内隐序列学习表征方式的实验研究

心理与行为研究 ›› 2003, Vol. 1 ›› Issue (4): 288-292.

内隐序列学习表征方式的实验研究

吴国来,沈德立,白学军

天津师范大学心理与行为研究中心,天津 300074

收稿日期:2003-06-18 出版日期:2003-12-20 发布日期:2015-01-21
作者简介:吴国来,男,天津师范大学心理与行为研究中心博士生,河北保定师范专科学校教育系副教授。沈德立,男,天津师范大学心理与行为研究中心教授,博士生导师。
基金资助:
本研究得到教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地2000zdxmxlx005重大项目和国家社会科学基金全国教育科学“十五”规划ABA010011国家重点项目资助

REPRESENTING FORMAT OF IMPLICIT SEQUENCE LEARNING

Wu Guolai,Shen Deli,Bai Xuejun

Research Center of Psychology and Behavior, Tianjin Normal University, Tianjin 300074

Received:2003-06-18 Online:2003-12-20 Published:2015-01-21

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 采用Lewicki等人创造的“矩阵扫描”任务,对内隐序列学习的表征方式进行了研究。结果发现：规则试验的反应时显著低于随机试验,说明被试能够内隐地掌握复杂规则,没有证据表明这与“运动”频率的大小和序列样例的记忆有关;此外,序列结构也是影响内隐序列学习的因素之一。

关键词: 内隐序列学习, 表征, 抽象观, 频率观, 记忆观

Abstract: This research examined the representing format of implicit sequence learning following the matrix-scaning task by Lewicki and his colleagues. The results show that RT of rule trials(CDE) is lower than that of random trials(AB) which means that subjects have learned the complex rules of sequence in implicit conditions, instead of sensitivity to frequency information and memory for instances of sequence. In addition, sequence structure is one of the factors influenced implicit sequence learning.

Key words: implicit sequence learning, representation, abstractive account, frequency account, memory for instance account

中图分类号:

B842.3

吴国来,沈德立,白学军. 内隐序列学习表征方式的实验研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2003, 1(4): 288-292.

Wu Guolai,Shen Deli,Bai Xuejun. REPRESENTING FORMAT OF IMPLICIT SEQUENCE LEARNING[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2003, 1(4): 288-292.

参考文献

[1] Reber A S. Implicit learning of artificial grammars. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1967, 5, 855~863
[2] Reber A S. The Penguin Dictionary of Psychology. Viking Penguin, New York, 1985
[3] Berry D C. How Implicit is Implicit Learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997
[4] Brooks L R, Vokey J R. Abstract analogies and abstract grammars: A comment on Reber(1989), and Mathews et al. (1989). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 1991, 120, 316~323
[5] Vokey J R, Brooks L R. Salience of item knowledge in learning artificial grammars. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 1992, 18, 328~344
[6] Perruchet P, Pacteau C. Synthetic grammar learning: Implicit rule abstraction or explicit fragmentary knowledge. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 1990, 119(3), 264~275
[7] Perruchet P, Pacteau C. Implicit acquisition of abstract knowledge about artificial grammar:Some methodological and conceptual issues. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 1991, 120, 112~116
[8] Lewicki P, Hill T, Bizot E. Acquisition of procedural knowledge about a pattern of stimuli that cannot be articulated. Cognitive Psychology, 1988, 20, 24~37
[9] Perruchet P, Gallego J, Savy I. A critical reappraisal of the evidence for unconscious abstraction of deterministic rules in complex experimental situations. Cognitive Psychology, 1990, 22, 493~516
[10] Stadler M A, Fresch P A. Handbook of Implicit Learning. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1998, 342~345
[11] Nissen M J, Bullemer P. Attentional requirements of learning: Evidence from performance measures. Cognitive Psychology, 1987, 19, 1~32
[12] Cleeremans A, McClelland J L. Learning the structure of event sequences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 1991, 120, 235~253
[13] Cohen A, Ivry R I, Keels S W. Attention and structure in sequence learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 1990, 16, 17~30
[14] Jimenez L, Mendez C, Cleeremans A. Comparing direct and indirect measures of sequence learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 1996, 22(4), 948~969
[15] Perruchet p, Amorim P A. Conscious knowledge and changes in performance in sequence learning: Evidence against dissociation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition. 1992, 18, 785~800
[16] Willingham D B, Nissen M J, et al. On the development of procedural knowledge. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 1989, 15(6), 1047~1060