网络募捐中求助者的面部表情对捐助意愿的影响：有中介的调节模型

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 基于框架效应和共情–助人行为假说，以82名大学生为被试，通过实验探讨了网络募捐中求助者的面部表情对捐助意愿的影响，并考察了目标框架的调节作用以及共情的中介作用。结果表明：目标框架调节了求助者的面部表情对捐助者的共情和捐助意愿的影响。在积极框架下，消极面部表情对捐助者的共情和捐助意愿的积极影响显著高于积极面部表情；而在消极框架下，两种面部表情对捐助者的共情和捐助意愿的影响均无显著差异。研究还发现了有中介的调节作用模型，共情在求助者的面部表情对捐助意愿的影响中发挥中介作用，而目标框架是有中介的调节变量。

关键词: 网络募捐, 面部表情, 目标框架, 共情, 捐助意愿

Abstract: Building on the framing effect and empathy-helping hypothesis, the present study constructed a mediated moderation model to examine whether and how facial emotion expression and goal framing would affect sympathy and online charity donation. The experiment employed a 2 (facial emotion expression:happy/painful)×2 (goal framing: positive/negative) between-subjects design. Results of ANOVAs showed that there were main effects for facial emotion expression and for goal framing on both empathy and online charity donation, and there was also a significant interaction between facial emotion expression and goal framing for both dependent variables. The results also revealed a mediated moderation, in which goal framing moderated the relationship between facial emotion expression and online charity donation, and this moderation effect was mediated by empathy. In conclusion, the present study introduces two critical features of online charity advertisements: facial emotion expression on images of victims and goal framing. One practical implication of the present study is that the online charity advertisements designers should pay attention to the importance of subtle emotional cues and goal framing which can sway sympathy and giving.

Key words: online charitable donation, facial emotion expression, goal framing, empathy, donation intention

中图分类号:

B849

衡书鹏, 赵换方, 熊建萍, 周宗奎. 网络募捐中求助者的面部表情对捐助意愿的影响：有中介的调节模型[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(1): 92-99.

HENG Shupeng, ZHAO Huanfang, XIONG Jianping, ZHOU Zongkui. The Relationship Between Facial Emotion Expression and Online Charity Donation: A Mediated Moderation Model[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2020, 18(1): 92-99.

参考文献

陈剑梅, 傅琦. (2016). 劝捐策略和框架效应对个体捐赠决策的影响. 心理与行为研究, 14(3), 377-383
丁凤琴, 陆朝晖. (2016). 共情与亲社会行为关系的元分析. 心理科学进展, 24(8), 1159-1174
丁凤琴, 纳雯. (2015). 真实急病情境下共情对大学生慈善捐助的影响: 有调节的中介效应. 心理发展与教育, 31(6), 694-702
李晓明, 傅小兰, 王新超. (2012). 移情在道德强度对企业道德决策影响中的作用. 心理科学, 35(6), 1429-1434
刘勤为, 徐庆春, 刘华山, 刘勤学. (2016). 大学生网络社会支持与网络利他行为的关系: 一个有调节的中介模型. 心理发展与教育, 32(4), 426-434
孙炳海, 苗德露, 李伟健, 张海形, 徐静逸. (2011). 大学生的观点采择与助人行为: 群体关系与共情反应的不同作用. 心理发展与教育, 27(5), 491-497
叶宝娟, 温忠麟. (2013). 有中介的调节模型检验方法: 甄别和整合. 心理学报, 45(9), 1050-1061
郑晓莹, 彭泗清, 彭璐珞. (2015). “达”则兼济天下? 社会比较对亲社会行为的影响及心理机制. 心理学报, 47(2), 243-250
Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park: Sage.
Arriaga, X. B., & Rusbult, C. E. (1998). Standing in my partner’s shoes: Partner perspective taking and reactions to accommodative dilemmas. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24(9), 927-948, doi: 10.1177/0146167298249002.
Batson, C. D. (1987). Prosocial motivation: Is it ever truly altruistic? Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 20, 65-122.
Batson, C. D., Lishner, D. A., Cook, J., & Sawyer, S. (2005). Similarity and nurturance: Two possible sources of empathy for strangers. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 27(1), 15-25, doi: 10.1207/s15324834basp2701_2.
Besel, L. D. S., & Yuille, J. C. (2010). Individual differences in empathy: The role of facial expression recognition. Personality and Individual Differences, 49(2), 107-112, doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2010.03.013.
Buda, R., & Zhang, Y. (2000). Consumer product evaluation: The interactive effect of message framing, presentation order, and source credibility. Journal of Product and Brand Management, 9(4), 229-242, doi: 10.1108/10610420010344022.
Chang, C. T. (2007a). Health-care product advertising: The influences of message framing and perceived product characteristics. Psychology & Marketing, 24(2), 143-169.
Chang, C. T. (2007b). Interactive effects of message framing, product perceived risk, and mood: The case of travel health care product advertising. Journal of Advertising Research, 47(1), 51-65, doi: 10.2501/S0021849907070067.
Chang, C. T., & Lee, Y. K. (2009). Framing charity advertising: Influences of message framing, image valence, and temporal framing on a charitable appeal. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 39(12), 2910-2935, doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2009.00555.x.
Chang, C. T., & Lee, Y. K. (2010). Effects of message framing, vividness congruency and statistical framing on responses to charity advertising. International Journal of Advertising, 29(2), 195-220, doi: 10.2501/S0265048710201129.
Corritore, C. L., Kracher, B., & Wiedenbeck, S. (2003). On-line trust: concepts, evolving themes, a model. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 58(6), 737-758, doi: 10.1016/S1071-5819(03)00041-7.
Dunn, E. W., Aknin, L. B., & Norton, M. I. (2008). Spending money on others promotes happiness. Science, 319(5870), 1687-1688, doi: 10.1126/science.1150952.
Fisher, R. J., & Ma, Y. (2014). The price of being beautiful: Negative effects of attractiveness on empathy for children in need. Journal of Consumer Research, 41(2), 436-450, doi: 10.1086/676967.
Green, M. C., & Brock, T. C. (2000). The role of transportation in the persuasiveness of public narratives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(5), 701-721, doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.79.5.701.
Keltner, D., Ekman, P., Gonzaga, G. C., & Beer, J. (2003). Facial expression of emotion. In R. J. Davidson, K. R. Scherer, & H. H. Goldsmith (Eds.), Handbook of affective sciences (pp. 415-432). New York: Oxford University Press.
Levin, I. P., Schneider, S. L., & Gaeth, G. J. (1998). All frames are not created equal: A typology and critical analysis of framing effects. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 76(2), 149-188, doi: 10.1006/obhd.1998.2804.
Loewenstein, G., & Small, D. A. (2007). The scarecrow and the tin man: The vicissitudes of human sympathy and caring. Review of General Psychology, 11(2), 112-126, doi: 10.1037/1089-2680.11.2.112.
Mayer, J. D., Gaschke, Y. N., Braverman, D. L., & Evans, T. W. (1992). Mood-congruent judgment is a general effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(1), 119-132, doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.63.1.119.
McCormick, M., & Seta, J. J. (2012). Lateralized goal framing: How selective presentation impacts message effectiveness. Journal of Health Psychology, 17(8), 1099-1109, doi: 10.1177/1359105311435944.
Neumann, R., & Strack, F. (2000). “Mood contagion”: The automatic transfer of mood between persons. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(2), 211-223, doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.79.2.211.
Pavey, L., Greitemeyer, T., & Sparks, P. (2012). “I help because I want to, not because you tell me to”: Empathy increases autonomously motivated helping. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38(5), 681-689, doi: 10.1177/0146167211435940.
Schneider, T. R., Salovey, P., Pallonen, U., Mundorf, N., Smith, N. F., & Steward, W. T. (2001). Visual and auditory message framing effects on tobacco smoking. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 31(4), 667-682, doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2001.tb01407.x.
Small, D. A., & Verrochi, N. M. (2009). The face of need: Facial emotion expression on charity advertisements. Journal of Marketing Research, 46(6), 777-787, doi: 10.1509/jmkr.46.6.777.
Stocks, E. L., Lishner, D. A., Waits, B. L., & Downum, E. M. (2011). I’m embarrassed for you: The effect of valuing and perspective taking on empathic embarrassment and empathic concern. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 41(1), 1-26, doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2010.00699.x.
Taylor, S. E., & Thompson, S. C. (1982). Stalking the elusive “vividness” effect. Psychological Review, 89(2), 155-181, doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.89.2.155.
Thornton, B., Kirchner, G., & Jacobs, J. (1991). Influence of a photograph on a charitable appeal: A picture may be worth a thousand words when it has to speak for itself. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 21(6), 433-445, doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1991.tb00529.x.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211(4481), 453-458, doi: 10.1126/science.7455683.

[1]	钟伟芳, 郭永兴. 悲伤表情识别能力影响疼痛共情—一项ERP研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(5): 585-592.
[2]	罗利, 杨东, 陈圣栋, 高伟, 陈永强, 袁加锦. 特质敬畏对亲社会倾向的正向预测：自我超越和共情的多重中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(3): 390-396.
[3]	郭英, 陈灿杰, 胡东, 袁安怡. 道德认同对大学生亲社会行为倾向的影响：共情的中介作用和正念的调节作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(1): 80-87.
[4]	颜志强, 李珊. 共情和抑郁的关系：同伴关系的调节作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(3): 424-430.
[5]	高玲, 花苏晴, 李沛沛, 杨继平, 王兴超. 同胞关系与青少年亲社会行为：道德推脱的中介作用和共情的调节作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(2): 216-222.
[6]	张振. 自恋与攻击行为的关系：观点采择和共情关注的调节作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(1): 131-136.
[7]	宋娟, 杜梦, 连涛, 张倩. 积极怀旧情绪对疼痛共情影响的ERP研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(4): 466-473.
[8]	谭千保, 李佳圆, 刘旭. 累积生态风险对农村初中生攻击行为的影响：有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(4): 489-495.
[9]	朱灏, 尹可丽, 杨李慧子. 面部表情与捐赠者–受益者关系对网络慈善众筹捐赠行为的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(4): 570-576.
[10]	李甜甜, 王娟娟, 顾吉有, 徐鹤文. 二胎出生对头胎儿童共情能力的影响：父母教养能力感的调节作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2019, 17(6): 810-816.
[11]	宋娟, 魏艳秋, 杜梦, 解鸿宇, 连涛, 胡亚奇, 马欧. 眼部情绪信息对疼痛共情影响的ERP研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2019, 17(3): 326-332,347.
[12]	王璐, 宋娟, 魏艳秋, 解鸿宇, 彭瑶, 张静达. 初中生家庭环境与攻击性的关系：共情的中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2019, 17(2): 216-222.
[13]	颜志强, 苏金龙, 苏彦捷. 共情与同情：词源、概念和测量[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2018, 16(4): 433-440.
[14]	郭文斌, 陈佳丹, 张梁. 表情强度对自闭症儿童面部表情识别影响的实验研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2018, 16(2): 157-163.
[15]	董军, 付淑英, 王洋, 李曌宇, 杨绍峰, 齐春辉. 自我控制对大学生人际信任的影响：多重中介效应分析[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2018, 16(2): 225-230.