韩-汉跨语言词义水平的重复知盲效应*

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 关于语义水平的重复知盲效应一直存在争论。本研究考察非平衡韩-汉双语者在语言内和语言间词义水平的RB效应。实验1采用韩语双字词为实验材料探究韩语语言内的RB效应，结果表明在韩语词汇水平存在RB效应。实验2采用两个关键词为韩语（R1）和汉语（R2）双字词，并通过韩-汉语间隔词W的语言类型变化探究韩、汉语言间的RB效应，结果表明：不同语言类型的间隔词的正确率有显著差异，语义重复词R2在重复条件的正确率显著高于非重复条件，出现语义重复启动效应。本研究结论是：（1）在韩语语言内词水平存在RB效应，具有语言类型普遍性；（2）韩、汉跨语言语义水平出现语义重复启动效应，而未发生RB效应，表明双语者在加工韩、汉两种语言时，采用分别形式表征和共享语义表征的方式。

关键词: 重复知盲效应, 韩-汉双语, 标记个体化理论, 语义表征。

Abstract: The study explored Repetition Blindness(RB)of intro-language and inter-language on semantic levels of Korean and Chinese words in two experiments. Method and results: Experiment 1 examined the RB on Korean words level of Korean-Chinese bilinguals. The result showed, it existed significantly RB effect in Korean word level. Experiment 2 examined the RB on Korean and Chinese word level by changing the language types of the interval words between two target words. The results show that the correct rate of Korean interval words was significant higher than Chinese. The correct rate of repeating semantic condition was significantly higher than the non-repeating semantic, and it appeared semantic repetition priming effect. Conclusions: 1)RB effect occurred in the Korean words, and not influenced by different languages. 2)The semantic repetition priming effect appeared on inter-languages(Korean and Chinese words), but not RB. It indicates that the orthographical representations were adopted separately and the semantic representations were shared when the bilinguals processed Korean and Chinese languages.

Key words: repetition blindness, Korean-Chinese bilingual, token individuation theory, semantic representation

中图分类号:

B842.5

Yoon HoYung,李程程,肖雪珍,王爱平. 韩-汉跨语言词义水平的重复知盲效应^*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2016, 14(2): 207-213.

Yoon HoYung, Li Chengcheng, Xiao Xuezhen, Wang Aiping. Repetition Blindness Effect of Korean-Chinese Cross-Language on Semantic Level[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2016, 14(2): 207-213.

参考文献

李荣宝, 彭聃龄, 郭桃梅.(2003). 汉英语义通达过程的事件相关电位研究. 心理学报,(3), 309-316.
冷英, 陈旭莲.(2011). 汉字多音字加工过程中的重复知盲效应. 心理学报, 43(6), 1370-1379.
冷英, 何秀丽.(2012). 重复知盲效应产生的机制-来自汉语叠词加工的证据. 心理科学, 35(2), 299-303.
冷英, 卢家楣, 金丽, 潘发达, 陈燕, 沈永江.(2014). RSVP 任务下双刺激重复的优势与劣势. 心理学报, 46(3), 298-311.
刘皓明.(2005). 汉字重复知盲发生水平的研究. 硕士学位论文. 广州: 华南师范大学.
王爱平, 张厚粲.(2004). 关于RB效应加工水平的研究. 心理科学, 27(6), 1470-1472.
王爱平, 张厚粲.(2005). 汉字加工中呈现速率对重复知盲效应的影响. 心理科学, 28(4), 809-811.
王爱平, 张厚粲.(2006). 汉语句子加工中RB效应的研究. 心理科学, 29(4), 848-851.
夏依婷, 冷英, 陈燕, 王纪妹, 程晓荣,卢佳楣.(2012a). 重复刺激的末位优势效应. 心理学报, 44(6), 766-776.
夏依婷, 冷英, 陈燕, 王纪妹, 程晓荣,卢佳楣.(2012b). 汉语颠倒词加工中重复知盲发生的水平. 心理学报, 44(12), 1583-1595.
武悦, 王爱平.(2015). 汉字部件水平的重复知盲效应. 心理科学, 38(2), 296-302.
Altarriba, J., & Soltano, E. G.(1996). Repetition blindness and bilingual memory: Token individuation for translation equivalents. Memory and Cognition, 24(6), 700-711.
Bavelier, D.(1994). Repetition Blindness between visually different Items: the case of pictures and words. Cognition, 51(3), 199–236.
Bavelier, D., & Potter, M. C.(1991). Visual and phonological codes in repetition blindness. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 29(6), 491.
Buffat, S., Plantier, J., Roumes, C., & Lorenceau, J.(2013). Repetition blindness for natural images of objects with viewpoint changes. Frontier in Psychology, 3, 1-11.
Buttle, H., Ball, C, K., Zhang, J., & Raymond, J. E.(2010). Semantic repetition blindness: Picture versus word effects. Journal of Vision, 3(9), 592-592.
Chialant, D., & Caramazza, A.(1997). Identity and similarity factors in repetition blindness: implications for lexical processing. Cognition, 63(1), 79-119.
Duyck, W., & De Houwer, J.(2008). Semantic access in second-language visual word processing: Evidence from the semantic Simon paradigm. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review(pre-2011), 15(5), 961-966.
Groot, A. M. B. D., & Nas, G. L. J.(1991). Lexical representation of cognates and noncognates in compound Bilinguals. Journal of Memory and Language, 30(1), 90.
Harris, C. L., & Morris, A. L.(2000). Orthographic repetition blindness. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. Section A: 53(4), 1039-1060.
Harris C. L., & Morris A. L.(2001). Illusory words created by repetition blindness: a technique for probing sublexical representations. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 8(1), 118-126.
Harris, I. M., & Dux, P. E.(2005). Orientation-invariant object recognition evidence from repetition blindness. Cognition, 95, 73-93.
Kanwisher, N. G.(1987). Repetition blindness: Type recognition without token individuation. Cognition, 27(2), 117-143.
Kanwisher, N. G., & Potter, M. C.(1990). Repetition blindness: Levels of processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16(1), 30-47.
Kanwisher, N. G.(1991). Orthographic versus phonological similarity in repetition blindness. Bulletin of the Psychology Society, 29(6), 496.
Knickerbockera, H., & Altarribaa, J.(2013). Differential repetition blindness with emotion and emotion-laden word types. Visual Cognition, 21(5), 599-627.
Koivisto, M., & Revonsuo, A.(2008). Comparison of event-related potentials in attentional blink and repetition blindness. Brain Research, 1189(3), 115-126.
Kroll, J. E, & Stewart, E.(1994). Category interference in translation and picture naming: Evidence for asymmetric connections between bilingual memory representations. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 149-174.
Mackay, D. G., & Miller, M. D.(1994). Semantic blindness: Rapidly presented repeated concepts are difficult to encode and recall. Psychological Science, 5, 52-55.
Mackay, D. G., Abrams, L., Pedroza, M. J., & Miller, M. D.(1996). Cross-language facilitation, semantic blindness, and the relation between language and memory: A reply to Altarriba and Soltano. Memory and Cognition, 6(24), 712-718.
Yeh, S., & Li, J.(2004). Sublexical processing in visual recognition of Chinese characters: Evidence from repetition blindness for subcharacter components. Brain and Language, 88(1), 47-53.

[1]	康廷虎, 王旎撰, 高吴平. 记叙文阅读中主人公转换对情境模型更新的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(1): 1-7.
[2]	倪亚琨, 赵君哲, 李巧灵, 郭腾飞, 王明辉. 高低拖延者的跨期选择差异：基于ERP的研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2019, 17(6): 831-839.
[3]	王婷, 王丹, 张积家. 双语与双言影响心理理论内隐系统与外显系统的分离[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2019, 17(4): 442-451.
[4]	刘志方, 陈朝阳, 仝文, 苏衡. 阅读中词汇识别依赖词内字序编码的阶段性特点：眼动证据[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2019, 17(3): 304-310.
[5]	陈宝国, 张媛玥, 马腾飞. 高限制性句子语境条件下词汇接触次数和二语熟练度对词汇习得的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2019, 17(2): 153-159.
[6]	孙尔鸿, 张启睿, 张积家. 书法字体与汉字颜色在成语重要性加工中的作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2019, 17(2): 160-169.
[7]	郝海平, 范宁. 反应模式对时间空间一致性效应的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2019, 17(2): 178-184.
[8]	潘颖, 邓小平, 林正军, 刘岩. 中国学生英语语音意识与英语阅读成绩关系的元分析[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2019, 17(2): 229-239.
[9]	赵帅, 鹿士义, 陈婧, 逯芝璇, 匡柳兴, 邓彧君, 付宸. 母语为韩语的汉语学习者加工“V+N1+的+N2”歧义结构的眼动研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2019, 17(1): 15-23.
[10]	于秒, 丁潼飞. 汉语词汇识别的声调时长效应[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2019, 17(1): 24-30.
[11]	赵冰洁, 王永胜, 陈茗静, 李馨, 闫国利, 白学军. 双字词整词加工与词素加工在眼跳目标选择中的作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2018, 16(6): 721-734.
[12]	赵黎明, 廉园, 李卫君. 口语句子产生中词汇选择的计划单元：来自大中小学生的比较研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2018, 16(6): 735-743.
[13]	季雨竹, 张逸玮, 毕鸿燕. 汉语发展性阅读障碍儿童的视觉大细胞-背侧通路功能[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2018, 16(5): 577-582.
[14]	张曼莉, 孟祥芝, 郑小蓓. 中文阅读障碍儿童的时间加工缺陷:来自知觉学习干预研究的证据[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2018, 16(5): 583-593,623.
[15]	白学军, 张明哲, 孟红霞, 谭珂, 王雯. 词边界信息对发展性阅读障碍儿童朗读和默读影响的眼动研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2018, 16(5): 594-602.

韩-汉跨语言词义水平的重复知盲效应^*

Repetition Blindness Effect of Korean-Chinese Cross-Language on Semantic Level

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价