情绪效价对不同抑郁水平大学生的反应性控制和主动性控制的影响

心理与行为研究 ›› 2017, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (6): 807-814.

情绪效价对不同抑郁水平大学生的反应性控制和主动性控制的影响

黄时华¹, 曾艳芬¹, 张卫²

1. 广州中医药大学经济与管理学院心理系, 广州 510006;
2. 华南师范大学心理学院/心理应用研究中心, 广州 510631

收稿日期:2016-08-23 出版日期:2017-11-20 发布日期:2017-12-28
通讯作者: 黄时华,E-mail:huangshihua@163.com
基金资助:
教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目（14YJC190007）和广州市哲学社会科学发展“十三五”规划共建课题（2016GZGJ77）

How Emotional Valence Affect the Reactive Control and Proactive Control of college students with Different Level of Depression

HUANG Shihua¹, ZENG Yanfen¹, ZHANG Wei²

1. College of Economic and Management, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510006;
2. School of Psychology & Center for Studies of Psychological Application, South China Normal University, Guangzhou 536100

Received:2016-08-23 Online:2017-11-20 Published:2017-12-28

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 探讨情绪效价和抑郁水平对反应性控制和主动性控制的影响。通过国际情绪图片诱发出积极、中性和消极情绪，采用修订后的AX-CPT任务分离出两种认知控制，考察了不同抑郁水平大学生在认知控制上的差异。结果表明大学生更倾向于采用主动性控制；相比于低抑郁个体，高抑郁个体的主动性和反应性控制均有下降；相比消极情绪，积极情绪可以降低高、低抑郁个体的主动性控制，但积极情绪只能降低高抑郁个体的反应性控制，对低抑郁个体无影响。

关键词: 情绪效价, 抑郁水平, 反应性控制, 主动性控制

Abstract: The mainly discussion in this paper is the emotional valence and depression effects on reactive control and proactive control. In this paper, International Affective Picture System was used to induce the positive/neutral/negative emotion, and the AX - CPT paradigm will be used to distinguish the two kinds of cognitive control, in order to compare the difference of cognitive control depression level of college students'. Results show that: College students prefer proactive control to reactive control; Relative to the low depressed individuals, proactive cognitive control and reactive cognitive control of high depression individual are damaged; Positive emotions can reduce high/low level of depression of college students' proactive control, while positive only reduce the reactive control of the high level of depression, but will not affect the low depressions' reactive control.

Key words: emotional valence, level of depression, reactive control, proactive control

中图分类号:

B846

黄时华, 曾艳芬, 张卫. 情绪效价对不同抑郁水平大学生的反应性控制和主动性控制的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2017, 15(6): 807-814.

HUANG Shihua, ZENG Yanfen, ZHANG Wei. How Emotional Valence Affect the Reactive Control and Proactive Control of college students with Different Level of Depression[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2017, 15(6): 807-814.

参考文献

和红, 杨洋. (2015). 大学生抑郁自杀意念及影响因素的路径分析. 中国学校卫生, 36(1), 80-83.
李斌彬, 周东丰. (2015). 抑郁症对负性情绪的认知偏向——记忆和注意. 临床精神医学杂志, 25(2), 133-135.
李嘉雯, 冯正直, 廖成菊, 蒋娟, 王晓霞. (2011). 情绪效价强度对抑郁症状个体认知控制的影响. 第三军医大学学报, 33(10), 1081-1084.
廖成菊, 冯正直, 王凤, 刘庆英, 黄赛. (2010). 抑郁个体情绪加工与认知控制的相互作用. 中国心理卫生杂志, 24(5), 387-391.
刘琰, 谭曦, 李扬, 徐芳, 张杰, 孔军辉. (2015). 大学生抑郁情绪现状及影响因素分析. 中华全科医学, 13(1), 91-93.
施静, 任俊, 张振新. (2012). 积极情绪对选择性注意分心抑制过程的影响. 中国特殊教育, (5), 75-81.
舒良. (1999). 自评抑郁量表和抑郁状态问卷. 中国心理卫生杂志, (增刊), 194-196.
唐慧, 丁伶灵, 宋秀丽, 黄志伟, 祁秦, 贺连平, 姚应水. (2013). 2002-2011年中国大学生抑郁情绪检出率的Meta分析. 吉林大学学报(医学版), 39(5), 965-969.
田菊, 王久菊, 权文香, 王鹏飞, 刘津, 董问天. (2015). 抑郁症患者的情绪对认知功能的影响. 中华行为医学与脑科学杂志, 24(6), 329-331.
王敬欣, 王春梅. (2015). 抑郁症患者情绪失调探析及其对治疗的启示. 南开学报(哲学社会科学版), (3), 119-128.
徐雷, 唐丹丹, 陈安涛. (2012). 主动性和反应性认知控制的权衡机制及影响因素. 心理科学进展, 20(7), 1012-1022.
蚁金瑶, 钟明天, 朱熊兆, 王湘, 廖坚, 姚树桥. (2013). 抑郁认知易感者在负性情绪信息加工中的脑功能连接特征. 中华精神科杂志, 46(2), 71-77.
Andrews-Hanna, J. R., Mackiewicz Seghete, K. L., Claus, E. D., Burgess, G. C., Ruzic, L., & Banich, M. T. (2011). Cognitive control in adolescence: Neural underpinnings and relation to self-report behaviors. PLoS One, 6(6), e21598.
Barch, D. M., Mitropoulou, V., Harvey, P. D., New, A. S., Silverman, J. M., & Siever, L. J. (2004). Context-processing deficits in schizotypal personality disorder. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 113(4), 556-568.
Bhatia, N. L., Collins, J. M., Nguyen, C. C., Jaroszewski, D. E., Vikram, H. R., & Charles, J. C. (2008). Esophageal perforation as a complication of esophagogastroduodenoscopy. Journal of Hospital Medicine, 3(3), 256-262.
Biss, R. K., Hasher, L., & Thomas, R. C. (2010). Positive mood is associated with the implicit use of distraction. Motivation & Emotion, 34(1), 73-77.
Braver, T. S. (2012). The variable nature of cognitive control: A dual mechanisms framework. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16(2), 106-113.
Braver, T. S., Gray, J. R., & Burgess, G. C. (2007). Explaining the many varieties of working memory variation: Dual mechanisms of cognitive control. In A. Conway, C. Jarrold, M. Kane, A. Miyake, & J. Towse (Eds.), Variation in working memory (pp. 76-106). New York: Oxford University Press.
Braver, T. S., Paxton, J. L., Locke, H. S., & Barch, D. M. (2009). Flexible neural mechanisms of cognitive control within human prefrontal cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106(18), 7351-7356.
Braver, T. S., Satpute, A. B., Rush, B. K., Racine, C. A., & Barch, D. M. (2005). Context processing and context maintenance in healthy aging and early stage dementia of the Alzheimer's type. Psychology & Aging, 20(1), 33-46.
Cohen, J. D., Barch, D. M., Carter, C., & Servan-Schreiber, D. (1999). Context-processing deficits in schizophrenia: Converging evidence from three theoretically motivated cognitive tasks. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 108(1), 120-133.
Dichter, G. S., Felder, J. N., & Smoski, M. J. (2009). Affective context interferes with cognitive control in unipolar depression: An fmri investigation. Journal of Affective Disorders, 114(1-3), 131-142.
Dreisbach, G. (2006). How positive affect modulates cognitive control: The costs and benefits of reduced maintenance capability. Brain and Cognition, 60(1), 11-19.
Friedman, D., Nessler, D., Cycowicz, Y. M., & Horton, C. (2009). Development of and change in cognitive control: A comparison of children, young adults, and older adults. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 9(1), 91-102.
Fröber, K., & Dreisbach, G. (2012). How positive affect modulates proactive control: Reduced usage of informative cues under positive affect with low arousal. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 265.
Geschwind, N., Nicolson, N. A., Peeters, F., van Os, J., Barge-Schaapveld, D., & Wichers, M. (2011). Early improvement in positive rather than negative emotion predicts remission from depression after pharmacotherapy. European Neuropsychopharmacology, 21(3), 241-247.
Iselin, A. M. R., & DeCoster, J. (2009). Reactive and proactive control in incarcerated and community adolescents and young adults. Cognitive Development, 24(2), 192-206.
Johnson, K. J., & Fredrickson, B. L. (2005). "we all look the same to me": Positive emotions eliminate the own-race bias in face recognition. Psychological Science, 16(11), 875-881.
Lamm, C., Pine, D. S., & Fox, N. A. (2013). Impact of negative affectively charged stimuli and response style on cognitive-control-related neural activation: An ERP study. Brain & Cognition, 83(2), 234-243.
Lang, P. J., Bradley, M. M., & Cuthbert, B. N. (2001). International affective picture system (IAPS): Instruction manual and affective ratings. Technical Report A-5, The Center for Research in Psychophysiology, University of Florida.
Phillips, L. H., Smith, L., & Gilhooly, K. J. (2002). The effects of adult aging and induced positive and negative mood on planning. Emotion, 2(3), 263-272.
Romero, N., Sanchez, A., & Vazquez, C. (2014). Memory biases in remitted depression: The role of negative cognitions at explicit and automatic processing levels. Journal of Behavior Therapy & Experimental Psychiatry, 45(1), 128-135.
Saunders, B., & Jentzsch, I. (2014). Reactive and proactive control adjustments under increased depressive symptoms: Insights from the classic and emotional-face stroop task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67(5), 884-898.
Vanderhasselt, M. A., De Raedt, R., De Paepe, A., Aarts, K., Otte, G., van Dorpe, J., & Pourtois, G. (2014). Abnormal proactive and reactive cognitive control during conflict processing in major depression. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 123(1), 68-80.
van Wouwe, N. C., Band, G. P. H., & Ridderinkhof, K. R. (2011). Positive affect modulates flexibility and evaluative control. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23(3), 524-539.
West, R., Choi, P., & Travers, S. (2010). The influence of negative affect on the neural correlates of cognitive control. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 76(2), 107-117.

[1]	周爱保, 赵海燕, 夏瑞雪, 袁月, 贾婷婷, 谢珮. 不同语义水平下参照方式、情绪效价和特质评价对记忆的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(2): 145-152.
[2]	赵思怡, 李莹, 王悦. 情绪效价−空间动作隐喻联结对成人和儿童外语情绪词学习的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(2): 153-159.
[3]	杜夏雨, 史从戎, 赵子仪, 薛婷. 情绪效价和动机情绪对创造力的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(2): 160-165.
[4]	姚文玉, 张雯, 刘影, 张思敏, 丁雪辰, 徐刚敏. 儿童抑郁水平与学业成绩的发展轨迹：基于平行潜变量增长模型[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(2): 223-229.
[5]	路瑶, 张颖颖, 陈宝国. 主动性控制在语言转换线索加工阶段的作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2018, 16(1): 37-44.
[6]	贾孟华, 杨小洋, 王大华. 婚姻自传体记忆的数量特征：时间与依恋风格的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2015, 13(2): 271-277.