藏-汉双语者语义与词汇表征特点研究

心理与行为研究 ›› 2015, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (6): 737-743.

藏-汉双语者语义与词汇表征特点研究

高晓雷^{1, 2}, 王永胜¹, 郭志英¹, 张慢慢¹, 白学军¹

1 天津师范大学心理与行为研究院,国民心理健康评估与促进协同创新中心,天津 300074;
2 西藏大学师范学院, 拉萨 850000

收稿日期:2014-12-06 出版日期:2015-11-20 发布日期:2015-12-24
通讯作者: 白学军,E-mail：bxuejun@126.com; 高晓雷,E-mail：gaoxiaolei2010@163.com。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目（81471629）

The Characteristics of Semantic and Lexical Representation of Tibetan-Chinese Bilinguals

Gao Xiaolei^{1, 2}, Wang Yongsheng¹, Guo Zhiying¹, Zhang Manman¹, Bai Xuejun¹

1 Academy of Psychology and Behavior, Tianjin Normal University, Center of Cooperative Innovation for Mental Health Evaluation and Promotion, Tianjin 300074;
2 Normal College of Tibet University, Lhasa 850000

Received:2014-12-06 Online:2015-11-20 Published:2015-12-24

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 使用跨语言长时重复启动实验范式,考察熟练和非熟练藏-汉双语者的语义和词汇表征的特点。在完成语义判断任务时,被试在测验阶段对已学词的反应时显著短于未学词,且熟练和非熟练藏-汉双语者都表现出明显的同语言和跨语言长时重复启动效应。在完成词汇判断任务时,同语言条件下已学词的反应时显著短于未学词,出现长时重复启动效应;跨语言条件下已学词的反应时显著长于未学词,未获得长时重复启动效应。结果表明,藏-汉双语者语义表征共同存储、词汇表征独立存储;熟练和非熟练藏-汉双语者语义和词汇表征模式相同;藏-汉双语熟练者比非熟练者跨语言启动更快。

关键词: 藏-汉双语者, 语义表征, 词汇表征, 跨语言长时重复启动。

Abstract: In the present study, we used the task of cross-language repetition priming paradigm, to investigate the characteristics of semantic and lexical representation for highly proficient and less proficient Tibetan-Chinese bilinguals. In semantic judgment task, the participants′ response time of the words studied is significantly shorter than that of the words unstudied in the test phase. Both highly proficient and less proficient Tibetan-Chinese bilinguals have apparent repetition priming effect within language and cross-language. In lexical judgment task, it was found that the response time of the words studied is significantly shorter than that of the words unstudied within languge, showing repetitior pring effect, but not in the cross-language cordition. The present study indicates that for Tibetan-Chinese bilinguals, semantic representation is shared, while lexical representation is separation. Highly proficient and less proficient Tibetan-Chinese bilinguals have the same bilingual language representation mode. In the cross-language priming, the highly proficient Tibetan-Chinese bilinguals are faster than the less proficient person.

Key words: Tibetan-Chinese bilinguals, semantic representation, lexical representation, long-term cross-language repetition priming.

高晓雷, 王永胜, 郭志英, 张慢慢, 白学军. 藏-汉双语者语义与词汇表征特点研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2015, 13(6): 737-743.

Gao Xiaolei, Wang Yongsheng, Guo Zhiying, Zhang Manman, Bai Xuejun. The Characteristics of Semantic and Lexical Representation of Tibetan-Chinese Bilinguals[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2015, 13(6): 737-743.

参考文献

1 蔡厚德. 中–英双语者词汇语义通达的大脑功能偏侧化与合作效应.(2008). 心理科学,31(6), 1394-1397.
2 崔占玲, 张积家. 藏-汉-英三语者词汇与语义表征研究.(2009). 心理科学, 32(3), 559-562.
3 崔占玲. 少数民族学生三语学习的心理学研究: 以藏族学生为例.(2011). 广州, 暨南大学出版社.
4 李波. 教育优先发展背景下的西藏双语教育策略研究.(2012). 中国藏学, 2, 213-216.
5 李杰, 侯友, 王凤梅, 姜淞秀. 非熟练蒙英双语者概念表征的非对称性特点.(2013). 心理科学, 36(2), 350-355.
6 李利, 莫雷, 王瑞明, 罗雪莹. 非熟练中—英双语者跨语言长时重复启动效应.(2006). 心理学报, 38(5), 672-680.
7 李荣宝, 彭聃龄, 郭桃梅. 汉英语义通达过程的事件相关电位研究.(2003). 心理学报, 35(3), 309-316.
8 李扬颖. 非熟练双语者听觉条件下跨语言长时重复启动效应的研究.(2014). 保定, 河北大学硕士学位论文.
9 莫雷, 李利, 王瑞明. 熟练中—英双语者跨语言长时重复启动效应.(2005). 心理科学, 28(6), 1288-1293.
10 王凤梅. 非熟练蒙-英双语者语义表征与切换的ERP研究.(2010). 呼和浩特, 内蒙古师范大学硕士学位论文.
11 闻素霞, 热比古丽·白克力. 熟练维—汉双语者第二语言的概念表征的特征.(2009). 心理学探新, (4), 65-67.
12 许文俊. 藏汉双语教学现状研究—以拉萨市为例.(2013). 兰州, 西北师范大学硕士学位论文.
13 杨娜. 藏族大学生藏汉双语词汇表征与语义通达的实验研究.(2013). 西宁, 青海师范大学硕士学位论文.
14 尹蔚彬. 近十年来我国汉藏语比较研究的特点及意义.(2012). 中国藏学, 2, 239-244.
15 张积家, 张凤玲. 熟练粤语-普通话双言者听觉词的语言表征.(2014). 心理与行为研究, 12(4), 433-440.
16 Cai, Q., & Brysbaert, M.(2010). SUBTLEX-CH: Chinese word and character frequencies based on film subtitles, PLoS One, 5(6), e10729.
17 Ervin, S., & Osgood, C.(1954). Psycholinguistics: A survey of theory and research problems. In: C. Osgood & T. Seboek(Eds.). Psycholinguistics. Baltimore. MA: Waverly Pres, 139-146.
18 Francis, W. S.(1999). Cognitive integration of language and memory in bilinguals: semantic representation. Psychol Bull, 125(2), 193-222.
19 French, R. M., & Jacquet, M.(2004). Understanding bilingual memory: models and data. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 87-93.
20 Gao, H., Han, L. X., Bai, H. M., Li, T. D., Wang, W., Liu, Y. B., & Wang, W. M.(2013). Study of functional magnetic resonance imaging in mandarin-English non-fluent late bilinguals. Chinese Journal of Neurosurgery, 29(11), 1097-1110.
21 Glanzer, M., & Duarte, A.(1971). Repetition between and within languages in free recall. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 10(6), 625-630.
22 Green, D. W.(1998). Mental control of the bilingual lexico-semantic system. Bilingualism Language and Cognition, 1, 67-81.
23 Grosjean, F.(1992). Another view of bilingualism. In: Harris R (Ed.). Cognitive Processing in Bilinguals. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 51-62.
24 Keatley, C. W., Spinks, J. A., & De Gelder, J. A.(1994). Asymmetrical cross-language priming effects. Memory and Cognition, 22, 70-84.
25 Kirsner, K., Smith, M. C., Lockhart, R. S., King, M. L., & Jain, M. (1984). The bilingual lexicon: Language-specific units in an integrated network. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 23(4), 519-539.
26 Kolers, P. A.(1963). Interlingual word associations. Journal of verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 2, 291-300.
27 Kolers, P. A.(1964). Specificity of a cognitive operation. Journal of verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 3, 244-248.
28 Kolers, P. A.(1966). Interlingual facilitation of short term-memory. Journal of verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 5(3), 314-319.
29 Kroll, J. F., & Stewart, E. (1994). Category interference in translation and picture naming: Evidence for asymmetric connections between bilingual memory representations. Journal of memory and language, 33(2), 149-174.
30 Potter, M. C., So, K. F., Eckhardt, B., & Feldman, L. B.(1984). Lexical and conceptual representation in beginning and more proficient bilinguals. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 23, 23-38.
31 Smith, M. C.( 1997). How do bilinguals access lexical information?. In: J F Kroll ed. Tutorials in Bilingualism: Psycholingualistics Perspectives. New Jersey: Lawrence Erbaum Associate, 145-168.
32 Weinreich, U.(1953). Languages in Contact: Findings and Problems. Linguistic Circle of New York.
33 Zeelenberg, R., & Pecher, D. (2003). Evidence for long-term cross-language repetition priming in conceptual implicit memory tasks. Journal of Memory and Language, 49(1), 80-94.

[1]	Yoon HoYung,李程程,肖雪珍,王爱平. 韩-汉跨语言词义水平的重复知盲效应^*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2016, 14(2): 207-213.
[2]	张积家，张凤玲. 熟练粤语-普通话双言者听觉词的语言表征^*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2014, 12(4): 433-440.
[3]	宋娟吕勇. 类别表征与策略的脑科学研究及对思维教学的启示[J]. , 2008, 6(1): 75-80.