认知抑制对创造性科学问题提出的影响：认知风格的中介作用

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 以105名大学生为被试,考察了认知抑制能力与创造性科学问题提出之间的关系,以及认知风格的中介作用。结果表明：（1）个体的认知抑制能力与创造性科学问题提出之间呈现正相关,对于个体在开放性情境下的问题提出流畅性、灵活性和独创性可以起到显著的正向预测作用;对于封闭性问题情境下的预测作用则并不显著。（2）认知风格在认知抑制能力与开放性情境下的创造性科学问题提出之间的关系中具有中介作用,主要表现为认知抑制能力高的个体具有更强的场独立倾向,进而在开放性情境下的创造性科学问题提出活动中表现更好。

关键词: 认知抑制, 创造性科学问题提出, 认知风格, 中介作用。

Abstract: 105 undergraduates were recruited to complete the Mittenecker Pointing Test, creative scientific problem finding task and embedded figure test, to measure of cognitive inhibition, creative scientific problem finding and field cognitive style respecticely. The results show that 1)Cognitive inhibition showed significant positive relationship with creative scientific problem finding performance and this relationship was moderated by problem finding situation, which showed that cognitive inhibition predicted individuals′ problem finding performance significantly only in open situation, not in closed situation. 2)Field cognitive style mediated the relationship between cognitive inhibition and creative scientific problem finding performance in open situation, which showed that individuals who have high cognitive inhibition were inclined to perform field independence, and then could find more creative scientific problems in open situation.

Key words: cognitive inhibition, creative scientific problem finding, field cognitive style, the mediating effect.

胡卫平, 程丽芳, 贾小娟, 韩蒙, 陈英和. 认知抑制对创造性科学问题提出的影响：认知风格的中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2015, 13(6): 721-728.

Hu Weiping, Cheng Lifang, Jia Xiaojuan, Han Meng, Chen Yinghe. The influence of Cognitive inhibition to Creative Scientific Problem Finding: Mediating Effect of Field Cognitive Style[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2015, 13(6): 721-728.

参考文献

1 邓铸, 曾晓尤.(2008). 场依存性认知方式对问题表征及表征转换的影响. 心理科学, 31(4), 814-817.
2 费广洪, 王细英, 龚桂红.(2013). 图文相关性对不同认知方式大学生阅读影响的眼动研究. 心理学报. 45(7). 783-789.
3 胡卫平, 王兴起.(2010). 情绪对创造性科学问题提出能力的影响. 心理科学, 33(3), 608-611.
4 胡卫平, 周蓓.(2010). 动机对高一学生创造性的科学问题提出能力的影响. 心理发展与教育, 25 (1), 31-36.
5 赖丁, 雷纳.(2003). 认知风格与学习策略—理解学习和行为中的风格差异. 上海: 华东师范大学出版社.
6 李寿欣, 李涛.(2000). 大学生认知方式与人际交往及创造力之间关系的研究. 心理科学, 23, 119-120.
7 刘正奎, 程黎, 施建农.(2007). 创造力与注意模式之间的关系. 心理科学, 30(7), 387-390.
8 沈汪兵, 刘昌, 王永娟.(2010). 艺术创造力的脑神经生理基础. 心理科学进展, 18(10), 1520-1528.
9 宋广文, 韩树杰.(2007). 场依存—独立认知方式干扰抑制的比较. 心理与行为研究, 5(2), 100-104.
10 王洪礼, 周玉林.(2006). 城乡高中生认知方式与创造力关系的比较研究. 心理科学, 29(1), 111-114.
11 武欣, 张厚粲.(1997). 创造力研究的新进展. 北京师范大学学报(社会科学版), 139(1), 13-18.
12 姚海娟, 白学军.(2014). 创造性思维与认知抑制的关系. 心理科学, 37(2), 316-321.
13 姚海娟, 沈德立.(2006). 启发信息对个体顿悟问题解决影响的眼动研究. 心理与行为研究, 4(3), 207-212.
14 衣新发, 胡卫平.(2013). 科学创造力与艺术创造力：启动效应及领域影响. 心理科学进展. 21(1), 22-30.
15 俞国良, 侯瑞鹤.(2004). 问题提出、认知风格与学校教育中的创造力培养. 教育科学, 20(4), 54-58.
16 岳珍珠, 周晓林.(2004). 国外最新研究动态: 执行功能与认知控制. 心理科学进展, 12(5), 762-764.
17 Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A.(1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182.
18 Benedek, M., Franz, F., Heene, M., & Neubauer, A. C.(2012). Differential effects of cognitive inhibition and intelligence on creativity. Personality and individual differences, 53, 480-485.
19 Brugger, P.(1997). Variables that influences the generation of random sequences: An update. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 84, 627-661.
20 Burch, G. S., Hemsley, D. R., Pavelis, C., & Corr, P. J.(2006). Personality, creativity and latent inhibition. European Journal of Personality, 20, 107-122.
21 Carson, S. H., Peterson, J. B., & Higgins, D. M.(2003). Decreased latent inhibition is associated with increased creative achievement in high-functioning individuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 499-506.
22 Chand, I., & Runco, M. A.(1993). Problem finding skills as components in the creative process. Personality and Individual Differences, 14(1), 155-162.
23 Dietrich, A.(2004). The cognitive neuroscience of creativity. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 1011-1026.
24 Dietrich, A., & Kanso, R.(2010). A review of EEG, ERP, and neuroimaging studies of creativity and insight. Psychology Bulletin, 136(5), 822-848.
25 Edl, S., Benedek, M., Papousek, I., Weiss, E. M., & Fink, A.(2014). Creativity and the Stroop interference effect. Personality and Individual Differences, 69, 38-42.
26 Eysenck, H. J.(1993). Creativity and personality: Suggestion for a theory. Psychological Inquiry. 4(3): 147-178.
27 Furnham, A., & Crump, J.(2013). The sensitive, imaginative, articulate art student and conservative, cool, numerate science student: Individual differences in art and science students. Learning and Individual Differences, 25, 150-155.
28 Getzels, J. W.(1975). Problem-finding and the inventiveness of solutions. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 9(1), 12-18.
29 Getzels, J. W., & Csikszentmihalyi, M.(1975). From problem solving to problem finding. In I. A. Taylor, & J. W. Getzels (Eds.), Perspectives in creativity, 90(p. 116). United States: Transaction Publishers.
30 Goode, P. E., Goddard, P. H., & Pascual-Leone, J.(2002) Event-related potentials index cognitive style differences during a serial-order recall task. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 43, 123-140.
31 Groborz, M., & Necka, E.(2003). Creativity and cognitive control: Explorations of generation and evaluation skills. Creativity Research Journal, 15, 183-197.
32 Han, Q., Hu, W., Liu, J., Jia, X., & Adey, P.(2013). The Influence of Peer Interaction on Students' Creative Problem-Finding Ability. Creativity Research Journal, 25(3), 248-258.
33 Holroyd, C. B., Nieuwenhuis, S., Yeung, N., Nystrom, L., Mars, R. B., Coles, M. G. H., & Cohen, J. D.(2004). Dorsal anterior cingulated cortex shows fMRI response to internal and external error signals. Nature Neuroscience, 7(5): 497- 498.
34 Hu, W., Shi, Q. Z., Han, Q., Wang, X., & Adey, P.(2010). Creative scientific problem finding and its developmental trend. Creativity Research Journal, 22(1), 46-52.
35 Iyengar, S. S., & Lepper, M. R.(2000). When choice is demotivating: Can one desire too much of a good thing? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 995-1006.
36 Iyer, L. R., Doboli, S., Minai, A. A., Brown, V. R., Levine, D. S., & Paulus, P. B.(2009). Neural dynamics of idea generation and the effects of priming. Neural Networks, 22, 674-686.
37 Jay, E., & Perkins, D.(1997). Creativity's compass: A review of problem finding. In M. A. Runco(Ed.), Creativity research handbook(vol. 1, pp. 257-293).Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
38 Jia, S., Zhang, Q., & Li, S.(2014). Field dependence-independence modulates the efficiency of filtering out irrelevant information in a visual working memory task. Neuroscience, 278, 136-143.
39 Jung, R. E., Segall, J. M., Bockholt, H. J., Chavez, R. S., Flores, R., & Haier, R. J.(2010). Neuroanatomy of Creativity. Human Brain Mapping, 31(3), 398-409.
40 Kern, J. G., Cohen, J. D., MacDonald, A. W., Cho, R. Y., Stenger, V. A., & Carter, C. S.(2004). Anterior cingulated conflict monitoring and adjustments in control. Science, 303(13), 1023-1026.
41 Limb, C. J., & Braun, A. R.(2008). Neural substrates of spontaneous musical performance: An fMRI study of jazz improvisation. PLoS ONE, 3(2), e1679.
42 Markela-Lerenc, J., Ille, N., Kaiser, S., Fiedler, P., Mundt, C., & Weisbrod, M.(2004). Prefrontal-cingulate activation during executive control: Which comes first? Cognitive Brain Research, 18, 278-287.
43 Mittenecker, E.(1958). Die Analyse “zuf?lliger” Reaktionsfolgen [The analysis of “random” action sequences]. Zeitschrift für Experimentelle und Angewandte Psychologie, 5, 45-60.
44 Miyake, A., Friedman, N. P., Emerson, M. J., Witzki, A. H., Howerter, A., & Wager, T. D.(2000). The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex “Frontal Lobe” tasks: A latent variable analysis. Cognitive Psychology, 41, 49-100.
45 Nijstad, B. A., & Stroebe, W.(2006). How the group affects the mind: A cognitive model of idea generation in groups. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 186-213.
46 Peterson, J. B., Smith, K. W., & Carson, S. H.(2002). Openness and extraversion are associated with reduced latent inhibition: Replication and commentary. Personality and individual differences, 33, 1137-1147.
47 Schulter, G., Mittenecker, E., & Papousek, I.(2010). A computer program for testing and analyzing random generation behavior in normal and clinical samples: The mittenecker pointing test. Behavior Research Methods, 42(1), 333-341.
48 Tong, D., Li, W., Dai, T., Howard C, N., Qiu, J., & Zhang, Q.(2013). Brain mechanisms of valuable scientific problem finding inspired by heuristic knowledge. Experimental Brain Research, 228, 437-443.
49 Towse, J. N., & Neil, D.(1998). Analyzing human random generation behavior: A review of methods used and a computer program for describing performance. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 30, 583-591.
50 Vartanian, O., Martindale, C., & Matthews, J.(2009). Divergent thinking ability is related to faster relatedness judgments. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 3(2), 99-103. Witkin, H. A., & Goodenough, D. R.(1981). Cognitive styles: Essence and origins. Madison, Conn.: International Universities Press, 38-47.
51 Zabelina, D. L., & Robinson, M. D.(2010). Creativity as flexible cognitive control. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 4, 136-143.
52 Zabelina, D. L., Robinson, M. D., Council, J. R., & Bresin, K.(2012). Patterning and nonpatterning in creative cognition: Insights from performance in a random number generation task. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 6, 137-145.

[1]	王焕弟, 陈世平. 利益冲突对不同认知风格决策者建议采纳的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2019, 17(3): 415-421.
[2]	张洪家, 汪玲, 张敏. 创造性认知风格、创造性人格与创造性思维的关系[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2018, 16(1): 51-57.
[3]	贾丽萍, 白学军, 王敬欣. 情绪对不同状态焦虑个体认知抑制的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2017, 15(6): 721-726.
[4]	韩琴, 强瑞超, 秦亚平. 样例启动对中学生创造性科学问题提出能力的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2017, 15(6): 750-755.
[5]	李艳芬, 赵宁宁, 周铁民. 不同内隐学习任务在不同认知风格个体上的成绩差异[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2017, 15(5): 606-612.
[6]	王博韬, 段海军, 韩琴, 胡卫平,. 大脑半球互动对创造性科学问题提出能力的影响*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2017, 15(2): 211-217.
[7]	胡青,孙宏伟. 情绪劳动与心理健康的关系: 工作倦怠的中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2016, 14(5): 662-667.
[8]	赵彦凯, 李晖, 吴真, 张珊珊. 认知抑制与人际宽恕：特质宽恕的调节作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2016, 14(4): 531-536.
[9]	刘志军, 刘旭, 李维. 初中生乐观归因风格与抗挫折能力：自尊的中介作用^*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2016, 14(1): 64-69.
[10]	胡闲秋, 李海垒, 张文新. 大学生认知风格与创业意向的关系：性别的调节作用^*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2016, 14(1): 87-94.
[11]	张田, 傅宏. 得到宽恕与否对冒犯者后续行为的影响：内疚与共情的作用^*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2016, 14(1): 100-105.
[12]	宋淑娟,刘华山,. 数学-性别刻板印象对女生的威胁效应：场认知风格的调节作用^*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2015, 13(3): 302-305.
[13]	杨楠,叶卓尔,林依,高宏巍,黄平,林慧妍,许欢,马军朋,金花. 认知风格分型的神经基础：静息态fMRI研究^[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2015, 13(3): 320-327.
[14]	杨秀木,高恒,齐玉龙,申正付,韩布新,周静. 大学生志愿功能动机与志愿行为：感恩品质的中介作用^*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2015, 13(3): 354-360.
[15]	李贞，刘新春，翟瑞龙，刘芳，邓晶晶，程诚，杨丽. 中国成年人认知风格调查报告^*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2014, 12(5): 621-626.