基于主体和客体的空间参照框架对数字-空间联结的影响

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 以1 ~ 9除5外的阿拉伯数字为实验材料，采用数字大小判断任务，探讨基于主体和客体的空间参照框架对数字-空间联结SNARC效应的影响。结果发现：（1）在基于主体的空间参照框架下，HH和PP条件出现SNARC效应；（2）在基于客体的空间参照框架下，HH和PP条件也都出现了SNARC效应；（3）在基于主体和客体的空间参照框架下，HP和PH条件都没有出现SNARC效应。说明无论是在主体还是客体的空间参照框架下，只有当基于反应的自我中心参照框架和基于数字排列位置的非自我中心参照框架方向一致时，才会出现SNARC效应。

关键词: 数字-空间联结, SNARC效应, 主体空间参照框架, 客体空间参照框架

Abstract: The study used Arabic numerals 1 to 9 (except number 5) as the material, and used the numerical size comparison task to explore the influence of the spatial reference frame based on the subject and object on the spatial-numerical association SNARC effect. The results showed that: (1) under the subject-based spatial reference frame, SNARC effects occured in HH and PP conditions; (2) under the object-based spatial reference frame, SNARC effects occured in HH and PP conditions; (3) under the spatial reference frame based on subject and object, there was no SNARC effect on both HP and PH conditions. It indicates that whether or not it is in the spatial reference frame of the subject or the object, the SNARC effect occurs only when the response-based egocentric reference frame and the allocentric reference frame based on the numerical arrangement position are in the same direction.

Key words: spatial reference frame, SNARC effect, subject-based spatial reference frame, object-based spatial reference frame

中图分类号:

B842

潘运, 杨阳, 邹昌浪, 陈衍, 龙女. 基于主体和客体的空间参照框架对数字-空间联结的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2019, 17(5): 613-619.

PAN Yun, YANG Yang, ZOU Changlang, CHEN Yan, LONG Nv. The Influence of the Spatial Reference Frame of the Subject and the Object on Spatial-Numerical Association[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2019, 17(5): 613-619.

参考文献

Bull, R., Marschark, M., & Blatto-Vallee, G. (2005). SNARC hunting:Examining number representation in deaf students. Learning and Individual Differences, 15(3), 223-236, doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2005.01.004.
Dehaene, S., Bossini, S., & Giraux, P. (1993). The mental representation of parity and number magnitude. Journal of Experimental Psychology:General, 122(3), 371-396, doi:10.1037/0096-3445.122.3.371.
Dehaene, S., Dupoux, E., & Mehler, J. (1990). Is numerical comparison digital? Analogical and symbolic effects in two-digit number comparison. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Human Perception and Performance, 16(3), 626-641, doi:10.1037/0096-1523.16.3.626.
Fias, W., van Dijck, J. P., & Gevers, W. (2011). How is number associated with space? The role of working memory. In S. Dehaene & E. M. Brannon (Eds.), Space, time and number in the brain (pp. 133-148). Amsterdam:Academic Press, doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-385948-8.00010-4.
Freksa, C., Habel, C., & Wender, K. F. (1998). Spatial cognition, an interdisciplinary approach to representing and processing spatial knowledge. Berlin, Heidelberg:Springer-Verlag, doi:10.1007/3-540-69342-4.
Gevers, W., Santens, S., Dhooge, E., Chen, Q., van den Bossche, L., Fias, W., & Verguts, T. (2010). Verbal-spatial and visuospatial coding of number-space interactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology:General, 139(1), 180-190, doi:10.1037/a0017688.
Gevers, W., Verguts, T., Reynvoet, B., Caessens, B., & Fias, W. (2006). Numbers and space:A computational model of the SNARC effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Human Perception and Performance, 32(1), 32-44, doi:10.1037/0096-1523.32.1.32.
Ginsburg, V., van Dijck, J. P., Previtali, P., Fias, W., & Gevers, W. (2014). The impact of verbal working memory on number-space associations. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40(4), 976-986, doi:10.1037/a0036378.
Gronau, N., Izoutcheev, A., Nave, T., & Henik, A. (2017). Counting distance:Effects of egocentric distance on numerical perception. PLoS One, 12(4), e0174772, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0174772.
Hartmann, M., Gashaj, V., Stahnke, A., & Mast, F. W. (2014). There is more than "more is up":Hand and foot responses reverse the vertical association of number magnitudes. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Human Perception and Performance, 40(4), 1401-1414, doi:10.1037/a0036686.
Holmes, K. J., & Lourenco, S. F. (2012). Orienting numbers in mental space:Horizontal organization trumps vertical. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65(6), 1044-1051, doi:10.1080/17470218.2012.685079.
Hung, Y. H., Hung, D. L., Tzeng, O. J. L., & Wu, D. H. (2008). Flexible spatial mapping of different notations of numbers in Chinese readers. Cognition, 106(3), 1441-1450, doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2007.04.017.
Jiang, Y. V., & Swallow, K. M. (2013). Spatial reference frame of incidentally learned attention. Cognition, 126(3), 378-390, doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2012.10.011.
Kopiske, K. K., Löwenkamp, C., Eloka, O., Schiller, F., Kao, C. S., Wu, C. H., … Franz, V. H. (2016). The SNARC effect in Chinese numerals:Do visual properties of characters and hand signs influence number processing? PLoS One, 11(9), e0163897, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0163897.
Mourad, A., & Leth-Steensen, C. (2017). Spatial reference frames and SNARC. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 29(2), 113-128, doi:10.1080/20445911.2016.1249483.
Müller, D., & Schwarz, W. (2007). Is there an internal association of numbers to hands? The task set influences the nature of the SNARC effect. Memory & Cognition, 35(5), 1151-1161, doi:10.3758/BF03193485.
Núñez, R. E., & Cornejo, C. (2012). Facing the sunrise:Cultural worldview underlying intrinsic-based encoding of absolute frames of reference in Aymara. Cognitive Science, 36(6), 965-991, doi:10.1111/j.1551-6709.2012.01237.x.
O'Keefe, J., & Nadel, L. (1978). The hippocampus as a cognitive map. Oxford, UK:Clarendon Press.
Proctor, R. W., & Cho, Y. S. (2006). Polarity correspondence:A general principle for performance of speeded binary classification tasks. Psychological Bulletin, 132(3), 416-442, doi:10.1037/0033-2909.132.3.416.
Santens, S., & Gevers, W. (2008). The SNARC effect does not imply a mental number line. Cognition, 108(1), 263-270, doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2008.01.002.
Schwarz, W., & Keus, I. M. (2004). Moving the eyes along the mental number line:Comparing SNARC effects with saccadic and manual responses. Perception & Psychophysics, 66(4), 651-664, doi:10.3758/BF03194909.
Shaki, S., Fischer, M. H., & Petrusic, W. M. (2009). Reading habits for both words and numbers contribute to the SNARC effect. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16(2), 328-331, doi:10.3758/pbr.16.2.328.
Shelton, A. L., & McNamara, T. P. (2004). Orientation and perspective dependence in route and survey learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30(1), 158-170, doi:10.1037/0278-7393.30.1.158.
Simonnet, M., Vieilledent, S., Tisseau, J. (2013). Note théorique:Influences des activités du sujet et des caractéristiques environnementales sur la nature de l'encodage spatial. L'Année Psychologique, 113, 227-254, doi:10.4074/S0003503313002054.
Viarouge, A., Hubbard, E. M., & Dehaene, S. (2014). The organization of spatial reference frames involved in the SNARC effect. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67(8), 1484-1499, doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2005.01.004.
Winter, B., Matlock, T., Shaki, S., & Fischer, M. H. (2015). Mental number space in three dimensions. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 57, 209-219, doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2015.09.005.
Wood, G., Nuerk, H. C., & Willmes, K. (2006). Crossed hands and the SNARC effect:A failure to replicate Dehaene, Bossini and Giraux (1993). Cortex, 42(8), 1069-1079, doi:10.1016/s0010-9452(08)70219-3.
Wood, G., Willmes, K., Nuerk, H. C., & Fischer, M. H. (2008). On the cognitive link between space and number:A meta-analysis of the SNARC effect. Psychology Science, 50(4), 489-525.

[1]	潘运, 赵竹君, 戴隆农. 言语与空间任务指令对数字-空间联结编码的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(6): 734-740.
[2]	李雅君, 刘阳, 闻素霞. 书写习惯对数字空间表征SNARC效应的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2018, 16(5): 618-623.
[3]	金桂春, 王有智, 王丽. Simon效应对空间-数字反应编码联合效应的抑制作用^*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2017, 15(4): 489-494.
[4]	金桂春,王强强,王有智,吴彦文. 数字SNARC效应中大小和顺序信息的分离^*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2016, 14(2): 228-233.
[5]	吴彦文, 杨龙. 计数单位的空间联合编码效应[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2013, 11(4): 440-443.
[6]	孔风；赵晶晶；游旭群；张宇. 听觉通道下负数的低水平加工引起注意的SNARC效应[J]. , 2012, 10(1): 12-17.
[7]	潘运；沈德立；王杰3. 不同注意提示线索条件下汉字数字加工的SNARC效应[J]. , 2009, 7(1): 21-26.