整体型和局部型思维风格的ERP研究

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 思维风格，作为一种典型的智力风格，在解释、预测人们的行为时有着显著的增量效度。研究分析了整体型和局部型两种思维风格在大学生组合字母识别任务中的ERP成分。行为实验发现，整体型个体处理整体任务更有优势，局部型个体处理局部任务更有优势。ERP结果显示，整体型风格者在F3，Fz，F4，FC3，FCz和FC4电极点的N270的波峰显著高于和潜伏期显著长于局部型思维风格者。整体型个体倾向于更高水平的认知复杂性，相较于局部型个体，工作记忆的编码和存储可能占用更少的神经资源，对冲突信息的处理可能会进入更深程度的加工。研究为认识思维风格的内部加工机制提供了脑电活动的神经生理学证据。

关键词: 思维风格, 整体型, 局部型, ERP, N270

Abstract: The present study examined the relationships between the global/local thinking styles and ERPs by using the compound letter tasks (Large letters were constructed from smaller letters; e.g., a large H made up of small Ss) recognition. The participants with typical global style showed significantly higher accuracy in the large letter identification task, whereas the participants with typical local style showed higher accuracy in the small letter identification task. The global style group had significantly shorter react time in the large letter identification task than in the small letter task, whereas the local group had significantly shorter react time in the small letter identification task than in the large letter task. Furthermore, the global style group had significantly larger amplitude and longer latency of N270 in F3, Fz, F4, FC3, FCz, and FC4 than did the local style group. The results indicate that individuals with typical global style do better in processing the global tasks, whereas individuals with typical local style do better in processing the concrete details. Global individuals with a higher level of cognitive complexity may occupy less neural resources and have deeper information processing levels than the local individuals do in the coding and storage of working memory. The present study provides neurophysiological evidence for further understanding the internal processing mechanism of thinking style.

Key words: thinking style, global, local, ERP, N270

中图分类号:

B842.1

王梦, 范为桥, 沈英. 整体型和局部型思维风格的ERP研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2019, 17(4): 472-479.

WANG Meng, FAN Weiqiao, SHEN Ying. An Event-Related-Potential (ERP) Study of Global and Local Thinking Styles[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2019, 17(4): 472-479.

参考文献

董艳娟, 王玉平, 王荫华, 毛薇. (2006). 大脑对早期、晚期冲突信息处理的事件相关电位研究. 临床神经电生理学杂志, 15(3), 136-141, doi:10.3969/j.issn.1674-8972.2006.03.002
欧阳取平, 王玉平. (2009). 记忆对冲突性负波N270及反应时和正确率的影响. 中国临床心理学杂志, 17(2), 188-190
王惠军, 王玉平, 崔莉莉, 田书娟, 王得泉. (2001). 注意对冲突监测事件相关电位N270的影响. 中国临床心理学杂志, 9(1), 1-4, doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-3611.2001.01.001
谢斯骏, 张厚粲. (1988). 认知方式——一个人格维度的实验研究. 北京:北京师范大学出版社.
Allport, G. W. (1937). Personality:A psychological interpretation. Oxford, England:Holt.
Alvarez, J. A., & Emory, E. (2006). Executive function and the frontal lobes:A meta-analytic review. Neuropsychology Review, 16(1), 17-42, doi:10.1007/s11065-006-9002-x.
Badgaiyan, R. D., & Posner, M. I. (1998). Mapping the cingulate cortex in response selection and monitoring. NeuroImage, 7(3), 255-260, doi:10.1006/nimg.1998.0326.
Badre, D., & Wagner, A. D. (2004). Selection, integration, and conflict monitoring:Assessing the nature and generality of prefrontal cognitive control mechanisms. Neuron, 41(3), 473-487, doi:10.1016/S0896-6273(03)00851-1.
Banich, M. T. (1998). Integration of information between the cerebral hemispheres. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 7(1), 32-37, doi:10.1111/1467-8721.ep11521844.
Botvinick, M., Nystorm, L. E., Flssell, K., Carter, C. S., & Cohen, J. D. (1999). Conflict monitoring versus selection-for-action in anterior cingulate cortex. Nature, 402(6758), 179-181, doi:10.1038/46035.
Carter, C. S., & Barch, D. M. (2000). Attention, memory and language disturbances in schizophrenia:Clinical and pathophysiological implications. In C. Andrade (Ed.), Advances in psychiatry (pp. 45-72). New Delhi:Oxford University Press.
Carter, C. S., Braver, T. S., Barch, D. M., Botvinick, M. M., Noll, D., & Cohen, J. D. (1998). Anterior cingulate cortex, error detection, and the online monitoring of performance. Science, 280(5364), 747-749, doi:10.1126/science.280.5364.747.
Case, R., & Globerson, T. (1974). Field independence and central computing space. Child Development, 45(3), 772-778, doi:10.2307/1127844.
Cui, L. L., Wang, Y. P., Wang, H. J., Tian, S. J., & Kong, J. (2000). Human brain sub-systems for discrimination of visual shapes. NeuroReport, 11(11), 2415-2418, doi:10.1097/00001756-200008030-00015.
Fan, W. (2012). An experimental comparison of the flexibility in the use of thinking styles in traditional and hypermedia learning environments. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 7, 224-233, doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2012.04.007.
Federico, P. A. (1984). Event-related-potential (ERP) correlates of cognitive styles, abilities and aptitudes. Personality and Individual Differences, 5(5), 575-585, doi:10.1016/0191-8869(84)90032-1.
Hilbert, S., Bühner, M., Sarubin, N., Koschutnig, K., Weiss, E., Papousek, I., Fink, A. (2015). The influence of cognitive styles and strategies in the digit span backwards task:Effects on performance and neuronal activity. Personality and Individual Differences, 87, 242-247, doi:10.1016/j.paid.2015.08.012.
Hunt, E. (2013). Current fashions in intellectual styles. The American Journal of Psychology, 126(4), 499-505, doi:10.5406/amerjpsyc.126.4.0499.
Imanaka, M., Kakigi, R., & Nakata, H. (2017). The relationship between cognitive style and event-related potentials during auditory and somatosensory go/no-go paradigms. NeuroReport, 28(13), 822-827, doi:10.1097/WNR.0000000000000833.
Isman, C. A., & Gundogan, N. U. (2009). The influence of digit ratio on the gender difference in learning style preferences. Personality & Individual Differences, 46(4), 424-427.
Kerns, J. G., Cohen, J. D., MacDonald, A. W., Ⅲ, Cho, R. Y., Stenger, V. A., & Carter, C. S. (2004). Anterior cingulate conflict monitoring and adjustments in control. Science, 303(5660), 1023-1026, doi:10.1126/science.1089910.
Kraemer, D. J. M., Rosenberg, L. M., & Thompson-Schill, S. (2009). The neural correlates of visual and verbal cognitive styles. The Journal of Neuroscience, 29(12), 3792-3798, doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4635-08.2009.
MacDonald, A. W., Cohen, J. D., Stenger, V. A., & Carter, C. S. (2000). Dissociating the role of the dorsolateral prefrontal and anterior cingulate cortex in cognitive control. Science, 288(5472), 1835-1838, doi:10.1126/science.288.5472.1835.
Meng, X. H., Mao, W., Sun, W., Zhang, X. T., Han, C. Y., Lu, C. F., … Wang, Y. P. (2012). Event-related potentials in adolescents with different cognitive styles:Field dependence and field independence. Experimental Brain Research, 216(2), 231-241, doi:10.1007/s00221-011-2919-1.
Navon, D. (1977). Forest before trees:The precedence of global features in visual perception. Cognitive Psychology, 9(3), 353-383, doi:10.1016/0010-0285(77)90012-3.
Nitzan-Tamar, O., Kramarski, B., & Vakil, E. (2016). Eye movement patterns characteristic of cognitive style:Wholistic versus analytic. Experimental Psychology, 63(3), 159-168, doi:10.1027/1618-3169/a000323.
Paus, T., Castro-Alamancos, M. A., & Petrides, M. (2001). Cortico-cortical connectivity of the human mid-dorsolateral frontal cortex and its modulation by repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation. European Journal of Neuroscience, 14(8), 1405-1411, doi:10.1046/j.0953-816x.2001.01757.x.
Riding, R. J., Glass, A., Butler, S. R., & Pleydell-Pearce, C. W. (1997). Cognitive style and individual differences in EEG alpha during information processing. Educational Psychology, 17(1-2), 219-234, doi:10.1080/0144341970170117.
Robaey, P., Laget, P., & Creff, J. (1989). ERP study of the development of the holistic and analytic modes of processing between 6 and 8 years. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 8(2), 145-153, doi:10.1016/0167-8760(89)90004-4.
Sergent, J. (1983). Role of the input in visual hemispheric asymmetries. Psychological Bulletin, 93(3), 481-512, doi:10.1037/0033-2909.93.3.481.
Sofo, F., Colapinto, C., Sofo, M., & Ammirato, S. (2013). Analytical exploration of intellectual style and critical thinking. In Adaptive decision making and intellectual styles (Vol. 13, pp. 55-84). New York:Springer.
Sternberg, R. J., & Grigorenko, E. L. (1997). Are cognitive styles still in style? American Psychologist, 52(7), 700-712, doi:10.1037/0003-066X.52.7.700.
Sternberg, R. J., Wagner, R. K., & Zhang, L. F. (2003). Thinking Styles Inventory-Revised. Unpublished Test, Yale University.
Sternberg, R. J., Wagner, R. K., & Zhang, L. F. (2007). Thinking Styles Inventory-Revised Ⅱ. Unpublished Test, Tufts University.
Tanaka, J. W., & Farah, M. J. (1993). Parts and wholes in face recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 46A(2), 225-245.
van Veen, V., & Carter, C. S. (2002). The anterior cingulate as a conflict monitor:FMRI and ERP studies. Physiology & Behavior, 77(4-5), 477-482.
Vernon, P. E. (1984). Intelligence, cognitive styles, and brain lateralization. International Journal of Psychology, 19(4-5), 435-455.
Waber, D. (1989). The biological boundaries of cognitive styles:A neuropsychological analysis. In T. Globerson, & T. Zelniker (Eds.), Cognitive style and cognitive development; Cognitive style and cognitive development (pp. 11-35, Chapter ix, 224 Pages) Ablex Publishing, Westport, CT.
Wang, Y. P., Wang, H. J., Cui, L. L., Tian, S. J., & Zhang, Y. Y. (2002). The N270 component of the event-related potential reflects supramodal conflict processing in humans. Neuroscience Letters, 332(1), 25-28, doi:10.1016/S0304-3940(02)00906-0.
Witkin, H. A., & Goodenough, D. R. (1981). Cognitive styles:Essence and origins. New York:International Universities Press.
Xie, Q. Z. (2015). Intellectual styles:Their associations and their relationships to ability and personality. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 14(1), 63-76, doi:10.1891/1945-8959.14.1.63.
Young, A. W., Hellawell, D., & Hay, D. C. (1987). Configurational information in face perception. Perception, 16(6), 747-759, doi:10.1068/p160747.
Yu, T. M., & Zhu, C. (2011). Relationship between teachers' preferred teacher-student interpersonal behavior and intellectual styles. Educational Psychology, 31(3), 301-317, doi:10.1080/01443410.2010.548116.
Zhang, L. F., & Sternberg, R. J. (2005). A threefold model of intellectual styles. Educational Psychology Review, 17(1), 1-53, doi:10.1007/s10648-005-1635-4.
Zhang, L. F., Sternberg, R. J., & Rayner, S. (2012). Handbook of intellectual styles:Preferences in cognition, learning, and thinking. New York, NY, US:Springer Publishing Co.
Zhang, Y. X., Caryl, P. G., & Deary, I. J. (1989). Evoked potentials, inspection time and intelligence. Personality and Individual Differences, 10(10), 1079-1094, doi:10.1016/0191-8869(89)90260-2.

[1]	钟伟芳, 郭永兴. 悲伤表情识别能力影响疼痛共情—一项ERP研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(5): 585-592.
[2]	张政华, 张航, 王兵, 郑子龙, 赵黎明, 李卫君. 不同任务下声调和韵母在诗句中的加工过程——来自ERP的证据[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(6): 728-735.
[3]	李昀松, 陈启杨, 吴岩, 李天虹, 段如君. 形旁在形声字识别中的优势作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(4): 439-446.
[4]	贾磊, 陆家豪, 王逸, 张常洁. 权力概念隐喻映射中的冲突控制：特征与过程[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(3): 417-423.
[5]	孙霁, 孙沛. 大小数量加工机制分离现象的ERP研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(1): 1-7.
[6]	马利军, 梁俊煜, 马云霄. 谐音线索和“歇后”时间对谐音型歇后语理解的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(3): 325-331.
[7]	李骋诗, 白学军, 王永胜. 映射具体性和语境线索对新颖隐喻加工的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(2): 153-160.
[8]	刘芳芳, 姜英杰. 主题与类属关系的距离对分类和属性推理过程的影响：来自ERP的证据[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(1): 24-30.
[9]	岳鹏飞, 史梦梦, 刘旭, 白学军. 词汇的唤醒度对情绪标注效应的影响—ERPs研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(1): 31-38.
[10]	李恒平, 何胜昔, 刘正奎. 快速阅读训练对基于视觉定向搜索的注意力影响：ERP研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(1): 78-84.
[11]	倪亚琨, 赵君哲, 李巧灵, 郭腾飞, 王明辉. 高低拖延者的跨期选择差异：基于ERP的研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2019, 17(6): 831-839.
[12]	王春梅, 吕勇. 高、低回避性消极情绪影响抑制功能的神经机制：ERP研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2019, 17(5): 577-582.
[13]	侯友, 七十三. 蒙语词汇识别中正字法加工的进程和作用：ERP研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2019, 17(5): 583-588.
[14]	李昱霖, 杨帆, 王琳, 隋雪. 汉字位置信息加工的脑电变化进程[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2019, 17(3): 296-303.
[15]	梁宗保, 杨韵, 张光珍, 杨元魁, 郑文明, 曹睿昕. 身体表情识别的ERP研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2019, 17(3): 318-325.