认知风格分型的神经基础：静息态fMRI研究**

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 认知风格是个体习惯性的加工偏好。行为研究和任务态的功能成像研究已为认知风格分型理论提供了丰富的依据，但关于个体安静无任务状态下的脑活动是否也能表现出认知风格上的差异仍知之甚少。本研究使用静息态功能磁共振（fMRI）技术，以在校大学生为研究对象，以较为严格的标准使用认知风格分型任务分离出整体型和分析型认知风格被试，通过分析两组被试局部脑活动的一致性和整体脑活动的功能连接性，考察了静息条件下认知风格分型的神经基础。结果发现，不同认知风格群体的脑局部和整体活动均可能存在差异。个体越偏向分析型认知风格，左侧小脑的激活越强；左侧小脑与双侧大脑的功能区有更强、更广泛的连接。结果提示，安静无任务下个体的脑活动也可能表现出认知风格上的差异。

关键词: 整体型认知风格, 分析型认知风格, 静息态fMRI, 小脑。

Abstract: Cognitive style is referred to the preference for cognitive processing. Results from lots of behavior and brain imaging studies demonstrated that individuals exhibited different cognitive style while performing certain cognitive tasks，but little is know about whether individuals’ brain activities would display such cognitive style differences under resting state. In the present study, undergraduates were divided into two groups(holistic or analytic cognitive style)according to their performance in the Frame Line Test. And the differences of the brain regional homogeneity and functional connectivity pattern between the two groups were explored using the resting-state fMRI technology. Results showed that, the analytic group is distinct from the holistic group both in the local and global resting brain activities. The more tended to the analytic, the greater activation in left cerebellum, the more extensive functional connectivity between left cerebellum and bilateral brain regions. These results suggested that, the resting brain activities, as well as task-evoked brain activities, may be shaped by individual’s cognitive style.

Key words: the holistic cognitive style, the analytic cognitive style, resting-state fMRI, cerebellum.

中图分类号:

B848

杨楠,叶卓尔,林依,高宏巍,黄平,林慧妍,许欢,马军朋,金花. 认知风格分型的神经基础：静息态fMRI研究*^*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2015, 13(3): 320-327.

Yang Nan,Ye Zhuoer,Lin Yi,Gao Hongwei,Huang Ping,Lin Huiyan,Xue Huan,Ma Junpeng,Jin Hua. The Neural Basis of Cognitive Style: an Resting-state fMRI study[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2015, 13(3): 320-327.

参考文献

[1] 宋晓伟.(2008). 静息态功能磁共振数据分析处理工具包的设计与实现. 北京师范大学硕士学位论文.
[2] 王辉, 卢洁, 李坤成, 张苗, 王晓怡.(2013). 中学生空间图形认知能力的发展研究. 中国医学影像技术报, 29(4), 651-654.
[3] 王有智.(2003). 认知风格、内外倾向、情绪稳定性与图形推理效果的关系. 心理科学, 26（6）, 1077-1081.
[4] 王有智.(2004).大学生不同认知方式对图形推理水平的影响——兼谈认知过程中的人格作用. 心理科学, 27(2), 359一39
[5] 岳鹏飞.(2010). 场认知方式个体在视空间加工上的 ERP 研究. 山东师范大学硕士学位论文.
[6] 赵晓妮, 游旭群.(2008). 场认知方式对心理旋转影响的实验研究. 应用心理学, 13(4), 334-340.
[7] 周珍, 连四清, 周春荔.(2001). 中学生空间图形认知能力的发展研究. 数学教育学报, 10(1), 75-78.
[8] Alloway, T. P., Banner, G. E., & Smith, P.(2010). Working memory and cognitive styles in adolescents’ attainment. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(4), 567-581.
[9] Allport, G. W.(1937). Personality: a psychological interpretation. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 13(7), 48-50.
[10] Binder, J. R., Desai, R. H., Graves, W. W., Conant, L. L.(2009). Where is the semantic system? A critical review and meta-analysis of 120 functional neuroimaging studies. Cerebral Cortex, 19, 2767-2796.
[11] Bouvet, L., Rousset, S., Valdois, S., & Donnadieu, S.(2011). Global precedence effect in audition and vision: Evidence for similar cognitive styles across modalities. Acta psychologica, 138(2), 329-335.
[12] Chiao, J. Y., Harada, T., Komeda, H., Li, Z., Mano, Y., Saito, D., Parrish, T. B., Sadato, N., & Iidaka, T.(2009). Neural Basis of ndividualistic and Collectivistic Views of Self. Human Brain Mapping. 30(9), 2813-2820.
[13] Copland, D. A., de Zubicaray, G. I., Mcmahon, K., & Eastburn, M.(2007). Neural correlates of semantic priming for ambiguous words: an event-related fmri study. Brain Research, 1131(1), 163-172.
[14] Damarla, S. R., Keller, T. A., Kana, R. K., Cherkassky, V. L., Williams, D. L., Minshew, N. J., & Just, M. A.(2010). Cortical underconnectivity coupled with preserved visuospatial cognition in autism: evidence from an fMRI study of an embedded figures task. Autism Research, 3(5), 273-279.
[15] Duffy, S., Toriyama, R., Itakura, S., & Kitayama, S.(2009). Development of cultural strategies of attention in North American and Japanese children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 102(3), 351-359
[16] Evans, J. B. T. & Over, D. E.(1996). Rationality and reasoning. Hove: Psychology Press.
[17] Focquaert, F., Steven-Wheeler, M. S., Vanneste, S., Doron, K. W., & Platek, S. M.(2010). Mindreading in individuals with an empathizing versus systemizing cognitive style: an fMRI study. Brain research bulletin, 83(5), 214-222.
[18] Grabowski, T. J., Damasio, H., Damasio, A.R.(1998). Premotor and prefrontal correlates of category-related lexical retrieval. Neuroimage, 7, 232-243.
[19] Gutchess, A. H., Hedden, T., Ketay, S., Aron, A., & Gabrieli, J. D.(2010). Neural differences in the processing of semantic relationships across cultures. Social cognitive and affective neuroscience, 5(2-3), 254-263.
[20] Gutchess, A. H., Welsh, R. C., Boduro?觧lu, A., & Park, D. C.(2006). Cultural differences in neural function associated with object processing. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 6(2), 102-109.
[21] Hao, X., Wang, K., Li, W., Yang, W., Wei, D., Qiu, J., & Zhang, Q.(2013). Individual Differences in Brain Structure and Resting Brain Function Underlie Cognitive Styles: Evidence from the Embedded Figures Test. PloS one, 8(12), e78089.
[22] James, W.(1890). The principles of psychology. New York: Dover.
[23] Ji, L., Zhang, Z., Nisbett, R. E.(2004). Is It Culture or Is It Language? Examination of Language Effects in Cross-Cultural Research on Categorization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(1), 57–65.
[24] Kitayama, S., Duffy, S., Kawamura, T., & Larsen, J. T.(2003). Perceiving an object and its context in different cultures: A cultural look at new look. Psychological Science, 14, 201-206.
[25] Kotz, S. A., Cappa, S. F., von Cramon, D. Y., Friederici, A. D.(2002). Modulation of the lexical-semantic network by auditory semantic priming: an event-related functional MRI study. Neuroimage, 17, 1761-1772.
[26] Kozhevnikov, M., Kozhevnikov, M., Yu, C. J., & Blazhenkova, O.(2013). Creativity, visualization abilities, and visual cognitive style. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(2), 196-209.
[27] Kraemer, D. J., Hamilton, R., Messing, S. B., DeSantis, J. H., & Thompson-Schill, S. L.(2014). Cognitive style, cortical stimulation, and the conversion hypothesis. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 15.
[28] Kuhnen, U., Hannover, B., & Schubert, B.(2001). The semantic-procedural interface model of the self: The role of self-knowledge for context-dependent versus context-independent modes of thinking. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 397-409.
[29] Lin, Z., Lin, Y., & Han, S.(2008). Self-construal priming modulates visual activity underlying global/local perception.Biological psychology, 77(1), 93-97.
[30] Maguire, M. J., Brier, M. R., & Ferree, T. C.(2010). EEG theta and alpha responses reveal qualitative differences in processing taxonomic versus thematic semantic relationships. Brain and language, 114(1), 16-25.
[31] Martin, A.(2007). The representation of object concepts in the brain. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 25-45.
[32] Meng, X., Mao, W., Sun, W., Zhang, X., Han, C., Lu, C., ... & Wang, Y.(2012). Event-related potentials in adolescents with different cognitive styles: field dependence and field independence. Experimental brain research, 216(2), 231-241.
[33] Miller, M. B., Donovan, C. L., Bennett, C. M., Aminoff, E. M., & Mayer, R. E.(2012). Individual differences in cognitive style and strategy predict similarities in the patterns of brain activity between individuals. NeuroImage, 59(1), 83-93.
[34] Neisser, U.(1963). The multiplicity of thought. British Journal of Psychology, 54, 1-14.
[35] Neuner, I., St?觟cker, T., Kellermann, T., Kircher, T., Zilles, K., Schneider, F., & Shah, N. J.(2007). Wechsler Memory Scale Revised Edition: neural correlates of the visual paired associates subtest adapted for fMRI. Brain research, 1177, 66-78.
[36] O’connor, K. P. & Shaw, J. C.(1978). Field dependence, laterality and the EEG. Biological Psychology, 6(2), 93-109
[37] Oltman, P. K.(1979). Cognitive style and interhemispheric differentiation in the EEG. Neuropsychologia, 17, 699-702.
[38] Passot, J. B., Sheynikhovich, D., Duvelle, ?魪., & Arleo, A.(2012). Contribution of cerebellar sensorimotor adaptation to hippocampal spatial memory. PloS one, 7(4), e32560.
[39] Posner, M. I., Rothbart, M. K., & Sheese, B. E.(2007). The anterior cingulate gyrus and the mechanism of self-regulation. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 7(4), 391-395.
[40] Riding, R. J.(1991). Cognitive styles analysis. Learning and Training Technology, Birmingham.
[41] Riding, R. J.(1997). On the nature of cognitive style. Educational Psychology, 17, 29-50.
[42] Riding R. J, & Cheema I.(1991). Cognitive style- an overview and integration. Educational Psychology, 11, 193-216.
[43] Riding, R. J., & Rayner, S.(1995). The information Superhighway and individualized learning. 15, 365-378.
[44] Rips, L. J.(1989). Similarity, typicality, and categorization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[45] Riskind, J. H., Kleiman, E. M., Seifritz, E., & Neuhoff, J.(2014). Influence of anxiety, depression and looming cognitive style on auditory looming perception. Journal of anxiety disorders, 28(1), 45-50.
[46] Rittschof, K. A.(2010). Field dependence-independence as visuospatial and executive functioning in working memory: implications for instructional systems design and research. Educational Technology Research and Development, 58(1), 99-114.
[47] Sass, K., Sachs, O., Krach, S., Kircher, T.(2009). Taxonomic and thematic categories: neural correlates of categorization in an auditory-to-visual priming task using FMRI. Brain Research, 1270, 78-87.
[48] Shoshina, I. I., & Shelepin, J. E.(2013). The Efficiency of Recognition of the Size of Segments of Line by the Observers with Different Parameters of the Cognitive Style. Zhurnal Vysshei Nervnoi Deyatelnosti Imeni Ip Pavlova, 63(3), 349-356.
[49] Smith, E. E., Langston, C., & Nisbett, R. E.(1992). The case for rules in reasoning. Cognitive Science, 16, 1-40.
[50] Smith, E. E., Patalano, A. L., & Jonides, J.(1998). Alternative strategies of categorization. Cognition, 65, 167-196
[51] Uskul, A. K., Kltayama, S., & Nisbett, R. E.(2008). Ecocultural basis of cognition: Farmers and fishermen are more holistic than herders. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105: 8552-8556
[52] Wager, T. D., Smith, E. E.(2003). Neuroimaging studies of working memory: a meta-analysis. Cognitive, Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience, 3, 255-274.
[53] Walter, E., & Dassonville, P.(2011). Activation in a frontoparietal cortical network underlies individual differences in the performance of an embedded figures task. PloS one, 6(7), e20742.
[54] Wu, T., Zang, Y., Wang, L., Long, X., Li, K., & Chan, P.(2007). Normal aging decreases regional homogeneity of the motor areas in the resting state. Neuroscience letters, 423(3), 189-193.
[55] Zang, Y., Jiang, T., Lu, Y., He, Y., & Tian, L.(2004). Regional homogeneity approach to fMRI data analysis. Neuroimage, 22(1), 394-400.
[56] Zoccolotti, P.(1982). Field dependence, laterality and the eeg: a reanalysis of O’connor and shaw(1978). Biological Psychology,15, 203-207.

认知风格分型的神经基础：静息态fMRI研究^

The Neural Basis of Cognitive Style: an Resting-state fMRI study

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	徐文明, 叶彩霞, 方烨仪. 早期累积家庭风险对青少年内化问题的影响：弹性双重机制[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(3): 361-368.
[2]	麻书滔, 陈少华, 麻彦坤. 未成年犯童年期受虐待程度与攻击行为的关系：有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(2): 220-226.
[3]	周含芳, 刘志军, 樊毓美, 李百涵. 初中生亲子关系与网络欺负：孤独感的中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2019, 17(6): 787-794.
[4]	田宏杰. 完美主义高标准对大学生拖延行为的影响：链式中介效应分析[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2019, 17(5): 668-674.
[5]	胡瑜, 黄崇蓉, 严婷婷. 公益广告对青少年公益行为的内隐启动研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2019, 17(3): 354-359.
[6]	耿靖宇, 侯晓, 杨华勇, 韩丕国, 高峰强, 韩磊. 特质焦虑与大学生拖延行为的关系：有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2019, 17(3): 402-407.
[7]	胡心怡, 陈英和. 智力增长观对高威胁下自我评价的作用效果：呈现顺序和自尊的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2018, 16(2): 195-201.
[8]	张洪家, 汪玲, 张敏. 创造性认知风格、创造性人格与创造性思维的关系[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2018, 16(1): 51-57.
[9]	张田, 傅宏, 朱婷婷. “善待宽恕者”还是“报复非宽恕者”：基于博弈范式对冒犯者得到宽恕以后行为动机的研究^*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2017, 15(3): 323-328.
[10]	高峰强, 杨华勇, 任跃强, 韩磊. 羞怯与敌对的关系：同伴侵害和偏执的复合中介效应^*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2017, 15(3): 400-404.
[11]	梅松丽, 柴晶鑫, 李娇朦, 王凌燕. 冲动性、自我调节与手机依赖的关系研究：手机使用的中介作用*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2017, 15(1): 136-143.
[12]	方溦,葛列众,甘甜. 道德具身认知的理论研究^*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2016, 14(6): 765-772.
[13]	赵彦凯, 李晖, 吴真, 张珊珊. 认知抑制与人际宽恕：特质宽恕的调节作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2016, 14(4): 531-536.
[14]	梁福成,周宇,王俊坤,唐卫海. 公正世界信念与跨情境动机效应[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2016, 14(3): 367-371.
[15]	王建峰,皇甫桦彦. 基于自我决定视角的动机结构与主观幸福感的关系^*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2016, 14(2): 234-240.