“我不喜欢你”所以“你也可能不喜欢我”：矛盾性别偏见与群际焦虑的关系

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 近期国内外研究发现，偏见水平和元刻板印象均可预测群际焦虑，且元刻板印象的作用更加重要。但这些研究并未解释偏见影响群际焦虑的具体机制，以及当个体不认同自身群体身份时这种作用是否显著。为此，本研究在群际焦虑模型的基础上，构建了一个有调节的中介模型，考察矛盾性别偏见与群际焦虑的关系，以及消极元刻板印象的中介作用和群体认同的调节作用。研究结果表明：（1）矛盾性别偏见正向预测群际焦虑，但善意性别偏见与群际焦虑相关不显著；（2）消极元刻板印象在矛盾性别偏见和群际焦虑间起部分中介作用；（3）消极元刻板印象的中介作用受到群体认同水平的调节。

关键词: 矛盾性别偏见, 消极元刻板印象, 群体认同, 群际焦虑

Abstract: Some recent studies show that prejudice and meta-stereotype can predict intergroup anxiety, while the influence of meta-stereotype is more important than that of prejudice, but one question that remained after these studies was what is the specific mechanisms of prejudice affecting intergroup anxiety. Therefore, according to the model of intergroup anxiety, a moderated mediation model was constructed to examine the relationship among ambivalent sexism, negative meta-stereotype, group identity and intergroup anxiety. The results indicate that: 1) ambivalent sexism positively predicts intergroup anxiety, but there is no significant correlation between benevolent sexism and intergroup anxiety; 2) negative meta-stereotype partially mediated the relationship between ambivalent sexism and intergroup anxiety; 3) the mediating role of negative meta-stereotype is moderated by the group identity.

Key words: ambivalent sexism, negative meta-srereotype, group identity, intergroup anxiety

中图分类号:

B849

苏曼, 蒋京川. “我不喜欢你”所以“你也可能不喜欢我”：矛盾性别偏见与群际焦虑的关系[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2019, 17(2): 274-281.

SU Man, JIANG Jingchuan. “I Do Not Like You, So You Probably Do Not Like Me”: The Relationship Between Ambivalent Sexism and Intergroup Anxiety[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2019, 17(2): 274-281.

参考文献

孙亚文, 贺雯, 罗俊龙. (2015). 随迁儿童元刻板印象威胁对工作记忆的影响:群际焦虑的中介作用. 心理学报, 47(11), 1349-1359
徐荣华. (2008). 矛盾性别偏见与工作场合性骚扰态度的相关研究 (硕士学位论文). 华中科技大学.
叶娜. (2009). 群体认同的结构与动机研究 (博士学位论文). 华中师范大学.
周浩, 龙立荣. (2004). 共同方法偏差的统计检验与控制方法. 心理科学进展, 12(6), 942-950
邹荣. (2012). 流动和城市儿童元刻板印象的特点及其对群际关系的影响 (硕士学位论文). 西南大学.
Ames, D. R. (2004). Inside the Mind Reader's Tool Kit:Projection and stereotyping in mental state inference. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 87(3), 340-353.
Anseel, F. (2011). A closer look at the mechanisms of perceived job discrimination:'How I think you think about us'. International Journal of Selection & Assessment, 19(3), 245-250.
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research:Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182, doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173.
Clark, H. H., & Brennan, S. E. (1991). Grounding in communication. In L. B. Resnick, J. M. Levine, & S. D. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 127-149). Washington, DC, US:American Psychological Association.
Dovidio, J. F., Gaertner, S. E., Kawakami, K., & Hodson, G. (2002). Why can't we just get along? Interpersonal biases and interracial distrust. Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology, 8(2), 88-102.
Finchilescu, G. (2005). Meta-stereotypes may hinder inter-racial contact. South African Journal of Psychology, 35(3), 460-472, doi:10.1177/008124630503500305.
Finchilescu, G. (2010). Intergroup anxiety in interracial interaction:The role of prejudice and metastereotypes. Journal of Social Issues, 66(2), 334-351, doi:10.1111/josi.2010.66.issue-2.
Finchilescu, G., Tredoux, C., Mynhardt, J., Pillay, J., & Muianga, L. (2007). Accounting for lack of interracial mixing amongst South African University students. South African Journal of Psychology, 37(4), 720-737, doi:10.1177/008124630703700404.
Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1996). The ambivalent sexism inventory:Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 70(3), 491-512.
Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1999). The ambivalence toward men inventory. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 23(3), 519-536, doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1999.tb00379.x.
Glick, P., Lameiras, M., Fiske, S. T., Eckes, T., Masser, B., Volpato, C., …Wells, R. (2004). Bad but bold:Ambivalent attitudes toward men predict gender inequality in 16 nations. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 86(5), 713-728.
Gómez, Á. (2002). If my group stereotypes others, others stereotype my group…and we know. Concept, research lines and future perspectives of meta-stereotypes. Revista De Psicología Social, 17(3), 253-282, doi:10.1174/02134740260372982.
Gómez, Á., & Huici, C. (2008). Vicarious intergroup contact and the role of authorities in prejudice reduction. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 11(1), 103-114, doi:10.1017/S1138741600004169.
Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis:A regression-based approach. New York, NY:The Guilford Press.
Hogg, M. A. (2000). Subjective uncertainty reduction through self-categorization:A motivational theory of social identity processes. European Review of Social Psychology, 11(1), 223-255, doi:10.1080/14792772043000040.
Hyers, L. L., & Swim, J. K. (1998). A comparison of the experiences of dominant and minority group members during an intergroup encounter. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 1(2), 143-163.
Klein, O., & Azzi, A. E. (2001). The strategic confirmation of meta-stereotypes:How group members attempt to tailor an out-group's representation of themselves. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40(2), 279-293, doi:10.1348/014466601164759.
McHugh, M. C., & Frieze, I. H. (1997). The measurement of gender-role attitudes:A review and commentary. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21(1), 1-16, doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1997.tb00097.x.
Oldenhuis, H. K. E. (2007). I know what they think about us:Metaperceptions and intergroup relations. Groningen:University of Groningen Press.
Owuamalam, C. K., & Zagefka, H. (2011). Downplaying a compromised social image:The effect of metastereotype valence on social identification. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41(4), 528-537, doi:10.1002/ejsp.v41.4.
Owuamalam, C., & Zagefka, H. (2013). We'll never get past the glass ceiling! Meta-stereotyping, world-views and perceived relative group-worth. British Journal of Psychology, 104(4), 543-562.
Plant, E. A., & Devine, P. G. (2003). The antecedents and implications of interracial anxiety. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 29(6), 790-801.
Ramos, M. R., Barreto, M., Ellemers, N., Moya, M., Ferreira, L., & Calanchini, J. (2016). Exposure to sexism can decrease implicit gender stereotype bias. European Journal of Social Psychology, 46(4), 455-466, doi:10.1002/ejsp.v46.4.
Rudman, L. A., & Glick, P. (2010). The social psychology of gender:How power and intimacy shape gender relations. New York:Guilford Press.
Spence, J. T., & Helmreich, R. (1972). Who likes competent women? Competence, sex-role congruence of interests, and subjects' attitudes toward women as determinants of interpersonal attraction. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 2(3), 197-213, doi:10.1111/jasp.1972.2.issue-3.
Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1986). Relevance:Communication and cognition. Cambridge:Harvard University Press.
Stephan, W. G., & Stephan, C. W. (1985). Intergroup anxiety. Journal of Social Issues, 41(3), 157-175, doi:10.1111/josi.1985.41.issue-3.
Swim, J. K., Aikin, K. J., Hall, W. S., & Hunter, B. A. (1995). Sexism and racism:Old-fashioned and modern prejudices. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 68(2), 199-214.
Swim, J. K., & Hyers, L. L. (2009). Sexism. In T. D. Nelson (Ed.), Handbook of prejudice, stereotyping, and discrimination (pp. 407-430). New York:Psychology Press.
Tajfel, H. (1978). Differentiation between social groups:Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations. New York:Academic Press.
Tredoux, C., & Finchilescu, G. (2010). Mediators of the contact-prejudice relation among South African students on four university campuses. Journal of Social Issues, 66(2), 289-308, doi:10.1111/josi.2010.66.issue-2.
Turner, R. N., Hewstone, M., & Voci, A. (2007). Reducing explicit and implicit outgroup prejudice via direct and extended contact:The mediating role of self-disclosure and intergroup anxiety. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(3), 369-388, doi:10.1037/0022-3514.93.3.369.
Vorauer, J. (2008). Unprejudiced and self-focused:When intergroup contact is experienced as being about the ingroup rather than the outgroup. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44(3), 912-919, doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2007.10.002.
Vorauer, J. D., Main, K. J., & O'Connell, G. B. (1998). How do individuals expect to be viewed by members of lower status groups? Content and implications of meta-stereotypes. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 75(4), 917-937.
Wilder, D. A. (1993). Freezing intergroup evaluations:Anxiety fosters resistance to counterstereotypic information. In M. A. Hogg & D. Abrams (Eds.), Group motivation:Social psychological perspectives (pp. 68-86). England:Harvester Wheatsheaf.

[1]	游旭群, 李倩钦, 张桢堉, 黄浦江, 刘志远. N-back任务训练迁移效果及其影响因素：来自元分析的证据[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(6): 794-801.
[2]	熊思成, 张斌, 姜永志, 蒋怀滨, 陈芸. 手机成瘾流行率及其影响因素的元分析[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(6): 802-808.
[3]	郭颖, 樊富珉, 张英俊, 刘宇. 团体咨询师胜任力量表的编制[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(6): 809-815.
[4]	姚崇, 惠琪, 王媛, 席海莎, 雒朝梁. 公费师范教师社会支持与职业倦怠的关系探究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(6): 816-823.
[5]	李飞飞, 缴润凯, 刘丹, 尹航. 幼儿教师感恩特质与职业使命感的交叉滞后分析[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(6): 824-830.
[6]	周彦榜, 李强, 暴卿. 跨期决策中的偏好反转：突出性效应和兼容性效应[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(6): 831-837.
[7]	侯娟, 郑心怡, 王秀, 方晓义. 金钱与时间感受启动对择偶标准的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(6): 838-844.
[8]	窦运来, 沈伊默. 参与式领导如何影响团队成员的工作表现？—有调节的中介效应[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(6): 845-852.
[9]	杨槐, 龚少英, 苗天长, 李伟贺. 工作-非工作边界管理一致性与高校辅导员工作满意度的关系：工作投入的中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(6): 853-860.
[10]	王艳丽, 陈红. 城市社区居民获得感量表的编制[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(5): 665-670.
[11]	贾晓珊, 朱海东. 社会经济地位与儿童青少年心理健康关系的元分析[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(5): 671-678.
[12]	黄明明, 陈丽萍, 郭莉萍, 赵守盈. 工作-家庭冲突与幼儿教师离职意向的关系：职业认同感与职业倦怠的序列中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(5): 679-686.
[13]	刘传军, 谢忠桔, 王星元. 诱发高兴情绪会降低人们的道德规范敏感度吗？[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(5): 687-694.
[14]	张霄钰, 朱海燕, 陈凤姣, 苏欣悦. 月是故乡明：家乡标签对风景图的情感和价值评估的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(5): 695-700.
[15]	苏明宇, 王光明. STEAM训练提升小学生的注意抑制与注意集中能力[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(5): 701-705.