小学教师敬业度影响因素实证研究*

心理与行为研究 ›› 2015, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (3): 341-346.

小学教师敬业度影响因素实证研究^*

杨宝忠^1,2

1 天津大学管理与经济学部，天津 300073;
2 天津师范大学初等教育学院，天津 300387

收稿日期:2015-02-10 出版日期:2015-05-20 发布日期:2015-07-03
通讯作者: 杨宝忠, E-mail: tjybz@sohu.com。
基金资助:
2011教育部人文社会科学规划基金项目（11YJA880133）。

Empirical Research on Influencing Factor of Engagement of Primary School Teachers

Yang Baozhong^1,2

1 College of Management and Economics of Tianjin University, Tianjin 300073;
2 Elementary Education College of Tianjin Normal University, Tianjin 3000387

Received:2015-02-10 Online:2015-05-20 Published:2015-07-03

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 探明小学教师敬业度的影响因素与影响程度是有效提高其敬业度的基础。本研究结合小学教师专业发展特点，构建了小学教师敬业度影响模型。通过实证研究对模型及假设进行了验证与修正，并对小学教师敬业度影响因素及影响程度进行研究，结果表明：（1）小学教师的角色扮演及其教学自主性、工作多样性、事务的琐碎性与繁复性等工作特征影响到教师对组织的归属感及其参与程度，也影响到教师对本职工作的态度及其行为表现。（2）组织氛围、组织制度对小学教师敬业度没有显著影响，但这些因素会影响到教师的组织敬业度，也会在某种程度上间接影响到教师敬业度和职业稳定性。（3）家庭因素对小学教师的敬业度具有显著负向影响，对组织敬业度也具有显著负向影响。

关键词: 小学教师, 教师敬业度, 影响因素。

Abstract: Improving the engagement is an important way to promote the professional development of primary school teachers and teaching quality. Finding out the influence factors of primary school teachers’ engagement and influence degree, is the foundation of effectively improve the engagement. Combining with the characteristics of primary school teachers’ professional development, the engagement influence model is constructed. Empirical research on the model and the hypotheses were verified and revised, based on the study of the influencing factors and the degree, the countermeasures are put forward to improve primary school teachers’ engagement.

Key words: primary school, organization engagement, influencing factor.

中图分类号:

G443

杨宝忠. 小学教师敬业度影响因素实证研究^*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2015, 13(3): 341-346.

Yang Baozhong. Empirical Research on Influencing Factor of Engagement of Primary School Teachers[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2015, 13(3): 341-346.

参考文献

[1] 陈绍辉.(2012). 吉林省地方高校教师绩效评价体系研究. 长春: 东北师范大学博士论文.
[2] 邓子鹃.(2013). 工作家庭冲突、工作效能感与工作生活质量——基于苏北268名高校女教师的实证研究, 教育学术月刊, (3), 34-38.
[3] 郭涛.(2012). 高校教师敬业度影响因素及其与工作绩效的关系研究. 天津: 天津大学博士学位论文.
[4] 郝天侠.(2001). 高校教师组织支持感、组织情感承诺及组织公民行为关系研究. 西北大学学报(哲学社会科学版),(2), 173-175.
[5] 卢纪华, 陈丽莉, 赵希男.(2013). 组织支持感、组织承诺与知识型员工敬业度的关系研究. 科学学与科学技术管理, 34(1), 147-153.
[6] 卢乃桂.(2013). 教育改革背景下的教师专业性与教师责任. 教师教育研究,(1), 1-5.
[7] 唐芳贵, 彭艳.(2006). 工作家庭冲突、控制感与中小学教师的职业倦怠. 中国临床康复, 46(10), 82-86.
[8] 汤舒俊.(2010). 高校教师工作家庭冲突与职业倦怠: 社会支持的中介作用. 教育学术月刊,(9), 35-38.
[9] 王永丽, 何熟珍.(2008). 工作家庭冲突研究综述: 跨文化视角. 管理评论, 20(5), 21-28.
[10] 杨新国.(2008). 中小学教师工作敬业的实证研究. 重庆: 西南大学博士学位论文.
[11] 张宁俊, 朱伏平, 张斌.(2013). 高校教师职业认同与组织认同关系及影响因素研究. 教育发展研究, 21, 53-59.
[12] Colquitt, J.(2001). On the dimensionality of organizational justice: A construct validation of a measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 386-400.
[13] Cropanzano, R., & Mitchell, M. S.(2005). Social exchange theory: An interdisciplinary review. Journal of Management, 31(6), 874-900.
[14] Dollard, M. F., & Bakker, A. B.(2010). Psychosocial safety climate as a precursor to conducive work environments, psychological health problems, and employee engagement. Journal of Occupational andOrganizational Psychology, 83(3), 579-599.
[15] Kahn, W. A.(1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of Management Journal, 33(4), 692-724.
[16] Lopez, S. J., & Sidhu, P.(2013). U.S. teachers love their lives, but struggle in the workplace. Well-Being,[2013-3-28](2015-5-19). http://www.gallup.com/poll/161516/teachers-love-lives-struggle-workplace.aspx.
[17] Maslachet, C., & Leiter, M. P.(1999). Burnout and engagement in the workplace: A contextual analysis. Advances in Motivation and Achievement, 11, 275-302.
[18] Maslachet, C., & Leiter, M. P.(2008). Early predictors of job burnout and engagement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(3), 498-512.
[19] May, D. R., Gilson, R. L., & Harter, L. M.(2004). The psychological conditions of meaningfulness, safety, and availability and the engagement of the human spirit at work. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 77, 11-37.
[20] Rhoades, L. & Eisenberger, R.(2002). Perceived organizational support: A review of the literature. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 698-714.
[21] Rhoades, L., Eisenberger, R., & Armeli, S.(2001). Affective commitment to the organization: The contribution of perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 825-836.
[22] Robinson, D., Perryman, S., & Hayday, S.(2004). The drivers of employee engagement, institute for employment studies. Brighton.
[23] Saks, A.(2006). Antecedents and consequences of employee engagement. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 21(7), 600-619.
[24] Schaufeli, W. B., & Bakker, A. B.(2004). Job demands, job resources, and their relationship with burnout and engagement: A multi-sample study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(3), 293-315.
[25] Shuck, B., & Wollard, K.(2010). Employee engagement and HRD: A seminal review of the foundations. Human Resource Development Review, 9(1), 89-110.