客体表征质量在语义客体注意效应中的作用

心理与行为研究 ›› 2018, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (3): 295-299.

客体表征质量在语义客体注意效应中的作用

吕勇¹, 李诸洋¹, 刘璐², 张婕¹

1. 天津师范大学心理与行为研究院, 天津 300074;
2. 鲁东大学教育科学学院, 烟台 264011

收稿日期:2016-10-14 出版日期:2018-05-20 发布日期:2018-06-05
通讯作者: 李诸洋,E-mail:zylee0619@163.com

The Role of the Quality of Object-based Representation in Semantic Object-based Attention

LYU Yong¹, LI Zhuyang¹, LIU Lu², ZHANG Jie¹

1. Academy of Psychology and Behavior, Tianjin Normal University, Tianjin 300074;
2. School of Educational Science, Ludong University, Yantai 264011

Received:2016-10-14 Online:2018-05-20 Published:2018-06-05

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 已有研究表明，除自下而上因素外，自上而下因素也能够对客体知觉起到调节作用，从而影响注意的分配。本研究以不同词频（高频和低频）的汉语双字词为实验材料，采用双矩形线索范式变式考察不同语义客体表征质量对基于语义客体注意效应的影响。结果发现，在高语义客体表征质量的条件下出现了基于语义客体的注意效应，而在低语义客体表征质量的条件下并未出现基于语义客体的注意效应。该结果表明，语义客体表征质量的高低是影响基于语义客体注意效应的重要因素。

关键词: 基于客体的注意, 语义客体, 客体表征质量

Abstract: In the present study, we wanted to investigate whether under different quality of object-based representation conditions, the high quality of object-based representation and the low quality of object-based representation, we could both find object-based attention effect, and what the role of the quality of object-based representation was in object-based attention effect. The results were as follows: There was a significant object-based attention effect under the high quality of semantic object-based representation condition, but more importantly, we did not find a significant object-based attention effect under the low quality of semantic object-based representation condition. These results indicated that the quality of object representation played an important role in the generation of the semantic object-based attention effect.

Key words: Object-based attention, semantic object, the quality of object representation

中图分类号:

B842.1

吕勇, 李诸洋, 刘璐, 张婕. 客体表征质量在语义客体注意效应中的作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2018, 16(3): 295-299.

LYU Yong, LI Zhuyang, LIU Lu, ZHANG Jie. The Role of the Quality of Object-based Representation in Semantic Object-based Attention[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2018, 16(3): 295-299.

参考文献

陈新葵, 张积家. (2010). 影响汉语动词、名词识别因素的回归分析. 心理科学, 33(1), 60-63.
田宏杰, 闫国利, 白学军. (2009). 中文双字词在心理词典中的通达表征. 心理科学, 32(6), 1302-1305.
Ariga, A., Yokosawa, K., & Ogawa, H. (2007). Object-based attentional selection and awareness of objects. Visual Cognition, 15(6), 685-709.
Baayen, R. H. (2011). Corpus linguistics and naive discriminative learning. Brazilian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 11(2), 295-328.
Baldauf, D., & Desimone, R. (2014). Neural mechanisms of object-based attention. Science, 344(6182), 424-427.
Cai, Q., & Brysbaert, M. (2010). SUBTLEX-CH:Chinese word and character frequencies based on film subtitles. PLoS One, 5(6), e10729.
Caramazza, A., Laudanna, A., & Romani, C. (1988). Lexical access and inflectional morphology. Cognition, 28(3), 297-332.
Chen, Z. (1998). Switching attention within and between objects:The role of subjective organization. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 52(1), 7-17.
Chen, Z. (2012). Object-based attention:A tutorial review. Attention Perception & Psychophysics, 74(5), 784-802.
Downing, C. J., & Pinker, S. (1985). The spatial structure of visual attention. In M. I. Posner & O. S. M. Marin (Eds.), Attention and performance XI (pp. 171-168). Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Duncan, J. (1984). Selective attention and the organization of visual information. Journal of Experimental Psychology:General, 113(4), 501-517.
Egly, R., Driver, J., & Rafal, R. D. (1994). Shifting visual attention between objects and locations:Evidence from normal and parietal lesion subjects. Journal of Experimental Psychology:General, 123(2), 161-177.
Eriksen, C. W., & St. James, J. D. (1986). Visual attention within and around the field of focal attention:A zoom lens model. Perception and Psychophysics, 40(4), 225-240.
Goldsmith, M., & Yeari, M. (2003). Modulation of object-based attention by spatial focus under endogenous and exogenous orienting. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Human Perception and Performance, 29(5), 897-918.
He, X., Fan, S. L., Zhou, K., & Chen, L. (2004). Cue validity and object-based attention. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16(6), 1085-1097.
Li, X. S., & Logan, G. D. (2008). Object-based attention in Chinese readers of Chinese words:Beyond gestalt principles. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 15(5), 945-949.
Liu, D. L., Wang, Y. H., & Zhou, X. L. (2011). Lexical- and perceptual-based object effects in the two-rectangle cueing paradigm. Acta Psychologica, 138(3), 397-404.
Moore, C. M., Yantis, S., & Vaughan, B. (1998). Object-based visual selection:Evidence from perceptual completion. Psychological Science, 9(2), 104-110.
Müller, H. J., & Rabbitt, P. M. A. (1989). Spatial cueing and the relation between the accuracy of "where" and "what" decisions in visual search. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A:Human Experimental Psychology, 41(4), 747-773.
Posner, M. I. (1980). Orienting of attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32(1), 3-25.
Yantis, S., & Jonides, J. (1990). Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention:Voluntary versus automatic allocation. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Human Perception and Performance, 16(1), 121-134.
Yuan, J., & Fu, S. M. (2014). Attention can operate on semantic objects defined by individual Chinese characters. Visual Cognition, 22(6), 770-788.
Zhao, J. J., Wang, Y. H., Liu, D. L., Zhao, L., & Liu, P. (2015). Strength of object representation:Its key role in object-based attention for determining the competition result between gestalt and top-down objects. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 77(7), 2284-2292.