基于同义关联的句子错误记忆：发展性逆转现象及句式效应

心理与行为研究 ›› 2020, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (3): 332-338.

基于同义关联的句子错误记忆：发展性逆转现象及句式效应

屈晓兰¹, 曾萍², 王思非³

1. 湖南第一师范学院教育科学学院，儿童心理发育与脑认知科学湖南省重点实验室，长沙 410205;
2. 长沙市华夏实验学校，长沙 410100;
3. 泉州市鲤城区第二实验小学，泉州 362000

收稿日期:2018-09-02 出版日期:2020-05-20 发布日期:2020-07-17
通讯作者: 屈晓兰，E-mail：quxiaolanhy@163.com
基金资助:
湖南省自然科学基金项目（2018JJ2075）；湖南省重点实验室项目（2019TP1032）

False Memories of Sentences Based on Synonymous Relevance: The Developmental Reversal and the Effect of Chinese Sentence Patterns

QU Xiaolan¹, ZENG Ping², WANG Sifei³

1. Hunan Key Laboratory of Children’s Psychological Development and Brain Cognitive Science, College of Education Science, Hunan First Normal University, Changsha 410205;
2. Changsha Huaxia Experimental School, Changsha 410100;
3. The Second Experimental Primary School of Licheng, Quanzhou 362000

Received:2018-09-02 Online:2020-05-20 Published:2020-07-17

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 以汉语把字句和被字句为材料，采用学习-再认方式，考察基于同义关联的句子错误记忆及其发展性逆转现象和句式效应。实验1结果发现高二和初二校正后的关键诱饵句错误再认率显著高于小学五年级，把字关键诱饵句校正后的错误再认率显著高于被字句，表明基于同义关联的句子错误记忆存在发展性逆转现象和句式效应。实验2结果发现三个年级关键诱饵句与无关句的错误再认率差异均不显著，表明去除同义关联后，句子错误记忆现象被抑制。结果表明，同义关联能诱发句子错误记忆，且句子错误记忆存在发展性逆转现象和句式效应。

关键词: 句子错误记忆, 发展性逆转现象, 句式效应

Abstract: The phenomena of false memories in sentences based on synonymous relevance were explored by using the materials of Chinese Ba- and Bei-sentences and the learning-recognition paradigm in two experiments. The results of Experiment 1 showed that the corrected rates of false recognition for lure sentences of Grade 2 students in junior middle school and Grade 2 students in senior high school were significantly higher than those of Grade 5 students in elementary school whereas no such differences were found between the former two age groups. Meanwhile, the corrected rates of false recognition of Ba-sentences were significantly higher than those of Bei-sentences. These results indicated that false memories in sentences could be induced by synonymous relevance, along with the developmental reversal and effect of sentence patterns in false memories. The results of Experiment 2 showed that there was no difference in rates of false recognition between lure sentences and no-relevance sentences in all participants. These results indicated that false memories in sentences could be eliminated when synonymous relevance of sentences was deducted. Several conclusions have been drawn as follows: on the basis of synonymous relevance, developmental reversals in false memories could take place and false memory of sentences could be significantly influenced by the patterns of Chinese sentences.

Key words: false memory of sentences, developmental reversal, effect of sentence pattern

中图分类号:

B844.1

屈晓兰, 曾萍, 王思非. 基于同义关联的句子错误记忆：发展性逆转现象及句式效应[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(3): 332-338.

QU Xiaolan, ZENG Ping, WANG Sifei. False Memories of Sentences Based on Synonymous Relevance: The Developmental Reversal and the Effect of Chinese Sentence Patterns[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2020, 18(3): 332-338.

参考文献

范晓. (2010). 论句式意义. 汉语学报, (3), 2-12
郭秀艳, 唐菁华, 李荆广. (2007). 汉字错误记忆的形、音编码差异研究. 心理与行为研究, 5(2), 86-92
江荣焕, 李晓东. (2015). 错误记忆的发展性逆转: 为什么越长大越易“错”? 心理科学进展, 23(8), 1371-1379.
姜有顺. (2018). 基于构式语法的汉语母语者和二语者“把”字句意义表征研究. 解放军外国语学院学报, 41(3), 60-67
李存龙. (2008). 形合意合与英汉句法结构对比研究. 青海师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), (5), 122-125
李宏英, 隋光远. (2003). 错误记忆研究综述. 心理科学, 26(3), 512-514, 518, doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-6981.2003.03.035
刘颂浩. (2018). “把”字句习得研究中的两个问题. 华文教学与研究, (2), 13-19, doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8174.2018.02.002
屈晓兰, 陈向阳, 钟毅平. (2010). 文本阅读理解中精加工推理及错误记忆探讨. 心理与行为研究, 8(4), 307-311, 318
屈晓兰, 凌宇, 孟红, 陈屈峰. (2017). 儿童句子错误记忆: 发展性逆转现象及精加工推理效应. 心理发展与教育, 33(3), 265-272
宋晓辉, 王楠. (2019). 语用视角下论把字句与被字句. 文学教育(上), (8), 162-163
孙文梅, 刘海伦. (2013). 汉语双字词语音关联对错误记忆的影响. 心理科学, 36(6), 1388-1392
王欣. (2013). 把字句和被字句的类型逻辑语法处理方案. 烟台大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 26(3), 113-117
吴增欣, 吴平. (2010). “把”字句和“被”字句的语义差异. 安庆师范学院学报(社会科学版), 29(10), 108-112
颜力涛. (2015). 汉语“物对人”与“物对物”模式被字句的理想认知模式问题. 社会科学论坛, (1), 42-48
张伯江. (2000). 论“把”字句的句式语义. 语言研究, (1), 28-40
张豫峰. (2006). 现代汉语句子研究. 上海: 学林出版社.
周楚, 苏曼, 周冲, 杨艳, 席雅琪, 董群. (2018). 想象膨胀范式下错误记忆的老化效应. 心理学报, 50(12), 1369-1380
周国光. (1994). 试析汉语被动句的习得机制. 世界汉语教学, 27(1), 30-36
Brainerd, C. J., & Reyna, V. F. (2007). Explaining developmental reversals in false memory. Psychological Science, 18(5), 442-448, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01919.x.
Brainerd, C. J., Reyna, V. F., & Ceci, S. J. (2008). Developmental reversals in false memory: A review of data and theory. Psychological Bulletin, 134(3), 343-382, doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.134.3.343.
Brainerd, C. J., Reyna, V. F., & Forrest, T. J. (2002). Are young children susceptible to the false-memory illusion? Child Development, 73(5), 1363-1377, doi: 10.1111/1467-8624.00477.
Gallo, D. A. (2010). False memories and fantastic beliefs: 15 years of the DRM illusion. Memory & Cognition, 38(7), 833-848.
Liben, L. S., & Posnansky, C. J. (1977). Inferences on inference: The effects of age, transitive ability, memory load, and lexical factors. Child Development, 48(4), 1490-1497, doi: 10.2307/1128511.
Montefinese, M., Zannino, G. D., & Ambrosini, E. (2015). Semantic similarity between old and new items produces false alarms in recognition memory. Psychological Research, 79(5), 785-794, doi: 10.1007/s00426-014-0615-z.
Roediger, H. L., Ⅲ, & McDermott, K. B. (1995). Creating false memories: Remembering words not presented in lists. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 21(4), 803-814.
Schacter, D. L., Verfaellie, M., & Pradere, D. (1996). The neuropsychology of memory illusions: False recall and recognition in amnesic patients. Journal of Memory and Language, 35(2), 319-334, doi: 10.1006/jmla.1996.0018.

[1]	吴旻, 孙丽萍, 梁丽婵, 边玉芳. 农村小学寄宿生心理资本的异质性及其社会适应：基于潜在剖面分析的证据[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(2): 186-192.
[2]	谭千保, 李佳圆, 刘旭. 累积生态风险对农村初中生攻击行为的影响：有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(4): 489-495.
[3]	曾天德, 李杰, 陈顺森. 心理理论对城区流动儿童心理社会能力的影响机制：双中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2019, 17(6): 846-853.
[4]	郝嘉佳, 陈英和, 刘拓, 白学军. 儿童青少年一般思维能力测验的编制和初步应用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2019, 17(5): 620-626.
[5]	李利平, 伍新春, 封安生, 陈芸. 学龄儿童早期汉语默读流畅的发展轨迹及影响因素[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2019, 17(5): 627-633.
[6]	李毅, 谭婷. 家庭经济资本和中小学生阅读兴趣的关系：家庭文化资本的中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2019, 17(4): 520-528,576.
[7]	李泉, 廖丽莉, 廉彬, 冯廷勇. 执行功能对4岁幼儿情绪胜任力的影响：语言的中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2019, 17(3): 340-347.
[8]	郑治国, 刘建平, 董圣鸿, 蒋艳, 廖华. 小学高年级学生父母教养方式与学业拖延的关系：时间管理倾向的中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2018, 16(6): 786-792.
[9]	李泉, 宋武, 廉彬, 冯廷勇. 语言影响4~6岁彝、白、纳西族儿童延迟满足能力发展[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2018, 16(5): 657-664.
[10]	赵鸣, 黄莹莹, 刘涛. 4-6岁儿童言语理解中世界知识运用能力的发展[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2018, 16(2): 202-208.
[11]	李虹, 王茹婧, 倪士光. 认同整合促进流动儿童文化适应：文化框架转换的解释[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2018, 16(1): 58-65.
[12]	陈晓燕, 莫秀锋, 张玲玲. 同伴接纳对儿童公平分配行为的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2017, 15(6): 774-780.
[13]	刘双, 张向葵. 幼儿物体掌控动机的发展特点研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2017, 15(5): 633-642.
[14]	伍秋萍, 郑佩芸, 刘相辉. 3-12岁儿童对汉语声、韵、调的意识与早期阅读的关系：基于元分析的证据[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2017, 15(5): 643-653.
[15]	毛晓翎, 王分分, 曹静, 祝卓宏. 多范例训练提升儿童隐喻理解能力的干预性研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2017, 15(5): 675-682.