学习时间分配的基于议程调节模型*

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 作为学习时间分配研究热点的基于议程调节模型认为，学习者是在学习目标的指导下，建构并执行议程来进行学习时间分配。议程即学习计划，是学习时间分配的驱动力。该模型强调学习者在自我调节学习过程中有意识的进行着学习效益最大化的权衡决策来实现学习目标，包容了以往学习时间分配的经典理论。大量的新近研究支持了基于议程调节模型，并深入地探讨了议程驱动与习惯性反应之间的关系。未来的研究应进一步考察学习时间分配权衡过程中的意识和无意识双加工机制，探讨个体变量对学习时间分配议程建构的权衡机制的影响，并在更加生态化的情境中考察学习时间分配议程建构的权衡机制。

关键词: 学习时间分配, 基于议程调节模型, 权衡决策观, 习惯性反应。

Abstract: Study-time allocation is a core aspect in the field of self-regulated learning' research. Dunlosky et al.(2009)proposed agenda-based regulation framework. This explains the internal mechanisms of study-time allocation from the perspective of information processing, that learners develop an agenda on how to allocate time to various study items and use this agenda when selecting items for study. Agenda that is, learning plans. A large number of recent studies support the agenda-based regulation. At the same time, some studies also examined the relationship between agenda-driven and habitual processes. In the future we should think highly of dual-processing mechanisms of the conscious and unconscious in allocating of study time and improving the ecological validity of research. As an advanced cognitive activity, decision-making weighing is affected by individual variables such as motive and working memory capacity, which also need higher attention and research.

Key words: study-time allocation, agenda-based regulation model, decision-making weighing, habitual processes

中图分类号:

B842.3

谢瑞波,路璐,李伟健. 学习时间分配的基于议程调节模型^*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2016, 14(2): 283-288.

Xie Ruibo, Lu Lu, Li Weijian. The Study-Time Allocation of Agenda-Based Regulation[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2016, 14(2): 283-288.

参考文献

李伟健.(2011). 学习困难儿童学习时间分配的特征. 博士学位论文, 北京师范大学.
李伟健, 谢瑞波, 陈海德, 黄杰.(2014). 议程与习惯性反应对学习时间分配的影响: 来自眼动的证据. 心理发展与教育, 30(3), 138-145.
谢瑞波, 黄杰, 陈海德, 李伟健.(2014). 不同学习目标下词对位置对学习时间分配的影响. 心理科学, 37(5), 1185-1189.
谢瑞波.(2014). 学习项目的字体大小对学习时间分配的影响. 硕士学位论文, 浙江师范大学.
Ariel, R.(2013). Learning what to learn: The effects of task experience on strategy shifts in the allocation of study time. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39(6), 1697-1711.
Ariel, R., Al-Harthy, I. S., Was, C. A., & Dunlosky, J.(2011). Habitual reading biases in the allocation of study time. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18(5), 1015-1021.
Ariel, R., & Dunlosky, J.(2013). When do learners shift from habitual to agenda-based processes when selecting items for study? Memory & Cognition, 41(3), 416-428.
Ariel, R., Dunlosky, J., & Bailey, H.(2009). Agenda-based regulation of study-time allocation: When agendas override item-based monitoring. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138(3), 432-447.
Boekaerts, M.(1996). Self-regulated learning at the junction of cognition and motivation. European Psychologist, 2(l), 100-112.
Boekaerts, M.(1995). Self-regulated learning: bridging the gap between metacognitive and metamotivation theories. Educational Psychologist, 30(4), 195-200.
Crabtree, T., Alber-Morgan, S. R., & Konrad, M.(2010). The Effects of Self-Monitoring of Story Elements on the Reading Comprehension of High School Seniors with Learning Disabilities. Education and Treatment of Children, 33(2), 187-203.
Dickson, K. L., Miller, M. D., & Devoley, M. S.(2005). Effects of textbook study guides on student performance in introductory psychology. Teaching of Psychology, 32(1), 34-39.
Dunlosky, J., & Ariel, R.(2011a). Self-Regulated learning and the allocation of study time. Psychology of Learning and Motivation-Advances in Research and Theory, 54, 103-135.
Dunlosky, J., & Ariel, R.(2011b). The influence of agenda-based and habitual processes on item selection during study. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37(4), 899-912.
Dunlosky, J., & Hertzog, C.(1998). Training programs to improve learning in later adulthood: helping older adults educate themselves. In Hacker, D. J., Dunlosky, J., & Graesser, A. C.(Eds.), Metacognition in educational theory and practice. 1998.(pp. 249-275). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Dunlosky, J., & Thiede, K. W.(2004). Causes and constraints of the shift-to-easier-materials effect in the control of study. Memory & Cognition, 32(5), 779-788.
Dunlosky, J., & Thiede, K. W.(1998). What makes people study more? An evaluation of factors that affect self-paced study. Acta Psychologica, 98(1), 37-56.
Finn, B.(2008). Framing effects on metacognitive monitoring and control. Memory & Cognition, 36(4), 813-821.
Hourihan, K. L., Benjamin, A. S., & Liu, X.(2012). A cross-race effect in metamemory: Predictions of face recognition are more accurate for members of our own race. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 1(3), 158-162.
Ilkowska, M., & Engle, R. W.(2010). Working memory capacity and self-regulation. In: R. H. Hoyle(Ed.), Handbook of personality and self-regulation(pp. 315-331). Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M.(1980). Conceptual Metaphor in Everyday Language. The Journal of Philosophy, 77(8), 453-486.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M.(1999). Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to western thought. New York: BasicBooks.
Li, F., Xie, R., Li, X., & Li, W.(2015). The influence of perceptual information on control processes involved in self-regulated learning: evidence from item selection. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 22(4), 1007-1013.
Metcalfe, J.(2002). Is study time allocated selectively to a region of proximal learning? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 131(3), 349-363.
Metcalfe, J.(2009). Metacognitive judgments and control of study. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18(6), 159–163.
Metcalfe, J., & Kornell, N.(2005). A region of proximal learning model of study time allocation. Journal of Memory and Language, 52(4), 463-477.
Nelson, T. O., & Leonesio, R. J.(1988). Allocation of self-paced study time and the "labor-in-vain effect". Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14(4), 676-686.
Nelson, T. O., & Narens, L.(1990). Metamemory: A theoretical framework and new findings. In G. H. Bower(Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation(Vol. 26, pp. 125-141). San Diego: Academic Press.
Nelson, T. O., & Narens, L.(1994). Why investigate metacognition? In Metcalfe, J., & Shimamura, A. P.(Eds.). Metacognition:Knowing about knowing(pp. 1-25). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Nomi, J. S., Rhodes, M. G., & Cleary, A. M.(2013). Emotional facial expressions differentially influence predictions and performance for face recognition. Cognition and Emotion, 27(1), 141-149.
Perfect, T. J., & Schwartz, B. L.(2002). Applied metacognition: Cambridge University Press.
Reis, S. M., McGuire, J. N., & Neu, T. W.(2000). Compensation strategies used by high ability students with learning disabilities who succeed in college. Gifted Child Quarterly, 44(2), 123-134.
Rhodes, M. G., & Castel, A. D.(2009). Metacognitive illusions for auditory information effects on monitoring and control. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16(3), 550-554.
Rhodes, M. G., & Castel, A. D.(2006). Memory predictions are influenced by perceptual information: Evidence for metacognitive illusions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 137(4), 615-625.
Rhodes, M. G., Sitzman, D. M., & Rowland, C. A.(2013). Monitoring and control of learning own-race and other-race faces. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 27(5), 553-563.
Rumsey, I., Ballard, K. D.(1985). Teaching self-management strategies for independent story writing to children with classroom behaviour difficulties. Educational Psychology, 5(2), 147-157.
Son, L. K., & Sethi, R.(2006). Metacognitive control and optimal learning. Cognitive Science, 30(4), 759-774.
Thiede, K. W., & Dunlosky, J.(1999). Toward a general model of self-regulated study: An analysis of selection of items for study and self-paced study time. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25(4), 10-24.
Torgesen, J. K.,(1977). The role of non-specific factors in the task performance of learning disabled children: A theoretical assessment. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 10(1), 27-34.
Tullis. J. G., & Benjamin, A. S.(2012). The effectiveness of updating metacognitive knowledge in the elderly: Evidence from metamnemonic judgments of word frequency. Psychology and Aging, 27(3), 683.
Watier, N. N., & Collin, C. A.(2011). Metamemory for faces, names, and common nouns. Acta Psychologica, 138(1), 143-154.
Zimmerman, B. J.(1995). Sel-regulation in volves more than metacognition: A social cognitive perspective. Educational Psychologist, 30(4), 217-221.

[1]	曹晓华，王本驰，家晓余，李锋盈. 惩罚对学习时间分配中决策与绩效的影响^*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2014, 12(4): 462-468.
[2]	刘希平,方格. 儿童学习时间分配决策能力发展的研究进展[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2004, 2(2): 443-446.
[3]	周楚,刘晓明,路海东. 学习困难儿童元记忆能力的实验研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2003, 1(3): 190-193.

学习时间分配的基于议程调节模型^*

The Study-Time Allocation of Agenda-Based Regulation

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 3

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价