情绪的确定性评价对信息加工的影响

心理与行为研究 ›› 2016, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (3): 305-310.

情绪的确定性评价对信息加工的影响

谢丽丽^1，2,徐慧芳¹,姜媛³,方平¹

1 首都师范大学教育学院心理系，北京市“学习与认知”重点实验室，北京 100037;
2 中国人民公安大学犯罪学学院心理学教研室，北京 100038;
3 北京体育大学运动心理学教研室，北京 100084

收稿日期:2015-08-10 出版日期:2016-05-20 发布日期:2016-06-06
通讯作者: 方平,E-mail:pfang2007@126.com
基金资助:
国家体育总局重大研究领域一般项目资助（2015B067）

The Effect of Emotional Certainty and Uncertainty on Information Processing

Xie Lili^1,2, Xu Huifang¹, Jiang Yuan³, Fang Ping¹

1 Beijing Key Laboratory of Learning and Cognition, Department of Psychology, Capital Normal University, Beijing 100037;
2 Criminal Psychology, Department of Criminal, Chinese People's Public Security University, Beijing 100038;
3 Division of Sport Psychology, Beijing Sport University, Beijing 100084

Received:2015-08-10 Online:2016-05-20 Published:2016-06-06

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 检验了情绪的效价和确定性评价对个体的信息加工策略选择的影响及其心理机制。结果表明，情绪效价对个体的信息加工方式的影响会受到情绪确定性评价的调节。高确定评价的情绪中，积极情绪的被试更倾向于采用启发式加工，消极情绪的被试更倾向于采用系统式加工。积极情绪中，高确定评价情绪的被试更倾向于采用启发式加工，低确定评价情绪的被试更倾向于采用系统式加工。当个体对自己产生情绪的原因进行合理归因后，情绪效价和确定性评价对个体信息加工方式的影响效应都消失了，说明情绪的效价和确定性评价均以信息的方式对对个体信息加工策略的选择产生影响。

关键词: 效价, 确定性评价, 归因, 信息加工策略

Abstract: Here we investigated: 1)the effect of valence on information processing; 2)the effect of emotional certainty and uncertainty on information processing; 3)the psychological mechanism. The results showed that only in the emotions which contain certainty appraisal, the positive emotions promoted heuristic processing, whereas the negative emotions resulted in systematic processing. On the other hand, the emotions contain certainty appraisal promoted heuristic processing, whereas the emotions contain uncertainty appraisal resulted in systematic processing. The effect of emotional certainty and uncertainty on information processing were only limited in positive emotions. Under the condition with attributions, the effect of valence and emotional certainty and uncertainty were all gone. These results suggest that valence and certainty appraisal of emotion affect information processing all by ways of being information which signaled environment.

Key words: valence, certainty appraisal, attribution, information processing

中图分类号:

B842.1

谢丽丽,徐慧芳,姜媛,方平. 情绪的确定性评价对信息加工的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2016, 14(3): 305-310.

Xie Lili, Xu Huifang, Jiang Yuan, Fang Ping. The Effect of Emotional Certainty and Uncertainty on Information Processing[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2016, 14(3): 305-310.

参考文献

[1] 高培霞, 刘惠军, 丁妮, 郭德俊.(2010). 少年对情绪性图片加工的脑电反应特征. 心理学报, 42, 342-351.
[2] Adaval, R.(2001). Sometimes it just feels right: The differential weighting of affect-consistent and affect-inconsistent product information. Journal of Consumer Research, 28, 1-17.
[3] Bless, H., Clore, G. L., Schwarz, N., Golisano, V., Rabe, C., & Wlk, M.(1996). Mood and the use of scripts: Does being in a happy mood really lead to mindlessness? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 665-679.
[4] Benkendorf, D. L.(2013). The impact of emotions on stereotyping and discrimination in workplace selection: The role of certainty appraisals. Dissertation Abstracts International, 73.
[5] Cavanaugh, L. A., Bettman, J. R., Luce, M. F., & Payne, J. W.(2007). Appraising the appraisal-tendency framework. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 17, 169-173.
[6] Gasper, K.(2004). Do you see what I see? Affect and visual information processing. Cognition and Emotion, 18, 405-421.
[7] Han, S., Lerner, J. S., & Keltner, D.(2007). Feelings and consumer decision making: The appraisal-tendency framework. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 17, 158-168.
[8] Lerner, J. S., & Keltner, D.(2000). Beyond valence: Toward a model of emotion-specific influences on judgment and choice. Cognition and Emotion, 14, 473-493.
[9] Lu, J., Xie, X., & Zhang, R.(2013). Focusing on appraisals: How and why anger and fear influence driving risk perception. Journal of Safety Research, 45(16), 65-73.
[10] Melton, R. J.(1995). The role of positive affect in syllogism performance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 788-794.
[11] Schwarz, N.(2002). Situated cognition and the wisdom of feelings: Cognitive tuning. In L. Feldman Barrett & P. Salovey(Eds.), The wisdom in feelings(pp.144-166). New York: Guilford.
[12] Windmann, S., & Kutas, M.(2001). Electrophysiological correlates of emotion-induced recognition bias. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 13, 577-592.

[1]	周爱保, 赵海燕, 夏瑞雪, 袁月, 贾婷婷, 谢珮. 不同语义水平下参照方式、情绪效价和特质评价对记忆的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(2): 145-152.
[2]	赵思怡, 李莹, 王悦. 情绪效价−空间动作隐喻联结对成人和儿童外语情绪词学习的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(2): 153-159.
[3]	朱文凤, 夏凌翔. 大学生神经质纵向预测攻击行为的时间路径模型：敌意归因偏向和愤怒沉浸的双向中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(3): 396-402.
[4]	杜夏雨, 史从戎, 赵子仪, 薛婷. 情绪效价和动机情绪对创造力的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(2): 160-165.
[5]	李喜乐, 孙安琪, 高平圆, 晏妮. 母亲的情景特异性归因与儿童问题行为：儿童消极情绪的调节作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(1): 74-81.
[6]	吴慧芬, 黎晓娜, 张琼, 唐一纯, 刘华山. 因为注意，所以拥有—纯粹所有权效应内部机制探究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(2): 161-167,175.
[7]	胡哲, 张杰, 黎翠红, 郭春彦. 来源记忆中背景的情绪效价与唤醒对提取过程的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(2): 185-192.
[8]	韩含, 李积鹏, 刘玉琳, 宋文翠. 学习不良初中生学业成败的归因训练研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2019, 17(4): 529-535.
[9]	邢强, 孙海龙, 车敬上. 反馈效价影响家族相似性类别学习的ERPs研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2018, 16(3): 300-307.
[10]	黄时华, 曾艳芬, 张卫. 情绪效价对不同抑郁水平大学生的反应性控制和主动性控制的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2017, 15(6): 807-814.
[11]	王汉林, 莫雷. “动作-评价”效应：动作与认知的交互作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2017, 15(5): 626-632.
[12]	董会芹, 张文新. 童年中晚期同伴侵害与情绪适应：归因的中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2017, 15(5): 654-662.
[13]	刘志军, 刘旭, 李维. 初中生乐观归因风格与抗挫折能力：自尊的中介作用^*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2016, 14(1): 64-69.
[14]	贾孟华, 杨小洋, 王大华. 婚姻自传体记忆的数量特征：时间与依恋风格的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2015, 13(2): 271-277.
[15]	隋雪,纪雅婷,陈欣,任桂琴. 正负效价面部表情图片加工的差异[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2015, 13(1): 7-12.