个体理想伴侣偏好的内隐—外显性差异研究*

心理与行为研究 ›› 2017, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (4): 551-561.

个体理想伴侣偏好的内隐—外显性差异研究^*

侯娟¹, 黄佳妮¹, 方晓义²

1 安徽大学哲学系,合肥 230039
2 北京师范大学发展心理研究院,北京 100875

收稿日期:2016-09-27 出版日期:2017-07-20 发布日期:2017-10-10
通讯作者: 方晓义,E-mail：fangxy@bnu.edu.cn。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目（31571157）,国家社会科学基金教育学青年课题（CEA150174）,教育部长江学者支持计划和安徽大学学术与技术带头人引进工程

The Difference Between the Implicit and Explicit Preferences for Ideal Partner

Hou Juan¹, Huang Jiani¹, Fang Xiaoyi²

1 Department of Philosophy, Anhui University, Hefei 230039;
2 Institute of Developmental Psychology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875

Received:2016-09-27 Online:2017-07-20 Published:2017-10-10

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为了探讨个体对于理想伴侣品质的内隐与外显偏好之间是否存在差异性,本研究以144名大学生为被试,采用伴侣品质偏好问卷以及内隐联想测验作为测量工具,结果发现：（1）个体对于伴侣品质具有内隐偏好,更倾向于将伴侣与积极的个人品质相联系;（2）个体对于理想伴侣品质的外显偏好与内隐偏好之间具有差异性,其中男性在9个伴侣品质的内隐-外显偏好上达到显著差异,女性在18个伴侣品质上达到显著差异。从对理想伴侣品质期待程度来说,女性对于理想伴侣品质追求更高于男性。

关键词: 理想伴侣, 伴侣品质, 内隐联想测验, 择偶偏好

Abstract: The present study discussed the differences between implicit and explicit preferences for ideal partner by completing the questionnaires about partner preferences and using the Implicit Association Test(IAT)in 144 undergraduates. The results revealed that: 1)Individuals showed an implicit partner preference for a positive personal characteristic in a partner. 2)A significant difference between the implicit and explicit preferences for ideal partner emerged in the research, given that men reached the differences in nine items and women in eighteen items. Women exhibited a higher demand in ideal partners' attributes than men.

Key words: ideal partner, partner attributes, IAT, partner preference

中图分类号:

B849

侯娟, 黄佳妮, 方晓义. 个体理想伴侣偏好的内隐—外显性差异研究^*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2017, 15(4): 551-561.

Hou Juan, Huang Jiani, Fang Xiaoyi. The Difference Between the Implicit and Explicit Preferences for Ideal Partner[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2017, 15(4): 551-561.

参考文献

1 陈浩, 刘依冉, 乐国安.(2012). 中美大学生理想伴侣相对偏好的性别与文化比较. 应用心理学, 18(3), 195-203.
2 陈欣欣.(2012). 80后90后大学生择偶偏好问卷编制及其走偏好现状(硕士学位论文). 沈阳师范大学, 沈阳.
3 刘依冉, 马颖, 陈浩, 乐国安.(2012). 中美大学生自我与理想伴侣性别角色, 依恋风格, 自尊的感知特征. 第十五届全国心理学学术会议论文摘要集.
4 刘永芳, 苏丽娜, 王怀勇.(2011). 女性择偶决策的线索偏好及信息加工方式. 心理学报, 43(1), 21-29.
5 田芊.(2012). 中国女性择偶倾向研究(硕士学位论文). 复旦大学, 上海.
6 熊太瑞.(2013). 女大学生的恋爱对象选择以及情感偏好: 问卷编制与实证研究——基于新的研究范式(硕士学位论文). 杭州师范大学, 杭州.
7 杨良群.(2009). 大学生恋爱价值观问卷编制及其特点研究(硕士学位论文). 西南大学, 重庆.
8 张小红.(2008). 基于理想标准的伴侣调控与接受对关系满意度的影响(硕士学位论文). 西南大学, 重庆.
9 邹红, 杨骏, 陈世琦, 廖文晨, 陈蓉蓉.(2014). 大学生恋爱决策中内隐与外显线索偏好的研究. 心理科学, 37(4), 902-906.
10 Banse, R., & Kowalick, C.(2007). Implicit attitudes towards romantic partners predict well-being in stressful life conditions: Evidence from the antenatal maternity ward. International Journal of Psychology, 42(3), 149-157.
11 Botwin, M. D., Buss, D. M., & Shackelford, T. K.(1997). Personality and mate preferences: Five factors in mate selection and marital satisfaction. Journal of Personality, 65(1), 107-136.
12 Buss, D. M.(1989). Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 14(3), 519-519.
13 Chang, L., Wang, Y., Shackelford, T. K., & Buss, D. M.(2011). Chinese mate preferences: Cultural evolution and continuity across a quarter of a century. Personality and Individual Differences(5), 678-683.
14 Eastwick, P. W., Eagly, A. H., Finkel, E. J., & Se., J.(2011). Implicit and explicit preferences for physical attractiveness in a romantic partner: A double dissociation in predictive validity. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 101(5), 993-1011.
15 Eastwick, P. W., & Ej., F.(2008). Sex differences in mate preferences revisited: Do people know what they initially desire in a romantic partner? Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 94(2), 245-264.
16 Eastwick, P. W., Finkel, E. J., & Ah, E.(2011). When and why do ideal partner preferences affect the process of initiating and maintaining romantic relationships?. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(5), 1012-1032.
17 Eastwick, P. W., Luchies, L. B., Finkel, E. J., & Hunt, L. L.(2014). The predictive validity of ideal partner preferences: A review and meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 140(3), 623-665.
18 Fitzsimons, G. M., & Bargh, J. A.(2003). Thinking of you: Nonconscious pursuit of interpersonal goals associated with relationship partners. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 84(1), 148-163.
19 Greenwald, A. G., Mcghee, D. E., & Schwartz, J. L.(1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 74(6), 1464-1480.
20 Greenwald, A. G., Poehlman, T. A., Uhlmann, E., & Banaji, M. R.(2009). Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: III. Meta-analysis of predictive validity. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 97(1), 197-216.
21 Kamble, S., Shackelford, T. K., Pham, M., & Buss, D. M.(2014). Indian mate preferences: Continuity, sex differences, and cultural change across a quarter of a century. Personality & Individual Differences, 70(70), 150-155.
22 Kenrick, D. T., Groth, G. E., Trost, M. R., & Sadalla, E. K.(1993). Integrating evolutionary and social exchange perspectives on relationships: Effects of gender, self-appraisal, and involvement level on mate selection criteria. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 64(6), 951-969.
23 Langhorne, M. C., & Secord, P. F.(1955). Variations in marital needs with age, sex, marital status, and regional location. Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 19-37.
24 Nosek, B. A., & Banaji, M. R.(2001). The go/no-go association task. Social Cognition, 19(6), 625-664.
25 Souza, A. L., Conroy-Beam, D., & Buss, D. M.(2016). Mate preferences in brazil: Evolved desires and cultural evolution over three decades. Personality & Individual Differences, 95, 45-49.
26 Thibaut, J. W., & Kelley, H. H.(1959). The social psychology of groups. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
27 Trivers, R. L.(1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. In B. G. Campbell(Ed.), Sexual selection and the descent of man, 1871-1971(pp. 136-179). Chicago, IL: Aldine.
28 Zayas, V., & Shoda, Y.(2005). Do automatic reactions elicited by thoughts of romantic partner, mother, and self-relate to adult romantic attachment? Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 31(8), 1011-1025.

[1]	吴三美, 王敬欣, 何先友, 田良苏, 赵雪汝, 陈广耀. 心理距离概念水平上的趋利避害相容效应[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2019, 17(4): 488-495.
[2]	张娟, 张大均. 大学生心理素质水平与正性负性情绪的外显和内隐相关[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2019, 17(1): 91-96.
[3]	徐钟庚，席贻莹，马婷张锋. 健全人对不同能力残疾人的刻板印象：基于SCM模型的研究^*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2016, 14(1): 106-113.
[4]	陈进, 梁宁建, 杨福义, 杨文圣. 多因素特质内隐联想测验（MFT-IAT）在多维度自我概念内隐测量中的应用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2013, 11(2): 184-189.
[5]	赵莹；吕勇；吴国来. [J]. , 2009, 7(1): 67-70.
[6]	张镇,李幼穗. 青少年内隐与外显自尊的比较研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2005, 3(3): 219-224.