文本阅读认知神经科学研究进展

心理与行为研究 ›› 2013, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (2): 264-269.

文本阅读认知神经科学研究进展

王雨函¹, 莫雷¹, 陈琳², 李悠¹, 汝涛涛¹

1 华南师范大学心理应用研究中心,广州 510631;
2 中山大学国际汉语学院,广州 510275

收稿日期:2012-04-05 出版日期:2013-03-20 发布日期:2015-02-15
通讯作者: 莫雷,男,华南师范大学心理应用研究中心教授,博士生导师。E-mail:molei@scnu.edu.cn。
作者简介:王雨函,女,华南师范大学心理应用研究中心博士生。
基金资助:
本研究得到国家重点基础研究发展计划项目（2012CB720700）和国家自然科学基金项目（30870783）的资助

Cognitive Neuroscience Study of Text Comprehension

Wang Yuhan¹, Mo Lei¹, Chen Lin², Li You¹, Ru Taotao¹

1 Center for Studies of Psychological Application, South China Normal University, Guangzhou 510631;
2 School of Chinese as A Second Language, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510275

Received:2012-04-05 Online:2013-03-20 Published:2015-02-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 功能磁共振成像等认知神经科学技术被广泛引入文本阅读的认知神经活动研究以来,其成果有力地促进了文本阅读信息加工过程研究的深入发展。本文系统总结了近二十余年关于文本阅读的认知神经科学研究进展,分别介绍文本阅读的一般过程的认知神经基础和理论模型建构、文本阅读过程的推理加工、情境模型建构与转换三个主要研究领域的研究成果,并对文本阅读的认知神经研究的现状及其存在的问题进行了总结。

关键词: 文本阅读, 认知神经科学, fMRI, 情境模型, 推理加工。

Abstract: In recent years, researchers used functional magnetic resonance imaging(fMRI)to investigate the neural mechanisms of text comprehension. The achievements of these studies have contributed a lot to the advancement of researches on information processing during text comprehension. In this paper, we summarized studies on the neural mechanisms of text comprehension, including the following main aspects: the general processing and the theory model which based on neuroimage studies, the inference processing and the situation model building during text comprehension. Moreover, we discussed the problems of the current studies and prospected the direction of the future studies on neural mechanisms of text comprehension.

Key words: text comprehension, cognitive neurosicence, fMRI, situation model, inference processes.

中图分类号:

B842.1

王雨函, 莫雷, 陈琳, 李悠, 汝涛涛. 文本阅读认知神经科学研究进展[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2013, 11(2): 264-269.

Wang Yuhan, Mo Lei, Chen Lin, Li You, Ru Taotao. Cognitive Neuroscience Study of Text Comprehension[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2013, 11(2): 264-269.

参考文献

1 伍丽梅, 莫雷.(2009). 情境模型研究中的分离与整合. 心理科学进展, 17 (6), 1124-1132.
2 伍丽梅, 莫雷.(2010). 说明文阅读中局部连贯因果推理的产生. 心理学报, 42 (2), 200-215.
3 Barsalou, L. W.(1999). Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences , 22 , 577-660.
4 Beeman, M. J.(2005). Bilateral brain processes for comprehending natural language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9 (11), 512-518.
5 Carin, W., Huber, W., Klann, J., Weis, S., Krach, S., & Kircher, T.(2009). Neural correlates of narrative shifts during auditory story comprehension. NeuroImage , 47 , 360-366.
6 Coulson, S. & Wu, Y. C.(2005). Right hemisphere activation of joke-related information: An event-related brain potential study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience , 17 , 494-506.
7 Estevez, A., & Calvo, M.(2000). Working memory capacity and time course of predictive inference. Memory, 8 (1), 51-61.
8 Ferstl, E. C.(2010). Neuroimaging of text comprehension: Where are we now? Italian Journal of Linguistics, 22 (1), 61-88.
9 Ferstl, E. C., & Cramon, V. Y.(2007). Time, space and emotion: fMRI reveals content-specific activation during text comprehension. Neuroscience Letters , 427 , 159-164.
10 Ferstl, E. C., Neumann, J., Bogler, C. D., & Cramon, V. Y.(2008). The Extended Language Network: A Meta-Analysis of Neuroimaging Studies on Text Comprehension. Human Brain Mapping , 29 , 581-593.
11 Ferstl, E. C., Rinck, M., & Cramon, V. Y.(2005). Emotional and temporal aspects of situation model processing during text comprehension: An event-related fMRI study. Journal of Cognitive. Neuroscience , 17 , 724-739
12 Ferstl, E. C., & VoncrAmon, D. Y.(2001). The role of coherence and cohesion in text comprehension: an event-related fMRI study. Cognitive Brain Research , 11 , 325-340.
13 Fletcher, P. C., Happe, F., Frith, U., Baker, S. C., Dolan, R. J., Frackowiak, R. S. J., & Frith, C. D.(1995). Other minds in the brain: A functional imaging study of‘theory of mind’in story comprehension. Cognition , 57 , 109-128.
14 Jin, H., Liu, H. L., Mo. L., Fang, S. Y., Zhang, J. X. & Lin, C. D.(2009). Involvement of the left inferior frontal gyrus in predictive inference making. International Journal of Psychophysiology , 71 , 142-148.
15 van Dijk T. A., & Kintsch, W.(1983). Strategies in discourse comprehension . New York: Academic Press, 34-42.
16 Kuperberg, G. R., Lakshmanan, B. M., Caplan, D. N., & Holcomb, P. J.(2006). Making sense of discourse: An fMRI study of causal inferencing across sentences. NeuroImage , 33 , 343-361.
17 Mason, R. A., & Just, M.(2004). How the brain processes causal inferencesin text: Atheoreticalaccount of generation andintegration component processes utilizing both cerebral hemispheres. Psychological Science , 15 , 1-7.
18 Mason, R. A., & Just, M. 2006). Neuroimaging contributions to the understanding of discourse processes. In M. Traxler & M. A. Gernsbacher,(Eds.), Handbook of Psycholinguistics (pp. 765-799). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
19 Mason, R. A., & Just, M.(2011). Differentiable Cortical Networks for Inferences Concerning People′s Intentions Versus Physical Causality. Huam Brain Mapping , 32 , 313-329.
20 Mason, R. A., Williams, D. L., Kana, R. K., Minshew, N., & Marcel A. J.(2008). Theory of Mind disruption and recruitment of the right hemisphere during narrative comprehension in autism. Neuropsychologia , 46 , 269-280.
21 Mazoyer, B. M., Tzourio, N., Frak, V., Syrota, A., Murayama, N., Levrier, O., et al.(1993). The cortical representation of speech. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience , 5 , 467-479.
22 Mo, L., Liu, H. L., Jin, H., NG, Y. B., & Lin, C. D.(2006). Passive reactivation of background information from long-term memory during reading. NeuroReport , 17 , 1887-1891.
23 Schmidt, G. L., & Serger, C. A.(2009). Neural correlates of metaphor processing: The roles of figurativeness, familiarity and difficulty. Brain and Cognition , 71 , 375-386.
24 Siebörger, F. T., Ferstl, E. C., & VoncrAmon, D. Y.(2007). Making sense of nonsense: An fMRI study of task induced inference processes during discourse comprehension. Brain Research , 1166 , 77-91.
25 Speer, N. K., Reynolds, J. R., Swallow, K. M., & Zacks, J. M.(2009). Reading stories activates neural representations of visual and motor experiences. Psychological Science, 20 (8), 989-999.
26 Speer, N. K., Zacks, J. M., & Reynolds, J. R.(2007). Human brain activity time-locked to narrative event boundaries. Psychological Science, 18 (5), 449-455.
27 Tal, Y., Nicole K. Speer, N. K., & Zacks, J. M.(2008). Neural substrates of narrative comprehension and memory. NeuroImage , 41 , 1408-1425.
28 Xu, J., Kemenya, S., Parka, G., Frattali, C., & Braun, A.(2005).
29 Language in context: Emergent features of word, sentence, and narrative comprehension. NeuroImage , 25 , 1002-1015.
30 Virtue, S., Arrish, T. P., & Jung-Beeman, M.(2008). Inferences during story comprehension: Cortical recruitment affected by predictability of events and working memory capacity. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience , 20 , 2274-2284.
31 Virtue, S., Haberman, J., Clancy, Z., Parrish, T., & Jung-Beeman, M.(2006). Neural activity of inferences during story comprehension. Brain research , 1084 , 104-114.
32 Zwaan, R. A.(2004). The immersed experiencer: Toward an embodied theory of language comprehension. In B. H. Ross (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation . NewYork: Academic Press. 44, 35-62.
33 Zwaan, R. A, MarkC, L. A., & Arthur, C. G.(1995). The construction of situation models in narrative comprehension: An event-indexing model. Psychological Science , 6 , 292-297.

[1]	康廷虎, 王旎撰, 高吴平. 记叙文阅读中主人公转换对情境模型更新的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(1): 1-7.
[2]	杨楠,叶卓尔,林依,高宏巍,黄平,林慧妍,许欢,马军朋,金花. 认知风格分型的神经基础：静息态fMRI研究^[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2015, 13(3): 320-327.
[3]	郭艳彪，陈琳，夏天生，莫雷. 文本阅读中情境模型时间维度研究^*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2014, 12(4): 558-565.
[4]	罗琳, 翟洪昌. 记忆汉字和英语单词的差异脑区研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2013, 11(2): 211-216.
[5]	王艳梅；郭德俊；方平；岳珍珠4. 中等强度情绪性图片的神经机制——一项fMRI研究[J]. , 2012, 10(1): 1-6.
[6]	王大华；付艳；唐丹；段云云3；于春水4. 任务难度与老化对大脑激活的影响——以线索记忆编码为例[J]. , 2012, 10(1): 25-31.
[7]	屈晓兰,陈向阳,钟毅平. 文本阅读理解中精加工推理及错误记忆探讨[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2010, 8(4): 307-311.
[8]	杜洪飞金花莫雷. 句子加工的脑成像研究[J]. , 2007, 5(1): 75-80.
[9]	郭桃梅,彭聃龄. 功能词与内容词加工的神经机制的研究综述[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2005, 3(1): 65-69.
[10]	李勇,阴国恩,陈燕丽. 阅读中疲劳、心理负荷因素对瞳孔大小的调节作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2004, 2(3): 545-548.
[11]	朱滢,隋洁. 社会认知神经科学——一个很有前途的交叉学科[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2004, 2(2): 401-404.
[12]	迟毓凯,莫雷,管延华,王穗萍. 时间因素对空间维度非线索更新的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2004, 2(1): 333-336.