情绪效价和动机情绪对创造力的影响

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 以图片材料为情绪启动刺激，以多用途测验（AUT）为创造力测量工具，探究情绪与创造力的关系。采用2（情绪效价类型：积极、消极）×2（动机情绪类型：高生存动机、低生存动机）的被试间设计，结果表明：情绪效价主效应显著，积极情绪组的创造力流畅性、灵活性、新颖性及总分显著高于消极情绪组；动机情绪主效应显著，低生存动机情绪组的创造力流畅性、灵活性及总分显著高于高生存动机情绪组；情绪效价和动机情绪的交互作用不显著。研究表明，积极情绪比消极情绪引发更多的创造性活动；低生存动机情绪下的创造力水平高于高生存动机情绪下的创造力水平；情绪效价与动机情绪对创造力的影响不存在交互作用。

关键词: 情绪效价, 生存动机, 情绪图片, 创造力

Abstract: This study explored the correlation between emotion and creativity by using pictures as the stimulus for emotional priming and Alternate Uses Test as a tool for measuring creativity. A 2 (emotional valence type: positive, negative) × 2 (motivational emotion types: high-survival motivation, low-survival motivation) design was used to test the correlation between emotional valence and motivational emotion. The results showed that the main effect of emotional valence was significant. The fluency, flexibility, novelty and total score of the positive emotions group were significantly higher than those of the negative emotions group. The results also showed that the creativity fluency, flexibility and total score of the low-survival motivational emotion were significantly higher than those of the high-survival motivational emotion, and thus the main effect of motivational emotion was significant. We also realized that the interaction between emotional valence and motivational emotion was not significant. Taken together, our findings indicate that positive emotions lead to more creative activities than negative emotions. The level of creativity under low-survival motivational emotion is higher than that under high-survival motivational emotion, but there is no interaction between emotional valence and motivational emotion on creativity.

Key words: emotional valence, survival motivation, emotional pictures, creativity

中图分类号:

B842

杜夏雨, 史从戎, 赵子仪, 薛婷. 情绪效价和动机情绪对创造力的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(2): 160-165.

DU Xiayu, SHI Congrong, ZHAO Ziyi, XUE Ting. The Influence of Emotional Valence and Motivational Emotion on Creativity[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2021, 19(2): 160-165.

参考文献

蒋一聪. (2018). 不同动机强度的趋–避情绪对发散性思维的影响 (硕士学位论文). 浙江师范大学, 杭州.
孟昭兰. (1985). 当代情绪理论的发展. 心理学报, 17(2), 97–103
王天力. (2018). 一般创造力: 概念内涵、存在机理与影响因素. 黄河科技大学学报, 20(6), 83–89
杨丽珠, 董光恒, 金欣俐. (2007). 积极情绪和消极情绪的大脑反应差异研究综述. 心理与行为研究, 5(3), 224–228
姚海娟, 王金霞, 苏清丽, 白学军. (2018). 具身情绪与创造性思维: 情境性调节定向的调节作用. 心理与行为研究, 16(4), 441–448, doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-0628.2018.04.002
张克, 杜秀敏, 董晓飞. (2018). 社会动机与“自我–他人”对创造性表现的影响. 心理与行为研究, 16(3), 414–420, doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-0628.2018.03.019
邹吉林, 张小聪, 张环, 于靓, 周仁来. (2011). 超越效价和唤醒——情绪的动机维度模型述评. 心理科学进展, 19(9), 1339–1346
Baas, M., De Dreu, C. K. W., & Nijstad, B. A. (2011). When prevention promotes creativity: The role of mood, regulatory focus, and regulatory closure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100(5), 794–809, doi: 10.1037/a0022981.
Baas, M., Roskes, M., Koch, S., Cheng, Y. J., & De Dreu, C. K. W. (2019). Why social threat motivates malevolent creativity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 45(11), 1590–1602, doi: 10.1177/0146167219838551.
Bechtoldt, M. N., De Dreu, C. K. W., Nijstad, B. A., & Choi, H. S. (2010). Motivated information processing, social tuning, and group creativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99(4), 622–637, doi: 10.1037/a0019386.
Carver, C. S., & Harmon-Jones, E. (2009). Anger is an approach-related affect: Evidence and implications. Psychological Bulletin, 135(2), 183–204, doi: 10.1037/a0013965.
De Dreu, C. K. W., Baas, M., & Nijstad, B. A. (2008). Hedonic tone and activation level in the mood-creativity link: Toward a dual pathway to creativity model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94(5), 739–756, doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.94.5.739.
Fitri, I., Aulia, T. B., & Fuady, M. (2020). The effect of public space availability on children’s creativity (Case study: Taman Sari kota Banda Aceh). IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 933, 012013, doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/933/1/012013.
Fredrickson, B. L. (2001). The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. American Psychologist, 56(3), 218–226, doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.56.3.218.
Friedman, R. S., & Förster, J. (2001). The effects of promotion and prevention cues on creativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(6), 1001–1013, doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.81.6.1001.
Friedman, R. S., & Förster, J. (2002). The influence of approach and avoidance motor actions on creative cognition. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38(1), 41–55, doi: 10.1006/jesp.2001.1488.
Gable, P. A., & Harmon-Jones, E. (2008). Approach-motivated positive affect reduces breadth of attention. Psychological Science, 19(5), 476–482, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02112.x.
Gable, P. A., & Harmon-Jones, E. (2010a). The motivational dimensional model of affect: Implications for breadth of attention, memory, and cognitive categorisation. Cognition & Emotion, 24(2), 322–337.
Gable, P. A., & Harmon-Jones, E. (2010b). The blues broaden, but the nasty narrows: Attentional consequences of negative affects low and high in motivational intensity. Psychological Science, 21(2), 211–215, doi: 10.1177/0956797609359622.
Gasper, K. (2003). When necessity is the mother of invention: Mood and problem solving. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39(3), 248–262, doi: 10.1016/S0022-1031(03)00023-4.
Grawitch, M. J., Munz, D. C., & Kramer, T. J. (2003). Effects of member mood states on creative performance in temporary workgroups. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 7(1), 41–54, doi: 10.1037/1089-2699.7.1.41.
Harmon-Jones, E. (2004). On the relationship of frontal brain activity and anger: Examining the role of attitude toward anger. Cognition and Emotion, 18(3), 337–361, doi: 10.1080/02699930341000059.
Harmon-Jones, E., & Gable, P. A. (2008). Incorporating motivational intensity and direction into the study of emotions: Implications for brain mechanisms of emotion and cognition-emotion interactions. Netherlands Journal of Psychology, 64(4), 132–142, doi: 10.1007/BF03076416.
Hennessey, B. A., & Amabile, T. M. (2010). Creativity. Annual Review of Psychology, 61(1), 569–598, doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.100416.
Levine, L. J., & Edelstein, R. S. (2009). Emotion and memory narrowing: A review and goal-relevance approach. Cognition and Emotion, 23(5), 833–875, doi: 10.1080/02699930902738863.
Mastria, S., Agnoli, S., & Corazza, G. E. (2019). How does emotion influence the creativity evaluation of exogenous alternative ideas? PLoS ONE, 14(7), e0219298, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0219298.
Ritter, S. M., & Ferguson, S. (2017). Happy creativity: Listening to happy music facilitates divergent thinking. PLoS ONE, 12(9), e0182210, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0182210.
Roskes, M., De Dreu, C. K. W., & Nijstad, B. A. (2012). Necessity is the mother of invention: Avoidance motivation stimulates creativity through cognitive effort. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103(2), 242–256, doi: 10.1037/a0028442.
Russell, J. A. (1980). A circumplex model of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(6), 1161–1178, doi: 10.1037/h0077714.
Shalley, C. E., Zhou, J., & Oldham, G. R. (2004). The effects of personal and contextual characteristics on creativity: Where should we go from here? Journal of Management, 30(6), 933–958, doi: 10.1016/j.jm.2004.06.007.
Shao, Y., Nijstad, B. A., & Täuber, S. (2018). Linking self-construal to creativity: The role of approach motivation and cognitive flexibility. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1929, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01929.
Sutton, S. K., & Davidson, R. J. (1997). Prefrontal brain asymmetry: A biological substrate of the behavioral approach and inhibition systems. Psychological Science, 8(3), 204–210, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1997.tb00413.x.

[1]	李娇娇, 刘晓冰, 裴丹丹, 徐碧波, 尹锡杨. 情绪智力对大学生恶意创造力的影响：一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(4): 563-569.
[2]	周爱保, 赵海燕, 夏瑞雪, 袁月, 贾婷婷, 谢珮. 不同语义水平下参照方式、情绪效价和特质评价对记忆的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(2): 145-152.
[3]	赵思怡, 李莹, 王悦. 情绪效价−空间动作隐喻联结对成人和儿童外语情绪词学习的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(2): 153-159.
[4]	李永杰, 刘春晖, 金花. 高创造力个体的群体差异性研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(4): 440-445.
[5]	李昂, 张景焕. 亲子关系和移情对青少年社会创造力的预测：友谊质量的中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(4): 496-502.
[6]	王战旗, 张兴利. 创造力成就问卷的中文修订[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(3): 390-397.
[7]	巩振兴, 张莹, 李新敏, 张甜甜. 求同方能存异：上下级学习目标导向契合对创造力的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(1): 128-135.
[8]	张克, 杜秀敏, 董晓飞. 社会动机与“自我-他人”对创造性表现的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2018, 16(3): 414-420.
[9]	尹奎, 邢璐, 王崇锋. 研究生科研经历、创造力与科研职业抱负的关系：学习目标导向的调节作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2017, 15(6): 799-806.
[10]	黄时华, 曾艳芬, 张卫. 情绪效价对不同抑郁水平大学生的反应性控制和主动性控制的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2017, 15(6): 807-814.
[11]	金童林, 陆桂芝, 张璐, 李肖肖, 张丽. 个人-组织契合与员工创造力的关系：有中介的调节模型[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2017, 15(6): 846-852.
[12]	张锋, 赵国祥, 孙真真. 控制感对聋哑人的情绪图片时距知觉的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2017, 15(5): 593-598.
[13]	张鹏程, 丁梦夏, 王灿明. 积极情绪体验对创造力影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2017, 15(5): 613-618.
[14]	庞维国，韩建涛，徐晓波，林崇德. “要有创造性”指导语效应及其对创造性教学的启示[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2016, 14(5): 701-708.
[15]	蔺素琴,申超男,段海军,胡卫平. 创造力的领域性研究进展：从对立到融合的转向[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2016, 14(3): 426-432.