刺激冲突和反应冲突的事件相关电位特征：中顶部P3

心理与行为研究 ›› 2018, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (1): 31-36.

刺激冲突和反应冲突的事件相关电位特征：中顶部P3

唐丹丹^1,2, 彭微微³, 杨青松¹, 陈安涛², 陈雪飞⁴

1. 遵义师范学院教师教育学院, 遵义 563006;
2. 西南大学心理学部, 重庆 400715;
3. 深圳大学心理与社会学院, 深圳 518060;
4. 曲靖师范学院教师教育学院, 曲靖 655011

收稿日期:2016-05-13 出版日期:2018-01-20 发布日期:2018-02-27
通讯作者: 陈雪飞,E-mail:xfchen0118@163.com
基金资助:
曲靖师范学院科研项目（2011QN016）

The Event-Related Potentials Characteristics of Stimulus-and Response-Conflicts: Centro-Parietal P3

TANG Dandan^1,2, PENG Weiwei³, YANG Qingsong¹, CHEN Antao², CHEN Xuefei⁴

1. School of Education & Center of Mental Health and Psychological Counseling, Zunyi Normal College, Zunyi 563006;
2. Key Laboratory of Cognition and Personality(Ministry of Education) and School of Psychology, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715;
3. College of Psychology and Sociology, Shenzhen University 518061;
4. College of Teacher Education, Qujing Normal University, Qujing 655011

Received:2016-05-13 Online:2018-01-20 Published:2018-02-27

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 在色-词Flanker任务中，研究者采用2:1映射设计能构造两类冲突：刺激冲突和反应冲突。然而，这两类冲突所涉及的神经机制还不清楚。本研究采用2:1映射设计，记录了31个健康成人被试完成色-词Flanker任务时的行为和脑电数据。反应时数据显示了明显的刺激冲突和反应冲突。事件相关电位结果表明，中顶部P3峰值与刺激冲突有关，峰潜伏期能预测反应冲突。所以，中顶部P3反映了刺激冲突和反应冲突的神经机制。

关键词: 2:1映射设计, 色-词Flanker任务, 事件相关电位, P3

Abstract: Adopting a 2:1 mapping design, two types of conflicts, i.e., stimulus conflict (SC) and response conflict (RC), can be constructed in the color-word Flanker task. However, the neural mechanisms of occurrence of the two types of conflicts do not be understood well. To address this issue, the present study recorded the behavioral and electroencephalography (EEG) data when thirty-one healthy participants were performing the 2:1 color-word Flanker task. Response time (RT) data showed significant SC and RC. Event-related potentials (ERPs) results manifested that 1) P3 peak amplitudes in the centro-parietal region might be related to SC, and 2) the peak latencies could make a well prediction for the RC in behavior. Thus, these results confirm that the neural mechanisms of occurrence of SC and RC are reflected in the centro-parietal P3 component.

Key words: 2:1 mapping design, color-word Flanker task, event-related potentials (ERPs), P3

中图分类号:

B842.5

唐丹丹, 彭微微, 杨青松, 陈安涛, 陈雪飞. 刺激冲突和反应冲突的事件相关电位特征：中顶部P3[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2018, 16(1): 31-36.

TANG Dandan, PENG Weiwei, YANG Qingsong, CHEN Antao, CHEN Xuefei. The Event-Related Potentials Characteristics of Stimulus-and Response-Conflicts: Centro-Parietal P3[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2018, 16(1): 31-36.

参考文献

唐丹丹, 陈安涛.(2013). 冲突适应的神经振荡机制. 中国科学:生命科学, 43, 992-1002.
Botvinick, M. M., Cohen, J. D., & Carter, C. S.(2004). Conflict monitoring and anterior cingulate cortex:An update. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 539-546.
Braver, T. S., Barch, D. M., Gray, J. R., Molfese, D. L., & Snyder, A.(2001). Anterior cingulate cortex and response conflict:Effects of frequency, inhibition and errors. Cerebral Cortex, 11, 825-836.
Chen, A. T., Tang, D. D., & Chen, X. F.(2013). Training reveals the sources of stroop and flanker interference effects. PLoS One, 8, e76580.
Cohen, M. X., & van Gaal, S.(2013). Dynamic interactions between large-scale brain networks predict behavioral adaptation after perceptual errors. Cerebral Cortex, 23, 1061-1072.
De Houwer, J.(2003). On the role of stimulus-response and stimulus-stimulus compatibility in the Stroop effect. Memory & Cognition, 31, 353-359.
Delorme, A., & Makeig, S.(2004). EEGLAB:an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 134, 9-21.
Doucet, C., & Stelmack, R. M.(1999). The effect of response execution on P3 latency, reaction time, and movement time. Psychophysiology, 36, 351-363.
Duncan-Johnson, C. C., & Kopell, B. S.(1981). The Stroop effect:Brain potentials localize the source of interference. Science, 214, 938-940.
Eriksen, B. A., & Eriksen, C. W.(1974). Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Perception & Psychophysics, 16, 143-149.
Gevins, A., Smith, M. E., McEvoy, L., & Yu, D.(1997). High-resolution EEG mapping of cortical activation related to working memory:Effects of task difficulty, type of processing, and practice. Cerebral Cortex, 7, 374-385.
Girden, E. R.(1992). ANOVA:Repeated measures. Newbury Park:SAGE.
Houlihan, M., Campbell, K., & Stelmack, R. M.(1994). Reaction time and movement time as measures of stimulus evaluation and response processes. Intelligence, 18, 289-307.
Jung, T.-P., Makeig, S., Westerfield, M., Townsend, J., Courchesne, E., & Sejnowski, T. J.(2001). Analysis and visualization of single-trial event-related potentials. Human Brain Mapping, 14, 166-185.
Kok, A.(2001). On the utility of P3 amplitude as a measure of processing capacity. Psychophysiology, 38, 557-577.
Kornblum, S., Hasbroucq, T., & Osman, A.(1990). Dimensional overlap:Cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility-A model and taxonomy. Psychological Review, 97, 253-270.
Kornblum, S., & Lee, J.-W.(1995). Stimulus-response compatibility with relevant and irrelevant stimulus dimensions that do and do not overlap with the response. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Human Perception and Performance, 21, 855-875.
Kutas, M., McCarthy, G., & Donchin, E.(1977). Augmenting mental chronometry:The P300 as a measure of stimulus evaluation time. Science, 197, 792-795.
Luck, S. J.(2005). An introduction to the event-related potential technique. Cambridge, MA:The MIT Press.
Makeig, S., Jung, T.-P., Bell, A. J., Ghahremani, D., & Sejnowski, T. J.(1997). Blind separation of auditory event-related brain responses into independent components. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 94, 10979-10984.
Picton, T. W.(1992). The P300 wave of the human event-related potential. Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology, 9, 456-479.
Polich, J.(2007). Updating P300:An integrative theory of P3a and P3b. Clinical Neurophysiology, 118, 2128-2148.
Posner, M. I., & DiGirolamo, G. J.(1998). Executive attention:Conflict, target detection, and cognitive control. In R. Parasuraman (Ed.), The attentive brain (pp. 401-423). Cambridge, MA:The MIT Press.
Purmann, S., Badde, S., Luna-Rodriguez, A., & Wendt, M.(2011). Adaptation to frequent conflict in the eriksen flanker task. Journal of Psychophysiology, 25, 50-59.
Simon, J. R.(1990). The effects of an irrelevant directional cue on human information processing. In R. W. Proctor, & T. G. Reeve (Eds.), Stimulus-response compatibility:An integrated prospective (pp. 31-86). Amsterdam:Elsevier.
Stroop, J. R.(1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 643-662.
Tang, D. D., Hu, L., & Chen, A. T.(2013). The neural oscillations of conflict adaptation in the human frontal region. Biological Psychology, 93, 364-372.
Tang, D. D., Hu, L., Lei, Y., Li, H., & Chen, A. T.(2015). Frontal and occipital-parietal alpha oscillations distinguish between stimulus conflict and response conflict. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9, 433.
Tang, D. D., Hu, L., Li, H., Zhang, Q. L., & Chen, A. T.(2013). The neural dynamics of conflict adaptation within a look-to-do transition. PLoS One, 8, e57912.
van Veen, V., Cohen, J. D., Botvinick, M. M., Stenger, V. A., & Carter, C. S.(2001). Anterior cingulate cortex, conflict monitoring, and levels of processing. NeuroImage, 14, 1302-1308.
Zhang, H. H., Zhang, J., & Kornblum, S.(1999). A parallel distributed processing model of stimulus-stimulus and stimulus-response compatibility. Cognitive Psychology, 38, 386-432.

[1]	金花, 严世振, 单金磊, 刘婷. 面孔生命性加工的时间进程：ERP研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(5): 577-584.
[2]	贾磊, 陆家豪, 王逸, 张常洁. 权力概念隐喻映射中的冲突控制：特征与过程[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(3): 417-423.
[3]	陈衍, 江婷, 李玮, 陈取麟, 潘运, 胡思瑶. 合作中责任比较和分配评价差异的ERPs研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(2): 152-159.
[4]	宋娟, 杜梦, 连涛, 张倩. 积极怀旧情绪对疼痛共情影响的ERP研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(4): 466-473.
[5]	李骋诗, 白学军, 王永胜. 映射具体性和语境线索对新颖隐喻加工的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(2): 153-160.
[6]	唐丹丹, 傅瑜, 吴燕京, 朱海. 视觉空间工作记忆组间差异的神经机制[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(2): 176-184.
[7]	曾庆, 郑希付. 高低厌恶敏感性个体对不同情绪刺激的注意时程: 来自ERP研究的证据[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2019, 17(6): 743-749.
[8]	贾丽萍, 卢国华, 宋玉萍, 李福洪. 负性情绪启动对特质焦虑个体行为抑制的影响机制[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2019, 17(5): 604-612.
[9]	宋娟, 魏艳秋, 杜梦, 解鸿宇, 连涛, 胡亚奇, 马欧. 眼部情绪信息对疼痛共情影响的ERP研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2019, 17(3): 326-332,347.
[10]	杨海波, 牛丽丽, 尹莎莎, 白学军. 视觉工作记忆中非语义编码信息对注意捕获的影响：来自ERPs的证据[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2019, 17(1): 8-14.
[11]	赵小淋, 张燕, 王建峰. 情绪对不同外倾水平个体行为抑制的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2018, 16(4): 449-457.
[12]	邢强, 孙海龙, 车敬上. 反馈效价影响家族相似性类别学习的ERPs研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2018, 16(3): 300-307.
[13]	梁丽美, 李佳根, 贾江晓, 宋海秀, 雷怡, 李红, 张文海. 不同性质的评价对特质焦虑者抑制功能影响的ERP研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2018, 16(3): 335-341.
[14]	侯娟, 侯莹莹, 陈双艺, 方晓义. 网络成瘾者工作记忆能力的ERP研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2018, 16(3): 384-393.
[15]	刘耀中, 刘敏, 彭滨. 任务框架和社会距离对风险决策的影响：来自ERP的证据[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2018, 16(1): 13-21.