辩证思维与辩证情绪的因果关系探究

心理与行为研究 ›› 2013, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (4): 457-462.

辩证思维与辩证情绪的因果关系探究

刘书青¹, 彭凯平^{1, 2}, 方平³, 孟亦田⁴, 林卓¹

1 清华大学心理学系,北京 100084;
2 加州大学伯克利分校心理学系,美国伯克利 94720;
3 首都师范大学教育学院心理系,北京 100048;
4 清华大学理学院,北京 100084

收稿日期:2013-04-23 出版日期:2013-07-20 发布日期:2015-02-15
通讯作者: 彭凯平,男,清华大学心理学系教授,博士。E-mail:kppeng@berkeley.edu。
作者简介:刘书青,女,清华大学心理学系博士生。

The Causal Relationship between Dialectical Thinking and Dialectical Emotions

Liu Shuqing¹, Peng Kaiping^{1, 2}, Fang Ping³, Meng Yitan⁴, Lin Zhuo¹

1 Department of Psychology, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084;
2 Department of Psychology, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA;
3 Department of Psychology, School of Education, Capital Normal University, Beijing 100048;
4 School of Science, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084

Received:2013-04-23 Online:2013-07-20 Published:2015-02-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 辩证情绪是指个体对同一刺激同时体验到积极和消极情绪的一种心理状态。为探索辩证思维和辩证情绪的因果关系,在研究1中首先收集和筛选了诱发辩证情绪的视频;在研究2中,选取219个被试,先通过思维启动改变被试的辩证思维程度,然后考察辩证思维程度的改变对随后诱发辩证情绪强度的影响。结果发现,思维启动（辩证思维和线性思维）引起的辩证思维程度的差异显著,辩证情绪诱发效果显著,辩证思维在启动类型和辩证情绪之间的中介作用显著。这揭示了辩证思维程度的改变确实引起随后诱发的辩证情绪强度的变化,即辩证思维和辩证情绪存在因果关系。

关键词: 辩证情绪, 辩证思维, 思维启动

Abstract: Dialectical emotion refers to a mental state of an individual in which both positive and negative emotions to a stimulus co-occur. This study examined the relationship between dialectical thinking and dialectical emotions. First we selected the film clips which can induce dialectical emotions in study 1, and in study 2, then we used thinking prime method to change the degree of dialectical thinking in a short time, to explore whether the changeable degree of dialectical thinking could influence the intensity of dialectical emotions. The results showed that the thinking prime was effective, and the intensity of dialectical emotions between the two groups had a significant difference, and most of all, dialectical thinking does influence the intensity of dialectical emotions measured by general rating. This finding demonstrated the causal relationship between dialectical thinking and the intensity of dialectical emotions.

Key words: dialectical emotions, dialectical thinking, thinking prime paradigm

中图分类号:

B842.5

刘书青, 彭凯平, 方平, 孟亦田, 林卓. 辩证思维与辩证情绪的因果关系探究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2013, 11(4): 457-462.

Liu Shuqing, Peng Kaiping, Fang Ping, Meng Yitan, Lin Zhuo. The Causal Relationship between Dialectical Thinking and Dialectical Emotions[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2013, 11(4): 457-462.

参考文献

1 Aaker, J., Drolet, A., & Griffin, D.(2008). Recalling mixed emotions. Journal of Consumer Research, 35 (2), 268-278.
2 Bagozzi, R. P., Wong, N., & Yi, Y. J.(1999). The role of culture and gender in the relationship between positive and negative affect. Cognition & Emotion, 13 (6), 641-672.
3 Carrera, P., & Oceja, L.(2007). Drawing mixed emotions: Sequential or simultaneous experiences? Cognition & Emotion, 21 (2), 422-441.
4 Diener, E., & Emmons, R. A.(1984). The independence of positive and negative affect. Journal of personality and social psychology, 47 (5), 1105-1117.
5 Ersner-Hershfield, H., Carvel, D. S., & Isaacowitz, D. M.(2009). Feeling happy and sad, but only seeing the positive: Poignancy and the positivity effect in attention. Motivation and Emotion, 33 , 333-342.
6 Ersner-Hershfield, H., Mikels, J. A., Sullivan, S. J., & Carstensen, L. L.(2008). Poignancy: Mixed emotional experience in the face of meaningful endings. Journal of personality and social psychology, 94 (1), 158-167.
7 Fong, C. T.(2006). The effects of emotional ambivalence on creativity. The Academy of Management Journal Archive, 49 (5), 1016-1030.
8 Goetz, J. L., Spencer-Rodgers, J., & Peng, K.(2008). Dialectical emotions: How cultural epistemologies influence the experience and regulation of emotional complexity. In R. M. Sorrentino & S. Yamaguchi (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition across cultures , 517-540.
9 Hunter, P. G., Schellenberg, E. G., & Schimmack, U.(2008). Mixed affective responses to music with conflicting cues. Cognition and Emotion, 22 , 327-352.
10 Kitayama, S., Markus, H. R., & Kurokawa, M.(2000). Culture, emotion, and well-being: Good feelings in Japan and the United States. Cognition & Emotion, 14 (1), 93-124.
11 Larsen, J. T., McGraw, A. P., & Cacioppo, J. T.(2001). Can people feel happy and sad at the same time? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81 (4), 684-696.
12 Ma-Kellams, C., Spencer-Rodgers, J., & Peng, K.(2011). I am against us? Unpacking cultural differences in ingroup favoritism via Naïve dialecticism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37 , 15-27.
13 Miyamoto, Y., & Ryff, C. D.(2011). Cultural differences in the dialectical and non-dialectical emotional styles and their implications for health. Cognition and Emotion, 25 (1), 22-39.
14 Peng, K., Nisbett, R. E., & Wong, N.(1997). Validity problems comparing values across cultures and possible solutions. Psychological methods, 2 , 329-344.
15 Peng, K., & Nisbett, R. E.(1999). Culture, dialectics, and reasoning about contradiction. American Psychologist, 54 , 741-754.
16 Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F.(2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods. 40 (3), 879-891.
17 Schimmack, U., Oishi, S., & Diener, E.(2002). Cultural influences on the relation between pleasant emotions and unpleasant emotions: Asian dialectic philosophies or individualism-collectivism? Cognition & Emotion, 16 , 705-719.
18 Schimmack, U., & Colcombe, S.(2007). Eliciting mixed feelings with the paired-picture paradigm: A tribute to Kellogg(1915). Cognition and Emotion, 21 , 1546-1553.
19 Spencer-Rodgers, J., Peng, K., Wang, L., & Hou, Y.(2004). Dialectical self-esteem and East-West differences in psychological well-being. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30 (11), 1416-1432.
20 Spencer-Rodgers, J., Peng, K., & Wang, L.(2010). Dialecticism and the co-occurrence of positive and negative emotions across cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 41 (1), 109-115.

[1]	康廷虎, 王旎撰, 高吴平. 记叙文阅读中主人公转换对情境模型更新的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(1): 1-7.
[2]	倪亚琨, 赵君哲, 李巧灵, 郭腾飞, 王明辉. 高低拖延者的跨期选择差异：基于ERP的研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2019, 17(6): 831-839.
[3]	王婷, 王丹, 张积家. 双语与双言影响心理理论内隐系统与外显系统的分离[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2019, 17(4): 442-451.
[4]	刘志方, 陈朝阳, 仝文, 苏衡. 阅读中词汇识别依赖词内字序编码的阶段性特点：眼动证据[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2019, 17(3): 304-310.
[5]	陈宝国, 张媛玥, 马腾飞. 高限制性句子语境条件下词汇接触次数和二语熟练度对词汇习得的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2019, 17(2): 153-159.
[6]	孙尔鸿, 张启睿, 张积家. 书法字体与汉字颜色在成语重要性加工中的作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2019, 17(2): 160-169.
[7]	郝海平, 范宁. 反应模式对时间空间一致性效应的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2019, 17(2): 178-184.
[8]	潘颖, 邓小平, 林正军, 刘岩. 中国学生英语语音意识与英语阅读成绩关系的元分析[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2019, 17(2): 229-239.
[9]	赵帅, 鹿士义, 陈婧, 逯芝璇, 匡柳兴, 邓彧君, 付宸. 母语为韩语的汉语学习者加工“V+N1+的+N2”歧义结构的眼动研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2019, 17(1): 15-23.
[10]	于秒, 丁潼飞. 汉语词汇识别的声调时长效应[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2019, 17(1): 24-30.
[11]	赵冰洁, 王永胜, 陈茗静, 李馨, 闫国利, 白学军. 双字词整词加工与词素加工在眼跳目标选择中的作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2018, 16(6): 721-734.
[12]	赵黎明, 廉园, 李卫君. 口语句子产生中词汇选择的计划单元：来自大中小学生的比较研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2018, 16(6): 735-743.
[13]	季雨竹, 张逸玮, 毕鸿燕. 汉语发展性阅读障碍儿童的视觉大细胞-背侧通路功能[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2018, 16(5): 577-582.
[14]	张曼莉, 孟祥芝, 郑小蓓. 中文阅读障碍儿童的时间加工缺陷:来自知觉学习干预研究的证据[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2018, 16(5): 583-593,623.
[15]	白学军, 张明哲, 孟红霞, 谭珂, 王雯. 词边界信息对发展性阅读障碍儿童朗读和默读影响的眼动研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2018, 16(5): 594-602.