团体宽恕干预在恋爱受挫群体中的运用及其对大学生心理健康教育的启示

心理与行为研究 ›› 2018, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (4): 541-548.

团体宽恕干预在恋爱受挫群体中的运用及其对大学生心理健康教育的启示

孙卉¹, 张田², 傅宏³

1. 南京师范大学教育科学学院, 南京 210028;
2. 南京理工大学社会学系, 南京 210094;
3. 南京师范大学心理学院, 南京 210028

收稿日期:2017-03-26 出版日期:2018-07-20 发布日期:2018-07-23
通讯作者: 张田,E-mail:zhangtian_psy@njust.edu.cn
基金资助:
江苏省社会科学基金项目（16SHC008）

The Implication of Group Forgiveness Intervention in College Students Suffered from Amativeness and Its Inspirations to Mental Health Education in Universities

SUN Hui¹, ZHANG Tian², FU Hong³

1. School of Education Science, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210028;
2. Department of Sociology, Nanjing University of Science & Technology, Nanjing 210094;
3. School of Psychology, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210028

Received:2017-03-26 Online:2018-07-20 Published:2018-07-23

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为探讨团体宽恕干预在大学生恋爱受挫群体中的应用效果，本研究以31名在恋爱中受到过伤害的女大学生为对象进行6次团体宽恕干预，并设立一般干预组和控制组进行比较。研究结果显示：（1）前测中，三个组在恋爱宽恕问卷的四个维度、抑郁量表、焦虑量表和幸福感量表上均不存在显著差异；（2）后测中，在恋爱宽恕问卷的四个维度上，宽恕干预组均优于控制组，而一般干预组和控制组没有显著差异；在抑郁、焦虑和幸福感三个量表上，宽恕干预组和一般干预组都要优于控制组，但两个干预组之间差异并不显著；（3）前后测比较显示，宽恕干预组在各个指标上均有了显著变化；一般干预组在抑郁、焦虑和幸福感量表的得分上有了显著变化，但在恋爱宽恕的各个维度上（除报复维度）变化不显著；控制组则在各个指标上都没有显著变化。研究表明，面对恋爱受挫群体，宽恕干预的针对性更强，并对大学生的心理健康教育具有一定的启示作用。

关键词: 恋爱受挫, 大学生, 宽恕干预, 心理健康教育

Abstract: To exam the effectiveness of group forgiveness intervention in college students suffered from amativeness, 31 female college students who were suffered from amativeness were collected in the research. 10 of them were distributed into forgiveness intervention group, 10 were in general group, and 11were in control group. Forgiveness group and general group received the group counseling 6 times. The results show:1) In pre-test, 3 groups had no significant differences on every scale; 2) In post-test, forgiveness group's scores of amative scale were better than general group and control group, but the scores of depression, anxiety, and well-being had no significant differences; 3) The comparison of pre- and post- test showed that in forgiveness group, every scale had significant differences, in general group, only the scores of amative forgiveness had significant differences, and in control group, every scale had no significant differences. The study invested that the direction of forgiveness intervention is clearer, and the results of the study could enlighten mental health education in universities

Key words: suffered from amativeness, college students, forgiveness intervention, mental health education

中图分类号:

B842

孙卉, 张田, 傅宏. 团体宽恕干预在恋爱受挫群体中的运用及其对大学生心理健康教育的启示[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2018, 16(4): 541-548.

SUN Hui, ZHANG Tian, FU Hong. The Implication of Group Forgiveness Intervention in College Students Suffered from Amativeness and Its Inspirations to Mental Health Education in Universities[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2018, 16(4): 541-548.

参考文献

郭本禹, 倪伟. (2000). 宽恕:品德心理研究的新主题. 教育研究与实验, (2), 38-43.
陶琳瑾, 傅宏. (2010). 宽恕治疗:基于东西方文化比较的研究. 医学与哲学, 31(6), 45-47.
叶浩生. (2004). 文化模式及其对心理与行为的影响. 心理科学, 27(5), 1032-1036.
张田, 傅宏. (2014). 大学生的恋爱宽恕:问卷编制与特点研究. 心理与行为研究, 12(2), 220-225.
张田, 孙卉, 傅安球. (2012). 集体主义背景下的宽恕研究及其对心理治疗的启示. 心理科学进展, 20(2), 265-273.
Baskin, T. W., & Enright, R. D. (2004). Intervention studies on forgiveness:A meta-analysis. Journal of Counseling & Development, 82, 79-90.
Beck, A. T. (1967). Depression:Causes and treatment. Philadelphia:University of Pennsylvania Press.
Beck, A. T., Emery, G., & Greenberg, R. L. (1985). Anxiety disorders and phobias. New York:Basic Books.
Blocher, W. G., & Wade, N. G. (2010). Sustained effectiveness of two brief group interventions:Comparing an explicit forgiveness-promoting treatment with a process-oriented treatment. Journal of Mental Health Counseling, 32, 58-74.
Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., & Rodgers, W. L. (1976). The quality of American life:Perceptions, evaluations, and satisfactions. New York:Russell Sage Foundation.
de Wall, F. B. M., & Pokorny, J. J. (2005). Primate conflict and its relation to human forgiveness. In E. L. Worthington, Jr. (Ed.), Handbook of forgiveness (pp. 17-32). New York:Brunner-Routledge.
DiBlasio, F. A., & Benda, B. B. (2008). Forgiveness intervention with married couples:Two empirical analyses. Journal of Psychology and Christianity, 27, 150-158.
Enright, R. D., Gassin, E. A., & Wu, C. R. (1992). Forgiveness:A developmental view. Journal of Moral Education, 21, 99-114.
Enright, R. D., & the Human Development Study Group. (1991). Five points on the construct of forgiveness within psychotherapy. Psychotherapy:Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 28, 493-496.
Fu, H. (2005). Personality correlates of the disposition towards interpersonal forgiveness (Unpublished doctorial dissertation). Hong Kong University, Hong Kong, China.
Hook, J. N., Worthington, E. L. J., & Utsey, S. O. (2009). Collectivism, forgiveness, and social harmony. The Counseling Psychologist, 37(6), 821-847.
Hui, E. K. P., & Chau, T. S. (2009). The impact of a forgiveness intervention with Hong Kong Chinese children hurt in interpersonal relationships. British Journal of Guidance & Counseling, 37, 141-156.
McCullough, M. E., Root, L. M., & Cohen, A. D. (2006). Writing about the benefits of an interpersonal transgression facilitates forgiveness. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 74, 887-897.
Mufson, L., Gallagher, T., Dorta, K. P., & Young, J. (2004). A group adaptation of interpersonal psychotherapy for depressed adolescents. American Journal of Psychotherapy, 58(2), 220-237.
Rye, M. S., & Pargament, K. I. (2002). Forgiveness and romantic relationships in college:Can it heal the wounded heart?. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 58, 419-441.
Tabak, B. A., McCullough, M. E., Luna, L. R., Bono, G., & Berry, J. W. (2012). Conciliatory gestures facilitate forgiveness and feelings of friendship by making transgressors appear more agreeable. Journal of Personality, 80(6), 503-536.
Wade, N. G., & Worthington, E, L., Jr. (2005). In search of a common core:A content analysis of interventions to promote forgiveness. Psychotherapy:Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 42, 160-177.

[1]	李甜甜, 徐鹤文. 大学生自我概念清晰性与社交焦虑的关系：多重中介效应分析[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(5): 700-706.
[2]	郝喜玲, 陈煊, 刘依冉. 失败恐惧对大学生失败学习的影响：一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(5): 707-713.
[3]	刘建榕, 谢林君, 郑琳. 社会性发展迟滞大学生的情绪韵律识别特点[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(5): 714-720.
[4]	李娇娇, 刘晓冰, 裴丹丹, 徐碧波, 尹锡杨. 情绪智力对大学生恶意创造力的影响：一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(4): 563-569.
[5]	尹静, 李传英, 马世超, 徐瑜姣, 李永升. 大学生人格与手机依赖的关系：压力感知的中介与性别的调节作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(3): 426-432.
[6]	姜琨, 兰泽波, 孙晓铜, 丁晓辉, 陶佳雨. 听障大学生社会支持对学业自我效能感的影响：心理韧性的中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(1): 96-100.
[7]	杨雪, 雷江华. 阅读能力对听障大学生语音编码的调节作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(5): 599-605.
[8]	朱莹莹, 马晓晴, 唐卓仪, 杨敏齐. 睡眠类型对大学生抑郁的影响：一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(5): 657-664,694.
[9]	彭顺, 胡祥恩. 大学生压力与疲劳的关系：一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(4): 563-570.
[10]	陈佩儀, 陈瑜, 杨雪岭. 中庸思维对大学生抑郁症状的影响机制：消极认知情绪调节策略的中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(4): 571-576.
[11]	彭丽仪, 胡义秋, 曾子豪, 詹林. 儿童期受虐经历对大学生抑郁的影响：神经质人格和MAOA基因rs3027407多态性的作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(2): 230-236.
[12]	闫广芬, 姜琨, 兰泽波, 丁晓辉. 听障大学生社会支持对适应的影响：心理韧性的中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(2): 252-257.
[13]	孙卉, 张田. 宽恕干预对降低农村留守儿童拒绝敏感性的作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(1): 111-117.
[14]	纪凌开, 刘华山, 李晨璐. 温水煮青蛙：专业认同对大学生抑郁的影响机制[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(6): 833-838.
[15]	黄明明, 赵守盈. 述情障碍对大学生手机成瘾倾向的影响：孤独感与正念的作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(5): 686-692.