新生代农民工身份认同对内隐群际攻击性的影响：内隐集体自尊的调节作用

心理与行为研究 ›› 2018, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (3): 371-377.

新生代农民工身份认同对内隐群际攻击性的影响：内隐集体自尊的调节作用

张淑华¹, 范洋洋^2,3

1. 沈阳师范大学人力资源开发与管理研究所, 沈阳 110034;
2. 沈阳师范大学教育科学学院, 沈阳 110034;
3. 青岛理工大学琴岛学院, 青岛 266106

收稿日期:2017-06-26 出版日期:2018-05-20 发布日期:2018-06-05
通讯作者: 张淑华,E-mail:zhangshuhua2000@126.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目（71271141）

The Effect of the Identity of New Generation Migrant Workers on the Implicit Intergroup Aggression:The Moderating Effect of Implicit Collective Self-esteem

ZHANG Shuhua¹, FAN Yangyang^2,3

1. Institute of Human Resource Development and Management, Shenyang Normal University, Shenyang 110034;
2. School of Education Science, Shenyang Normal University, Shenyang 110034;
3. Qindao College, Qingdao Technological University, Qingdao 266106

Received:2017-06-26 Online:2018-05-20 Published:2018-06-05

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为探讨社会认同理论框架下，身份认同与内隐群际攻击性的关系，并分析内隐集体自尊在身份认同对内隐群际攻击性影响的调节作用，采用内隐IAT测验和问卷调查相结合的方法对326名新生代农民工进行调查，结果发现：（1）内农外农型新生代农民工对内群体和外群体的内隐群际攻击性均高于内城外城型被试，内农外农型新生代农民工对内群体的内隐攻击性水平显著高于其对外群体和模糊群体的内隐攻击性水平，内城外城型新生代农民工的外群内隐攻击性显著高于内群内隐攻击性；（2）内隐集体自尊调节了内农外农型被试对内群体内隐攻击的影响，内隐集体自尊对内城外城型新生代农民工的群际攻击性不存在显著影响。研究结果揭示了内隐集体自尊在个体身份认同与内隐群际攻击性产生的调节作用，从而丰富了社会认同理论。

关键词: 身份认同, 内隐群际攻击性, 内隐集体自尊, 新生代农民工

Abstract: In order to explore the relationship between identity and implicit intergroup aggression in the framework of social identity theory, and analyzing the implication of implicit collective self-esteem in the influence of identity on implicit intergroup aggression, this paper used implicit IAT test and questionnaire to investigate 424 new generation migrant workers ,and the result indicated that: 1)The implicit in-group and out-group aggression of new generation migrant workers that having farmer identity both in explicit and implicit are higher than the new generation migrant workers that having urbanite identity both in explicit and implicit. The implicit in-group aggression of new generation migrant workers that had a farmer identity both in explicit and implicit aspects are higher than it implicit out-group aggression and unclear group aggression. The implicit out-group aggression of new generation migrant workers that having urbanite identity both in explicit and implicit are higher than it implicit aggression of in-group. 2) The implicit self-esteem moderate the influence of new generation migrant workers that having farmer identity both in explicit and implicit to the implicit in-group aggression, and there is no significant impact of implicit self-esteem on implicit intergroup aggression of new generation migrant workers that having urbanite identity both in explicit. The results of the study revealed the moderating effect of implicit collective self-esteem between the identity and implicit intergroup aggression, which enriches the theory of social identity.

Key words: identity, implicit intergroup aggression, implicit collective self-esteem, new generation migrant workers

中图分类号:

B849

张淑华, 范洋洋. 新生代农民工身份认同对内隐群际攻击性的影响：内隐集体自尊的调节作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2018, 16(3): 371-377.

ZHANG Shuhua, FAN Yangyang. The Effect of the Identity of New Generation Migrant Workers on the Implicit Intergroup Aggression:The Moderating Effect of Implicit Collective Self-esteem[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2018, 16(3): 371-377.

参考文献

何洪涛. (2010). 从身份认同看英国工业化进程中的贵族. 兰州学刊, (4), 186-190.
任美葳. (2015). 农民工与城市人内隐身份认同、自我污名和攻击性的关系研究(硕士学位论文). 沈阳师范大学.
王春光. (2010). 新生代农民工城市融入进程及问题的社会学分析. 青年探索, (3), 5-15.
王柳生, 江燕. (2008). 女大学生内隐集体自尊研究. 中华女子学院学报, 20(3), 31-37.
王沛. (2001). 刻板印象的内隐效应与内-外群体效应的实验研究. 心理科学, 24(2), 178-180, 254.
王一竹. (2012). 高低社会经济地位群际攻击性研究(硕士学位论文). 西南大学, 重庆.
张淑华. (2017). 新生代农民身份认同的心理重构及其与偏差行为的关系——心理结构变化视角. 福建论坛(人文社会科学版), (2), 158-165.
张淑华, 李海莹. (2016). 新生代农民工身份认同测量分析. 沈阳师范大学学报(社会科学版), 40(5), 46-52.
张淑华, 王海雯, 刘芳. (2017). 新生代农民工身份认同分化的认知基础——社会比较策略视角. 心理与行为研究, 15(2), 258-263, 281.
赵立. (2017). 农民工群体身份认同与群体偏好研究——自我认同的中介作用. 浙江社会科学, (2), 75-83, 158.
钟毅平, 王伟宇, 周海波, 童真. (2009). 内、外群体态度与士兵内隐集体自尊效应. 中国临床心理学杂志, 17(6), 672-674.
周颖, 刘俊升, 杨海波. (2007). 阈下攻击启动对内隐攻击性的影响. 心理科学, 30(2), 325-327, 286.
Baumeister, R. F., Smart, L., & Boden, J. M. (1996). Relation of threatened egotism to violence and aggression:The dark side of high self-esteem. Psychological Review, 103(1), 5-33.
Bushman, B. J., & Baumeister, R. F. (1998). Threatened egotism, narcissism, self-esteem, and direct and displaced aggression:Does self-love or self-hate lead to violence? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(1), 219-229.
Dasgupta, N. (2004). Implicit ingroup favoritism, outgroup favoritism, and their behavioral manifestations. Social Justice Research, 17(2), 143-169.
Greenwald, A. G.., Brian, A., & Mahzarin, R. (2003). Understanding and using the implicit association test:An improved scoring algorithm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychological, 85(2), 197-215.
Hunter, J. A., Platow, M. J., Howard, M. L., & Stringer, M. (1996). Social identity and intergroup evaluative bias:Realistic categories and domain specific self-esteem in a conflict setting. European Journal of Social Psychology, 26(4), 631-647.
Lickel, B., Miller, N., Stenstrom, D. M., Denson, T. F., & Schmader, T. (2006). Vicarious retribution:The role of collective blame in intergroup aggression. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10(4), 372-390.
Merrilees, C. E., Cairns, E., Taylor, L. K., Goeke-Morey, M. C., Shirlow, P., & Cummings, E. M. (2013). Social identity and youth aggressive and delinquent behaviors in a context of political violence. Political Psychology, 34(5), 695-711.
Palmer, S. B., Rutland, A., & Cameron, L. (2015). The development of bystander intentions and social-moral reasoning about intergroup verbal aggression. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 33(4), 419-433.
Rudman, L. A. (2011). Implicit measures for social and personality psychology. London:SAGE Publication Ltd.
Rutland, A., & Killen, M. (2015). A developmental science approach to reducing prejudice and social exclusion:Intergroup processes, social-cognitive development, and moral reasoning. Social Issues and Policy Review, 9(1), 121-154.
Schmid, K., Hewstone, M., Küpper, B., Zick, A., & Tausch, N. (2014). Reducing aggressive intergroup action tendencies:Effects of intergroup contact via perceived intergroup threat. Aggressive Behavior, 40(3), 250-262.
Srull, T. K., & Wyer, R. S. Jr. (1979). The role of category accessibility in the interpretation of information about persons:some determinants and implications. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(10), 1660-1672.
Staub, E. (2004). Justice, healing, and reconciliation:How the people's courts in Rwanda can promote them. Peace and Conflict:Journal of Peace Psychology, 10(1), 25-32.
Tajfel, H., Billig, M. G., Bundy, R. P., & Flament, C. (1971). Social categorization and intergroup behaviour. European Journal of Social Psychology, 1(2), 149-178.
Tajfel, H. (1978). Differentiation between social groups:Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations. London:Academic Press.
Wilson, T. D., Lindsey, S., & Schooler, T. Y. (2000). A model of dual attitudes. Psychological Review, 107(1), 101-126.
Yzerbyt, V., Dumont, M., Wigboldus, D., & Gordijn, E. (2003). I feel for us:The impact of categorization and identification on emotions and action tendencies. British Journal of Social Psychology, 42(4), 533-549.