傣-汉双语小学生词汇选择过程中的抑制控制*

心理与行为研究 ›› 2015, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (5): 671-677.

傣-汉双语小学生词汇选择过程中的抑制控制*

陶云^1,2,陈睿^1,2,刘智^1,2,王晓曦³,马谐^1,2,陈红⁴

1 云南师范大学民族教育信息化教育部重点实验室，昆明 650500
2 云南师范大学教育科学与管理学院，昆明 650500 3 西南大学心理学部，重庆 400715
4 云南开放大学，昆明 650500

收稿日期:2015-08-15 出版日期:2015-09-20 发布日期:2015-09-29
通讯作者: 陶云，E-mail: taoyun2011@126.com。
基金资助:
云南省教育科学“十二五”规划课题（GY11025）和国家自然科学科研基金项目（31260240）。

Inhibitory Control in Dai-Han Bilingual Children in Lexical Selection

Tao Yun^1,2, Chen Rui^1,2, Liu Zhi^1,2, Wang Xiaoxi³, Ma Xie^1,2, Chen Hong⁴

1 Department of Educational Science and Management, Yunnan Normal University, kunming 650500;
2 Key Laboratory of Educational Information for Nationalities YNNU, Ministry of Education, Kunming 650500;
3 School of Psychology, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715;
4 Yunnan Open University, Kunming 650500

Received:2015-08-15 Online:2015-09-20 Published:2015-09-29

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 双语者在词汇选择过程中进行两种语言之间的转换称为语码切换。实验1采用语码切换范式，探讨不同熟练程度傣-汉双语小学生的语码切换代价。结果发现，傣-汉双语小学生在语码切换任务中产生了切换代价，且熟练与非熟练双语小学生均存在切换代价的不对称现象，切换至汉语的代价大于切换至傣语的代价。基于实验1发现的语码切换代价不对称现象，实验2选取刺激-刺激和刺激-反应相容任务，对傣-汉双语小学生的语码切换代价的抑制控制机制进行深入研究。结果发现，熟练双语小学生的抑制控制能力比非熟练双语小学生强，二者的差异主要表现在反应抑制阶段。

关键词: 傣-汉双语, 小学生, 词汇选择, 抑制控制, 语码切换

Abstract: The lexical selection of two languages for bilinguals is called language switching. Experiment 1 used language-switching paradigm to investigate the switching costs of proficient and non-proficient Dai-Han bilinguals. The results revealed that switching cost of both proficient and non-proficient bilinguals were asymmetrical. Moreover, cost of switching into Han were larger than cost of switching into Dai. In order to further study the asymmetrical of switch costs in lexical selection, Experiment 2 used a combined stimulus-stimulus and stimulus-response compatibility paradigm that investigated the mechanism of inhibitory control. The result indicated a difference of inhibitory control that emerged in the response inhibition stage with interference by Han lexicons. Compared to NPB, PB showed inhibition control advantage.

Key words: Dai-Han bilinguals, primary school students, lexical selection, inhibitory control, language switching.

中图分类号:

B842.5

陶云,陈睿,刘智,王晓曦,马谐,陈红. 傣-汉双语小学生词汇选择过程中的抑制控制*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2015, 13(5): 671-677.

Tao Yun, Chen Rui, Liu Zhi, Wang Xiaoxi, Ma Xie, Chen Hong. Inhibitory Control in Dai-Han Bilingual Children in Lexical Selection[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2015, 13(5): 671-677.

参考文献

刘敏.(2012). 蒙汉双语者冲突控制和反应抑制的实验研究. 内蒙古师范大学.
刘艳, 陶云.(2015). 少数民族儿童汉语发展性阅读障碍研究. 昆明: 云南科技出版社.
罗美珍.(2008). 傣语方言研究(语法). 北京: 民族出版社.
张茜, 张文鹏.(2007). 双语心理词典表征理论及研究. 电子科技大学学报: 社会科学版, 9(3), 80-84.
周晓林, 亚克甫玛依拉, 李恋敬, 吕建国.(2008). 语言经验可以改变双语者的主导语言. 心理科学, 31(2), 266-272.
Bialystok, E.(2007). Cognitive effects of bilingualism: How linguistic experience leads to cognitive change. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 10(3), 210-223.
Bialystok, E., Craik, F., & Luk, G.(2008). Cognitive control and lexical access in younger and older bilinguals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34(4), 859.
Costa, A., & Santesteban, M.(2004). Lexical access in bilingual speech production: Evidence from language switching in highly proficient bilinguals and L2 learners. Journal of Memory and Language, 50(4), 491-511.
Costa, A., Roelstraete, B., & Hartsuiker, R. J.(2006). The lexical bias effect in bilingual speech production: Evidence for feedback between lexical and sublexical levels across languages. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13(6), 972-977.
De Bot, K.(2000). A bilingual production model: Levelt's‘speaking’model adapted. Applied Linguistics, 13(1), 1-24.
Declerck, M., Stephan, D. N., Koch, I., & Philipp, A. M.(2015). The other modality: Auditory stimuli in language switching. Journal of Cognitive Psychology(ahead-of-print), 1-7.
Filippi, R., Karaminis, T., & Thomas, M.(2014). Bilingual language switching in production: Empirical and computational studies. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 17, 294-315.
Finkbeiner, M., Almeida, J., Janssen, N., & Caramazza, A.(2006). Lexical selection in bilingual speech production does not involve language suppression. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32(5), 1075.
Frühholz, S., Godde, B., Finke, M., & Herrmann, M.(2011). Spatio-temporal brain dynamics in a combined stimulus-stimulus and stimulus-response conflict task. Neuroimage, 54(1), 622-634.
Gollan, T. H., Sandoval, T., & Salmon, D. P.(2011). Cross-language intrusion errors in aging bilinguals reveal the link between executive control and language selection. Psychological Science, 22(9), 1155-1164.
Green, D. W.(1998). Mental control of the bilingual lexico-semantic system. Bilingualism: Language and cognition, 1(02), 67-81.
Grosjean, F.(1982). Life with two languages: An introduction to bilingualism: Harvard University Press.
Guo, T., Liu, F., Chen, B., & Li, S.(2013). Inhibition of non-target languages in multilingual word production: Evidence from Uighur-Chinese-English trilinguals. Actapsychologica, 143(3), 277-283.
Jin, Z., Zhang, J., & Li, L.(2014). Endogenous language control in Chinese-English switching: An event-related potentials study. Neuroscience bulletin, 30(3), 461-468.
Kornblum, S.(1992). Dimensional overlap and dimensional relevance in stimulus-response and stimulus-stimulus compatibility. Paper presented at the Portions of this paper were presented at the Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Nov 1990, New Orleans, LA.
Kornblum, S., & Lee, J.(1995). Stimulus-response compatibility with relevant and irrelevant stimulus dimensions that do and do not overlap with the response. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21(4), 855.
Kroll, J. F., Bobb, S. C., Misra, M., & Guo, T.(2008). Language selection in bilingual speech: Evidence for inhibitory processes. Actapsychologica, 128(3), 416-430.
La Heij, W.(2005). Monolingual and bilingual lexical access in speech production: Issues and models. Kroll & de Groot(eds.), 289-307.
Macizo, P., Bajo, T., & Paolieri, D.(2012). Language switching and language competition. Second Language Research, 28(2), 131-149.
Peeters, D., Runnqvist, E., Bertrand, D., & Grainger, J.(2014). Asymmetrical switch costs in bilingual language production induced by reading words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40(1), 284.
Robertson, I. H., Manly, T., Andrade, J., Baddeley, B. T., & Yiend, J.(1997). Oops!': Performance correlates of everyday attentional failures in traumatic brain injured and normal subjects. Neuropsychologia, 35(6), 747-758.
Schwieter, J. W., & Sunderman, G.(2008). Language switching in bilingual speech production: In search of the language-specific selection mechanism. The Mental Lexicon, 3(2), 214-238.
Simon, J. R.(1969). Reactions toward the source of stimulation.Journal of experimental psychology, 81(1), 174.
Thomas, M. S., & Allport, A.(2000). Language switching costs in bilingual visual word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 43(1), 44-66.
Verhoef, K. M., Roelofs, A., & Chwilla, D. J.(2010). Electrophysiological evidence for endogenous control of attention in switching between languages in overt picture naming. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22(8), 1832-1843.
Wang, K., Li, Q., Zheng, Y., Wang, H., & Liu, X.(2014). Temporal and spectral profiles of stimulus-stimulus and stimulus-response conflict processing. Neuroimage, 89, 280-288.
Weinreich, U.(1979). Languages in contact: Findings and problems: Walter de Gruyter.
Zhang, H. H., Zhang, J., & Kornblum, S.(1999). A parallel distributed processing model of stimulus-stimulus and stimulus-response compatibility. Cognitive Psychology, 38(3), 386-432.

[1]	刘璇璇, 张李斌, 刘峥, 杨喆, 李丽娜. 正念训练对康复期精神分裂症患者抑制控制的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(1): 138-144.
[2]	梁菲菲, 向颖, 武浩, 韩洋. 汉语发展性阅读障碍小学生词边界划分的发展研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(6): 757-763.
[3]	李赛男, 闫国利, 王亚丽, 刘敏, 赵淑萍. 一年级小学生阅读知觉广度的眼动研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(5): 606-611.
[4]	邱晨, 牛美心, 周新林, 杨涛. 四、七年级学生分数数量表征与数学学业成就的关系：分数概念理解的中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(5): 628-635.
[5]	张苏媛, 兰泽波, 张水, 孟珠, 闫国利. 无关言语对一年级小学生阅读影响的眼动研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(4): 433-438,446.
[6]	郭筱琳, 秦欢, 罗良. 父母孝道信念与小学生孝道信念的关系：父母教育卷入的中介作用及家庭结构的差异[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(2): 258-264.
[7]	刘文, 孟祥蕊, 车翰博, 张嘉琪, 沈漪. 小学生创造性人格教师评定问卷的编制及信效度检验[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(5): 624-630.
[8]	曾桐奥, 卜晓鸥, 王庭照, 马海林. 听障儿童抑制控制能力特点及其与数学基本能力的关系[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(4): 517-523.
[9]	刁春婷, 周文倩, 黄臻. 小学生成长型思维模式与学业成绩、生活满意度的关系：学业自我效能感的中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(4): 524-529.
[10]	苏金龙, 肖瑶, 苏彦捷. 哈欠传染的发展与演化：一项探索性研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(3): 346-353.
[11]	王立东, 李倩, 罗良. 父母家校沟通与小学生参与数学课外补习的关系研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(1): 67-71.
[12]	赵黎明, 刘奕伶. 口吃儿童言语产生中的抑制控制：来自出声Go/Nogo任务的证据[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2019, 17(6): 780-786.
[13]	王江洋, 肖青, 聂家昕, 高亚华. 孤儿小学生主观幸福感的积极心理教育干预[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2019, 17(5): 634-643.
[14]	麦子峰, 孙瑞, 张群, 梁华, 马宁. 个体行为的昼夜节律效应：来自华南地区的证据[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2019, 17(2): 185-192.
[15]	赵黎明, 廉园, 李卫君. 口语句子产生中词汇选择的计划单元：来自大中小学生的比较研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2018, 16(6): 735-743.