约翰内斯-恩格尔坎普. (1997). 心理语言学 (陈国鹏 译). 上海: 上海译文出版社.
Boland, J. E., Tanenhaus, M. K., Garnsey, S. M., & Carlson, G. N. (1995). Verb argument structure in parsing and interpretation: Evidence from wh-questions. Journal of Memory and Language, 34(6), 774-806.
Clahsen, H., & Felser, C. (2006a). Grammatical processing in language learners. Applied Psycholinguistics, 27(1), 3-42.
Clahsen, H., & Felser, C. (2006b). How native-like is non-native language processing? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10(12), 564-570.
Frenck-Mestre, C.(2002). An on-line look at sentence processing in the second language. In R. R. Herridia & J. Altarriba (Eds.), Bilingual sentence processing (pp. 218-236). The Netherlands: North Holland.
Friedmann, N., Belletti, A., & Rizzi, L. (2009). Relativized relatives: Types of intervention in the acquisition of a-bar dependencies. Lingua, 119(1), 67-88.
Friederici, A. D., Rüschemeyer, S. A., Hahne, A., & Fiebach, C. J. (2003). The role of left inferior frontal and superior temporal cortex in sentence comprehension: Localizing syntactic and semantic processes. Cerebral Cortex, 13(2), 170-177.
Hopp, H. (2006). Syntactic features and reanalysis in near-native processing. Second Language Research, 22(3), 369-397.
Hsin, A. L. C. (2012). The acquisition of English complementizers in canonical vs. noncanonical structures. Taiwan Journal of TESOL, 9(2), 95-141.
Jackson, C. (2008). Proficiency level and the interaction of lexical and morphosyntactic information during l2 sentence processing. Language Learning, 58(4), 875-909.
Jiang, N. (2007). Selective integration of linguistic knowledge in adult second language learning. Language Learning, 57(1), 1-33.
Juffs, A., & Harrington, M. (1995). Parsing effects in second language sentence processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 17(4), 483-516.
Juffs, A. (2005). The influence of first language on the processing of wh-movement in English as a second language. Second Language Research, 21(2), 121-151.
King, J. W., & Kutas, M. (1995). Who did what and when? Using word- and clause-level ERPs to monitor working memory usage in reading. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 7(3), 376-395.
Lewis, R. L., & Vasishth, S. (2005). An activation-based model of sentence processing as skilled memory retrieval. Cognitive Science, 29(3), 375-419.
Mikhailov, R. (2014). Homotopical and combinatorial aspects of the theory of normal series in groups. Proceedings of the Steklov Institute of Mathematics, 286(S1), 1-135.
Papadopoulou, D., & Clahsen, H. (2003). Parsing strategies in L1 and L2 sentence processing: A study of relative clause attachment in Greek. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 25(4), 501-528.
Pearlmutter, N. J., & MacDonald, M. C. (1995). Individual differences and probabilistic constraints in syntactic ambiguity resolution. Journal of Memory and Language, 34(4), 521-542.
Omaki, A., & Schulz, B. (2011). Filler-gap dependencies and island constraints in second-language sentence processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 33(4), 563-588.
Staub, A. (2010). Eye movements and processing difficulty in object relative clauses. Cognition, 116(1), 71-86.
Tsimpli, I. M., & Dimitrakopoulou, M. (2007). The interpretability hypothesis: Evidence from wh-interrogatives in second language acquisition. Second Language Research, 23(2), 215-242.
Wanner, E., & Maratsos, M.(1978). An ATN approach to comprehension. In M. Halle, J. Bresnan, & G. A. Miller (Eds.), Linguistic theory and psychological reality. Cambridge, MA.: MIT Press.
Williams, J. N., Möbius, P., & Kim, C. (2001). Native and non-native processing of English wh-questions: Parsing strategies and plausibility constraints. Applied Psycholinguistics, 22, 509-540.
Xiang, M., Dillon, B., Wagers, M., Liu, F. Q., & Guo, T. M. (2014). Processing covert dependencies: An SAT study on mandarin wh-in-situ questions. Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 23(2), 207-232.
Yang, F., Mo, L., & Louwerse, M. M. (2013). Effects of local and global context on processing sentences with subject and object relative clauses. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 42(3), 227-237. |