工作记忆广度与爱荷华赌博任务的关系

心理与行为研究 ›› 2013, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (6): 721-727.

• 基础心理学 • 下一篇

工作记忆广度与爱荷华赌博任务的关系

于斌^{1, 2}, 乐国安¹, 刘惠军²

1 南开大学社会心理学系,天津 300071;
2 天津医科大学心理学研究所,天津 300070

收稿日期:2013-05-06 出版日期:2013-11-20 发布日期:2015-02-15
通讯作者: 乐国安,男,南开大学教授,博士生导师。E-mail:yuega@126.com。
作者简介:于斌,男,天津医科大学医学人文学院讲师,南开大学社会心理学系博士生。
基金资助:
本研究得到天津市哲学社会科学规划项目(TJJX11—065)和教育部人文社会科学青年基金项目(12YJC190036)资助。

The Relation between Working Memory Span and Iowa Gambling Task Performance

Yu Bin^1,2, Yue Guoan¹, Liu Huijun²

1 Department of Social Psychology, Nankai University, Tianjin 300071, China;
2 Institute of Psychology, Tianjin Medical University, Tian jin 300070, China

Received:2013-05-06 Online:2013-11-20 Published:2015-02-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 以179名大学生为被试,考察了工作记忆广度与爱荷华赌博任务(IGT)的关系以及任务的计划性对两者关系的影响。结果发现,标准IGT组被试的工作记忆广度与IGT成绩无关,而mIGT组被试(被试知道选择次数)的工作记忆广度与IGT成绩明显相关。而且,mIGT组中工作记忆广度高的被试在整个选牌过程中的成绩都好于工作记忆广度低的被试。结果表明,任务的计划性是影响工作记忆广度与IGT关系的一个重要因素。

关键词: 爱荷华赌博任务, 工作记忆广度, 计划

Abstract: The purpose of the present study is to assess the relation between working memory span and Iowa Gambling Task(IGT) Performance and the impact of planning on this relation. 179 college students were recruited. All the participants’ working memory span(WMS) were accessed, then were assigned to two independent group and complete different IGT: the standard IGT(sIGT) and the modified IGT(mIGT). The modified version of the IGT told the participants how many times they have to choose the cards and indicate the progress of the task in the whole procedure. The results showed that WMS is unrelated with sIGT performance, but significantly related with mIGT performance. These results indicate that the working memory might involve in the decision making process in IGT. And whether the participants know how many times they have to choose the cards is one of the factors that might have impact on the involvement.

Key words: Iowa Gambling Task, working memory span, planning

中图分类号:

B842

于斌, 乐国安, 刘惠军. 工作记忆广度与爱荷华赌博任务的关系[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2013, 11(6): 721-727.

Yu Bin, Yue Guoan, Liu Huijun. The Relation between Working Memory Span and Iowa Gambling Task Performance[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2013, 11(6): 721-727.

参考文献

Albert, D., & Steinberg, L. (2011). Age differences in strategic planning as indexed by the Tower of London. Child development, 82(5), 1501-1517.
Bechara, A., Damasio, A. R., Damasio, H., & Anderson, S. W. (1994). Insensitivity to future consequences following damage to human prefrontal cortex. Cognition, 50(1-3), 7-15.
Bechara, A., Damasio, H., Damasio, A. R., & Lee, G. P. (1999). Different contributions of the human amygdala and ventromedial prefrontal cortex to decision-making. The Journal of Neuroscience, 19(13), 5473-5481.
Bechara, A., Damasio, H., Tranel, D., & Anderson, S. W. (1998). Dissociation Of Working Memory from Decision Making within the Human Prefrontal Cortex. The Journal of Neuroscience, 18(1), 428-437.
Bechara, A., Tranel, D., Damasio, H., & Damasio, A. R. (1996). Failure to Respond Autonomically to Anticipated Future Outcomes Following Damage to Prefrontal Cortex. Cerebral Cortex, 6(2), 215-225.
Buelow, M., & Suhr, J. (2009). Construct Validity of the Iowa Gambling Task. Neuropsychology Review, 19(1), 102-114.
Damasio, A. R. (1996). The somatic marker hypothesis and the possible functions of the prefrontal cortex. Philos ophical Trans actions of The Royal Society Lond B Biological Sciences, 351(1346), 1413-1420.
Damasio, A. R., Adolphs, R., & Damasio, H. (2003). The contributions of the lesion method to the functional neuroanatomy of emotion. Handbook of affective sciences, 66-87.
Denburg, N. L., Tranel, D., & Bechara, A. (2005). The ability to decide advantageously declines prematurely in some normal older persons. Neuropsychologia, 43(7), 1099-1106.
Dretsch, M. N., & Tipples, J. (2008). Working memory involved in predicting future outcomes based on past experiences. Brain and Cognition, 66(1), 83-90.
Hinson, J. M., Jameson, T. L., & Whitney, P. (2002). Somatic markers, working memory, and decision making. Cognitive, Affective and Behav ioral Neuroscience, 2(4), 341-353.
Jameson, T. L., Hinson, J. M., & Whitney, P. (2004). Components of working memory and somatic markers in decision making. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 11(3), 515-520.
Kane, M. J., & Engle, R. W. (2003). Working-memory capacity and the control of attention: the contributions of goal neglect, response competition, and task set to Stroop interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 132(1), 47.
Lawrence, N. S., Jollant, F., O'Daly, O., Zelaya, F., & Phillips, M. L. (2009). Distinct roles of prefrontal cortical subregions in the Iowa Gambling Task. Cerebral Cortex, 19(5), 1134-1143.
Li, X., Lu, Z.-L., D'Argembeau, A., Ng, M., & Bechara, A. (2010). The Iowa Gambling Task in fMRI images. Human Brain Mapping, 31(3), 410-423.
Séguin, J. R., Arseneault, L., & Tremblay, R. E. (2007). The contribution of “cool” and “hot” components of decision-making in adolescence: Implications for developmental psychopathology. Cognitive Development, 22(4), 530-543.
Sinz, H., Zamarian, L., Benke, T., Wenning, G. K., & Delazer, M. (2008). Impact of ambiguity and risk on decision making in mild Alzheimer's disease. Neuropsychologia, 46(7), 2043-2055.
Smith, E. E., & Jonides, J. (1999). Storage and executive processes in the frontal lobes. Science, 283(5408), 1657-1661.
Toplak, M. E., Sorge, G. B., Benoit, A., West, R. F., & Stanovich, K. E. (2010). Decision-making and cognitive abilities: A review of associations between Iowa Gambling Task performance, executive functions, and intelligence. Clinical psychology review, 30(5), 562-581.
Unsworth, N., & Engle, R. W. (2007). On the division of short-term and working memory: An examination of simple and complex span and their relation to higher order abilities. Psychological Bulletin, 133(6), 1038-1066.
Unsworth, N., Heitz, R., Schrock, J., & Engle, R. (2005). An automated version of the operation span task. Behavior Research Methods, 37(3), 498-505.
Unterrainer, J. M., & Owen, A. M. (2006). Planning and problem solving: from neuropsychology to functional neuroimaging. Journal of Physiology-Paris, 99(4), 308-317.

[1]	白学军, 张琪涵, 赵光, 孙弘进, 陈怡馨, 孙世南, 章鹏, 宋璐, 杨宇, 原胜. 连续触点运动中障碍物影响个体运动的认知神经机制[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2019, 17(2): 145-152.
[2]	赵黎明, 廉园, 李卫君. 口语句子产生中词汇选择的计划单元：来自大中小学生的比较研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2018, 16(6): 735-743.
[3]	孔海燕, 孙雨, 宋广文. 心智游移、工作记忆对初中生阅读理解的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2018, 16(3): 362-370,377.
[4]	于斌，刘惠军，乐国安. 工作记忆广度与自我损耗的关系[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2016, 14(5): 577-583.
[5]	官群. 中文数量语义更多为上的空间动觉一致性效应[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2013, 11(5): 589-594.
[6]	刘丽,李晖. 认知负荷和控制性注意对工作记忆广度任务成绩的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2008, 6(2): 112-116.

工作记忆广度与爱荷华赌博任务的关系

The Relation between Working Memory Span and Iowa Gambling Task Performance

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 6

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价