跨视听通道的错误记忆ERP新旧效应研究

心理与行为研究 ›› 2013, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (2): 176-183.

跨视听通道的错误记忆ERP新旧效应研究

毛伟宾, 朱永泽

山东师范大学心理学院,济南 250014

收稿日期:2011-11-23 出版日期:2013-03-20 发布日期:2015-02-15
作者简介:毛伟宾,女,山东师范大学心理学院教授,博士。E-mail:wb_mao@163.com。
基金资助:
本研究得到人类认知与行为发展山东省高校重点实验室、2008年华东师范大学优秀博士基金的资助

ERP Old/New Effect of False Memory in Visual and Auditory Modalities

Mao Weibin, Zhu Yongze

School of psychology, Shandong Normal University, Jinan 250014

Received:2011-11-23 Online:2013-03-20 Published:2015-02-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要： Smith和Hunt于1998年首次采用DRM范式提出了错误记忆通道效应,即视觉学习通道较之听觉学习通道会降低错误再认或错误回忆,这不仅引发了一系列关于错误记忆通道效应的研究,而且提出了许多关于错误记忆通道效应产生机制的不同观点。本实验采用DRM范式,运用ERP技术,考察了视觉与听觉通道在提取阶段的错误记忆新旧效应,以从更深层面认识错误记忆的内在加工机制。结果发现,视觉与听觉通道在300-500ms和500-700ms两个时间窗都发现了ERP新旧效应,但在脑区位置以及错误记忆的新旧效应方面存在差异,这表明视觉通道与听觉通道在提取阶段的新旧效应存在不同的脑神经活动,不同学习通道在提取阶段的监测加工差异在导致错误记忆通道效应方面起着非常重要的作用。

关键词: 视觉与听觉通道, 错误记忆, DRM范式, ERP新旧效应。

Abstract: Modality effect in false memory was firstly reported and defined by Smith and Hunt in 1998, namely there is a lower false recognition to critical lures following visual presentation than following auditory presentation. The effect of modality in false memory was not only explored by using the DRM(Deese-Roediger-McDermott)paradigm on many written recall tests and on visual recognition tests, but also the different explanations on modality effect in false memory were put forward.In the present study, we recorded ERPs in retrieval phases to investigate the neurophysiological correlates of visual modality and auditory modality in retrieval processing of false memory with the DRM paradigm. The results showed that: 2 ERP old/new components were identified at retrieval in 300-500ms and 500-700ms, but there were different distribution between in visual modality and in auditory modality. The ERP results showed the different monitoring processes occurred in visual modality and auditory modality had important role in modality effect of false memory.

Key words: visual and auditory modality, false memory, DRM paradigm, ERP old/new effect

中图分类号:

B842.3

毛伟宾, 朱永泽. 跨视听通道的错误记忆ERP新旧效应研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2013, 11(2): 176-183.

Mao Weibin, Zhu Yongze. ERP Old/New Effect of False Memory in Visual and Auditory Modalities[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2013, 11(2): 176-183.

参考文献

1 罗跃嘉, 魏景汉, 翁旭初, 卫星.(2001). 汉字视听再认的ERP效应与记忆提取脑机制. 心理学报, 33 (6), 489-494.
2 孟迎芳, 郭春彦.(2009). 内隐记忆和外显记忆的编码与提取非对称性关系. 心理学报, 41 , 694-705.
3 王益文, 林崇德, 高艳霞, 王钰, 张文新.(2010). 视听跨通道干扰抑制：儿童ERP研究. 中国科学：生命科学, 40 , 273-280.
4 Curran, T.(1999). The electrophysiology of incidental retrieval: ERP old/new effects in lexical decision and recognition memory. Neuropsychologia, 37 , 771-785.
5 Curran, T.(2004). Effects of attention and confidence on the hypothesized ERP correlates of recollection and familiarity. Neuropsychologia, 42 , 1088-1106.
6 Curran, T., & Cleary, A. M.(2003). Using ERPs to dissociate recollection from familiarity in picture recognition. Cognitive Brain Research, 15 , 191-205.
7 Curran, T., Schacter, D. L., Johnson, M. K., & Spinks, R.(2001). Brain potentials reflect behavioral differences in true and false recognition. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 13 , 201-216.
8 Donaldson, D. L., & Rugg, M. D.(1999). Event-related potential studies of associative recognition and recall: electrophysiological evidence for context dependent retrieval processes. Cognitive Brain Research, 8 , 1-16.
9 Gallo D A, McDermott K. B., Percer J M, & Roediger H L.(2001). Modality effects in false recall and false recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27 (2), 339-353.
10 Geng H., Qi Y., Li Y., Fan S., Wu Y., & Zhu Y.(2007). Neurophysiological correlates of memory illusion in both encoding and retrieval phases. Brain Research, 1136 , 154-168.
11 Israel, L., & Schacter, D. L.(1997). Pictorial encoding reduces false recognition of semantic associates. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4 , 577-581.
12 Mao, W B., Yang, Z L; & Wang, L S.(2010). Modality effect in false memory: Evidence from Chinese Characters. International Journal of Psychology, 1 , 4-10.
13 Nessler, D., Mecklinger, A., & Penney, T. B.(2001). Event related brain potentials and illusory memories: The effects of differential encoding. Cognitive Brain Research, 10 , 283-301.
14 Olichney, J. M., Petten, C. V., Paller, K. A., Salmon D P., Iragui V J., & Kutas M.(2000). Word repetition in amnesia: electrophysiological measures of impaired and spared memory. Brain, 123 , 1948-1963.
15 Rubin, S. R., Van Petten, C., Glisky, E., & Newberg, W. M.(1999). Memory conjunction errors in younger and older adults: event related potential and neuropsychological data. Cognition Neuropsycholgia, 16 , 459-488.
16 Rugg, M. D., Mark, R. E.,Walla, P., Schloerscheidt, A. M., Birch, C. S., & Allan, K.(1998). Dissociation of the neural correlates of implicit and explicit memory. Nature, 392 , 595-598.
17 Rugg, M. D., Schloerscheidt, A. M., Fletcher P C., Frith, C D., & Dolan, R. J.(1998). Neural correlates of depth of processing effects on recollection: Evidence from brain potentials and positron emission tomography. Experimental Brain Research, 123 , 18-23.
18 Schacter, D. L., Buckner, R L., Koustaal, W., Dale, A. M., & Rosen, B. R.(1997). Late onset of anterior prefrontal activity during true and false recognition: an event-related fMRI study. NeuroImage, 6 , 259-269.
19 Smith, R. E., & Hunt, R. R.(1998). Presentation modality affects false memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 5 , 710-715.
20 Smith, R. E., Hunt, R. R., & Gallagher, M. P.(2008). The effect of study modality on false recognition. Memory & Cognition, 36 (8), 1439-1449.
21 Swick, D., & Knight, R. T.(1997). Event-related potential differentiate the effects of aging on word and nonword repetition in explicit and implicit memory tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 23 (1), 123-142.
22 Wilding, E. L.(1999). Separating retrieval strategies from retrieval success: an event related potential study of source memory. Neuropsychologia, 37 , 441-454.
23 Wilding, E. L., Doyle, M. C., & Rugg, M. D.(1995). Recognition memory with and without retrieval of context: an event-related potential study. Neuropsychologia, 33 (6), 734-764.

[1]	屈晓兰, 曾萍, 王思非. 基于同义关联的句子错误记忆：发展性逆转现象及句式效应[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(3): 332-338.
[2]	宋耀武, 房美妍, 仝宇光. 定向遗忘条件下DRM词的加工深度和情境对错误记忆的影响^*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2016, 14(1): 7-13.
[3]	陈红,郭春彦,杨海波. 延迟间隔和提取条件对短时错误记忆的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2015, 13(1): 37-43.
[4]	屈晓兰,陈向阳,钟毅平. 文本阅读理解中精加工推理及错误记忆探讨[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2010, 8(4): 307-311.
[5]	mhx84@64.com. 启动情绪和呈现方式对错误记忆的影响[J]. , 2010, 8(3): 208-212.
[6]	郭秀艳唐菁华李荆广. 汉字错误记忆的形、音编码差异研究[J]. , 2007, 5(2): 86-92.
[7]	王红椿,刘鸣. 关联效应中对情绪诱词的错误再认的实验研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2006, 4(2): 143-148.