合作中责任比较和分配评价差异的ERPs研究

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为了考察在合作任务中，个体对任务结果的比较阶段及分配阶段的脑电变化，本研究采用事件相关电位技术，考察三个任务变量：情境（贡献、责任）、比较（大、小）、分配（贡献原则、平均原则）对合作结果评价的影响。结果发现，责任比贡献诱发更大的FRN和更小的P3；贡献大小诱发的FRN和P3无差异，但责任大比责任小诱发更大的FRN和更小的P3。分配评价阶段，罚金反馈比奖金反馈诱发更大的FRN，基于贡献（责任）分配比基于平均分配的方案诱发出更大的P3。这表明合作背景中仅在责任比较中表现出自我服务偏向，在分配评价阶段未显示自我服务偏向。

关键词: 合作, 责任比较, 贡献原则, 事件相关电位

Abstract: Using the event-related potential (ERP) technique, the present study investigated how context-based social comparison and distribution affect individuals’ outcome evaluation in a cooperative task and their associated EEG responses. Three task variables including context (contribution vs. responsibility), comparison (more vs. less) and distributive principle (equity vs. equality) were manipulated. The results revealed that compared to the contribution based context, responsibility induced larger FRN and smaller P3; furthermore, there was no difference in terms of FRN and P3 induced by more or less contribution. However, the more responsibility condition triggered larger FRN and smaller P3 than the less responsibility condition. In the distribution phase, feedback by monetary penalty elicited larger FRN than feedback by monetary rewards, and the equity based principle elicited larger P3 than the equality based principle. These results indicate that self-service bias appears only in the responsibility comparison rather than the distributive evaluation.

Key words: cooperation, responsibility comparison, equity based principle, ERPs

中图分类号:

B842

陈衍, 江婷, 李玮, 陈取麟, 潘运, 胡思瑶. 合作中责任比较和分配评价差异的ERPs研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(2): 152-159.

CHEN Yan, JIANG Ting, LI Wei, CHEN Qulin, PAN Yun, HU Siyao. Differences of Responsibility Comparison and Distribution Evaluation in Cooperation: An ERPs study[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2021, 19(2): 152-159.

参考文献

李琎, 孙宇, 杨子鹿, 钟毅平. (2020). 社会价值取向对自我社会奖赏加工的影响——来自ERPs的证据. 心理学报, 52(6), 786–800
李鹏. (2012). 社会责任感的认知神经机制研究(博士学位论文), 西南大学, 重庆.
窦炜, 曲璐璐, 曲琛. (2014). 社会比较对合作任务结果评价的影响: 来自ERP的证据. 心理学报, 46(3), 405–414
王笑楠, 苏彦捷. (2019). 平均分配还是按劳分配: 学龄儿童分配模式的发展及影响因素. 心理学探新, 39(6), 563–570
吴燕, 周晓林. (2012). 公平加工的情境依赖性: 来自ERP的证据. 心理学报, 44(6), 797–806
徐富明, 黄龙, 沈友田, 张凤华, 向玲. (2019). 过程公平、结果公平和任务角色对公平判断的影响. 中国临床心理学杂志, 27(5), 874–877
占斌, 杜碧煊, 陈绍华, 李轶文, 何蔚祺, 罗文波. (2020). 道德判断影响大脑对公平行为的早期评价. 科学通报, 65(19), 1985–1995
Alexander, W. H., & Brown, J. W. (2010). Computational models of performance monitoring and cognitive control. Topics in Cognitive Science, 2(4), 658–677, doi: 10.1111/j.1756-8765.2010.01085.x.
Beyer, F., Sidarus, N., Bonicalzi, S., & Haggard, P. (2017). Beyond self-serving bias: Diffusion of responsibility reduces sense of agency and outcome monitoring. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 12(1), 138–145, doi: 10.1093/scan/nsw160.
Bland, A. R., Roiser, J. P., Mehta, M. A., Schei, T., Sahakian, B. J., Robbins, T. W., & Elliott, R. (2017). Cooperative behavior in the ultimatum game and prisoner’s dilemma depends on players’ contributions. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1017, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01017.
Ernst, B., & Steinhauser, M. (2020). The effect of feedback novelty on neural correlates of feedback processing. Brain and Cognition, 144, 105610, doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2020.105610.
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A. G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191, doi: 10.3758/BF03193146.
Feng, C. L., Feng, X., Wang, L., Wang, L. L., Gu, R. L., Ni, A. P., … Luo, Y. J. (2019). The neural signatures of egocentric bias in normative decision-making. Brain Imaging and Behavior, 13(3), 685–698, doi: 10.1007/s11682-018-9893-1.
Feng, C. L., Luo, Y., Gu, R. L., Broster, L. S., Shen, X. Y., Tian, T. X., … Krueger, F. (2013). The flexible fairness: Equality, earned entitlement, and self-interest. PLoS One, 8(9), e73106, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0073106.
Ferdinand, N. K., Mecklinger, A., Kray, J., & Gehring, W. J. (2012). The processing of unexpected positive response outcomes in the mediofrontal cortex. The Journal of Neuroscience, 32(35), 12087–12092, doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1410-12.2012.
Guo, X. Y., Zheng, L., Cheng, X. M., Chen, M. H., Zhu, L., Li, J. Q., … Yang, Z. L. (2014). Neural responses to unfairness and fairness depend on self-contribution to the income. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 9(10), 1498–1505, doi: 10.1093/scan/nst131.
Krigolson, O. E. (2018). Event-related brain potentials and the study of reward processing: Methodological considerations. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 132, 175–183, doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2017.11.007.
Kroemer, N. B., Guevara, A., Teodorescu, I. C., Wuttig, F., Kobiella, A., & Smolka, M. N. (2014). Balancing reward and work: Anticipatory brain activation in NACC and VTA predict effort differentially. NeuroImage, 102, 510–519, doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.07.060.
Leib, M., Pittarello, A., Gordon-Hecker, T., Shalvi, S., & Roskes, M. (2019). Loss framing increases self-serving mistakes (but does not alter attention). Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 85, 103880, doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2019.103880.
Leng, Y., & Zhou, X. L. (2010). Modulation of the brain activity in outcome evaluation by interpersonal relationship: An ERP study. Neuropsychologia, 48(2), 448–455, doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.10.002.
Li, P., Yin, H., Xu, H. Y., Lei, Y., & Li, H. (2018). Disappearance of self-serving bias: Reward positivity reflects performance monitoring modulated by responsibility attribution in a two-person cooperative task. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 133, 17–27, doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2018.09.002.
Luck, S. J., & Gaspelin, N. (2017). How to get statistically significant effects in any ERP experiment (and why you shouldn’t). Psychophysiology, 54(1), 146–157, doi: 10.1111/psyp.12639.
Ma, Q. G., Hu, Y., Jiang, S. S., & Meng, L. (2015). The undermining effect of facial attractiveness on brain responses to fairness in the ultimatum game: An ERP study. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 9, 77.
Nieuwenhuis, S., Aston-Jones, G., & Cohen, J. D. (2005). Decision making, the P3, and the locus coeruleus-norepinephrine system. Psychological Bulletin, 131(4), 510–532, doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.131.4.510.
Olofsson, J. K., Nordin, S., Sequeira, H., & Polich, J. (2008). Affective picture processing: An integrative review of ERP findings. Biological Psychology, 77(3), 247–265, doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2007.11.006.
Spaans, J. P., Peters, S., & Crone, E. A. (2020). Neural reward related-reactions to monetar gains for self and charity are associated with donating behavior in adolescence. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 15(2), 151–163, doi: 10.1093/scan/nsaa027.
Wang, Y. F., Zheng, L., Wang, C. G., & Guo, X. Y. (2020). Attenuated self-serving bias in people with internet gaming disorder is related to altered neural activity in subcortical-cortical midline structures. BMC Psychiatry, 20, 512, doi: 10.1186/s12888-020-02914-4.
Yamagishi, T., Matsumoto, Y., Kiyonari, T., Takagishi, H., Li, Y., Kanai, R., & Sakagami, M. (2017). Response time in economic games reflects different types of decision conflict for prosocial and proself individuals. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 114(24), 6394–6399, doi: 10.1073/pnas.1608877114.
Yeung, N., Holroyd, C. B., & Cohen, J. D. (2005). ERP correlates of feedback and reward processing in the presence and absence of response choice. Cerebral Cortex, 15(5), 535–544, doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhh153.
Yuan, J. J., Long, Q. S., Li, X., Deng, Z. Y., Ma, B., Chen, S. D., & Yang, J. M. (2019). Regulatory effect of implicit acceptance during outcome evaluation: The temporal dynamics in an event-related potential study. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 141, 37–44, doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2019.05.003.
Zuckerman, M. (1979). Attribution of success and failure revisited, or: The motivational bias is alive and well in attribution theory. Journal of Personality, 47(2), 245–287, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1979.tb00202.x.

[1]	金花, 严世振, 单金磊, 刘婷. 面孔生命性加工的时间进程：ERP研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(5): 577-584.
[2]	王欣竹, 邹何辉, 郝娜, 黄瑶, 吴琴, 崔丽莹. 抑制还是补偿？尴尬情绪对初中生合作倾向和行为的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(4): 549-555.
[3]	邓颜彦, 郭成. 合作与竞争关系中社会比较对高中生认知信任与情感信任的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(4): 556-562.
[4]	贾磊, 陆家豪, 王逸, 张常洁. 权力概念隐喻映射中的冲突控制：特征与过程[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(3): 417-423.
[5]	宋娟, 杜梦, 连涛, 张倩. 积极怀旧情绪对疼痛共情影响的ERP研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(4): 466-473.
[6]	李骋诗, 白学军, 王永胜. 映射具体性和语境线索对新颖隐喻加工的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(2): 153-160.
[7]	唐丹丹, 傅瑜, 吴燕京, 朱海. 视觉空间工作记忆组间差异的神经机制[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(2): 176-184.
[8]	郑文倩, 陈云云, 宋国萍, 徐敏, 白正月, 李兰洁. 亲社会视频游戏中的合作对博弈决策中合作行为的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(1): 85-91.
[9]	曾庆, 郑希付. 高低厌恶敏感性个体对不同情绪刺激的注意时程: 来自ERP研究的证据[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2019, 17(6): 743-749.
[10]	贾丽萍, 卢国华, 宋玉萍, 李福洪. 负性情绪启动对特质焦虑个体行为抑制的影响机制[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2019, 17(5): 604-612.
[11]	宋娟, 魏艳秋, 杜梦, 解鸿宇, 连涛, 胡亚奇, 马欧. 眼部情绪信息对疼痛共情影响的ERP研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2019, 17(3): 326-332,347.
[12]	凌晓丽, 孙鹏. 损失情境下社会困境中的合作行为[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2019, 17(3): 377-383.
[13]	赵小淋, 张燕, 王建峰. 情绪对不同外倾水平个体行为抑制的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2018, 16(4): 449-457.
[14]	侯娟, 侯莹莹, 陈双艺, 方晓义. 网络成瘾者工作记忆能力的ERP研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2018, 16(3): 384-393.
[15]	周详, 张泽宇, 曾晖. 长期合作学习小组中的集体智慧及其影响因素研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2018, 16(2): 231-237.