大脑半球互动对创造性科学问题提出能力的影响*

心理与行为研究 ›› 2017, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (2): 211-217.

大脑半球互动对创造性科学问题提出能力的影响*

王博韬¹, 段海军¹, 韩琴³, 胡卫平¹,²

1 陕西师范大学现代教学技术教育部重点实验室，西安 710062;
2 中国基础教育质量监测协同创新中心，北京 100875;
3 山西基础教育质量提升协同创新中心，临汾 041004

收稿日期:2015-10-23 出版日期:2017-03-20 发布日期:2017-04-24
通讯作者: 胡卫平，E-mail: weipinghu@163.com。

The Influence of Inter-Hemispheric Interaction on Creative Scientific Problem Finding Ability

Wang Botao¹, Duan Haijun¹, Han Qin³, Hu Weiping¹,²

1 MOE Key Laboratory of Modern Teaching Technology, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi′an 710062;
2 Collaborative Innovation Center of Assessment toward Basic Education Quality, Beijing 100875;
3 Collaborative Innovation Center of Shanxi basic education quality improvement, Linfen 041004

Received:2015-10-23 Online:2017-03-20 Published:2017-04-24
Supported by:
国家自然科学基金项目（31470977）、国家社科基金重大项目（14ZDB160）、陕西省重点科技创新团队项目（2014KTC-18）和教育部人文社会科学一般项目（16YJC190004）。

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 以124名本科生为被试，通过划分利手程度（实验一）与添加眼动刺激（实验二）的方法，系统考察了大脑半球互动对创造性科学问题提出能力的影响作用。结果发现：（1）与强右利手被试相比，混合利手被试在创造性科学问题提出能力测验上的得分更高；（2）与非眼动组被试相比，眼动组被试在创造性科学问题提出能力测验上的表现更好；（3）大脑半球互动与问题情境在灵活性品质上存在交互作用，大脑半球互动对开放性问题灵活性品质的影响大于封闭性问题。

关键词: 半球互动, 利手程度, 双边水平眼动, 创造性科学问题提出能力

Abstract: Creative scientific problem finding ability is an important part of scientific creativity. This research aims to assess the relationship between IHI level and CSPFA through comparing the subjects′ performance on the CSPEA of different IHI levels. Experiment 1: Adopts a mixed experiment design, which is 2(mixed-hander, strong right-handed)×2(question type: open-ended questions, closed-ended questions), to inspect the influence of handedness on CSPFA. The result demonstrates: The CSPFA of mixed-hander is much stronger, and is coincident with different questions. Experiment 2: Adopts a mixed experiment design, which is 2(question type: open-ended questions, closed-ended questions)×2(eye movement level: control group, horizontal eye movements group), to investigate the influence of eye movement on CSPFA. The result shows: Compared with control group, horizontal eye movements are more conducive to the subjects′ performance in their creative scientific problem finding task. Conclusion: IHI level influences individual CSPEA by promoting its flexibility, and the path way for this is different with the question types.

Key words: inter-hemispheric interaction, handedness, bilateral eye movements, creative scientific problem finding ability.

中图分类号:

B842.5

王博韬, 段海军, 韩琴, 胡卫平,. 大脑半球互动对创造性科学问题提出能力的影响*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2017, 15(2): 211-217.

Wang Botao, Duan Haijun, Han Qin, Hu Weiping,. The Influence of Inter-Hemispheric Interaction on Creative Scientific Problem Finding Ability[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2017, 15(2): 211-217.

参考文献

[1] 胡卫平, 程丽芳, 贾小娟, 韩蒙, 陈英和.(2015). 认知抑制对创造性科学问题提出的影响: 认知风格的中介作用. 心理与行为研究, 13(6), 721-728.
[2] 胡卫平, 王兴起.(2010). 情绪对创造性科学问题提出能力的影响. 心理科学, 33(3), 608-611.
[3] 胡卫平, 周蓓.(2010). 动机对高一学生创造性的科学问题提出能力的影响. 心理发展与教育, 36, 31-36.
[4] 王博韬, 陈泊蓉, 段海军, 胡卫平.(2015). 大脑半球互动: 一个影响认知活动的因素. 心理科学进展, 23(7), 1181-1186.
[5] Baer, J., & Kaufman, J. C.(2005). Bridging generality and specificity: The Amusement Park Theoretical(APT) model of creativity. Roeper Review, 27(3), 158-163.
[6] Badzakova-Trajkov, G., H berling, I. S., & Corballis, M. C.(2011). Magical ideation, creativity, handedness, and cerebral asymmetries: A combined behavioural and fMRI study. Neuropsychologia, 49(10), 2896-2903.
[7] Bakan, P., & Svorad, D.(1969). Resting EEG alpha and asymmetry of reflective lateral eye movements. Nature, 223(5209), 975-976.
[8] Barcaro, U., Bonanni, E., Denoth, F., Murri, L., Navona, C., & Stefanini, A.(1989). A study of the interhemispheric correlation during sleep in elderly subjects. Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology: Official Publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society, 6(2), 191-199.
[9] Bink, M. L., & Marsh, R. L.(2000). Cognitive regularities in creative activity. Review of General Psychology, 4(1), 59.
[10] Brunyé,T. T., Mahoney, C. R., Augustyn, J. S., & Taylor, H. A.(2009). Horizontal saccadic eye movements enhance the retrieval of landmark shape andlocation information. Brain and Cognition, 70, 279-288.
[11] Christman, S. D.(2001). Individual differences in stroop and local-global processing: A possible role of interhemispheric interaction. Brain and Cognition, 45(1), 97-118.
[12] Christman, S. D.(2013). Handedness and‘open-earedness’: Strong right-handers are less likely to prefer less popular musical genres. Psychology of Music, 41(1), 89-96.
[13] Christman, S. D.(2014). Individual differences in personality as a function of degree of handedness: Consistent-handers are less sensation seeking, more authoritarian, and more sensitive to disgust. Laterality: Asymmetries of Body, Brain and Cognition, 19(3), 354-367.
[14] Christman, S. D., & Butler, M.(2011). Mixed-handedness advantages in episodic memory obtained under conditions of intentional learning extend to incidental learning. Brain and Cognition, 77(1), 17-22.
[15] Christman, S. D., & Jasper, J. D.(2014). “All-or-none” versus“most-or-some”options in risky choice: Effects of domain and handedness. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 27(4), 378-385.
[16] Christman, S. D., Propper, R. E., & Brown, T. J.(2006). Increased interhemispheric interaction is associated with earlier offset of childhood amnesia. Neuropsychology, 20(3), 336-345.
[17] Christman, S. D., Propper, R. E., & Dion, A.(2004). Increased interhemispheric interaction is associated with decreased false memories in a verbal converging semantic associates paradigm. Brain and Cognition, 56(3), 313-319.
[18] Dumermuth, G., & Lehmann, D.(1981). EEG power and coherence during non-REM and REM phases in humans in all-night sleep analyses. European Neurology, 20(6), 429-434.
[19] Finke, R. A., Ward, T. B., & Smith, S. M.(1992). Creative cognition: Theory, research, and applications. MIT Press.
[20] Han, Q., Hu, W., Liu, J., Jia, X., & Adey, P.(2013). The influence of peer interaction on students′ creative problem-finding ability. Creativity Research Journal, 25(3), 248-258.
[21] Hu, W.P., Shi, Q. Z., Han, Q., Wang, X. Q., & Adey, P.(2010). Creative Scientific Problem Finding and Its Developmental Trend. Creativity Research Journal, 22(1), 1-7.
[22] Luders, E., Cherbuin, N., Thompson, P. M., Gutman, B. A., Kaarin. J., Sachdev, P., & Toga, A. W.(2010). When more is less: Associations between corpus callosum size and handedness lateralization. NeuroImage, 52(1), 43-49.
[23] Lyle, K. B., Chapman, L. K., & Hatton, J. M.(2013). Is handedness related to anxiety? New answers to an old question. Laterality: Asymmetries of Body, Brain and Cognition, 18(5), 520-535.
[24] Lyle, K. B., & Jacobs, N. E.(2010). Is saccade-induced retrieval enhancement a potential means of improving eyewitness evidence? Memory, 18(6), 581-594.
[25] Lyle, K. B., Logan, J. M., & Roediger, H. L.(2008). Eye movements enhance memory for individuals who are strongly right-handed and harm it for individuals who are not. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15(3), 515-520.
[26] Lyle, K. B., & Orsborn, A. E.(2011). Inconsistent handedness and saccade execution benefit face memory without affecting interhemispheric interaction. Memory, 19(6), 613-624.
[27] Oldfield, R. C.(1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9(1), 97-113.
[28] Parker, A., & Dagnall, N.(2007). Effects of bilateral eye movements on gist based false recognition in the DRM paradigm. Brain and Cognition, 63(3), 221-225.
[29] Parker, A., & Dagnall, N.(2010). Effects of handedness and saccadic bilateral eye movements on components of autobiographical recollection. Brain and Cognition, 73(2), 93-101.
[30] Parker, A., Relph, S., & Dagnall, N.(2008). Effects of bilateral eye movements on the retrieval of item, associative, and contextual information. Neuropsychology, 22(1), 136-145.
[31] Propper, R. E., Pierce, J., Geisler, M. W., Christman, S. D., & Bellorado, N.(2007). Effect of bilateral eye movements on frontal interhemispheric gamma EEG coherence: Implications for EMDR therapy. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 195(9), 785-788.
[32] Prichard, E., Propper, R. E., & Christman, S. D.(2013). Degree of handedness, but not direction, is a systematic predictor of cognitive performance. Frontiers in Psychology[electronic resource】, 4, 9.
[33] Shobe, E. R., Ross, N. M., & Fleck, J. I.(2009). Influence of handedness and bilateral eye movements on creativity. Brain and Cognition, 71(3), 204-214.
[34] Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I.(1999). The concept of creativity: Prospects and paradigms. In R. J. Sternberg(Ed.), Handbook of creativity(pp. 3-15). New York: Cambridge University Press.
[35] Sontam, V., & Christman, S. D.(2012). Semantic organisation and handedness: Mixed-handedness is associated with more diffuse activation of ambiguous word associates. Laterality: Asymmetries of Body, Brain and Cognition, 17(1), 38-50.