元认知的领域特殊性：来自知觉和高阶层次的证据

心理与行为研究 ›› 2019, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (4): 480-487.

元认知的领域特殊性：来自知觉和高阶层次的证据

邓春婷^1,3, 刘岩^1,2

1. 辽宁师范大学心理学院, 大连 116029;
2. 辽宁省儿童青少年健康人格评定与培养协同创新中心, 大连 116029;
3. 徐州工程学院心理咨询中心, 徐州 221018

收稿日期:2017-07-16 出版日期:2019-07-20 发布日期:2019-08-08
通讯作者: 刘岩
基金资助:
教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目（14YJC190015）和辽宁省教育厅项目（W201683616）

Metacognitive Domain-specificity: Evidence from Perceptual and Higher-order Metacognition

DENG Chunting^1,3, LIU Yan^1,2

1. School of Psychology, Liaoning Normal University, Dalian 116029;
2. Collaboration and Innovation Center for Assessment and Promotion of Children and Adolescents'Healthy Personality of Liaoning Province, Dalian 116029;
3. Psychological Counseling Center, Xuzhou Institute of Technology, Xuzhou 221018

Received:2017-07-16 Online:2019-07-20 Published:2019-08-08

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 该研究通过三个实验，分别考察了知觉元认知和高阶元认知是否均具有跨任务的领域特殊性。实验1选取26名大学生被试，探讨了视知觉领域内两个任务上元认知之间的关系。实验2选取30名大学生被试，探讨了个体对词语和图片任务的记忆监测能力之间的关系。实验3选取30名大学生被试，探讨了个体在呈现方式不同的两个词语记忆任务上，记忆监测能力之间的关系。结果表明，无论是知觉元认知还是高阶元认知，不同任务上的元认知能力并不相关，说明知觉元认知与高阶元认知能力在任务水平上具有领域特殊性。

关键词: 知觉元认知, 高阶元认知, 领域一般, 领域特殊

Abstract: The current study explored whether the perceptual metacognition and higher-order metacognition are domain-specific by three experiments. In Experiment 1, we selected 26 college students as participants to explore the relationship of metacognitive abilities between two visual perception tasks. In Experiment 2, 30 college students were selected to explore the relationship of metacognitive abilities between two memory monitoring tasks. In Experiment 3, 30 college students were selected to explore the relationship of metacognitive abilities between memory monitoring tasks with high similarity. The results showed that metacognitive abilities on different tasks were not relevant in all three experiments, indicating that perceptual metacognitive ability and higher-order metacognitive ability are domain-specific.

Key words: perceptual metacognition, higher-order metacognition, domain-generality, domain-specificity

中图分类号:

B842.1

邓春婷, 刘岩. 元认知的领域特殊性：来自知觉和高阶层次的证据[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2019, 17(4): 480-487.

DENG Chunting, LIU Yan. Metacognitive Domain-specificity: Evidence from Perceptual and Higher-order Metacognition[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2019, 17(4): 480-487.

参考文献

戴维·巴斯. (2015). 进化心理学:心理的新科学(4版). 张勇, 蒋柯译. 商务印书馆.
Alcock, J. (2009). Animal behavior:An evolutionary approach (9th ed.). Sunderland, MA:Sinauer.
Baird, B., Cieslak, M., Smallwood, J., Grafton, S. T., & Schooler, J. W. (2015). Regional white matter variation associated with domain-specific metacognitive accuracy. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 27(3), 440-452, doi:10.1162/jocn_a_00741.
Baird, B., Smallwood, J., Gorgolewski, K. J., & Margulies, D. S. (2013). Medial and lateral networks in anterior prefrontal cortex support metacognitive ability for memory and perception. Journal of Neuroscience, 33(42), 16657-16665, doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0786-13.2013.
Chiappe, D., & MacDonald, K. (2005). The evolution of domain-general mechanisms in intelligence and learning. The Journal of General Psychology, 132(1), 5-40, doi:10.3200/GENP.132.1.5-40.
Deroy, O., Spence, C., & Noppeney, U. (2016). Metacognition in multisensory perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20(10), 736-747, doi:10.1016/j.tics.2016.08.006.
Fitzgerald, L. M., Arvaneh, M., & Dockree, P. M. (2017). Domain-specific and domain-general processes underlying metacognitive judgments. Consciousness & Cognition, 49, 264-277.
Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring:A new area of cognitive developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906-911, doi:10.1037/0003-066X.34.10.906.
Flavell, J. H. (2000). Development of children's knowledge about the mental world. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 24(1), 15-23, doi:10.1080/016502500383421.
Fleming, S. M., & Lau, H. C. (2014). How to measure metacognition. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 443.
Fleming, S. M., Ryu, J., Golfinos, J. G., & Blackmon, K. E. (2014). Domain-specific impairment in metacognitive accuracy following anterior prefrontal lesions. Brain, 137(10), 2811-2822, doi:10.1093/brain/awu221.
Fleming, S. M., Weil, R. S., Nagy, Z., Dolan, R. J., & Rees, G. (2010). Relating introspective accuracy to individual differences in brain structure. Science, 329(5998), 1541-1543, doi:10.1126/science.1191883.
Frost, R., Armstrong, B. C., Siegelman, N., & Christiansen, M. H. (2015). Domain generality versus modality specificity:The paradox of statistical learning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 19(3), 117-125, doi:10.1016/j.tics.2014.12.010.
Galvin, S. J., Podd, J. V., Drga, V., & Whitmore, J. (2003). Type 2 tasks in the theory of signal detectability:Discrimination between correct and incorrect decisions. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10(4), 843-876.
Maniscalco, B., & Lau, H. (2012). A signal detection theoretic approach for estimating metacognitive sensitivity from confidence ratings. Consciousness & Cognition, 21(1), 422-430.
McCurdy, L. Y., Maniscalco, B., Metcalfe, J., Liu, K. Y., de Lange, F. P., & Lau, H. (2013). Anatomical coupling between distinct metacognitive systems for memory and visual perception. Journal of Neuroscience, 33(5), 1897-1906, doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1890-12.2013.
Molenberghs, P., Trautwein, F. M., Böckler, A., Singer, T., & Kanske, P. (2016). Neural correlates of metacognitive ability and of feeling confident:A large-scale fMRI study. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 11(12), 1942-1951, doi:10.1093/scan/nsw093.
Nelson, T. O., & Narens, L. (1990). Metamemory:A theoretical framework and new findings. The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 26, 125-173, doi:10.1016/S0079-7421(08)60053-5.
Pescetelli, N., Rees, G., & Bahrami, B. (2016). The perceptual and social components of metacognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology:General, 145(8), 949-965, doi:10.1037/xge0000180.
Shimamura, A. P. (2000). Toward a cognitive neuroscience of metacognition. Consciousness & Cognition, 9(2), 313-323.
Song, C., Kanai, R., Fleming, S. M., Weil, R. S., Schwarzkopf, D. S., & Rees, G. (2011). Relating inter-individual differences in metacognitive performance on different perceptual tasks. Consciousness & Cognition, 20(4), 1787-1792.
Valk, S. L., Bernhardt, B. C., Böckler, A., Kanske, P., & Singer, T. (2016). Substrates of metacognition on perception and metacognition on higher-order cognition relate to different subsystems of the mentalizing network. Human Brain Mapping, 37(10), 3388-3399, doi:10.1002/hbm.v37.10.