真实型领导对员工创新行为的影响：工作投入的中介效应

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 采用问卷法对302名企业员工和64名企业管理者进行调查，探讨真实型领导影响员工创新行为的内在作用机制，检验员工工作投入的中介效应。跨层次分析结果显示：（1）真实型领导对员工的工作投入和创新行为均有显著的正向预测作用；（2）员工工作投入正向预测其创新行为；（3）员工工作投入在真实型领导对员工创新行为的影响中发挥部分中介效应。

关键词: 真实型领导, 工作投入, 创新行为, 知识型员工

Abstract: To explore the internal mechanism of the impact of authentic leadership on employees’ innovative behavior, 302 employees and 64 supervisors of knowledge-based enterprises were recruited to complete the questionnaires. The results of the Hierarchical Linear Models (HLM) analysis indicated that: 1) authentic leadership had positive influence on employees’ work engagement and their innovative behavior; 2) employees’ work engagement positively influenced their innovative behavior; 3) employees’ work engagement acted as a partial mediator between authentic leadership and employees’ innovative behavior.

Key words: authentic leadership, work engagement, innovative behavior, knowledge-based employees

中图分类号:

B849

李永占. 真实型领导对员工创新行为的影响：工作投入的中介效应[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2019, 17(6): 854-860.

LI Yongzhan. The Impact of Authentic Leadership on Employees’ Innovative Behavior: The Mediating Role of Work Engagement[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2019, 17(6): 854-860.

参考文献

?丁琳, 席酉民, 张华. (2010). 变革型领导与员工创新:领导-下属关系的中介作用. 科研管理, 31(1), 177-184
郭玮, 李燕萍, 杜旌, 陶厚永. (2012). 多层次导向的真实型领导对员工与团队创新的影响机制研究. 南开管理评论, 15(3), 51-60, doi:10.3969/j.issn.1008-3448.2012.03.007
韩翼, 廖建桥, 龙立荣. (2007). 雇员工作绩效结构模型构建与实证研究. 管理科学学报, 10(5), 62-77, doi:10.3321/j.issn:1007-9807.2007.05.007
韩翼, 杨百寅. (2011). 真实型领导、心理资本与员工创新行为:领导成员交换的调节作用. 管理世界, (12), 78-86
李珲, 丁刚, 李新建. (2014). 基于家长式领导三元理论的领导方式对员工创新行为的影响. 管理学报, 11(7), 1005-1013, doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-884x.2014.07.009
李永鑫, 周海龙, 田艳辉. (2014). 真实型领导影响员工工作投入的多重中介效应. 心理科学, 37(3), 716-722
梁巧转, 张真真, 李洁. (2016). 真实型领导对员工创新行为的影响机制. 西安交通大学学报 (社会科学版), 36(2), 17-23, 31
廖卉, 庄瑷嘉. (2008). 多层次理论模型的建立及研究方法. 见陈晓萍, 徐淑英, 樊景立 (编), 组织与管理研究的实证方法 (pp. 332-357). 北京:北京大学出版社.
林海燕. (2014). 真实型领导对员工工作投入的影响研究 (硕士学位论文). 华南理工大学, 广州.
刘永安. (2018). 积极文化氛围视角下真实型领导与团队创新关系研究. 领导科学, (11), 24-26, doi:10.3969/j.issn.1003-2606.2018.11.007
钱白云, 苏倩倩, 郑全全. (2011). 组织创新气氛与中小企业员工创新行为:工作投入的中介作用. 人类工效学, 17(2), 28-30, 46
石冠峰, 杨高峰. (2015). 真实型领导对员工创新行为的影响:领导-成员交换和心理授权的中介作用. 领导科学, 26, 30-32, doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-5103.2015.22.013
苏伟琳, 林新奇, 丁贺. (2018). 核心自我评价对员工创新行为的影响机制-工作投入的中介作用. 软科学, (7), 52-55
苏屹, 崔明明, 孙莹. (2017). 共享变革型领导对员工创新行为的影响:基于权力距离的调节作用. 科技管理研究, (2), 125-132, doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-7695.2017.02.022
杨浩, 杨百寅, 韩翼, 毛畅果. (2016). 建设性责任知觉对真实型领导与员工创新绩效关系的中介作用研究. 管理学报, 13(4), 533-541, doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-884X.2016.04.008
Amabile, T. M. (1993). Motivational synergy:Toward new conceptualizations of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in the workplace. Human Resource Management Review, 3, 185-201, doi:10.1016/1053-4822(93)90012-S.
Avolio, B. J., Gardner, W. L., Walumbwa, F. O., Luthans, F., & May, D. R. (2004). Unlocking the mask:A look at the process by which authentic leaders impact follower attitudes and behaviors. The Leadership Quarterly, 15, 801-823, doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2004.09.003.
Bamford, M., Wong, C. A., & Laschinger, H. (2013). The influence of authentic leadership and areas of worklife on work engagement of registered nurses. Journal of Nursing Management, 21(3), 529-540, doi:10.1111/jonm.2013.21.issue-3.
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research:Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182, doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173.
Bliese, P. D. (2000). Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability:Implications for data aggregation and analyses. In K. J. Klein & S. W. J. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations:Foundations, extensions, and new directions (pp. 349-381). San Francisco:Jossey-Bass.
Dackert, I., Lööv, L. Å., & Mårtensson, M. (2004). Leadership and climate for innovation in teams. Economic & Industrial Democracy, 25(2), 301-318.
Fredrickson, B. L. (2001). The role of positive emotions in positive psychology:The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. American Psychologist, 56(3), 218-226, doi:10.1037/0003-066X.56.3.218.
Gardner, W. L., Avolio, B. J., & Walumbwa, F. O. (2005). Authentic leadership development:Emergent trends and future directions. In W. L. Gardner & B. J. Avolio (Eds.), Authentic leadership theory and practice:Origins, effects, and development (pp. 387-406). Oxford:Elsevier Science.
Hakanen, J. J., Perhoniemi, R., & Toppinen-Tanner, S. (2008). Positive gain spirals at work:From job resources to work engagement, personal innovative and work-unit innovativeness. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 73(1), 78-91, doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2008.01.003.
Ilies, R., Morgeson, F. P., & Nahrgang, J. D. (2005). Authentic leadership and eudaemonic well-being:Understanding leader-follower outcomes. The Leadership Quarterly, 16, 373-394, doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2005.03.002.
James, L. R., Demaree, R. G., & Wolf, G. (1984). Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69(1), 85-98, doi:10.1037/0021-9010.69.1.85.
James, L. R., Demaree, R. G., & Wolf, G. (1993). rwg:An assessment of within-group interrater agreement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(2), 306-309, doi:10.1037/0021-9010.78.2.306.
Janssen, O. (2000). Job demands, perceptions of effort-reward fairness and innovative work behaviour. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73, 287-302, doi:10.1348/096317900167038.
Janssen, O., & van Yperen, N. W. (2004). Employee's goal orientations, the quality of leader-member exchange, and the outcomes of job performance and job satisfaction. Academy of Management Journal, 47(3), 368-384.
Michie, S., & Gooty, J. (2005). Values, emotions, and authenticity:Will the real leader please stand up? The Leadership Quarterly, 16(3), 441-457, doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2005.03.006.
Mumford, M. D., Scott, G. M., Gaddis, B., & Strange, J. M. (2002). Leading creative people:Orchestrating expertise and relationships. The Leadership Quarterly, 13(6), 705-750, doi:10.1016/S1048-9843(02)00158-3.
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research:A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879-903, doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879.
Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks:SAGE Publications.
Rego, A., Sousa, F., Cunha, M. P., Correia, A., & Saur-Amaral, I. (2007). Leader self-reported emotional intelligence and perceived employee creativity:An exploratory study. Creativity and Innovation Management, 16(3), 250-264, doi:10.1111/caim.2007.16.issue-3.
Rego, A., Sousa, F., Marques, C., & Cunha, M. P. (2012). Authentic leadership promoting employees' psychological capital and creativity. Journal of Business Research, 65(3), 429-437, doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.10.003.
Schaufeli, W. B., Salanova, M., González-Romá V., & Bakker, A. B. (2002). The measurement of engagement and burnout:A two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3, 71-92, doi:10.1023/A:1015630930326.
Scott, S. G., & Bruce, R. A. (1994). Determinants of innovative behavior:A path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 37(3), 580-607.
Shin, S. J., & Zhou, J. (2003). Transformational leadership, conservation, and creativity:Evidence from Korea. Academy of Management Journal, 46(6), 703-714.
Tierney, P., Farmer, S. M., & Graen, G. B. (1999). An examination of leadership and employee creativity:The relevance of traits and relationships. Personnel Psychology, 52, 591-620, doi:10.1111/peps.1999.52.issue-3.
Walumbwa, F. O., Avolio, B. J., Gardner, W. L., Wernsing, T. S., & Peterson, S. J. (2008). Authentic leadership:Development and validation of a theory-based measure. Journal of Management, 34(1), 89-126, doi:10.1177/0149206307308913.
Zhang, X. M., & Bartol, K. M. (2010). Linking empowering leadership and employee creativity:The influence of psychological empowerment, intrinsic motivation, and creative process engagement. Academy of Management Journal, 53(1), 107-128, doi:10.5465/amj.2010.48037118.
Zhang, Z., Zyphur, M. J., & Preacher, K. J. (2009). Testing multilevel mediation using hierarchical linear models:Problems and solutions. Organizational Research Methods, 12(4), 695-719, doi:10.1177/1094428108327450.
Zhou, J., & George, J. M. (2001). When job dissatisfaction leads to creativity:Encouraging the expression of voice. Academy of Management Journal, 44(4), 682-696.

[1]	王嘉莹, 姚梅林, 刘红瑞. 成就目标与教师效能感、焦虑、工作投入的关系：基于变量中心和个体中心的视角[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(1): 122-129.
[2]	窦运来, 沈伊默. 参与式领导如何影响团队成员的工作表现？—有调节的中介效应[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(6): 845-852.
[3]	杨槐, 龚少英, 苗天长, 李伟贺. 工作-非工作边界管理一致性与高校辅导员工作满意度的关系：工作投入的中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(6): 853-860.
[4]	李宏利, 王星, 董丽娟, 杨岚. 员工创新行为源于领导情感信任吗?风险倾向与组织行为授权的调节作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2018, 16(5): 701-712.
[5]	曾练平, 何明远, 潘运, 赵守盈. 工作家庭平衡双构面视角下社会支持对农村教师工作投入的影响：一个多重中介模型[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2018, 16(4): 518-524.
[6]	刘金培, 朱磊, 倪清. 组织氛围如何影响知识型员工敬业度：基于工作倦怠的中介效应研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2018, 16(3): 394-401.
[7]	李永占. 特殊教育教师工作家庭冲突、情绪智力与工作投入的关系[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2018, 16(1): 103-110.
[8]	吴国强, 郭亚宁, 黄杰, 鲍旭辉, 李越. 挑战性-阻碍性压力源对工作投入和工作倦怠的影响：应对策略的中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2017, 15(6): 853-859.
[9]	王楠,张立艳,王洋. 创新自我效能感对创新行为的影响：多重中介效应分析^*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2016, 14(6): 811-816.
[10]	王晓庄,骆皓爽,张永翠,吴捷. 工作-家庭中心性与延迟退休态度的关系研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2016, 14(3): 390-398.
[11]	柯江林, 吴丹, 孙健敏. 心理资本对工作投入、主观幸福感与沉默行为的影响：交互效应与效应比较*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2015, 13(6): 804-810.
[12]	周海龙，田艳辉，王明辉，李永鑫. 真实型领导对教师知识分享行为的影响:组织支持感的中介和调节作用^*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2014, 12(2): 212-219.
[13]	赵鹏娟, 赵国祥. 知识型员工共享领导对团队绩效的影响：团队学习能力的中介效应[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2013, 11(3): 374-379.
[14]	魏蕾,时勘. 家长式领导与员工工作投入：心理授权的中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2010, 8(2): 88-93.