具身情绪与创造性思维：情境性调节定向的调节作用

心理与行为研究 ›› 2018, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (4): 441-448.

具身情绪与创造性思维：情境性调节定向的调节作用

姚海娟¹, 王金霞², 苏清丽¹, 白学军³

1. 天津商业大学法学院心理学系, 天津 300134;
2. 天津师范大学教育科学学院, 天津 300387;
3. 天津师范大学心理与行为研究院, 天津 300074

收稿日期:2017-12-20 出版日期:2018-07-20 发布日期:2018-07-23
通讯作者: 姚海娟,E-mail:yhjrenfei@163.com;白学军,E-mail:bxuejun@126.com
基金资助:
教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目（13YJC190028）

The Effects of Embodied Emotion and Creative Thinking: Situational Regulatory Focus as Moderator

YAO Haijuan¹, WANG Jinxia², SU Qingli¹, BAI Xuejun³

1. Department of Psychology at College of Law, Tianjin University of Commerce, Tianjin 300134;
2. School of Educational Science, Tianjin Normal University, Tianjin 300387;
3. Academy of Psychology and Behavior, Tianjin Normal University, Tianjin 300074

Received:2017-12-20 Online:2018-07-20 Published:2018-07-23

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 采用面部肌肉控制技术诱发被试的具身积极和具身消极情绪，并设置中性控制组，然后采用双任务启动范式启动情境性调节定向，最后要求被试完成创造性思维测验，探讨具身情绪和情境性调节定向对创造性思维的影响。结果发现：具身积极情绪促进思维的独创性，具身消极情绪阻碍创造性思维，主要表现在流畅性和灵活性上；情境性促进定向被试的创造性表现好于情境性预防定向的被试；情境性调节定向在具身情绪和创造性思维关系中起调节作用，当个体处于情境性促进定向时，具身积极情绪促进创造性思维，而当个体处于情境性预防定向时，具身积极情绪和具身消极情绪均对创造性思维有阻碍作用。

关键词: 具身情绪, 创造性思维, 情境性调节定向

Abstract: The experiment used a facial manipulation task to induce the embodied positive, negative emotions, set a control group, and then used the dual-task to initiate the situational regulatory focus. Subjects were asked to complete the creative thinking task in order to investigate the influence of embodied emotion and situational regulatory focus on creative thinking. The results found that:1) The scores of originality under the embodied positive emotion condition were higher than that under the control condition, and the scores of fluency and flexibility under the embodied negative emotion condition were lower than that under the control condition; 2) Promotion focus was more beneficial to creativity than was prevention focus; 3) creative thinking level may be enhanced by a match between embodied positive emotion and promotion focus and may be decreased by a match between embodied positive, negative emotion and prevention focus. The findings highlight embodied positive emotion promotes the originality of creative thinking, embodied negative emotion hinders the fluency and flexibility of creative thinking, and situational regulatory focus has a moderator effect between embodied emotion and creative thinking.

Key words: embodied emotion, creative thinking, situational regulatory focus

中图分类号:

B842.8

姚海娟, 王金霞, 苏清丽, 白学军. 具身情绪与创造性思维：情境性调节定向的调节作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2018, 16(4): 441-448.

YAO Haijuan, WANG Jinxia, SU Qingli, BAI Xuejun. The Effects of Embodied Emotion and Creative Thinking: Situational Regulatory Focus as Moderator[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2018, 16(4): 441-448.

参考文献

鲍婧, 傅纳. (2018). 具身的情绪调节:面部表情对内隐情绪的影响. 心理与行为研究, 16(2), 180-187.
胡卫平, 王博韬, 段海军, 程丽芳, 周寰, 李晶晶. (2015). 情绪影响创造性认知过程的神经机制.心理科学进展, 23(11), 1869-1878.
胡卫平, 周蓓. (2010). 动机对高一学生创造性的科学问题提出能力的影响. 心理发展与教育, 26(1), 31-36.
刘亚, 王振宏, 孔风. (2011). 情绪具身观:情绪研究的新视角. 心理科学进展, 19(1), 50-59.
卢家楣, 刘伟, 贺雯, 卢盛华. (2002). 情绪状态对学生创造性的影响. 心理学报, 34(4), 381-386.
沈承春, 张庆林. (2012). 负性情绪对创造性问题解决中原型启发的影响. 西南大学学报(自然科学版), 34(6), 150-156.
Baas, M., Roskes, M., Sligte, D., Nijstad, B. A., & De Dreu, C. K. W. D. (2013). Personality and creativity:The dual pathway to creativity model and a research agenda. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 7(10), 732-748.
Baek, T. H., & Reid, L. N. (2013). The interplay of mood and regulatory focus in influencing altruistic behavior. Psychology & Marketing, 30(8), 635-646.
Chen, B. R., Hu, W. P., & Plucuker, J. A. (2016). The effect of mood on problem finding in scientific creativity. Journal of Creative Behavior, 50(4), 308-320.
Damian, R. I., & Robins, R. W. (2013). Aristotle's virtue or Dante's deadliest sin? The influence of authentic and hubristic pride on creative achievement. Learning and Individual Differences, 26, 156-160.
Ding, X., Tang, Y. Y., Deng, Y., Tang, R., & Posner, M. I. (2015). Mood and personality predict improvement in creativity due to meditation training. Learning and Individual Differences, 37, 217-221.
Eastwood, J. D., Frischen, A., Fenske, M. J., & Smilek, D. (2012). The unengaged mind. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(5), 482-495.
Elliot, A. J., Eder, A. B., & Harmon-Jones, E. (2013). Approach-avoidance motivation and emotion:Convergence and divergence. Emotion Review, 5(3), 308-311.
Fernández-Abascal, E. G., & Díaz, M. D. M. (2013). Affective induction and creative thinking. Creativity Research Journal, 25(2), 213-221.
Förster, J., Friedman, R. S., & Liberman, N. (2004). Temporal construal effects on abstract and concrete thinking:Consequences for insight and creative cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(2), 177-189.
Förster, J., Grant, H., Idson, L. C., & Higgins, E. T. (2001). Success/failure feedback, expectancies, and approach/avoidance motivation:How regulatory focus moderates classic relations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37(3), 253-260.
Fredrickson, B. L., & Branigan, C. (2005). Positive emotions broaden the scope of attention and thought-action repertoires. Cognition and Emotion, 19(3), 313-332.
Friedman, R. S., & Förster, J. (2001). The effects of promotion and prevention cues on creativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(6), 1001-1013.
Geers, A. L., Weiland, P. E., Kosbab, K., Landry, S. J., & Helfer, S. G. (2005). Goal activation, expectations, and the placebo effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(2), 143-159.
Hao, N., Xue, H., Yuan, H., Wang, Q., & Runco, M. A. (2017). Enhancing creativity:Proper body posture meets proper emotion. Acta Psychologica, 173, 32-40.
Herman, A., & Reiter-Palmon, R. (2011). The effect of regulatory focus on idea generation and idea evaluation. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 5(1), 13-20.
Higgins, E. T., Shah, J., & Friedman, R. (1997). Emotional Responses to goal attainment:Strength of regulatory focus as moderator. Journal of personality and Social Psychology, 72(3), 515-525.
Idson, L. C., Liberman, N., & Higgins, E. T. (2000). Distinguishing gains from nonlosses and losses from nongains:A regulatory focus perspective on hedonic intensity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36(3), 252-274.
Jin, X. T., Wang, L., & Dong, H. Z. (2016). The relationship between self-construal and creativity-Regulatory focus as moderator. Personality and Individual Differences, 97, 282-288.
Lam, T. W., & Chiu, C. Y. (2002). The motivational function of regulatory focus in creativity. Journal of Creative Behavior, 36(2), 138-150.
Nelson, D. W., & Sim, E. K. (2014). Positive affect facilitates social problem solving. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 44(10), 635-642.
Niedenthal, P. M. (2007). Embodying emotion. Science, 316(5827), 1002-1005.
Pessoa, L., & Engelmann, J. B. (2010). Embedding reward signals into perception and cognition. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 4, 17.
Price, T. F., & Harmon-Jones, E. (2010). The effect of embodied emotive states on cognitive categorization. Emotion, 10(6), 934-938.
Roskes, M., Elliot, A. J., Nijstad, B. A., & De Dreu, C. K. W. (2013). Time pressure undermines performance more under avoidance than approach motivation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39(6), 803-813.
Rowe, G., Hirsh, J. B., & Anderson, A. K. (2007). Positive affect increases the breadth of attentional selection. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104(1), 383-388.
Rudowicz, E., & Yue, X. D. (2002). Compatibility of Chinese and creative personalities. Creativity Research Journal, 14(3-4), 387-394.
Stanciu, M. M. (2015). Embodied creativity:A critical analysis of an underdeveloped subject. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 187, 312-317.
Ståhl, T., van Laar, C., & Ellemers, N. (2012). The role of prevention focus under stereotype threat:Initial cognitive mobilization is followed by depletion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(6), 1239-1251.
Sun, S., & van Emmerik, H. I. (2015). Are proactive personalities always beneficial? Political skill as a moderator. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(3), 966-975.
Wood, A., Rychlowska, M., Korb, S., & Niedenthal, P. (2016). Fashioning the face:Sensorimotor simulation contributes to facial expression recognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20(3), 227-240.
Xiao, F. Q., Wang, L., Chen, Y. H., Zheng, Z. W., & Chen, W. J. (2015). Dispositional and situational autonomy as moderators of mood and creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 27(1), 76-86.
Zabetipour, M., Pishghadam, R., & Ghonsooly, B. (2015). The impacts of open/closed body positions and postures on learners' moods. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 6(2), 643-655.
Zajusz-Gawędzka, D., & Marszał-Wiśniewska, M. (2015). Context-dependent effect of mood:The regulatory role of personality. Polish Psychological Bulletin, 46(1), 144-150.

[1]	陈建新, 伍莉, 黄蓉, 王喆, 陈悦, 杨伟平. 情绪的相容性对创造性思维的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(4): 433-439.
[2]	鲍婧, 傅纳. 具身的情绪调节：面部表情对内隐情绪的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2018, 16(2): 180-187.
[3]	张洪家, 汪玲, 张敏. 创造性认知风格、创造性人格与创造性思维的关系[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2018, 16(1): 51-57.
[4]	张丽华, 白学军张秀红3. 创造性思维能力高、低大学生特性负启动效应的实验研究[J]. , 2007, 5(2): 112-115.