相对剥夺感与大学生社交焦虑的关系：一个有调节的中介模型

doi:10.12139/j.1672-0628.2023.01.010

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

采用问卷法对湖北省674 名大学生进行调查，探讨了相对剥夺感影响社交焦虑的路径，考察了核心自我评价的中介作用和自我关注的调节作用。结果发现：(1)相对剥夺感可以正向预测大学生社交焦虑；(2)核心自我评价在大学生相对剥夺感与社交焦虑之间起中介作用；(3)自我关注调节了核心自我评价中介效应的后半段路径，即随着自我关注程度提高，核心自我评价对社交焦虑的预测作用增强。

关键词: 相对剥夺感, 核心自我评价, 自我关注, 社交焦虑

Abstract:

A questionnaire survey was conducted among 674 college students in Hubei Province to explore the influence of relative deprivation on social anxiety, focusing on the mediating role of core self-evaluation and the moderating role of self-focused attention. The results showed that: 1) relative deprivation positively predicted college students’ social anxiety; 2) core self-evaluation played a partial mediating role between relative deprivation and social anxiety; 3) self-focused attention moderated the second half of the mediation effect of core self-evaluation, specifically, the predictive effect of core self-evaluation on social anxiety was enhanced with the increase of self-focused attention.

Key words: relative deprivation, core self-evaluation, self-focused attention, social anxiety

中图分类号:

B844

陈姣, 熊猛. 相对剥夺感与大学生社交焦虑的关系：一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2023, 21(1): 65-71.

Jiao CHEN, Meng XIONG. Effects of Relative Deprivation on College Students’ Social Anxiety: A Moderated Mediating Model[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2023, 21(1): 65-71.

图/表 7

参考文献

	陈英敏, 李迎丽, 肖胜, 高玉洁, 邓秋月, 高峰强高中生羞怯与学校适应: 一个有调节的中介模型. 心理学探新, 2019, 39 (6): 527- 532.
	丁倩, 梁一冰, 张永欣, 黄凤低阶层大学生贫富归因对心理特权的影响: 相对剥夺感的中介作用. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2019, 27 (5): 1041- 1044.
	杜建政, 张翔, 赵燕核心自我评价的结构验证及其量表修订. 心理研究, 2012, 5 (3): 54- 60. DOI
	侯娟, 朱英格, 方晓义手机成瘾与抑郁: 社交焦虑和负性情绪信息注意偏向的多重中介作用. 心理学报, 2021, 53 (4): 362- 373.
	孔莲, 崔馨月, 田录梅微信使用强度与大学生自尊之间的关系: 上行社会比较和好友亲密度的作用. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37 (4): 576- 583.
	黎建斌, 聂衍刚核心自我评价研究的反思与展望. 心理科学进展, 2010, 18 (12): 1848- 1857.
	廖化化, 黄蕾,胡斌资源保存理论在组织行为学中的应用: 演变与挑战. 心理科学进展, 2022, 30 (2): 449- 463. DOI
	刘丽红上行社会比较与社交焦虑的关系: 核心自我评价和内外倾性的作用. 山西大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2021, 44 (6): 131- 136.
	罗柳芬, 涂冬波, 吴雪扬, 蔡艳大学生社交焦虑的计算机化自适应测验开发: CAT-SA. 心理科学, 2019, 42 (6): 1485- 1492.
	马皑相对剥夺感与社会适应方式: 中介效应和调节效应. 心理学报, 2012, 44 (3): 377- 387.
	王凯, 张野校园排斥对初中生内外化问题的影响: 同伴关系与核心自我评价的中介作用. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36 (5): 594- 604.
	王雅芯, 刘亚男, 翟婧雅, 蔡济民, 陈祉妍. (2021). 2020年大学生心理健康状况与需求. 见傅小兰, 张侃 (主编), 中国国民心理健康发展报告 (2019–2020) (pp. 94–121). 北京: 社会科学文献出版社.
	王英杰, 李燕, 吴凡家庭功能与学前儿童行为问题的关系: 依恋回避和社交焦虑的多重中介作用. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37 (1): 76- 83.
	肖诗来. (2010). 父母教养方式、自我关注与大学生自我和谐的关系研究(硕士学位论文). 华东师范大学, 上海.
	熊猛, 刘若瑾, 叶一舵单亲家庭儿童相对剥夺感与心理适应的循环作用关系: 一项追踪研究. 心理学报, 2021, 53 (1): 67- 80.
	熊猛, 叶一舵相对剥夺感: 概念、测量、影响因素及作用. 心理科学进展, 2016, 24 (3): 438- 453.
	张永欣, 董思唯, 丁倩, 陈阳阳父母低头行为与青少年攻击行为: 一个双路径模型. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2022, 30 (1): 129- 133.
	Amiri, M., Taheri, E., Mohammadkhani, P., & Dolatshahi, B. The study of predictive model of social anxiety, based on behavioral inhibition and cognitive factors. Journal of Fundamentals of Mental Health, 2017, 19 (1): 45- 51.
	Asher, M., & Aderka, I. M. Gender differences in social anxiety disorder. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 2018, 74 (10): 1730- 1741. DOI
	Clark, D. M., & Wells, A. (1995). A cognitive model of social phobia. In R. G. Heimberg, M. R. Liebowitz, D. A. Hope, & F. R. Schneier (Eds.), Social phobia: Diagnosis, assessment, and treatment (pp. 69–93). New York: Guilford Press.
	Conrad, R., Forstner, A. J., Chung, M. L., Mücke, M., Geiser, F., Schumacher, J., & Carnehl, F. Significance of anger suppression and preoccupied attachment in social anxiety disorder: A cross-sectional study. BMC Psychiatry, 2021, 21 (1): 116. DOI
	Fergus, S., & Zimmerman, M. A. Adolescent reailience: A framework for understanding healthy development in the face of risk. Annual Review of Public Health, 2005, 26 (1): 399- 419. DOI
	Hayes, A. F., & Scharkow, M. The relative trustworthiness of inferential tests of the indirect effect in statistical mediation analysis. Psychological Science, 2013, 24 (10): 1918- 1927. DOI
	Hiller, T. S., Steffens, M. C., Ritter, V., & Stangier, U. On the context dependency of implicit self-esteem in social anxiety disorder. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 2017, 57, 118- 125. DOI
	Hobfoll, S. E., & Ford, J. S. (2007). Conservation of resources theory. In G. Fink (Ed.), Encyclopedia of stress (2nd ed., pp. 562−567). Oxford: Academic Press.
	Hobfoll, S. E., Halbesleben, J., Neveu, J. P., & Westman, M. Conservation of resources in the organizational context: The reality of resources and their consequences. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 2018, 5, 103- 128. DOI
	Ingram, R. E. Self-focused attention in clinical disorders: Review and a conceptual model. Psychological Bulletin, 1990, 107 (2): 156- 176. DOI
	Iverach, L., Rapee, R. M., Wong, Q. J. J., & Lowe, R. Maintenance of social anxiety in stuttering: A cognitive-behavioral model. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 2017, 26 (2): 540- 556. DOI
	Judge, T. A., & Bono, J. E. Relationship of core self-evaluations traits—self-esteem, generalized self-efficacy, locus of control, and emotional stability—with job satisfaction and job performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2001, 86 (1): 80- 92. DOI
	Judge, T. A., Locke, E. A., & Durham, C. C. The dispositional causes of job satisfaction: A core evaluations approach. Research in Organizational Behavior, 1997, 19, 151- 188.
	Kim, H., Callan, M. J., Gheorghiu, A. I., & Skylark, W. J. Social comparison processes in the experience of personal relative deprivation. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 2018, 48 (9): 519- 532. DOI
	Kuo, F. W., & Yang, S. C. In-group comparison is painful but meaningful: The moderator of classroom ethnic composition and the mediators of self-esteem and school belonging for upward comparisons. The Journal of Social Psychology, 2019, 159 (5): 531- 545. DOI
	Leigh, E., Chiu, K., & Clark, D. M. Self-focused attention and safety behaviours maintain social anxiety in adolescents: An experimental study. PLoS ONE, 2021, 16 (2): e0247703. DOI
	Leung, C. Y., Leung, G. M., & Schooling, C. M. Behavioral problem trajectories and self-esteem changes in relation with adolescent depressive symptoms: A longitudinal study. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 2018, 53 (7): 673- 684. DOI
	Leviston, Z., Dandy, J., Jetten, J., & Walker, I. The role of relative deprivation in majority-culture support for multiculturalism. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 2020, 50 (4): 228- 239. DOI
	Mattick, R. P., & Clarke, J. C. Development and validation of measures of social phobia scrutiny fear and social interaction anxiety. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 1998, 36 (4): 455- 470. DOI
	Morrison, A. S., & Heimberg, R. G. Social anxiety and social anxiety disorder. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 2013, 9, 249- 274. DOI
	Mummendey, A., Kessler, T., Klink, A., & Mielke, R. Strategies to cope with negative social identity: Predictions by social identity theory and relative deprivation theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1999, 76 (2): 229- 245. DOI
	Osborne, D., Sibley, C. G., & Sengupta, N. K. Income and neighbourhood-level inequality predict self-esteem and ethnic identity centrality through individual- and group-based relative deprivation: A multilevel path analysis. European Journal of Social Psychology, 2015, 45 (3): 368- 377. DOI
	Smith, H. J., Pettigrew, T. F., Pippin, G. M., & Bialosiewicz, S. Relative deprivation: A theoretical and meta-analytic review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2012, 16 (3): 203- 232. DOI
	Xiong, M., Chen, J., & Johnson, W. Relative deprivation and social anxiety among Chinese migrant children: Testing a moderated mediation model of perceived control and belief in a just world. Journal of Health Psychology, 2022, 37 (11): 2581- 2602. DOI
	Zeigler-Hill, V., Dahlen, E. R., & Madson, M. B. Self-esteem and alcohol use: Implications for aggressive behavior. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 2017, 15 (5): 1103- 1117. DOI

变量	M	SD	1	2	3
1.相对剥夺感	2.40	0.83
2.核心自我评价	3.42	0.61	−0.37**
3.自我关注	3.50	0.53	0.08*	0.00
4.社交焦虑	2.68	0.58	0.32**	−0.59**	0.13**

变量	M	SD	1	2	3
1.相对剥夺感	2.40	0.83
2.核心自我评价	3.42	0.61	−0.37**
3.自我关注	3.50	0.53	0.08*	0.00
4.社交焦虑	2.68	0.58	0.32**	−0.59**	0.13**

结果变量	预测变量	R	R²	F	β	t
社交焦虑		0.37	0.14	34.55***
	性别				0.41	5.27***
	年龄				−0.01	−0.28
	相对剥夺感				0.35	9.33***
核心自我评价		0.42	0.17	45.37***
	性别				−0.45	−5.96***
	年龄				−0.01	−0.03
	相对剥夺感				−0.39	−10.73***
社交焦虑		0.60	0.36	92.49***
	性别				0.17	2.52*
	年龄				−0.01	−0.34
	相对剥夺感				0.14	4.12***
	核心自我评价				−0.52	−15.16***

结果变量	预测变量	R	R²	F	β	t
社交焦虑		0.37	0.14	34.55***
	性别				0.41	5.27***
	年龄				−0.01	−0.28
	相对剥夺感				0.35	9.33***
核心自我评价		0.42	0.17	45.37***
	性别				−0.45	−5.96***
	年龄				−0.01	−0.03
	相对剥夺感				−0.39	−10.73***
社交焦虑		0.60	0.36	92.49***
	性别				0.17	2.52*
	年龄				−0.01	−0.34
	相对剥夺感				0.14	4.12***
	核心自我评价				−0.52	−15.16***

中介变量	间接效应值	Boot 标准误	Boot CI 下限	Boot CI 上限	相对中介效应
核心自我评价	0.20	0.03	0.16	0.25	57%