379.

参考文献

1 陈国权.(2007). 团队学习和学习型团队：概念、能力模型、测量及对团队绩效的影响. 管理学报, 4(5), 602-609.
2 陈国权, 周为.(2009). 领导行为、组织学习能力与组织绩效关系研究. 科研管理, 30(5), 148-154.
3 李霞.(2012). 高校创新型科研团队知识共享行为、学习行为及团队绩效研究. 软科学, 6, 83-87.
4 芮明杰, 吕毓芳.(2005). 论领导行为、组织学习、创新与绩效间影响的实证研究. 上海管理科学, 2, 30-35.
5 王飞绒, 陈文兵.(2012). 领导风格与企业创新绩效关系的实证研究—基于组织学习的中介作用. 科学学研究, 30(6), 943-949.
6 张志学.(2010). 组织心理学研究的情境化及多层次理论. 心理学报, 42(1), 10-21.
7 赵国祥.(2011). 领导理论核心观点颤变：从领导权力控制的视角. 第十四届全国心理学大会论文摘要集.
8 赵国祥, 赵鹏娟.(2012). 知识型员工共享领导内容结构. 心理科学, 35(5), 1149-1153.
9 Avolio, J. B., Walumbwa, F. O., & Weber, T. J.(2009). Leadership: current theories, research, and future directions. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 421-449.
10 Baker, W. E., & Sinkula, J. M.(1999). The Synergistic Effect of Market Orientation and Learning Orientation on Organizational Performance. Journal of the academy of marketing, 27(4), 411-427.
11 Bligh, M. C., Pearce, C. L., & Kohles, J. C.(2006). The importance of self and shared leadership in team based knowledge work. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 21(4), 296-318.
12 Camps, J., & Rodriguez, H.(2011). Transformational leadership, learning, and employability-Effects on performance among faculty members. Personnel Review, 4(4), 423-442.
13 Carson, J. B., Tesluk, P. E., & Marrone, J. A.(2007). Shared leadership in Teams: an investigation of antecedent conditions and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 50(5), 1217-1234.
14 Chen, C. C., Greene, P. G., & Crick, A.(1998). Does entrepreneurial self-efficacy distinguish entrepreneurs from managers? Journal of Business Venturing, 13, 295-316.
15 Ensley, M. D., Pearson, A., & Pearce, C. L.(2003). Top management team process, shared leadership, and new venture performance: a theoretical model and research agenda. Human Resource Management Review, 13, 329-346.
16 Ensley, M. D., Hmieleski, K. M., & Pearce, C. L.(2006). The importance of vertical and shared leadership within new venture top management teams: Implications for the performance of startups. The Leadership Quarterly, 17, 217-231.
17 Erkutlu, H., & Turkey, N.(2012). The impact of organizational culture on the relationship between shared leadership and team proactivity. Team Performance Management, 18(1), 102-119.
18 Franco, M., & Almeida, J.(2011). Organizational learning and leadership styles in healthcare organizations: An exploratory case study. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 32(8), 782-806.
19 Hallinger, P., & Richardson, D.(1988). Models of Shared Leadership: Evolving Structures and Relationships. The Urban Review, 20(4), 229-245.
20 Hulpia, H., & Devos, G.(2009). Exploring the link between distributed leadership and job satisfaction of school leaders. Educational Studies, 35(2), 153-171.
21 James, L. R., Demaree, R. G., &Wolf, G.(1984). Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69(1), 85-98.
22 Manz, C. C., & Sims, H. P.(1984). Searching for the“un leader”: Organizational member views on leading self-managed groups. Human Relations, 37(5), 409-424.
23 Pearce, C. L.(2004). The future of leadership: Combining vertical and shared leadership to transform knowledge work. Academy of Management Executive, 18(1), 47-57.
24 Prati, L. M., Douglas, C., Ferris, G. R., Ammeter, A. P., & Buckley, M. R.(2003). The Role of Emotional Intelligence in Team Leadership: Reply to the Critique by antonakis. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 11(4), 363-369.
25 Sinkula, J. M.(1994). Market Information Processing and Organizational Learning. Journal of Marketing, 58(1), 35-45.
26 Sivasubramaniam, N., Murry, W. D., Avolio, B. J., & Jung, D. I.(2002). A longitudinal model of the effects of team leadership and group Potency on group Performance. Group & organization Management, 27, 66-96.
27 Slater, S. F., & Narver, J. C.(1995). Market Orientation and the Learning Organization. Journal of Marketing, 59(3), 63-74.
28 Wageman, R.(2001). How leaders foster self-managing team effectiveness: Design choices versus hands-on coaching. Organization Science, 12(5), 559-577.
29 Wood, M. S., & Fields, D.(2007). Exploring the impact of shared leadership on management team member job outcomes. Journal of Management, 2(3), 251-272.

[1]	李永占. 真实型领导对员工创新行为的影响：工作投入的中介效应[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2019, 17(6): 854-860.
[2]	刘金培, 朱磊, 倪清. 组织氛围如何影响知识型员工敬业度：基于工作倦怠的中介效应研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2018, 16(3): 394-401.