直觉性和分析性决策策略偏好的情境效应

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 旨在考察决策情境对个体的决策策略偏好的影响。研究通过两个实验分别从外显偏好和内隐偏好的角度出发,考察了个体在紧急应激和日常消费情境下,对直觉性决策策略和分析性决策策略的偏好程度,结果表明:(1)紧急应激情境下,个体在外显和内隐层面上,都更倾向直觉性决策策略;(2)日常消费情境下,个体在外显和内隐层面上,都更倾向分析性决策策略;(3)在外显层面上,个体总体上更倾向分析性决策策略。结论是,紧急应激情境会优先启动直觉性决策策略,而日常消费情境则优先启动分析性决策策略。

关键词: 直觉, 分析, 决策策略偏好, 情境

Abstract: The purpose of the present study was to examine how the context influences individual strategy preferences. We conducted two experiments on the explicit and implicit levels respectively, investigating to what extent people tend to adopt intuitive or deliberative decision strategies under the situations of emergency and consumption. Main findings are listed as follows: (1) On both of the explicit and implicit levels, people preferred to an intuitive strategy under emergence situation. (2) On both of the explicit and implicit levels, people preferred to deliberative strategy under consumption situation. (3) People more tended to use deliberative strategy than intuitive strategy no matter under either of the situations. The conclusion is that the context of emergency is more likely to prime intuitive strategy, while the context of consumption tends to prime deliberative strategy.

Key words: intuition, deliberation, strategy preference, context

中图分类号:

B849:C91

黄琳妍, 李虹, 徐继红. 直觉性和分析性决策策略偏好的情境效应[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2013, 11(6): 739-745.

Huang Linyan, Li Hong, Xu Jihong. The Context Effects of Preferences for Intuitive and Analytic Decision Strategies[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2013, 11(6): 739-745.

参考文献

陈石, 李虹. (出版中). 双系统逃生决策的顺序替代效应. 心理科学, .
李虹, 陈石, 倪士光. (2013). 直觉和分析在不同任务条件下的逃生决策效果比较. 心理学报, 45(1), 94-103.
任娜, 佐斌, 侯飞翔, 汪国驹. (2012). 情境效应或自动化加工:大学生对老年人的内隐态度. 心理学报,44 (6), 777-788.
张凤华, 张华, 曾建敏, 张庆林. (2011).意识思维和无意识思维对复杂决策的影响. 心理科学, 34(1), 88-92.
Acker, F. (2008). New findings on unconscious versus conscious thought in decision making: Additional empirical data and meta-analysis, Judgment and Decision Making, 3(4), 292-303.
Agor, W. H. (1986). The logic of intuition: How top executives make important decision. Organizational Dynamics, 14(3), 5-18.
Agor, W. H. (1990). Leading and managing productively. In W. H. Agor (Ed.), Intuition in organizations (p.285). Newbury Park, CA: Sage publication.
Betsch, C., & Kunz, J. J. (2008). Individual strategy preferences and decisional fit. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 21, 532-555.
Betsch, T., & Haberstroh, S. (2005). Current research on routine decision making: Advances and prospects. In T. Betsch, & S. Haberstroh (Eds.), The routines of decision making (pp. 359-376). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publisher.
Betsch, T., Haberstroh, S., & Hhle, C. (2002). Explaining and predicting routinized decision making: A review of theories. Theory and Psychology, 12, 453-488.
Betsch, T. (2008). The nature of intuition and its neglect in research on judgment and decision making. In H. Plessner, C. Betsch & T. Betsch (Eds.), Intuition in judgment and decision making (pp.3-22). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
Blattberg, R. C., & Hoch, S. J. (1990). Database models and managerial intuition: 50% model + 50% manager. Management Science, 36(8), 887-899.
Bodenhausen, G. V., & Todd, A. R. (2010). Automatic aspects of judgment and decision making. In B. Gawronski & B. K. Payne (Eds.), Handbook of implicit social cognition (pp. 278-294). New York: Guilford.
Bond, S.D. (2007). How should I think about it: Perceived suitability and the resolution of simultaneous conflicting preferences. Doctoral Thesis, Duke University.
Brockman, E. N., & Anthony, W. P. (1998). The influence of tacit knowledge and collective mind on strategic planning. Journal of Managerial Issues, 10(2), 204-222.
Brder, A., & Schiffer, S. (2006). Adaptive flexibility and maladaptive routines in selecting fast and frugal decision strategies, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition , 32, 904-918.
Buchtel, E. E., & Norenzayan, A. (2008). Which should you use, intuition or logic? Cultural differences in injunctive norms about reasoning. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 11(4), 264-273.
Buchtel, C., & Norenzayan, A. (2009). Thinking across cultures: Implications for dual processes. In J. St.B.T. Evans & K. Frankish (Eds.), In two minds: Dual processes and beyond (pp. 217-238).Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Casper, C., Rothermund, K., & Wentura, D. (2010). Automatic stereotype activation is context dependent. Social Psychology, 41(3), 131-136.
Damasio, A. R. (1994). Descartes’ error: Emotion, reason, and the human brain. New York: Putnam.
Dane, E., & Pratt, M. G. (2007). Exploring intuition and its role in managerial decision making. Academy of Management Review, 32, 33-54.
Dane, E., & Pratt, M. G. (2009). Conceptualizing and measuring intuition: A review of recent trends. International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 24, 1-39.
De Vries, M., Holland, R. W., & Witteman, C. L. M. (2008). Fitting decisions: Mood and intuitive versus deliberative decision strategies. Cognition and Emotion, 22, 931-943.
Dijksterhuis, A. (2004). Think different: The merits of unconscious thought in preference development and decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 586-598.
Dijksterhuis, A., Bos, M. W., Nordgren, L. F., & van Baaren, R. B. (2006). On making the right choice: The deliberation-without-attention effect. Science, 311, 1005-1007.
Epstein, S. (2010). Demystifying intuition: What it is, what it does, and how it does it. Psychological Inquiry, 21, 295-312.
Evans, J. St. B. T. (2007). On the resolution of conflict in dual process theories of reasoning. Thinking & Reasoning, 13(4), 321-339.
Evans, J. St. B. T. (2008). Dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgment, and social cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 255-278.
Evans, J. St. B. T. (2010). Intuition and reasoning: A dual-process perspective. Psychological Inquiry, 21, 313-326.
Frankish, K., & Evans, J. St. B. T. (2009). The duality of mind: An historical perspective. In J. St. B. T. Evans & K. Frankish (Eds.), In two minds: Dual processes and beyond (pp. 1-30). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Gilet, A., & Jallais, C. (2011). Valence, arousal and word associations. Cognition and Emotion, 25, 740-746.
Gilovich, T., Cone, J., & Rosenzweig, E. (2011). Where the mind goes: The infuence of endogenous priming on thought and behavior. In J. Krueger (Ed.), Judgment and decision making (pp.3-20). London, UK: Psychology Press.
Glckner, A., & Betsch, T. (2008). Modeling option and strategy choices with connectionist networks: Towards an integrative model of automatic and deliberate decision making. Judgment and Decision Making, 3(3), 215-228.
Glckner, A., & Witteman, C. (2010). Beyond dual-process models: A categorisation of processes underlying intuitive judgment and decision-making. Thinking and Reasoning, 16 (1), 1-25.
Gawronski, B. and Cesario, J. (2013). Of Mice and Men: What Animal Research Can Tell Us about Context Effects on Automatic Response in Humans. Personality and Social Psychology Review 17(2), 187-215.
Hammond, K. R. (1996).Human judgment and social policy: Irreducible uncertainty, inevitable error, unavoidable injustice. New York, NY:Oxford University Press.
Hammond, K.R., Hamm, R.M., Grassia, J., & Pearson, T. (1987). Direct comparison of the efficacy of intuitive and analytical cognition in expert judgment. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, & Cybernetics, 17(5), 753-770.
Inbar, Y., Cone, J., & Gilovich, T. (2010). People’s intuitions about intuitive insight and intuitive choice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 232-247.
Kahneman, D., & Frederick, S. (2002). Representativeness revisited: Attribute substitution in intuitive judgment. In T. Gilovich, D. Griffin, & D. Kahneman (Eds.), Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment (pp. 49-81). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Klein, G. A. (1993). Recognition -primed decision (RPD) model of rapid decision making. In G. A. Klein, J. Orasanu, R. Calderwood, & C. E. Zsambok (Eds.), Decision making in action: Models and methods (pp. 138-147). Westport, CT:Ablex Publishing.
Klauer, K. C. (2009). Spontaneous evaluations. In F. Strack & J. Frster (Eds.), Social cognition: The basis of human interaction (pp. 199-217). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
Kleinmuntz, B. (1990). Why we still use our heads instead of formulas? Toward an integrative approach. Psychological Bulletin, 107(3), 296-310.
Mikels, J. A., Maglio, S. J., Reed, A. E., & Kaplowitz, L. J. (2011). Should I go with my gut? Investigating the benefits of emotion- focused decision making. Emotion, 11(4), 743-753.
Miller, G. A. (1956). Information theory. Scientific American, 195, 42-46.
Morris, M. W., & Mason M. F. (2009). Intentionality in Intuitive Versus Analytic Processing: Insights From Social Cognitive Neuroscience. Psychological Inquiry, 20, 58-65.
Novak, T. P., & Hoffman, D. L. (2009). The fit of thinking style and situation: New measures of situation-specific experiential and rational cognition. Journal of Consumer Research, 36(1), 56-72.
Payne, B. K., Cheng, C. M., Govorun, O., & Stewart, B. D. (2005). An inkblot for attitudes: affect misattribution as implicit measurement. Journal of personality and social psychology, 89(3), 277-293.
Payne, J. W., Bettman, J. R., & Johnson, E. J. (1993).The adaptive decision maker. Cambridge. England: Cambridge University Press.
Petty, R., & Cacioppo, J. (1986). Communication and persuasion: Central and peripheral routes to attitude change. New York: Springer.
Sayegh, L., Anthony, W. P., & Perrewe, P. L. (2004). Managerial decision making under crisis: The role of emotion in an intuitive decision process. Human Resource Management Review, 14, 179-199.
Sloman, S. A. (2002). Two systems of reasoning. In T. Gilovich, D. Griffin, & D. Kahneman (Eds.), Heuristics and Biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment (pp. 379-396). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Stanovich, K. E. (2009). Distinguishing the reflective and the algorithmic mind:Is it time for a tri-process theory. In J. St. B. T. Evans & K. Frankish (Eds.), In two minds: Dual processes and beyond (pp. 55-88). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Stanovich, K.E. (2012). On the distinction between rationality and intelligence: Implications for understanding individual differences in reasoning. In: Holyoak KJ, Morrison RG, editors. The Oxford handbook of thinking and reasoning(pp. 343-360). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Vries, M. D., Holland, R. W., & Witteman, C. L. (2008). Fitting decisions: Mood and intuitive versus deliberative decision strategies. Cognition and Emotion, 22(5), 931-943.
Wentura, D., & Degner, J. (2010). A practical guide to sequential priming and related tasks. Handbook of implicit social cognition: Measurement, theory, and applications,(pp. 95-116). New York: Guilford.

[1]	曾拓, 马伟军, 孙名秀, 莫雷. 分析思维对冲动购买意向影响的研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(4): 536-541.
[2]	朱娜平, 王文平, 李丽琼, 刘雁伶. 数量让位价值：5～10岁儿童公平分配发展的“此消彼长”[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(2): 233-239.
[3]	白慧慧, 王雨晴, 孙婉靖. 留守儿童心理韧性的元分析[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(2): 261-267.
[4]	周广方, 魏子晗, 欧阳良媛, Ngure Mary Muthoni, 王晓庄. 描述信息与经验不一致对个体风险选择的影响：决策模型的拟合[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(1): 29-36.
[5]	张馨予, 孙琦, 周广东, 李冰. 大学生进食障碍症状的潜在剖面分析及其与抑郁的关系[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(1): 73-79.
[6]	王嘉莹, 姚梅林, 刘红瑞. 成就目标与教师效能感、焦虑、工作投入的关系：基于变量中心和个体中心的视角[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(1): 122-129.
[7]	游旭群, 李倩钦, 张桢堉, 黄浦江, 刘志远. N-back任务训练迁移效果及其影响因素：来自元分析的证据[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(6): 794-801.
[8]	熊思成, 张斌, 姜永志, 蒋怀滨, 陈芸. 手机成瘾流行率及其影响因素的元分析[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(6): 802-808.
[9]	李飞飞, 缴润凯, 刘丹, 尹航. 幼儿教师感恩特质与职业使命感的交叉滞后分析[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(6): 824-830.
[10]	贾晓珊, 朱海东. 社会经济地位与儿童青少年心理健康关系的元分析[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(5): 671-678.
[11]	高峰, 白学军. 越努力越幸福—中国背景下成就动机与主观幸福感的元分析[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(4): 466-472.
[12]	史滋福, 唐婉秋, 谢云天. 初中生认知需求与数学学业成绩的关系：基于潜在剖面分析[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(4): 480-485.
[13]	万娇娇, 纪莉莉, 吴丽娜, 张亚飞, 刘改改, 谷璜, 赵俊峰. 农村留守初中生亲子亲合与安全感的关系：一项交叉滞后研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(4): 500-506.
[14]	马玲玲, 余鸿燕, 范为桥, 孟小. 父母教养方式与随迁儿童问题行为关系的交叉滞后分析[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(3): 334-340.
[15]	朱文凤, 夏凌翔. 大学生神经质纵向预测攻击行为的时间路径模型：敌意归因偏向和愤怒沉浸的双向中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(3): 396-402.