自我妨碍与学习投入的关系：学业浮力的中介作用和父母支持的调节作用

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 以498名高中生为研究对象，通过问卷调查法探讨高中生的自我妨碍与学习投入的关系，并考察学业浮力的中介作用以及父母支持的调节作用。测量工具包括自我妨碍量表、学习投入量表、学业浮力量表和父母自主支持量表。结果表明：（1）自我妨碍对学习投入有显著负向预测作用；（2）学业浮力在自我妨碍和学习投入的关系中起部分中介作用；（3）自我妨碍和学习投入的关系受到父母支持的调节。与低父母支持相比，在高父母支持的学生中，自我妨碍对学习投入有更强的负向预测作用。

关键词: 自我妨碍, 学习投入, 学业浮力, 父母支持

Abstract: Using questionnaires survey, the relation between self-handicapping and academic engagement was explored, and the mediating effect of academic buoyancy and the moderating effect of parental support were investigated among 498 high school students. The instruments included self-handicapping scale, academic engagement scale, academic buoyancy scale and parental support scale. The results showed that: 1) self-handicapping had a significant negative prediction on academic engagement; 2) the academic buoyancy played a mediating role in the relationship between self-handicapping and academic engagement; 3) the relationship between self-handicapping and academic engagement was moderated by parental support. Compared with the students who have lower parental support, self-handicapping was a stronger predictor of academic engagement among students who have higher parental support.

Key words: self-handicapping, academic engagement, academic buoyancy, parental support

中图分类号:

B842.3

贾绪计, 李雅倩, 蔡林, 王庆瑾, 林琳. 自我妨碍与学习投入的关系：学业浮力的中介作用和父母支持的调节作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(2): 227-233.

JIA Xuji, LI Yaqian, CAI Lin, WANG Qingjin, LIN Lin. The Relationship Between Self-Handicapping and Academic Engagement: The Mediating Effect of Academic Buoyancy and Moderating Effect of Parental Support[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2020, 18(2): 227-233.

参考文献

陈英敏, 张文献, 陶婧, 邓娜, 韩磊, 高峰强. (2017). 初中生羞怯对学校适应的影响: 多重中介模型的检验. 中国特殊教育, (8), 74-79, doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-3728.2017.08.020
董存梅, 刘冰瑶. (2016). 初二学生的自我决定动机对其学业投入的影响: 成就目标的中介作用. 心理与行为研究, 14(1), 57-63, doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-0628.2016.01.009
方来坛, 时勘, 张风华. (2008). 中文版学习投入量表的信效度研究. 中国临床心理学杂志, 16(6), 618-620
石伟, 黄希庭. (2004). 自我设限及其研究范型和影响因素. 心理科学进展, 12(1), 72-78
宋广文, 杨孟甜. (2018). 大学生自我分化与学习倦怠的关系: 自我妨碍的中介作用. 黑龙江高教研究, (2), 84-88, doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-2614.2018.02.020
唐芹, 方晓义, 胡伟, 陈海德, 吴梦希, 王帆. (2013). 父母和教师自主支持与高中生发展的关系. 心理发展与教育, 29(6), 604-615
文超, 张卫, 李董平, 喻承甫, 代维祝. (2010). 初中生感恩与学业成就的关系: 学习投入的中介作用. 心理发展与教育, 26(6), 598-605
王文, 盖笑松, 张玉清, 王国霞. (2018). 青少年幸福感对学业发展的影响: 学校投入的中介效应. 心理学探新, 38(3), 260-266
徐明津, 杨新国. (2017). 家庭经济困难对青少年不良适应的影响: 父母支持与心理韧性的链式中介效应. 中国特殊教育, (2), 72-77, doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-3728.2017.02.013
赵凤青, 俞国良. (2018). 日常性学业弹性: 日常学业压力下的积极适应机制. 心理科学进展, 26(6), 1054-1062
Adil, A., Ameer, S., & Ghayas, S. (2020). Impact of academic psychological capital on academic achievement among university undergraduates: Roles of flow and self-handicapping behavior. PsyCh Journal, 9(1), 56-66, doi: 10.1002/pchj.318.
Alarcon, G. M., Edwards, J. M., & Menke, L. E. (2011). Student burnout and engagement: A test of the conservation of resources theory. The Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 145(3), 211-227, doi: 10.1080/00223980.2011.555432.
Anderman, E. M., & Wolters, C. A. (2006). Goals, values, and affect: Influences on student motivation. In P. A. Alexander & P. Winne (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 369-389). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Berglas, S., & Jones, E. E. (1978). Drug choice as a self-handicapping strategy in response to noncontingent success. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 36(4), 405-417.
Chang, E. C., & Yang, H. F. (2016). Personal and family growth initiative as predictors of study engagement in Chinese and American college students: Is there any evidence for group differences? Personality and Individual Differences, 102, 186-189, doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2016.07.004.
Collie, R. J., Ginns, P., Martin, A. J., & Papworth, B. (2017). Academic buoyancy mediates academic anxiety’s effects on learning strategies: An investigation of English- and Chinese-speaking Australian students. Educational Psychology, 37(8), 947-964, doi: 10.1080/01443410.2017.1291910.
Collie, R. J., Martin, A. J., Bottrell, D., Armstrong, D., Ungar, M., & Liebenberg, L. (2017). Social support, academic adversity and academic buoyancy: A person-centred analysis and implications for academic outcomes. Educational Psychology, 37(5), 550-564, doi: 10.1080/01443410.2015.1127330.
Collie, R. J., Martin, A. J., Malmberg, L. E., Hall, J., & Ginns, P. (2015). Academic buoyancy, student’s achievement, and the linking role of control: A cross-lagged analysis of high school students. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(1), 113-130, doi: 10.1111/bjep.12066.
Covington, M. V. (1992). Making the grade: A self-worth perspective on motivation and school reform. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
De Castella, K., Byrne, D., & Covington, M. (2013). Unmotivated or motivated to fail? A cross-cultural study of achievement motivation, fear of failure, and student disengagement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(3), 861-880, doi: 10.1037/a0032464.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227-268, doi: 10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01.
Etzion, D. (1984). Moderating effect of social support on the stress-burnout relationship. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69(4), 615-622, doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.69.4.615.
Gillet, N., Vallerand, R. J., & Lafrenière, M. A. K. (2012). Intrinsic and extrinsic school motivation as a function of age: The mediating role of autonomy support. Social Psychology of Education, 15(1), 77-95, doi: 10.1007/s11218-011-9170-2.
Grolnick, W. S. (2009). The role of parents in facilitating autonomous self-regulation for education. Theory and Research in Education, 7(2), 164-173, doi: 10.1177/1477878509104321.
Holliman, A. J., Martin, A. J., & Collie, R. J. (2018). Adaptability, engagement, and degree completion: A longitudinal investigation of university students. Educational Psychology, 38(6), 785-799, doi: 10.1080/01443410.2018.1426835.
Klem, A. M., & Connell, J. P. (2004). Relationships matter: Linking teacher support to student engagement and achievement. Journal of School Health, 74(7), 262-273, doi: 10.1111/j.1746-1561.2004.tb08283.x.
Lerner, R. M., Lerner, J. V., Almerigi, J., & Theokas, C. (2006). Dynamics of individual—context relations in human development: A developmental systems perspective. In J. C. Thomas, D. L. Segal, & M. Hersen (Eds.), Comprehensive handbook of personality and psychopathology, Vol. 1. Personality and everyday functioning (pp. 23-43). Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons Inc.
Maralani, F. M., Lavasani, M. G., & Hejazi, E. (2016). Structural modeling on the relationship between basic psychological needs, academic engagement, and test anxiety. Journal of Education and Learning, 5(4), 44-52, doi: 10.5539/jel.v5n4p44.
Martin, A. J., Colmar, S. H., Davey, L. A., & Marsh, H. W. (2010). Longitudinal modelling of academic buoyancy and motivation: Do the 5Cs hold up over time? British Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(3), 473-496, doi: 10.1348/000709910X486376.
Martin, A. J., Ginns, P., Brackett, M. A., Malmberg, L. E., & Hall, J. (2013). Academic buoyancy and psychological risk: Exploring reciprocal relationships. Learning and Individual Differences, 27, 128-133, doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2013.06.006.
Martin, A. J., & Marsh, H. W. (2008). Academic buoyancy: Towards an understanding of students’ everyday academic resilience. Journal of School Psychology, 46(1), 53-83, doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2007.01.002.
Martin, A. J., & Marsh, H. W. (2009). Academic resilience and academic buoyancy: Multidimensional and hierarchical conceptual framing of causes, correlates and cognate constructs. Oxford Review of Education, 35(3), 353-370, doi: 10.1080/03054980902934639.
Martin, A. J., Marsh, H. W., & Debus, R. L. (2001). Self-handicapping and defensive pessimism: Exploring a model of predictors and outcomes from a self-protection perspective. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(1), 87-102, doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.93.1.87.
Martin, A. J., Marsh, H. W., & Debus, R. L. (2003). Self-handicapping and defensive pessimism: A model of self-protection from a longitudinal perspective. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 28(1), 1-36, doi: 10.1016/S0361-476X(02)00008-5.
Pietromonaco, P. R., & Barrett, L. F. (2000). The internal working models concept: What do we really know about the self in relation to others? Review of General Psychology, 4(2), 155-175, doi: 10.1037/1089-2680.4.2.155.
Pitzer, J., & Skinner, E. (2017). Predictors of changes in students’ motivational resilience over the school year. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 41(1), 15-29, doi: 10.1177/0165025416642051.
Putwain, D. W. (2019). An examination of the self-referent executive processing model of test anxiety: Control, emotional regulation, self-handicapping, and examination performance. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 34(2), 341-358, doi: 10.1007/s10212-018-0383-z.
Putwain, D. W., & Daly, A. L. (2013). Do clusters of test anxiety and academic buoyancy differentially predict academic performance? Learning and Individual Differences, 27, 157-162, doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2013.07.010.
Rappo, G., Alesi, M., & Pepi, A. (2017). The effects of school anxiety on self-esteem and self-handicapping in pupils attending primary school. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 14(4), 465-476, doi: 10.1080/17405629.2016.1239578.
Raufelder, D., Hoferichter, F., Ringeisen, T., Regner, N., & Jacke, C. (2015). The perceived role of parental support and pressure in the interplay of test anxiety and school engagement among adolescents: Evidence for gender-specific relations. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 24(12), 3742-3756, doi: 10.1007/s10826-015-0182-y.
Rhodewalt, F., & Fairfield, M. (1991). Claimed self-handicaps and the self-handicapper: The relation of reduction in intended effort to performance. Journal of Research in Personality, 25(4), 402-417, doi: 10.1016/0092-6566(91)90030-T.
Rhodewalt, F., Saltzman, A. T., & Wittmer, J. (1984). Self-handicapping among competitive athletes: The role of practice in self-esteem protection. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 5(3), 197-209, doi: 10.1207/s15324834basp0503_3.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68-78, doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68.
Ryan, R. M., Deci, E. L., Grolnick, W. S., & La Guardia, J. G. (2015). The significance of autonomy and autonomy support in psychological development and psychopathology. In D. Cicchetti & D. J. Cohen (Eds.), Developmental psychopathology (pp. 795-849). Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons Inc.
Schaufeli, W. B., Salanova, M., González-Romá, V., & Bakker, A. B. (2002). The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3(1), 71-92, doi: 10.1023/A:1015630930326.
Schwinger, M., Wirthwein, L., Lemmer, G., & Steinmayr, R. (2014). Academic self-handicapping and achievement: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106(3), 744-761, doi: 10.1037/a0035832.
Skinner, E. A., & Pitzer, J. R. (2012). Developmental dynamics of student engagement, coping, and everyday resilience. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 21-44). Boston: Springer.
Sulea, C., van Beek, I., Sarbescu, P., Virga, D., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2015). Engagement, boredom, and burnout among students: Basic need satisfaction matters more than personality traits. Learning and Individual Differences, 42, 132-138, doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2015.08.018.
Vansteenkiste, M., Lens, W., & Deci, E. L. (2006). Intrinsic versus extrinsic goal contents in self-determination theory: Another look at the quality of academic motivation. Educational Psychologist, 41(1), 19-31, doi: 10.1207/s15326985ep4101_4.
Wang, Q., Pomerantz, E. M., & Chen, H. C. (2007). The role of parents’ control in early adolescents’ psychological functioning: A longitudinal investigation in the United States and China. Child Development, 78(5), 1592-1610, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01085.x.
Won, S., & Yu, S. L. (2018). Relations of perceived parental autonomy support and control with adolescents’ academic time management and procrastination. Learning and Individual Differences, 61, 205-215, doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2017.12.001.
Yu, K., & Martin, A. J. (2014). Personal best (PB) and ‘classic’ achievement goals in the Chinese context: Their role in predicting academic motivation, engagement and buoyancy. Educational Psychology, 34(5), 635-658, doi: 10.1080/01443410.2014.895297.

[1]	李嘉欣, 雒瑞帆, 封洪敏, 司继伟. 初中生感知到的同伴支持与数学学习投入—基于变量为中心和个体为中心的分析[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(5): 629-636.
[2]	鲍旭辉, 黄杰, 李娜, 李健军, 李亚红. 主动性人格对学习投入的影响：领悟社会支持和积极情绪的链式中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(4): 508-514.
[3]	黄杰, 朱丹, 周丽敏, 刘望. 核心自我评价的代际传递：父母支持和子女基本心理需要满足的链式中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(4): 515-521.
[4]	岳鹏飞, 胡文丽, 张嘉鑫, 史梦梦. 粗暴养育与中学生学习投入：状态焦虑与性别的作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(2): 226-232.
[5]	蔡林, 贾绪计. 学业自我效能感与在线学习投入的关系：学习动机和心流体验的链式中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(6): 805-811.
[6]	黄熙彤, 张敏强, 方俊燕, 李拓宇, 房燕, 甘露. 家长投入对子女学业成绩的影响：有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(5): 666-672.
[7]	蒋舒阳, 刘儒德, 甄瑞, 洪伟, 金芳凯. 小学生能力观对数学学习投入的影响：学业控制感和期望的中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2018, 16(4): 490-496.
[8]	魏华, 周宗奎, 张永欣, 丁倩. 压力与网络成瘾的关系：家庭支持和朋友支持的调节作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2018, 16(2): 266-271.
[9]	雷玉菊, 张冬静, 牛更枫, 胡祥恩,. 网络学习中学习者个人特征对学习投入的影响：一个有调节的中介效应模型*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2017, 15(2): 181-188.
[10]	魏军，刘儒德，何伊丽，唐铭，邸妙词，庄鸿娟. 小学生学习坚持性和学习投入在效能感、内在价值与学业成就关系中的中介作用^*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2014, 12(3): 326-332.