母语为韩语的汉语学习者加工“V+N1+的+N2”歧义结构的眼动研究

心理与行为研究 ›› 2019, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (1): 15-23.

母语为韩语的汉语学习者加工“V+N1+的+N2”歧义结构的眼动研究

赵帅¹, 鹿士义¹, 陈婧¹, 逯芝璇¹, 匡柳兴¹, 邓彧君¹, 付宸²

1. 北京大学对外汉语教育学院, 北京 100871;
2. 大连外国语大学法语系, 大连 116044

收稿日期:2017-07-08 出版日期:2019-01-20 发布日期:2019-01-24
通讯作者: 鹿士义

L1 Korean L2 Chinese Learners' Processing of V+N1+de+N2: An Eye Movement Research

ZHAO Shuai¹, LU Shiyi¹, CHEN Jing¹, LU Zhixuan¹, KUANG Liuxing¹, DENG Yujun¹, FU Chen²

1. School of Chinese as a Second Language, Peking University, Beijing 100871;
2. Department of French, Dalian University of Foreign Languages, Da Lian 116044

Received:2017-07-08 Online:2019-01-20 Published:2019-01-24

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 以28名母语为韩语的汉语学习者和28名汉语母语者为被试，运用眼动技术，阐释汉语作为第二语言的句子加工机制。研究发现：在句法歧义结构加工过程中，语义和语境在早期加工阶段即时起作用，符合句子加工理论中的相互作用模型和基于制约的模型。在本实验中，母语为韩语的汉语学习者汉语水平接近汉语母语者水平，其L2句子晚期加工也与汉语母语者趋于一致，符合L2句子加工的会聚假设。母语为韩语的学习者汉语句子加工是限制性并行的，符合相互作用模型和基于制约的模型。

关键词: L2句子加工, 眼动研究, 句法歧义

Abstract: The goal of this study is to explore the L2 sentence processing mechanism by conducting an eye movement experiment on 28 native speakers of Chinese and 28 Korean-speaking learners of Chinese with high proficiency. It has been found in both two groups of participants that semantics and context take effect in processing syntactic ambiguity (V+N1+de+N2) at an early stage, which supports Interactive Model, Constraint-based Model and Convergence Hypothesis.

Key words: L2 sentence processing, eye movement, syntactic ambiguity

中图分类号:

B842.5

赵帅, 鹿士义, 陈婧, 逯芝璇, 匡柳兴, 邓彧君, 付宸. 母语为韩语的汉语学习者加工“V+N1+的+N2”歧义结构的眼动研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2019, 17(1): 15-23.

ZHAO Shuai, LU Shiyi, CHEN Jing, LU Zhixuan, KUANG Liuxing, DENG Yujun, FU Chen. L1 Korean L2 Chinese Learners' Processing of V+N1+de+N2: An Eye Movement Research[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2019, 17(1): 15-23.

参考文献

戴运财. (2010). 汉语作为第二语言的关系从句习得难度调查. 中国海洋大学学报(社会科学版), (6), 85-91
戴运财, 王同顺, 余樟亚. (2013). 二语关系从句挂靠的歧义消解研究. 外语界, (4), 55-62
冯志伟. (1995). 论歧义结构的潜在性. 中文信息学报, 9(4), 14-24
牛萌萌, 吴一安. (2007). 关系从句挂靠偏向研究. 现代外语, 30(3), 271-279
徐英红. (2009). 汉韩句子成分比较. 安徽文学(下半月), (3), 316
Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1-48.
Dekydtspotter, L., Schwartz, B. D., & Sprouse, R. A. (2006). The comparative fallacy in L2 processing research. In M. G. O'Brien, C. Shea, & J. Archibald (Eds.), Proceedings of the 8th generative approaches to second language acquisition conference (GASLA 2006) (pp. 33-40). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
Dussias, P. E. (2003). Syntactic ambiguity resolution in L2 learners: Some effects of bilinguality on L1 and L2 processing strategies. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 25(4), 529-557.
Dussias, P. E. (2010). Uses of eye-tracking data in second language sentence processing research. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 30, 149-166.
Frazier, L., & Rayner, K. (1982). Making and correcting errors during sentence comprehension: Eye movements in the analysis of structurally ambiguous sentences. Cognitive Psychology, 14(2), 178-210.
Friederici, A. D. (2002). Towards a neural basis of auditory sentence processing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6(2), 78-84.
Gibson, E., Pearlmutter, N., Canseco-Gonzalez, E., & Hickok, G. (1996). Recency preference in the human sentence processing mechanism. Cognition, 59(1), 23-59.
Gregg, K. R. (2001). Learnability and second language acquisition theory. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 152-180). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Hernandez, A., Li, P., & MacWhinney, B. (2005). The emergence of competing modules in bilingualism. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9(5), 220-225.
Hopp, H. (2017). Cross-linguistic lexical and syntactic co-activation in L2 sentence processing. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 7(1), 96-130.
Hsiao, F., & Gibson, E. (2003). Processing relative clauses in Chinese. Cognition, 90(1), 3-27.
Hsieh, Y., & Boland, J. E. (2015). Semantic support and parallel parsing in Chinese. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 44(3), 251-276.
Jackson C. N., Dussias P. E. (2008). Cross-linguistic differences and their impact on L2 sentence processing. Bilingualism Language & Cognition, 12(1), 65-82.
Jacob, G., & Felser, C. (2016). Reanalysis and semantic persistence in native and non-native garden-path recovery. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 69(5), 907-925.
Juffs, A. (1998). Main verb versus reduced relative clause ambiguity resolution in L2 sentence processing. Language Learning, 48(1), 107-147.
Leikin, M. (2008). Syntactic processing in two languages by native and bilingual adult readers: An ERP study. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 21(4), 349-373.
Marinis, T., Roberts, L., Felser, C., & Clahsen, H. (2005). Gaps in second language sentence processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27(1), 53-78.
Omaki, A., & Schulz, B. (2011). Filler-gap dependencies and island constraints in second-language sentence processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 33(4), 563-588.
Papadopoulou, D. (2006). Cross-linguistic variation in sentence processing: Evidence from RC attachment preferences in Greek. Netherlands: Springer.
Papadopoulou, D., & Clahsen, H. (2003). Parsing strategies in L1 and L2 sentence processing: A study of relative clause attachment in Greek. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 25(4), 501-528.
Ravi, S. K., & Chengappa, S. K. (2015). Sentence processing in high proficient Kannada-English bilinguals: A reaction time study. International Journal of Multilingualism, 12(3), 376-392.
Roberts, L., & Meyer, A. S. (2012). Individual differences in second language learning: Introduction. Language Learning, 62(S2), 1-4.
Steinhauer, K. (2014). Event-related potentials (ERPs) in second language research: A brief introduction to the technique, a selected review, and an invitation to reconsider critical periods in L2. Applied Linguistics, 35(4), 393-417.
Steinhauer, K., White, E. J., & Drury, J. E. (2009). Temporal dynamics of late second language acquisition: Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Second Language Research, 25(1), 13-41.
Tabor, W., & Hutchins, S. (2004). Evidence for self-organized sentence processing: Digging-in effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30(2), 431-450.

[1]	沈英伦, 孟珠, 兰泽波, 王影超, 闫国利. 大学生英语语篇重复阅读的眼动研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2018, 16(4): 464-470.
[2]	何一粟,杨声伟,李洪玉. 散打运动员视觉信息加工的眼动研究^*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2016, 14(6): 755-759.
[3]	张妍, 郑敏晓. 面孔吸引力观察者参照：“角度效应”的眼动研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2016, 14(4): 459-464.
[4]	王庭照,杨鹃. 不同工作记忆负荷下聋人与听力正常人注意捕获的眼动研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2013, 11(5): 601-606.
[5]	刘宝根；周兢；李林慧3；张莉4；高晓妹3. 文字突显程度对学前儿童图画书阅读中文字注视的影响[J]. , 2013, 11(1): 90-96.
[6]	闫国利白学军. 汉语阅读的眼动研究[J]. , 2007, 5(3): 229-234.
[7]	孙兵, 刘鸣. 句子加工中语义关联性和句法歧义性实验研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2005, 3(2): 121-124.
[8]	阎国利,田宏杰,白学军. 工作记忆与汉语歧义句加工的眼动研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2004, 2(3): 524-528.