[1] Medin D L, Wattenmaker W D, Hampson S E. Family resem- blance, conceptual cohesiveness, and category construction. Cognitive Psychology, 1987, 19: 242~279 [2] Quinn P C, Eimas P D. Perceptual cues that permit categorical differentiation of animal species by infants. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1996, 63: 189~211 [3] Merriman W E, Schuster J M, Hager L. Are names ever mapp- ed onto preexisting categories? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 1991, 120: 288-300 [4] Regher E, Brooks L R. Category organization in free classifica- tion: The organizing effect of an array of stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 1995, 21: 347~363 [5] Krascrum R M, Andrews S. The effects of theories on children′s acquisition of family-resemblance categories. Child Development, 1998, 699(2): 333~346 [6] Murphy G L, Medin D L. The role of theories in conceptual coherence. Psychological Review, 1985, 92(3): 289~316 [7] Ahn W K, Marsh J K, Luhmann C C, et al. Effects of theory-based correlations on typicality judgements. Memory and Cognition, 2002, 30(1): 107~118 [8] Johnson M C. The role of conceptual structure and background knowledge in category learning. Dissertation abstracts interna- tional section B: the sciences and engineering, 1999, 59(11-B): 6085 [9] Spalding T L, Murphy G L. Effects of background knowledge on category construction. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 1996, 22(2): 525~538 [10] Kaplan A S, Murphy G L. The acquisition of category structure in unsupervised learning. Memory and Cognition, 1999, 27(4): 699~712 |