心算形式对不同近似数量系统敏锐度儿童心算表现的影响

心理与行为研究 ›› 2018, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (4): 505-511.

心算形式对不同近似数量系统敏锐度儿童心算表现的影响

宗正^1,2, 李红霞², 司继伟²

1. 中央财经大学社会与心理学院, 北京 100081;
2. 山东师范大学心理学院, 济南 250358

收稿日期:2017-06-14 出版日期:2018-07-20 发布日期:2018-07-23
通讯作者: 司继伟,E-mail:sijiwei1974@126.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金面上项目（31371048）、山东省“十二五”特色重点学科“发展与教育心理学”（2011-2015）和山东省应用基础型名校工程建设应用心理学项目专项经费资助

Mental Arithmetic Performance of Children with Different Approximate Number System Acuity: Effect of Mental Arithmetic Forms

ZONG Zheng^1,2, LI Hongxia², SI Jiwei²

1. School of Sociology and Psychology, Central University of Finance and Economics, Beijing 100081, China;
2. School of Psychology, Shandong Normal University, Jinan 250358, China

Received:2017-06-14 Online:2018-07-20 Published:2018-07-23

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 选取112名二年级小学生，以点阵比较任务测量近似数量系统敏锐度，同时以工作记忆测验成绩为协变量，探究了不同心算形式（视算、读算）对不同近似数量系统敏锐度儿童心算表现的潜在影响。结果显示：（1）心算形式显著影响心算的正确率，读算形式下儿童的心算表现最好；（2）控制工作记忆影响后，心算形式与近似数量系统敏锐分组均对心算正确率影响显著。总体来讲，读算可能是提高小学儿童简单心算表现的有效形式，并能提高低近似数量系统敏锐度儿童的心算表现。

关键词: 小学低学段儿童, 近似数量系统, 工作记忆, 心算形式

Abstract: One hundred and twelve second graders from a primary school (8-to 9-year-old) participated in measuring approximate number system acuity, working memory and mental arithmetic accuracy and reaction time. With working memory as a covariate, the influence of different mental arithmetic forms (watching calculation, reading calculation) on mental arithmetic performance of children with different acuity of ANS was explored. Results showed that 1) mental arithmetic forms had a significant effect on mental arithmetic accuracy. Children who used reading calculation had the best performance; 2) after controlling the effect of working memory, when using watching calculation, the accuracy of mental arithmetic in children with high ANS acuity was higher than those with low ANS acuity. However, when using reading calculation, children with different ANS acuity had no significant difference on the accuracy of mental arithmetic. The above findings imply that reading calculation may be one of effective ways to improve the performance of mental arithmetic for children with low ANS acuity.

Key words: lower grade of primary school, approximate number system, working memory, mental arithmetic forms

中图分类号:

B842

宗正, 李红霞, 司继伟. 心算形式对不同近似数量系统敏锐度儿童心算表现的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2018, 16(4): 505-511.

ZONG Zheng, LI Hongxia, SI Jiwei. Mental Arithmetic Performance of Children with Different Approximate Number System Acuity: Effect of Mental Arithmetic Forms[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2018, 16(4): 505-511.

参考文献

曹贤才, 时冉冉, 牛玉柏. (2016). 近似数量系统敏锐度与数学能力的关系. 心理科学, 39(3), 580-586.
匡华. (2008). 工作记忆与儿童加减法心算(硕士学位论文). 华中师范大学, 武汉.
李红霞. (2016). 工作记忆成分、近似数量系统精确性对个体算术策略运用的影响:来自行为与ERP的证据(硕士学位论文). 山东师范大学.
李红霞, 司继伟, 陈泽建, 张堂正. (2015). 人类的近似数量系统. 心理科学进展, 23(4), 562-570.
刘昌, 王翠艳. (2008). 心算的加工机制:来自认知神经科学的研究. 心理科学进展, 16(3), 446-452.
吕娜. (2015). 工作记忆中央执行在算术估计策略运用中的作用:行为与ERP证据(硕士学位论文). 山东师范大学.
牛玉柏, 时冉冉, 曹贤才. (2016). 学前儿童近似数量系统敏锐度与符号数学能力的关系. 心理发展与教育, 32(2), 129-138.
文玲玲, 陈建华. (2013). 关于小学低年级有效开展听算训练的若干思考. 现代基础教育研究, 10(2), 127-130.
章雷刚. (2007). 大, 小数量表征的心理机制(硕士学位论文). 浙江大学.
张奇, 林崇德, 赵冬梅, 王秀丽. (2002). 小学生加法口算速度和广度的发展研究. 心理发展与教育, 18(1), 16-21.
Alloway, T. P. (2007). Automated working memory assessment. London:Pearson Assessment.
Baddeley, A. (1992). Working memory. Science, 255(5044), 556-559.
Campbell, J. I. D. (1994). Architectures for numerical cognition. Cognition, 53(1), 1-44.
Campbell, J. I. D. (2004). Handbook of mathematical cognition. New York:Psychology Press.
Chesney, D., Bjalkebring, P., & Peters, E. (2015). How to estimate how well people estimate:Evaluating measures of individual differences in the approximate number system. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 77(8), 2781-2802.
Dehaene, S., & Cohen, L. (1995). Towards an anatomical and functional model of number processing. Mathematical Cognition, 1(1), 83-120.
Feigenson, L. (2011). Predicting sights from sounds:6-month old infants' intermodal numerical abilities. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 110(3), 347-361.
Feigenson, L., Dehaene, S., & Spelke, E. (2004). Core systems of number. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8(7), 307-314.
Geary, D. C. (2013). Early foundations for mathematics learning and their relations to learning disabilities. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22(1), 23-27.
Gilmore, C. K., McCarthy, S. E., & Spelke, E. S. (2010). Non-symbolic arithmetic abilities and mathematics achievement in the first year of formal schooling. Cognition, 115(3), 394-406.
Hitch, G. J. (1978). The role of short-term working memory in mental arithmetic. Cognitive Psychology, 10(3), 302-323.
Halberda, J., Ly, R., Wilmer, J. B., Naiman, D. Q., & Germine, L. (2012). Number sense across the lifespan as revealed by a massive Internet-based sample. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109(28), 11116-11120.
Halberda, J., Mazzocco, M. M. M., & Feigenson, L. (2008). Individual differences in non-verbal number acuity correlate with maths achievement. Nature, 455(7213), 665-668.
Inglis, M., Attridge, N., Batchelor, S., & Gilmore, C. (2011). Non-verbal number acuity correlates with symbolic mathematics achievement:But only in children. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18(6), 1222-1229.
Izard, V., Sann, C., Spelke, E. S., & Streri, A. (2009). Newborn infants perceive abstract numbers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106(25), 10382-10385.
Libertus, M. E., Feigenson, L., & Halberda, J. (2013). Is approximate number precision a stable predictor of math ability? Learning and Individual Differences, 25, 126-133.
Logie, R. H., Gilhooly, K. J., & Wynn, V. (1994). Counting on working memory in arithmetic problem solving. Memory & Cognition, 22(4), 395-410.
Pinheiro-Chagas, P., Wood, G., Knops, A., Krinzinger, H., Lonnemann, J., Starling-Aalves, I., … Haase, V. G. (2014). In how many ways is the approximate number system associated with exact calculation? PLoS One, 9(11), e111155. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0111155.
Rubenstein, R. N. (1985). Computational estimation and related mathematical skills. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 16(2), 106-119.
Reys, R. E., Bestgen, B. J., Trafton, P. R., & Zawojewski, J. S. (1984). Computational estimation instructional materials for the middle grades. Final report. Washington, DC:National Science Foundation.
van Marle, K., Chu, F. W., Li, Y., & Geary, D. C. (2014). Acuity of the approximate number system and preschoolers' quantitative development. Developmental Science, 17(4), 492-505.
van Opstal, F., & Verguts, T. (2011). The origins of the numerical distance effect:The same-different task. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 23(1), 112-120.

[1]	陈相霖, 张军恒, 晏碧华. 现实场景典型空间位置关系客体的解码效应[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(4): 441-449.
[2]	王家慰, 冼美君, 邢强. 任务数量与工作记忆容量对交错学习的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(1): 15-21.
[3]	刘湍丽, 郝兴风, 邢敏, 白学军. 网络成瘾对大学生推理能力的影响：工作记忆容量的中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(5): 642-649.
[4]	王嵩, 李甦. 幼儿复述能力的发展及其与言语工作记忆的关系[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(5): 596-602.
[5]	车晓玮, 王凯旋, 上官梦麒, 李寿欣. 视觉工作记忆中注意模板的表征—来自EROS的证据[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(3): 297-303.
[6]	唐丹丹, 傅瑜, 吴燕京, 朱海. 视觉空间工作记忆组间差异的神经机制[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(2): 176-184.
[7]	吴国来, 张婧婧, 任方圆, 杨晶晶, 酒艳红. 工作记忆容量与走神频率关系的元分析[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2019, 17(4): 461-471.
[8]	张心, 宋锦涛, 应荣华, 周仁来. 工作记忆训练效果是安慰剂作用的结果吗？[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2019, 17(2): 170-177.
[9]	杨海波, 牛丽丽, 尹莎莎, 白学军. 视觉工作记忆中非语义编码信息对注意捕获的影响：来自ERPs的证据[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2019, 17(1): 8-14.
[10]	谭珂, 马杰, 连坤予, 郭志英, 白学军. 双重缺陷汉语发展性阅读障碍儿童的言语工作记忆和阅读能力研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2018, 16(3): 308-314,354.
[11]	刘含君兰, 赵守盈, 郭海辉. 篮球运动员视觉工作记忆对注意控制的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2018, 16(3): 315-320.
[12]	孔海燕, 孙雨, 宋广文. 心智游移、工作记忆对初中生阅读理解的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2018, 16(3): 362-370,377.
[13]	侯娟, 侯莹莹, 陈双艺, 方晓义. 网络成瘾者工作记忆能力的ERP研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2018, 16(3): 384-393.
[14]	郝嘉佳, 陈英和, 陈艺萍, 白学军. 工作记忆和类比推理与初一年级学生数学成绩的关系：有调节的中介效应^*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2017, 15(4): 495-499.
[15]	苏娟, 白学军, 王超, 阴国恩,. 比较视觉搜索任务中工作记忆最小化的眼动研究*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2017, 15(1): 49-53.