家长式领导与员工建言行为：组织认同的中介作用

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为探讨家长式领导对员工建言行为的影响，并考察组织认同在其中的作用机制，采用家长式领导、组织认同、建言行为三个量表对316名员工进行测量，层次回归分析和Bootstrap检验的结果表明：（1）家长式领导的三个维度均对建言行为有显著正向预测作用；（2）组织认同对抑制性建言和促进性建言均有显著正向预测作用；（3）组织认同分别在仁慈领导、德行领导与建言行为之间起部分中介作用。

关键词: 家长式领导, 建言行为, 组织认同

Abstract: This study was to explore the influences of paternalistic leadership on employee's voice behavior, and the mediating effect of organizational identification between paternalistic leadership and voice behavior. The data were collected from 316 employees by the three scales of PLS, organizational identification, and voice behavior. The results of hierarchical regression analysis (HRA) and Bootstrap analysis procedures showed that superior's benevolence leadership, moral leadership, and authority leadership all had significant positive effect on voice behavior; organizational identification both had significant and positive effect on prohibitive voice behavior and promotive voice behavior. Besides, the employees' organizational identification is one of the important factors affecting the voice behavior, and playing partial intermediary role respectively between benevolence, moral leadership and voice behavior.

Key words: Paternalistic Leadership, Voice Behavior, Organizational Identification

中图分类号:

B849

沈翔鹰, 穆桂斌. 家长式领导与员工建言行为：组织认同的中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2018, 16(6): 841-846.

SHEN Xiangying, MU Guibin. The Effect of Paternalistic Leadership on the Voice Behavior of Employees: Mediated by Organizational Identification[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2018, 16(6): 841-846.

参考文献

陈文平, 段锦云, 田晓明. (2013). 员工为什么不建言: 基于中国文化视角的解析. 心理科学进展, 21(5), 905-913
杜鹏程, 丁梦茹, 巩妙宇, 王成城. (2016). 组织认同与非任务绩效关系的元分析. 科技管理研究, 36(16), 137-143
段锦云. (2012). 家长式领导对员工建言行为的影响: 心理安全感的中介机制. 管理评论, 24(10), 109-116, 142
樊景立, 郑伯埙. (2000). 华人组织的家长式领导: 一项文化观点的分析. 本土心理研究, (13), 127-180
蒋丽芹, 胥永倩, 张迪. (2018). 伦理型领导、组织认同与知识型员工情感承诺的关系——伦理氛围的调节作用. 工业技术经济, (2), 82-90
雷星晖, 杨元飞, 苏涛永. (2017). 谦卑领导行为、组织认同与员工创造力的关系研究. 工业工程与管理, 22(1), 154-161
李燕萍, 刘宗华, 郑馨怡. (2016). 组织认同对建言行为的影响: 基于组织的自尊和工作价值观的作用. 商业经济与管理, (3), 46-55
梁建. (2014). 道德领导与员工建言: 一个调节-中介模型的构建与检验. 心理学报, 46(2), 252-264
沈伊默, 周婉茹, 魏丽华, 张庆林. (2017). 仁慈领导与员工创新行为: 内部人身份感知的中介作用和领导?部属交换关系差异化的调节作用. 心理学报, 49(8), 1100-1112
田在兰, 黄培伦. (2014). 基于自我认知理论的家长式领导对建言的影响. 科研管理, 35(10), 150-160
王甜, 苏涛, 陈春花. (2017). 家长式领导的有效性: 来自Meta分析的证据. 中国人力资源开发, (3), 69-80
魏昕, 张志学. (2010). 组织中为什么缺乏抑制性进言?. 管理世界, (10), 99-109, 121
务凯, 李永鑫, 刘霞. (2016). 家长式领导与员工建言行为: 领导-成员交换的中介作用. 心理与行为研究, 14(3), 384-389
吴隆增, 曹昆鹏, 陈苑仪, 唐贵瑶. (2011). 变革型领导行为对员工建言行为的影响研究. 管理学报, 8(1), 61-66
徐悦, 段锦云, 李成艳. (2017). 仁慈领导对员工建言的影响: 自我预防和自我提升的双重路径. 心理与行为研究, 15(6), 839-845
郑伯埙. (1999). 企业组织中上下属的信任关系. 社会学研究, (2), 22-37
郑伯埙, 周丽芳, 樊景立. (2000). 家长式领导: 三元模式的建构与测量. 本土心理学研究, (14), 3-64
Bashshur, M. R., & Oc, B (2014). When voice matters: A multilevel review of the impact of voice in organizations. Journal of Management, 41(5), 1530-1554.
Chan, S. C (2014). Paternalistic leadership and employee voice: Does information sharing matter? Human Relations, 67(6), 667-693.
Detert, J. R., & Burris, E. R (2007). Leadership behavior and employee voice: Is the door really open? Academy of Management Journal, 50(4), 869-884.
Hayes, A. F. (2012). PROCESS: A versatile computational tool for observed variable mediation, moderation, and conditional process modeling. Manuscript Submitted for Publication.
Lee, E. S., Park, T. Y., & Koo, B (2015). Identifying organizational identification as a basis for attitudes and behaviors: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 141(5), 1049-1080.
LePine, J. A., & van Dyne, L (2001). Predicting voice behavior in work groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(6), 853-868.
Liang, J., Farh, C. I. C., & Farh, J. L (2012). Psychological antecedents of promotive and prohibitive voice: A two-wave examination. Academy of Management Journal, 55(1), 71-92.
Liang, J., & Farh, L. J. L. (2008). Promotive and prohibitive voice behavior in organizations: A two-wave longitudinal examination. Biannual Meeting of 3rd International Association for Chinese Management Research (IACMR). Guangzhou, China.
Liu, W., Zhu, R. H., & Yang, Y. K (2010). I warn you because I like you: Voice behavior, employee identifications, and transformational leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 21(1), 189-202.
Liu, Y., Loi, R., & Lam, L. W (2011). Linking organizational identification and employee performance in teams: The moderating role of team-member exchange. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 22(15), 3187-3201.
Mael, F., & Ashforth, B. E (1992). Alumni and their alma mater: A partial test of the reformulated model of organizational identification. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13(2), 103-123.
McClean, E. J., Burris, E. R., & Detert, J. R (2013). When does voice lead to exit? It depends to leadership. Academy of Management Journal, 56(2), 525-548.
Morrison, E. W (2011). Employee voice behavior: Integration and directions for future research. Academy of Management Annals, 5(1), 373-412.
Ng T. W. H, & Feldmn, D. C (2012). Employee voice behavior: A meta-analytic test of the conservation of resources framework. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33(2), 216-234.
Ning, H. Y., Zhou, M. J., Lu, Q., & Wen, L. Q (2012). Exploring relationship between authority leadership and organizational citizenship behavior in China: The role of collectivism. Chinese Management Studies, 6(2), 231-244.
Rhoades, L., & Eisenberger, R (2002). Perceived organizational support: A review of the literature. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 698-714.
Riketta, M (2005). Organizational identification: A meta-analysis. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 66(2), 358-384.
Yan, A. M., & Xiao, Y. G (2016). Servant leadership and employee voice behavior: A cross-level investigation in China. SpringerPlus, 5, 1595.
Zhang, Y., Huai, M. Y., & Xie, Y. H (2015). Paternalistic leadership and employee voice in China: A dual process model. The Leadership Quarterly, 26(1), 25-36.
Zhu, H., Chen, X. L., & Qian, J. X (2014). Charting the development of social and cultural geography in Mainland China: Voices from the inside. Social and Cultural Geography, 15(3), 255-283.

[1]	李晓玉, 赵申苒, 高昂, 高冬东. 差序式领导对员工建言行为的影响：组织承诺与内部人身份认知的多重中介效应[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2019, 17(3): 408-414,432.
[2]	张峰, 耿晓伟. 组织政治知觉对乡村教师离职意向的影响:组织公平和组织认同的中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2018, 16(5): 678-683.
[3]	务凯, 张再玄, 李永鑫. 家长式领导与员工离职意向：组织认同的中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2018, 16(4): 557-562.
[4]	务凯,李永鑫,刘霞. 家长式领导与员工建言行为：领导-成员交换的中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2016, 14(3): 384-389.
[5]	张海军. 高校教练家长式领导行为与运动员精神：有中介的调节效应[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2015, 13(1): 109-114.
[6]	万红艳. 组织认同研究新进展：基本概念及其形成、整合机制[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2013, 11(3): 425-432.
[7]	陈世平；胡艳军；王晓庄3. 高校教师知识共享态度的相关研究[J]. , 2011, 9(4): 251-255.
[8]	李永鑫；杨文君；申继亮3. 教师组织认同、工作满意感与情感承诺的关系[J]. , 2011, 9(3): 185-189.
[9]	魏蕾,时勘. 家长式领导与员工工作投入：心理授权的中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2010, 8(2): 88-93.
[10]	李永鑫,李艺敏,张娜,申继亮. 组织公正、组织认同与教师离职意向的关系[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2009, 7(4): 253-257.
[11]	李永鑫,申继亮,张娜. 组织认同问卷（OIQ）在教师样本中的修订[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2008, 6(3): 176-181.