典型性对群际偏差的影响：以城市居民与农民工的群际关系为例

心理与行为研究 ›› 2018, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (1): 125-129.

典型性对群际偏差的影响：以城市居民与农民工的群际关系为例

张冀琦¹, 黄桢炜², 刘力¹

1. 北京师范大学心理学部, 应用实验心理北京市重点实验室, 心理学国家级实验教学示范中心(北京师范大学), 北京 100875;
2. 北京行政学院, 北京 100000

收稿日期:2016-03-08 出版日期:2018-01-20 发布日期:2018-02-27
通讯作者: 刘力,E-mail:l.liu@bnu.edu.cn
基金资助:
北京市哲学社会科学规划项目（13ZHB027）、北京市支持中央在京高校共建项目、国家自然科学基金项目（31571145）

The Influence of Prototypicality on Intergroup Bias: A Case Study on the Intergroup Relation between Urban Residents and Rural-to-urban Migrants

Zhang Jiqi¹, Huang Zhenwei², Liu Li¹

1. Faculty of Psychology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing Key Lab of Applied Experimental Psychology, National Experimental Teaching Demonstration Center of Psychology(Beijing Normal University), Beijing 100875;
2. Beijing Administration Institute, Beijing 100000

Received:2016-03-08 Online:2018-01-20 Published:2018-02-27

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 已有研究表明典型群体成员会表现出更强的群际偏差。然而，典型群体成员表现群际偏差的基础是内群体偏好还是外群体贬损尚未明确。本研究以中国社会背景下城市居民与农民工的群际关系为例，对典型城市居民表现群际偏差的基础进行探索。研究一采用相关研究设计考察典型性与群际偏差的关系，结果表明越典型的城市居民会表现越强的内群体偏好，但外群体贬损不受典型性影响。研究二采用实验设计对城市居民典型性进行操纵，结果进一步证实了典型性会导致内群体偏好，而非外群体贬损。研究结果一致地表明，典型城市居民表现群际偏差的基础是内群体偏好而非外群体贬损。

关键词: 典型性, 群际偏差, 内群体偏好, 外群体贬损, 农民工

Abstract: Previous research suggested that prototypical group members tend to have stronger intergroup bias than the non-prototypical. However, it is not clear what is the root of bias:whether it is ingroup favoritism or outgroup derogation? This study investigated the effect of urban residents' prototypicality on their intergroup bias against rural-to-urban migrants in China. Correlational Study 1 showed that prototypicality is positively associated with ingroup favoritism, but not outgroup derogation. In Study 2, urban resident's prototypicality was experimentally manipulated. The results indicated that prototypicality could lead to ingroup favoritism, but not outgroup derogation against rural-to-urban migrants. The results consistently showed that ingroup favoritism is the root of prototypical urban residents' intergroup bias against rural-to-urban migrants.

Key words: prototypicality, intergroup bias, ingroup favoritism, outgroup derogation, rural-to-urban migrants

中图分类号:

B849

张冀琦, 黄桢炜, 刘力. 典型性对群际偏差的影响：以城市居民与农民工的群际关系为例[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2018, 16(1): 125-129.

Zhang Jiqi, Huang Zhenwei, Liu Li. The Influence of Prototypicality on Intergroup Bias: A Case Study on the Intergroup Relation between Urban Residents and Rural-to-urban Migrants[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2018, 16(1): 125-129.

参考文献

蔡昉. (2010). 城市化与农民工的贡献——后危机时期中国经济增长潜力的思考. 中国人口科学, (1), 2-10.
陈信勇, 金向英. (2006). 农民工医疗救助研究. 浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版), 36(6), 128-135.
程诚, 边燕杰. (2014). 社会资本与不平等的再生产以农民工与城市职工的收入差距为例. 社会, 34(4), 67-90.
高明华. (2013). 教育不平等的身心机制及干预策略——以农民工子女为例. 中国社会科学, (4), 60-80.
熊红星, 张璟, 叶宝娟, 郑雪, 孙配贞. (2012). 共同方法变异的影响及其统计控制途径的模型分析. 心理科学进展, 20(5), 757-769.
张慧. (2005). 农民工就业歧视问题分析. 上海经济研究, (10), 72-78.
周浩, 龙立荣. (2004). 共同方法偏差的统计检验与控制方法. 心理科学进展, 12(6), 942-950.
Billig, M. (1987). Arguing and thinking:A rhetorical approach to social psychology. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
Brewer, M. B. (1999). The psychology of prejudice:Ingroup love and outgroup hate? Journal of Social Issues, 55(3), 429-444.
Dovidio, J. F., Kawakami, K., & Gaertner, S. L. (2002). Implicit and explicit prejudice and interracial interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(1), 62-68.
Hains, S. C., Hogg, M. A., & Duck, J. M. (1997). Self-categorization and leadership:Effects of group prototypicality and leader stereotypicality. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23(10), 1087-1099.
Hewstone, M., Rubin, M., & Willis, H. (2002). Intergroup bias. Annual Review of Psychology, 53(1), 575-604.
Jetten, J., Branscombe, N. R., & Spears, R. (2002). On being peripheral:Effects of identity insecurity on personal and collective self-esteem. European Journal of Social Psychology, 32(1), 105-123.
Jetten, J., Spears, R., & Manstead, A. S. R. (1997). Distinctiveness threat and prototypicality:Combined effects on intergroup discrimination and collective self-esteem. European Journal of Social Psychology, 27(6), 635-657.
Kruglanski, A. W., Shah, J. Y., Pierro, A., & Mannetti, L. (2002). When similarity breeds content:Need for closure and the allure of homogeneous and self-resembling groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(3), 648-662.
Kuang, L., & Liu, L. (2012). Discrimination against rural-to-urban migrants:The role of the Hukou system in China. PLoS One, 7(11), e46932.
Noel, J. G., Wann, D. L., & Branscombe, N. R. (1995). Peripheral ingroup membership status and public negativity toward outgroups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68(1), 127-137.
Okimoto, T. G., & Wrzesniewski, A. (2012). Effort in the face of difference:Feeling like a non-prototypical group member motivates effort. European Journal of Social Psychology, 42(5), 628-639.
Schmitt, M. T., & Branscombe, N. R. (2001). The good, the bad, and the manly:Threats to one's prototypicality and evaluations of fellow in-group members. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37(6), 510-517.
Steinel, W., van Kleef, G. A., van Knippenberg, D., Hogg, M. A., Homan, A. C., & Moffitt, G. (2010). How intragroup dynamics affect behavior in intergroup conflict:The role of group norms, prototypicality, and need to belong. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 13(6), 779-794.
Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group:A self-categorization theory. Oxford:Basil Blackwell.
van Kleef, G. A., Steinel, W., van Knippenberg, D., Hogg, M. A., & Svensson, A. (2007). Group member prototypicality and intergroup negotiation:How one's standing in the group affects negotiation behaviour. British Journal of Social Psychology, 46(1), 129-152.
van Knippenberg, D., Lossie, N., & Wilke, H. (1994). In-group prototypicality and persuasion:Determinants of heuristic and systematic message processing. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 289-300.
Zhang, X. X., Zheng, J., Liu, L., Zhao, X., & Sun, X. M. (2014). The effect of group boundary permeability on intergroup prejudice:The case of rural-to-urban migrants in China. Journal of Pacific Rim Psychology, 8(2), 53-61.

[1]	张淑华, 范洋洋. 新生代农民工身份认同对内隐群际攻击性的影响：内隐集体自尊的调节作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2018, 16(3): 371-377.
[2]	李强, 梁栋, 郝志红, 徐晟, 汪娜. 我国农民工核心心理健康素质的调查*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2017, 15(2): 250-257.
[3]	张淑华,王海雯, 刘芳. 新生代农民工身份认同分化的认知基础——社会比较策略视角*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2017, 15(2): 258-263.
[4]	陶云, 王晓曦, 刘艳, 马谐, 陈睿, 李思齐,. 类别使用目的对类别典型性效应的影响*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2017, 15(1): 34-40.
[5]	周春燕, 黄海, 刘陈陵, 郭永玉, 贺金波. 评价者与被评价者的社会阶层对阶层刻板印象的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2015, 13(4): 511-515.
[6]	任璐；刘电芝；刘礼艳；胡美娟；武燕；张辰毅. 农民工感恩问卷的编制与应用价值[J]. , 2012, 10(2): 125-130.
[7]	阴国恩,左春雨,曹瑞. 不同分类水平自然类概念的实例效应[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2009, 7(3): 161-165.
[8]	梁宝勇. “非典”流行期民众常见的心理应激反应与心理干预[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2003, 1(3): 223-230.